Chicago Fanatics Message Board • View topic - Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Page 3 of 4

[ 117 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

badrogue17

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:00 pm

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis

Janikowski hasn't missed too many Paczki days has he?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

Last edited by badrogue17 on Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top

Godfella

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:02 pm

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 6:18 pm
Posts: 4865
pizza_Place: Luigi's

NME wrote:

Godfella wrote:

NME wrote:

Dewskie wrote:

Woodson owns Cutler through his career, but this is also just who Cutler is. I'd rather see this than Jimmy Clausen's offense getting shut out, though.

I can't argue with this at all.

Without Cutler, it's 17-0 Oakland.

17-3

We'd have that fg off of McPhees INT

I stand corrected.

_________________
"This is Chicago, my friend. Anything can happen."

Top

Minooka Meatball

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:04 pm

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8011
pizza_Place: Rosati's

Gumbel just said "here at Wrigley" :lol:

_________________
Not a mult.

Top

NME

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:04 pm

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone

lol

Dewskies prediction holding up so far

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?

Top

NME

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:07 pm

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone

Man Bennet has been money today.

Rest of the WR's? Not so much..

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?

Top

Spaulding

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:08 pm

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33815
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's

long time guy wrote:

Dewskie wrote:

Cutler is a good but not great QB whose career will be known for disappointment, turnovers, and his media-created false sense of indifference to winning or losing.

He's got mechanical flaws that will never be corrected but ultimately aren't responsible for why he throws picks. He simply makes bad decisions or straight-up gets outplayed by good defenses. He wasn't worth the money or years Emery paid him, but the arguments people made for starting nobodies over him can almost always be traced back to a particular moment or game where a fan makes up their mind and says ENOUGH (2011 NFC title comes to mind) and begins to look for any reason to see anyone else play QB for their favorite team, while the OTHER side of the fan coin wants to see Cutler succeed because they feel like he is capable of having his moment in the sun in spite of all the statistics, trends, and flaws that indicate this kind of consistency is impossible from Cutler.

This is exactly how I view Cutler. The promise and talent that he displayed as a 23 or 24 yr old has long since subsided. The talent is what wowed people about him. You can't be holding that same conversation about him at 32.
All of the coordinators and coaches have not been able to correct the flaws that he possesses. He has not been a willing participant in this process either.
That being said he is not as bad a player as his detractors would lead you to believe. Cutler's essential problem is that he has been good at times but never great. You don't win simply because you have Jay Cutler on your team. That doesn't mean he is a complete bum. It just means that if you're mad because he is not Brees, Brady, Rodgers, Manning, Luck, or even Tony Romo, then your anger is probably misplaced.

The other part of that is the fucking salary that Emery decided to pay. He is nowhere near worth it.

Yes but I thought he'd be more like Favre. I'm mad because he's the losing version of Favre.

Top

Scorehead

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:09 pm

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park

Minooka Meatball wrote:

Gumbel just said "here at Wrigley" :lol:

Yea...he caught himself and stopped short of saying Wrigley Field.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan

Top

Scorehead

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:11 pm

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park

NME wrote:

Man Bennet has been money today.

Rest of the WR's? Not so much..

The Raiders defense still doesnt realize that opposing offenses play a TE.

Top

Nas

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:12 pm

100000 CLUB

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222

Bears got this

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!

Top

NME

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:12 pm

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone

Should have ran one more play there with a timeout

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?

Top

long time guy

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:12 pm

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948

Spaulding wrote:

long time guy wrote:

Dewskie wrote:

Yes but I thought he'd be more like Favre. I'm mad because he's the losing version of Favre.

That's what I thought also. I figured out a few yrs ago that he would never be that and decided to settle for him simply becoming Vince Evans. That'll work for me.

_________________

The Hawk wrote:

This is going to reach a head pretty soon.

Top

NME

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:14 pm

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone

Scorehead wrote:

NME wrote:

Man Bennet has been money today.

Rest of the WR's? Not so much..

The Raiders defense still doesnt realize that opposing offenses play a TE.

And thank God for that.

And nice to get a win finally. Now we don't have to worry about being 0-16 Detroit

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?

