It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 8:04 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 230 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
good dolphin wrote:
This three years should be looked at as a stain on Cub history. I sit here dumbfounded at how bad is good in this upside down universe and further floored by how it is met with applause of those who should be the most cynical.


Cubs fans hated this period. I went to a lot less games. It is simply a product of a burnt down building being repaired slowly in an effort to prevent the same mistakes from happening again. Jed and Theo inherited a mess on every level. Instead of rebuilding the team in the mold of the prior group, they took a different design path. Hopefully this pain will be worth the wait. A lot of folks act as if there is only one way to build a baseball team, and it is a guaranteed outcome. It does them no good to spend $125M to win 85 games.

Thanks for caring so much.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82203
denisdman wrote:
Purposely losing sounds like you direct your players to throw games. Cubs management had a huge clean up to rid the team of bad contracts, old players, and acquire assets. They simply chose to trade anything of value for future talent. Additionally, they largely refused to spend on high cost free agents when they had very little in the way of major league talent.

They are trying to build a sustainable long term model with a pipeline of valuable minor league assets. The Sox fans on this board are very concerned about the way the Cubs go about losing. We appreciate your sympathies.

Yes, that had the effect of a bad major league roster.


This has been rebutted over the years ad nauseum.

They could have signed really good players to 3-4 years contracts in year 1, competed at the MLB level and still rebuilt the farm system. Those contracts would now have finished their term providing all the necessary room for the minor leaguers. Sure they may not have had Bryant but if you trust the system as much as you do, they certainly would have found great players in the draft.

We were left to hear about the poor Cubs and big contracts that had to be consumed over the last three years. Meanwhile, the market value has more than doubled in the short time they have owned and they are proposing $500 in capital improvements.

There is a very large trough of bullshit that you have swallowed with this management.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82203
Kirkwood wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Here is my honest response: purposely losing is repugnant to the entire concept of sport and should be met with the greatest disdain despite its byproducts. Openly and obviously losing for three years is an abomination against god and man.

We praise those who try their best but fail because we understand that there is glory in the process as much as the result.

If this were ancient Greece, poets would write stories of Theo offending the gods and being doomed to relive these three seasons for the rest of his life.

Alas, this is modern Wrigleyville where losses are met with calls for another round.

Amen.

Ah, very obvious you're a lawyer. I need a barf bag after reading that dreck.


Why do you fear the truth. Even if you believe in The(o) Plan, there isn't much here you can contradict.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82203
denisdman wrote:
[ A lot of folks act as if there is only one way to build a baseball team, and it is a guaranteed outcome. .


and yet, that is exactly what you do

The Cubs have wasted a lot of great pitching in the past few years, playoff caliber pitching, due to Theo not caring to put together a competitive lineup in the off season.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
good dolphin wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Here is my honest response: purposely losing is repugnant to the entire concept of sport and should be met with the greatest disdain despite its byproducts. Openly and obviously losing for three years is an abomination against god and man.

We praise those who try their best but fail because we understand that there is glory in the process as much as the result.
107+ years of failure is glorious? Ok.......

If this were ancient Greece, poets would write stories of Theo offending the gods and being doomed to relive these three seasons for the rest of his life.
Because he's gone from 61 to 66 to 73 wins? Looks like steady progress to me

Alas, this is modern Wrigleyville where losses are met with calls for another round.
Yea, beer is tasty. Wins are met with the same calls.
Amen.

Ah, very obvious you're a lawyer. I need a barf bag after reading that dreck.


Why do you fear the truth. Even if you believe in The(o) Plan, there isn't much here you can contradict.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
I don't have a problem with purposely losing for a short period of time. The bigger issue is the need to follow up two years of losing with three years of intentional losing.

I'd be pissed if the Sox decided at the end of last season they were going to tank for 3 more years so they could compete later on.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
good dolphin wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Purposely losing sounds like you direct your players to throw games. Cubs management had a huge clean up to rid the team of bad contracts, old players, and acquire assets. They simply chose to trade anything of value for future talent. Additionally, they largely refused to spend on high cost free agents when they had very little in the way of major league talent.

They are trying to build a sustainable long term model with a pipeline of valuable minor league assets. The Sox fans on this board are very concerned about the way the Cubs go about losing. We appreciate your sympathies.

Yes, that had the effect of a bad major league roster.


This has been rebutted over the years ad nauseum.

They could have signed really good players to 3-4 years contracts in year 1, competed at the MLB level and still rebuilt the farm system. Those contracts would now have finished their term providing all the necessary room for the minor leaguers. Sure they may not have had Bryant but if you trust the system as much as you do, they certainly would have found great players in the draft.

We were left to hear about the poor Cubs and big contracts that had to be consumed over the last three years. Meanwhile, the market value has more than doubled in the short time they have owned and they are proposing $500 in capital improvements.

There is a very large trough of bullshit that you have swallowed with this management.


I thought the goal was to win the World Series? You would have been ok if they just competed, so what are we talking about 85 wins?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82203
Kirkwood wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Here is my honest response: purposely losing is repugnant to the entire concept of sport and should be met with the greatest disdain despite its byproducts. Openly and obviously losing for three years is an abomination against god and man.

