It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:56 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Fox hasn't done anything over the past 3 years that leads me to believe he is the right guy for this Bears team.
I'd say coaching in the Super Bowl less than one calendar year ago is a good thing.

He took over a 1-15 Carolina team and had them in the Super Bowl two seasons later. That Carolina team had started the year 1-0 then dropped the rest of the games that season. They were the second team in the NFL history to lost 15 in a row.


That Panthers team was young and very talented. He had perfect timing.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Quote:
Vic LombardiVerified account ‏@VicLombardi
Great stat from @IAOFM this morning. And, ultimately, a big reason a change was made. As Broncos coach, Fox 1-7 against Patriots & Seahawks.

If people were pissed about Lovie being a bumslayer...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nobody should care about them playing the Patriots unless its the playoffs. The Division record is what matters most.

Goober himself could be considered a bumslayer. Nine times he has been 1-and-done in the playoffs. Most by far in the Super Bowl era. There could be a good argument made that if Lovie doesn't abandon the run and Rex hold onto the football, Peyton doesn't even get the one ring he has.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Fox hasn't done anything over the past 3 years that leads me to believe he is the right guy for this Bears team.
I'd say coaching in the Super Bowl less than one calendar year ago is a good thing.

He took over a 1-15 Carolina team and had them in the Super Bowl two seasons later. That Carolina team had started the year 1-0 then dropped the rest of the games that season. They were the second team in the NFL history to lost 15 in a row.


That Panthers team was young and very talented. He had perfect timing.


That's not an argument. They were young and talented? What super bowl team isn't talented? He got a team Quarterbacked by Jake Delhomme to the super bowl and lost to a dynasty and one of the best QB's ever and you act like it was nothing at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Kirkwood wrote:
Quote:
Vic LombardiVerified account ‏@VicLombardi
Great stat from @IAOFM this morning. And, ultimately, a big reason a change was made. As Broncos coach, Fox 1-7 against Patriots & Seahawks.

If people were pissed about Lovie being a bumslayer...


nobody in denver is upset fox left.

this is like tampa being excited to get lovie.

now we are tampa. we hired a guy that had success but will come here and be shit. and we are excited about it.

way to go bears.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Powerhouse233 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Fox hasn't done anything over the past 3 years that leads me to believe he is the right guy for this Bears team.
I'd say coaching in the Super Bowl less than one calendar year ago is a good thing.

He took over a 1-15 Carolina team and had them in the Super Bowl two seasons later. That Carolina team had started the year 1-0 then dropped the rest of the games that season. They were the second team in the NFL history to lost 15 in a row.


That Panthers team was young and very talented. He had perfect timing.


That's not an argument. They were young and talented? What super bowl team isn't talented? He got a team Quarterbacked by Jake Delhomme to the super bowl and lost to a dynasty and one of the best QB's ever and you act like it was nothing at all.


Delhomme wasn't a terrible QB. I don't give him credit for turning that team around. I believe any competent coach would have been successful. That draft they had the year he arrived was a home run. Everything was in place.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
The year they went to the Super Bowl Delhomme had 19 touch downs and 16 interceptions and a completion percentage under 60 percent and he had no previous success as an NFL starting QB before that year. Everything wasn't in place. They had an inexperienced and limited QB yet they were able to make it to the Super Bowl.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
They had great defensive talent and great talent at WR. Their RB was really good and their QB was competent. That's good enough to win with in any era. Belichick has been successful despite not having most of that the last 4 or 5 seasons.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:22 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Yep. They were so talented that over 2/3 of their starters in 2001 were gone by that Super Bowl year.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Yep. They were so talented that over 2/3 of their starters in 2001 were gone by that Super Bowl year.


Really? You're struggling here. The overwhelming majority of all the elite players were already on the roster. This is a fact.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
Nas wrote:
They had great defensive talent and great talent at WR. Their RB was really good and their QB was competent. That's good enough to win with in any era. Belichick has been successful despite not having most of that the last 4 or 5 seasons.


They had a sub par, unproven QB, Steve Smith had never cracked 1,000 yards before that season so he was unproven as well and Muhammad was a good possession receiver who had one enormous year in his career (2004, the year after the super bowl). Fox seems to get the most out of his players' talent. Muhammad had by far his biggest season under Fox, Steve Smith realized his potential with Fox as head coach and he got every ounce of ability out of Delhomme.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5120
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
John Fox is a great hire. Who is a better alternative? He's an experienced head coach with credibility who has been successful. If he brings Kyle Shanahan or Peyton Manning with him, its an even better hire. I also think that he has enough red ass in him to not let Teddy or anyone else push him around or tell him what to do.


He was 81-79 before Peyton Manning arrived.




I still like the hire. Bears get a real NFL football coach and a GM that will hopefully be able to work well in sync together.

Fox didn't always have the most talented teams in Carolina and still managed to put together some good seasons. Not sure what his input was on drafting and so on in Carolina, but if Pace can hand him some real NFL football players, I'm confident that Fox can coach them up and win with them.

