Yes it was. Read what I said again.

People say he shouldn't do it. Just let it go. But if Kane didn't rape her, if he didn't even have sex with her, if I'm him, once they drop the case, I'm suing her. Then I'm gonna make her settle before it goes to court. And Dad will pay for her cuz he knows it would be more money if it went to court.

Yes it is.

When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.

People say he shouldn't do it. Just let it go. But if Kane didn't rape her, if he didn't even have sex with her, if I'm him, once they drop the case, I'm suing her. Then I'm gonna make her settle before it goes to court. And Dad will pay for her cuz he knows it would be more money if it went to court.

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

Yes it was. Read what I said again.

No.

Wannabee attorney vs. real attorney.

Don't play coy with me.

No, its still possible for there to be sex without DNA, but its highly unlikely. A condom would stop most of the DNA, but there would still be skin cells, hair (unless there's no hair down there).

Also, the fact that she was claiming forcible rape makes it even less likely since forcible raps with condoms and no DNA left behind are virtually impossible.

Focus on the wannabee vs. actual part.

That's quite a leap in logic.

I've tried to keep an open mind throughout this whole thing.

But, like Julie, I'm biased. Two colleagues and I, and our company, were falsely accused of harassment charges by somebody looking for a money grab. Completely fabricated stuff, hoping to catch a small business unaware, and hoping to get us on retaliation charges when we would get pissed off and fire her. Fortunately, we had, as Bernstein would say, really smart lawyers... and we're not too stupid ourselves. She didn't get a penny.

The whole ordeal lasted five years, however, as that's how long it took to move from a complaint to finding of possible cause by the commission staff, to a full hearing. The insurance company wanted to settle, our company's president to his credit spent more on legal fees than what a settlement would have cost, because he was pissed that somebody had tried to play his company.

Fortunately, almost nobody in our firm, and nobody in our office, believed the accuser. But today, I have some colleagues who take Julie's point of view and would have definitely branded us as guilty. Even though we were the victims. The woman who made up the claims? No recourse against her... except that if she pulls this crap with somebody else, a search will find the ruling from the hearing officer which eviscerates her.

The other night, with the mom and the bag and the whatever.... I really lost it. I was thoroughly depressed, it brought up all of this crap again (the case was dismissed about 7-8 years ago).

I feel like people like Julie owe me a fucking apology for presuming that every man ever accused by a woman is guilty. I'm sorry somebody raped her. I doubt she's sorry about what happened to me.... as it obviously had to be my fault somehow, that I must have given that woman the idea that it was ok to just make shit up. And that goes double for what she thinks about Patrick Kane.

Di Caro would take the same approach as the writer of the Rolling Stone UVa article and justify her actions by saying, although it may not have happened in this case, she is battling a societal problem.

Di Caro would take the same approach as the writer of the Rolling Stone UVa article and justify her actions by saying, although it may not have happened in this case, she is battling a societal problem.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

I think you guys nailed it.

Julie views Kane as the guy that raped her. So that's why she's on the attack. It's actually understandable. She should be biased as a rape victim. You would expect that. But it's also why she has no credibility.

I think you guys nailed it.

Julie views Kane as the guy that raped her. So that's why she's on the attack. It's actually understandable. She should be biased as a rape victim. You would expect that. But it's also why she has no credibility.

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

What makes her incapable of traveling to Cancun? I see no reason not to believe her. We owe her at least that much.

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

What makes her incapable of traveling to Cancun?

I think it's a bit of a leap to go from "got emotionally invested in a story and became the story" to "is a lifelong pathological liar."

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

...I was unaware her alleged rape was in Cancun...

I could have sworn she said she reported it months? or years later?

To who?

I mean Cancun is a little cleaner and civilized than some other parts of mexico, but reporting a rape, even right after it happened down there, during break, guessing might not be the top issue they have.....yet alone, calling them even the next week and reporting it?

....and while I continue to say it shouldnt happen....no means no....blah blah....you are telling me you left a bar druk with a guy in Cancun...?? Come On Man!!!

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

Cancun is a vile place where vile things happen.

10000% believe her.

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

\



Not if you stay at this place...

http://www.leblancsparesort.com/

Rated #1 adults only all inclusive in the Carribean, stayed there 11 days for our honeymoon a couple years ago. Place was amazing, but yea, I wouldn't bother leaving the resort for any reason other than golf.