We praise those who try their best but fail because we understand that there is glory in the process as much as the result.
107+ years of failure is glorious? Ok.......

Talk to me about this Friday night after we are done honoring a guy who won nothing in two decades

If this were ancient Greece, poets would write stories of Theo offending the gods and being doomed to relive these three seasons for the rest of his life.
Because he's gone from 61 to 66 to 73 wins? Looks like steady progress to me

I've been told there is no difference between 63-73 losses on several occasions

Alas, this is modern Wrigleyville where losses are met with calls for another round.
Yea, beer is tasty. Wins are met with the same calls.

How would you know what the call is after a win.
Amen.

Ah, very obvious you're a lawyer. I need a barf bag after reading that dreck.


Why do you fear the truth. Even if you believe in The(o) Plan, there isn't much here you can contradict.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82203
denisdman wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Purposely losing sounds like you direct your players to throw games. Cubs management had a huge clean up to rid the team of bad contracts, old players, and acquire assets. They simply chose to trade anything of value for future talent. Additionally, they largely refused to spend on high cost free agents when they had very little in the way of major league talent.

They are trying to build a sustainable long term model with a pipeline of valuable minor league assets. The Sox fans on this board are very concerned about the way the Cubs go about losing. We appreciate your sympathies.

Yes, that had the effect of a bad major league roster.


This has been rebutted over the years ad nauseum.

They could have signed really good players to 3-4 years contracts in year 1, competed at the MLB level and still rebuilt the farm system. Those contracts would now have finished their term providing all the necessary room for the minor leaguers. Sure they may not have had Bryant but if you trust the system as much as you do, they certainly would have found great players in the draft.

We were left to hear about the poor Cubs and big contracts that had to be consumed over the last three years. Meanwhile, the market value has more than doubled in the short time they have owned and they are proposing $500 in capital improvements.

There is a very large trough of bullshit that you have swallowed with this management.


I thought the goal was to win the World Series? You would have been ok if they just competed, so what are we talking about 85 wins?


How many times have we heard that the playoffs are a crap shoot? 85 wins can and has put teams in the playoffs, even moreso in the expanded version

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
good dolphin wrote:
How many times have we heard that the playoffs are a crap shoot? 85 wins can and has put teams in the playoffs, even moreso in the expanded version

Twice in the history of baseball teams with 85 wins or lower have made it to the World Series.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 1553
Location: Long Grove,IL
pizza_Place: Thin crust cheese extra cheese ....Pizza DOC
JORR and GD thanks for the serious replies.

I do not like the concept of tanking at all. My biggest problem is that MLB and the slotting system rewards tanking. By tying in how much you can spend with how bad you are. It really encourages teams to tank. I know slotting was put ion to control costs and both bog and small market teams supported it but it makes no sense to me.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't waste my time with the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 8:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Florida High School SS Brendan Rodgers crushed a home run in his first game of the season last night. Rodgers is a possible 1-1 and my top player in the draft.

http://m.mlb.com/news/article/108247032 ... chool-game


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40644
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Keyser Soze wrote:
Florida High School SS Brendan Rodgers crushed a home run in his first game of the season last night. Rodgers is a possible 1-1 and my top player in the draft.

http://m.mlb.com/news/article/108247032 ... chool-game


Are they playing HS baseball in FL already?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Yep. That's why players in the south have such an advantage over players in the north. Those guys have been practicing outside for weeks and started playing games while guys here are still practicing indoors and their high school season doesn't start for a month and a half.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 8:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40644
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Wow I knew they went early but Feb!

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 8:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
College baseball starts in 10 days and it's not a minute too soon. It's been a loooooong off season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30318
Keyser Soze wrote:
College baseball starts in 10 days and it's not a minute too soon. It's been a loooooong off season.

+1

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 1:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
With the San Diego Padres signing James Shields and surrendering the 13th pick the draft order is (finally) set:

First Round

1. Arizona Diamondbacks
2. Houston Astros (Brady Aiken - unsigned)
3. Colorado Rockies
4. Texas Rangers
5. Houston Astros
6. Minnesota Twins
7. Boston Red Sox
8. Chicago White Sox
9. Chicago Cubs
10. Philadelphia Phillies
11. Cincinnati Reds
12. Miami Marlins
13. Tampa Bay Rays
14. Atlanta Braves
15. Milwaukee Brewers
16. New York Yankees
17. Cleveland Indians
18. San Francisco Giants
19. Pittsburgh Pirates
20. Oakland Athletics
21. Kansas City Royals
22. Detroit Tigers
23. St. Louis Cardinals
24. Los Angeles Dodgers
25. Baltimore Orioles
26. Los Angeles Angels