Those coordinators in Seattle are nobody's without Pete Carrol, and I'm willing to bet they aren't NFL HC's for long after leaving Petey's nest.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:31 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Powerhouse233 wrote:
Nas wrote:
They had great defensive talent and great talent at WR. Their RB was really good and their QB was competent. That's good enough to win with in any era. Belichick has been successful despite not having most of that the last 4 or 5 seasons.


They had a sub par, unproven QB, Steve Smith had never cracked 1,000 yards before that season so he was unproven as well and Muhammad was a good possession receiver who had one enormous year in his career (2004, the year after the super bowl). Fox seems to get the most out of his players' talent. Muhammad had by far his biggest season under Fox, Steve Smith realized his potential with Fox as head coach and he got every ounce of ability out of Delhomme.


Fox is a defensive coach. That's like giving Lovie credit for the success Forte has had. This Bears defense doesn't have any talent. Fox isn't a rebuild type of coach.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Nas wrote:
[ Fox isn't a rebuild type of coach.


This AM on M&H his old GM said Fox can take a bad defense and turn it around in a year. I'd like to see that. :lol:

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
NME wrote:
Nas wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
John Fox is a great hire. Who is a better alternative? He's an experienced head coach with credibility who has been successful. If he brings Kyle Shanahan or Peyton Manning with him, its an even better hire. I also think that he has enough red ass in him to not let Teddy or anyone else push him around or tell him what to do.


He was 81-79 before Peyton Manning arrived.




I still like the hire. Bears get a real NFL football coach and a GM that will hopefully be able to work well in sync together.

Fox didn't always have the most talented teams in Carolina and still managed to put together some good seasons. Not sure what his input was on drafting and so on in Carolina, but if Pace can hand him some real NFL football players, I'm confident that Fox can coach them up and win with them.

Those coordinators in Seattle are nobody's without Pete Carrol, and I'm willing to bet they aren't NFL HC's for long after leaving Petey's nest.


Those Panthers teams were talented and had great defenses. This is a rebuild and I don't think Fox is a rebuild coach. Our defense is beyond awful

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hatchetman wrote:
Nas wrote:
[ Fox isn't a rebuild type of coach.


This AM on M&H his old GM said Fox can take a bad defense and turn it around in a year. I'd like to see that. :lol:


If he can do that with this Bears defense he should be put in the HoF immediately.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
Nas wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
Nas wrote:
They had great defensive talent and great talent at WR. Their RB was really good and their QB was competent. That's good enough to win with in any era. Belichick has been successful despite not having most of that the last 4 or 5 seasons.


They had a sub par, unproven QB, Steve Smith had never cracked 1,000 yards before that season so he was unproven as well and Muhammad was a good possession receiver who had one enormous year in his career (2004, the year after the super bowl). Fox seems to get the most out of his players' talent. Muhammad had by far his biggest season under Fox, Steve Smith realized his potential with Fox as head coach and he got every ounce of ability out of Delhomme.


Fox is a defensive coach. That's like giving Lovie credit for the success Forte has had. This Bears defense doesn't have any talent. Fox isn't a rebuild type of coach.


He's the head coach, not the DC. Even though he may specialize more on the defensive side of the ball he can't have a positive impact on offense? He clearly did. He's responsible for the entire roster and many players on both sides of the ball realized their full potential while under John Fox.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5120
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
NME wrote:
Nas wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
John Fox is a great hire. Who is a better alternative? He's an experienced head coach with credibility who has been successful. If he brings Kyle Shanahan or Peyton Manning with him, its an even better hire. I also think that he has enough red ass in him to not let Teddy or anyone else push him around or tell him what to do.


He was 81-79 before Peyton Manning arrived.




I still like the hire. Bears get a real NFL football coach and a GM that will hopefully be able to work well in sync together.

Fox didn't always have the most talented teams in Carolina and still managed to put together some good seasons. Not sure what his input was on drafting and so on in Carolina, but if Pace can hand him some real NFL football players, I'm confident that Fox can coach them up and win with them.

Those coordinators in Seattle are nobody's without Pete Carrol, and I'm willing to bet they aren't NFL HC's for long after leaving Petey's nest.


Those Panthers teams were talented and had great defenses. This is a rebuild and I don't think Fox is a rebuild coach. Our defense is beyond awful



I always looked at many of those 'talented' players in Carolina as being good fits for the scheme more so than top tier talent. Sure there were a handful of guys that could play on any team and look good like Steve Smith, but those Carolina teams were not as stacked as you're trying to make them out to be Nas.


Also, he rebuilt in Carolina like others have said.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Last edited by NME on Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:38 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Powerhouse233 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
Nas wrote:
They had great defensive talent and great talent at WR. Their RB was really good and their QB was competent. That's good enough to win with in any era. Belichick has been successful despite not having most of that the last 4 or 5 seasons.


They had a sub par, unproven QB, Steve Smith had never cracked 1,000 yards before that season so he was unproven as well and Muhammad was a good possession receiver who had one enormous year in his career (2004, the year after the super bowl). Fox seems to get the most out of his players' talent. Muhammad had by far his biggest season under Fox, Steve Smith realized his potential with Fox as head coach and he got every ounce of ability out of Delhomme.


