You know the salary cap situation the Hawks are in.

What is Bowman going to do?

geez, talk about full on retard topic.

First of all, Buffalo loves hockey and watches the SCF with or without Kane in it.

Second of all, yea let's trade one of our big 3, a guy who was on his way to leading the league in scoring this year and is once again scoring in the playoffs. Yea, let's trade that guy cause of the cap.


Third of all, Buffalo is in the early stages of a rebuild and has a stockpile of very young talent. By the time they are maturing Kane will be closing in on 30. So, from their end they have just as little interest in tradeing for Kane as we have for getting rid of him.

And to top it off, there is no way they would trade their top draft pick this year straight up for Kane. Jack Eichel is going to be a grade A stud. No chance in hell they trade him for Kane. And on the flipside, the Hawks have no interest in that deal either despite how good Eichel projects...we are in win now mode. No need to trade a boat for a mystery box just because it might contain a similar or slightly better boat.


Such a dumb post on so many levels.

You only pay attention to the Hawks once every 2 years and only for the final series, please just sit back and enjoy it rather than trying so hard to make an ass of yourself.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Look, there's just no reason to trade him to Buffalo. He's here to stay. That's a good thing.

On Aug. 9, 1988, Gretzky was traded by the Edmonton Oilers to the Los Angeles Kings with forward Mike Krushelnyski and defenseman Marty McSorley for center Jimmy Carson, forward Martin Gelinas, Los Angeles' first-round picks in 1989, 1991 and 1993 as well as straight cash....


The greatest player ever traded.....but you cant trade Kane.....

Stop being an idiot. There is a documentary on that trade and the circumstances.

Stop being an idiot. There is a documentary on that trade and the circumstances.

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

....and the NHL wonders why their biggest ratings of any game they have are equal to the lowest rated TV NBA games ...

Hey, if you cant play other sports, lace up the skates and start whacking guys.....and then tell everyone you play hockey

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Well , if a documentary exists......

So, a franchise sold out everything to get what they expected was a franchise changing player?

Shouldn't the Oilers history from 1990 to the present be a great reason why you should never consider trading Kane

I am only really roughly paraphrasing from memory but Edmonton's owner could not afford to pay him and he was marrying the hot LA star (at the time) Janet Jones. Owner and GM cried real tears. It was not a typical I have cap issues trade Kane thing.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Right, it was a question and everyone except Hothatch McHackchat said no.

Right, it was a question and everyone except Hothatch McHackchat said no.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

Ovechkin, Stamkos, Nash and Washington 1st rounder in 2016 and 2017

for Crawford, Kane and Saad


That's a NO?

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

I'm ambivalent to trading Crawford. I like what's behind him. That's why I wasn't sweating losing Niemi. Saad is a rising star. Kane is a superstar. Q would quit coaching if the Hawks had Ovechkin. Nash?

Ovechkin, Stamkos, Nash and Washington 1st rounder in 2016 and 2017

for Crawford, Kane and Saad


That's a NO?

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.

She could get it from me

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Ovechkin, Stamkos, Nash and Washington 1st rounder in 2016 and 2017

for Crawford, Kane and Saad


That's a NO?

Yeah. She'd probably want that. She'd probably rather have a facial with an angle grinder.

I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.