Compensation Picks

27. Colorado Rockies (Michael Cuddyer)
28. Atlanta Braves (Ervin Santana)
29. Toronto Blue Jays (Melky Cabrera)
30. New York Yankees (David Robertson)
31. San Francisco Giants (Pablo Sandoval)
32. Pittsburgh Pirates (Russell Martin)
33. Kansas City Royals (James Shields)
34. Detroit Tigers (Max Scherzer)
35. Los Angeles Dodgers ( Hanley Ramirez)
36. Baltimore Orioles (Nelson Cruz)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Quote:
Astros – $17.98MM
Rockies – $14.55MM
D’backs – $14.18MM
Rangers – $9.47MM
Braves – $8.70MM
Yankees – $8.21MM
Reds – $8.09MM
Brewers – $8.06MM
Orioles – $7.99MM
Giants – $7.82MM
Pirates – $7.69MM
Twins – $7.69MM
Cardinals – $7.69MM
Cubs – $7.55MM
Indians – $7.53MM
Royals – $7.50MM
Tigers – $7.40MM
Phillies – $7.36MM
Dodgers – $7.24MM
Marlins – $7.04MM
Rays – $6.86MM
Red Sox – $6.48MM
Athletics – $5.67MM
Blue Jays – $5.63MM
White Sox – $5.54MM
Angels – $5.42MM
Padres – $5.39MM
Mariners – $4.36MM
Mets – $3.74MM
Nationals – $3.70MM

Such crap the Cardinals get a "competitive balance" pick given they have had a payroll in the top-half of the league for a few years now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82203
When you lose a pick after signing a restricted free agent, do you retain the money slotted to that pick or does that go as well. Conversely, does the team gaining the pick also get extra money?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
good dolphin wrote:
When you lose a pick after signing a restricted free agent, do you retain the money slotted to that pick or does that go as well. Conversely, does the team gaining the pick also get extra money?

lose pick - lose money
gain pick - gain money


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
When you lose a pick after signing a restricted free agent, do you retain the money slotted to that pick or does that go as well. Conversely, does the team gaining the pick also get extra money?

Thankfully Kirkwood is here to explain these things to you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 9:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
That's why the Sox only have $5.54M to spend. They lost the money for their 2nd (Robertson) and 3rd round (Melky) picks. Houston could do some serious damage in this draft if they didn't have an idiot running it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Funk Man was rockin and rollin is his debut against Alabama St. Funk sat 91-94 and topped at 95. He also featured his 83-85 wipeout slider. Funk gave up a walk and a hit in the 1st then retired 20 straight hitters. 7 IP 1 H 0 ER 1 BB 12 K's

Virginia LHP Nathan Kirby had a solid debut against East Carolina. 7 IP 3 H 0 ER 2 BB5 K's

Vandy RHP Carson Fulmer sat 92-95 and topped at 96 in a nice outing against Santa Clara. 5 IP 2 H 0 ER 3 BB 7 K's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 11:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
LSU SS Alex Bregman got off to a slow start going 2-12 with 0 extra base hits and 1 rbi over the weekend

Cincinnati 2B Ian Happ was 7-16 with 2 doubles 2 home runs and 4 rbi

Vandy SS/2B Dansby Swanson 6-14 with 2 doubles a triple and 2 rbi

Florida St OF DJ Stewart was 5-9 with a double 5 runs scored 1 rbi and 6 BB's


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Funk Man got slapped around today against Arkansas St though it was 38 degrees at game time with snow flurries. He still sat 91-94 and topped out at 95. 4.2 IP 7 H 7 R 4 ER 3 BB 7 K's

UCLA RHP James Kaprelian was good in his start against North Carolina. He sat 88-90 topping at 91 and had his wipeout 12/6 curveball working. 6 IP 7 H 3 ER 0 BB 7 K's.

Duke RHP Mike Matuella was scratched from his start with forearm soreness. The move was precautionary and not considered serious.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2015 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:29 pm
Posts: 691
pizza_Place: Cali Za Kitchen
@kileymcd: Buzz growing on Dillon Tate. Flashed good CH, holding 95. Its early but he's in top 5 picks right now, esp w/Matuella & Aiken durability ?'s


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2015 10:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Tate is a hot name right now. He's a converted closer with a huge arm. We'll see if he can hold his stuff all season as a starter. If he can I agree he could go top 5 but it's way too early to say Aiken and Matuella have durability questions, Kiley.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2015 12:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
LHP Brady Aiken has enrolled at IMG Academy.

Good. Someone finally talked sense into him (or more likely his agent). I heard he was just going to throw bullpens until the draft. Now guys will be able to see how strong his elbow is in game situations.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2015 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 9:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Funk Man was good in a ND against Boston College. He sat 92-95 and topped at 96. 7 IP 3 H 2 ER 4 BB 6 K

Carson Fulmer was roughed up by Arkansas. He sat 93-95 topping at 96 and his wipeout slider was 83-85. 6 IP 5 H 5 ER 2 BB 7 K

Dillon Tate was brilliant in a win against Wichita St. He sat 94-96 and topped at 97. 8 IP 4 H 1 ER 0 BB 6 K

Mike Matuella was on a 40 pitch count and was real good against Georgia Tech. 4 IP 3 H 0 ER 0 BB 4 K


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 230 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group