Fox is a defensive coach. That's like giving Lovie credit for the success Forte has had. This Bears defense doesn't have any talent. Fox isn't a rebuild type of coach.


He's the head coach, not the DC. Even though he may specialize more on the defensive side of the ball he can't have a positive impact on offense? He clearly did. He's responsible for the entire roster and many players on both sides of the ball realized their full potential while under John Fox.


You're really reaching IMO. If you like Fox that's fine but he didn't make the Broncos offense or the Panthers offense better.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 8:31 pm
Posts: 232
pizza_Place: whatever
Hatchetman wrote:
Nas wrote:
[ Fox isn't a rebuild type of coach.


This AM on M&H his old GM said Fox can take a bad defense and turn it around in a year. I'd like to see that. :lol:


The list of a few 2003 Panthers who were picked during the pre-2003 Capers/Seifert era include: Steve Smith, Muhsin Muhammad, Dan Morgan, Mike Rucker, Deon Grant, Kris Jenkins, and Mike Minter.

He inherited the 2nd overall pick to take Peppers in 2002.
Which new players developed after 2003?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
John Fox was lucky in all his 13 NFL seasons.
Lovie Smith was unlucky in all his 10 NFL seasons.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Fox hasn't done anything over the past 3 years that leads me to believe he is the right guy for this Bears team.
I'd say coaching in the Super Bowl less than one calendar year ago is a good thing.

He took over a 1-15 Carolina team and had them in the Super Bowl two seasons later. That Carolina team had started the year 1-0 then dropped the rest of the games that season. They were the second team in the NFL history to lost 15 in a row.
He also followed a 12-4 season with an 8-8 & then a 2-14. How many "good" coaches have a 2-14 season on their resume?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
IkeSouth wrote:

nobody in denver is upset fox left.

this is like tampa being excited to get lovie.

now we are tampa. we hired a guy that had success but will come here and be shit. and we are excited about it.

way to go bears.


I'm afraid you are correct...

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
PFT reporting NOT DONE DEAL. :lol:

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Hatchetman wrote:
PFT reporting NOT DONE DEAL. :lol:


Another MacGinnis-like fiasco would be glorious.

Maybe Phillips and Pace found out Fox doesn't want Cutler.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Last edited by Jaw Breaker on Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 8:31 pm
Posts: 232
pizza_Place: whatever
Jaw Breaker wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:

nobody in denver is upset fox left.

this is like tampa being excited to get lovie.

now we are tampa. we hired a guy that had success but will come here and be shit. and we are excited about it.

way to go bears.


I'm afraid you are correct...


Yes. Its not like he's taking over the 2001 Bucs. The defense and ST talent is awful.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:57 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Yep. They were so talented that over 2/3 of their starters in 2001 were gone by that Super Bowl year.


Really? You're struggling here. The overwhelming majority of all the elite players were already on the roster. This is a fact.
The roster is over 2/3 different. There were a couple of "elite" players there, but nowhere near the 'overwhelming majority.
Code:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/car/2001_roster.htm

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/car/2003_roster.htm
With how much Bears kool-aid you drink, maybe its a good thing you don't like this hire Nas.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
wonder if lawers are involved in the contract. Bearss, burned by McGinnis fiasco, not saying boo til ink is dry.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
NME wrote:
I always looked at many of those 'talented' players in Carolina as being good fits for the scheme more so than top tier talent. Sure there were a handful of guys that could play on any team and look good like Steve Smith, but those Carolina teams were not as stacked as you're trying to make them out to be Nas.


Also, he rebuilt in Carolina like others have said.


I'm not saying Fox is a terrible coach. I just think he's an average coach. IMO he would have been a good fit to replace Lovie. He would have had the respect of the locker room and would have gotten whatever was left out of that team. They definitely would have made the playoffs in 2013 if he was the coach.

Here are a few of the players he inherited in Carolina:

Julius Peppers
DeShaun Foster
Will Witherspoon
Dante Wesley
Kris Jenkins
John Kasay
Dan Morgan
Muhsin Muhammad
Mike Rucker
Steve Smith
Deon Grant
Jordan Gross

That's a pretty good core to start with IMO.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Yep. They were so talented that over 2/3 of their starters in 2001 were gone by that Super Bowl year.


Really? You're struggling here. The overwhelming majority of all the elite players were already on the roster. This is a fact.
The roster is over 2/3 different. There were a couple of "elite" players there, but nowhere near the 'overwhelming majority.
Code:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/car/2001_roster.htm

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/car/2003_roster.htm
With how much Bears kool-aid you drink, maybe its a good thing you don't like this hire Nas.


I don't think you understand what I'm saying. John Fox inherited the team in 2002 and the overwhelming majority of the elite players (if not all) they had in the Super Bowl were already on the roster. That was a great draft they had in 2002. They hit on their first 4 picks.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blackhawksfan and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group