Top

Scorehead

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:15 pm

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park

BEARSSS!!!

Top

NME

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:16 pm

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone

lol

Appropriate ending

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?

Top

Curious Hair

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:16 pm

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen

Great, now we'll have to deal with BEAARRSSSS!!!!!! assholes because these chucklefucks won by a point.

_________________

Molly Lambert wrote:

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Top

Quadrophenia

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:19 pm

Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:35 am
Posts: 447

Horrray, win a meaningless game! Now we get to hear about how wonderful the defense played and how we gutted out a win.

This is why the Bears never end up with elite talent and never pick at the top of the draft.

Top

RFDC

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:19 pm

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57240

Curious Hair wrote:

Great, now we'll have to deal with BEAARRSSSS!!!!!! assholes because these chucklefucks won by a point.

won by 2 pts, get it right.

Superbowl!

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Frank Coztansa wrote:

I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.

Top

Frank Coztansa

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:20 pm

100000 CLUB

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's

This team sucks, but a win makes Sunday a little better.

_________________

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

It's more fun to be a victim

Caller Bob wrote:

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Top

Spaulding

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:22 pm

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33815
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's

long time guy wrote:

That's what I thought also. I figured out a few yrs ago that he would never be that and decided to settle for him simply becoming Vince Evans. That'll work for me.

Without the perfect quarterback rating in a game against Green Bay.

Top

Curious Hair

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:22 pm

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen

Quadrophenia wrote:

Don't forget Jay Cutler heroically coming back a week early and only having one terrible redzone interception.

_________________

Molly Lambert wrote:

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Top

Dewskie

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:23 pm

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Champaign, IL
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th

Curious Hair wrote:

Great, now we'll have to deal with BEAARRSSSS!!!!!! assholes because these chucklefucks won by a point.

Quadrophenia wrote:

Two bad Bears thoughts, please disregard these, unless being a moron is what you're looking for.

Frank Coztansa wrote:

This team sucks, but a win makes Sunday a little better.

I suggest this mentality.

_________________

Quote:

When it comes to the Bears, America is just a slobbering shitwagon. Every single opinion of his regarding this team is the most pristine of doomsday horseshit.

Top

Beebo

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:24 pm

1000 CLUB

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 9:58 am
Posts: 4456
Location: @ ROH Show Near Me.
pizza_Place: Freezer.

Darkside wrote:

Cutler is the only guy on the roster that gives them a chance to win. That chance may be a poor chance but it's a chance.
I know what you mean though, Pickles and Fales do not give them a chance to win. Cutler can win them a game but he is well able to cost them a game as well. I'm just giving you shit.

No matter what, they clipped Pickle's playbook to virtually nothing in Seattle. Probably would have passed INTs like water, but, we don't know.

Let's go get Henry Burris back!

_________________
Middle Aged Crazy, like Uncle Terry

Last edited by Beebo on Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top

jimmypasta

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:24 pm

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere

Time for the Cowboys to trade Mat Cassell (to help the Bears the rest of the season at QB) and a couple of low round draft picks to the Bears and acquire Cutler.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."

Top

Scorehead

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:25 pm

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park

Curious Hair wrote:

Great, now we'll have to deal with BEAARRSSSS!!!!!! assholes because these chucklefucks won by a point.

Who hates sports more, you or Berns?

Top

Dave In Champaign

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:29 pm

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 3287
pizza_Place: Olde Silver Tavern, Manalapan, NJ [R.I.P.?]

They should give Cutler an extension.

_________________
The Bulls haven't done anything wrong, and they're not going to do anything wrong.

Top

Curious Hair

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:29 pm

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen

Scorehead wrote:

Curious Hair wrote:

Great, now we'll have to deal with BEAARRSSSS!!!!!! assholes because these chucklefucks won by a point.

Who hates sports more, you or Berns?

I like sports, I hate the Bears. Tired of them monopolizing the sports landscape the way they do; no team in pro sports does less with more.

_________________

Molly Lambert wrote:

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Top

Godfella

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:30 pm

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 6:18 pm
Posts: 4865
pizza_Place: Luigi's

I'll take theW because we needed one badly.

Love the Del Rio smirk at the end.

_________________
"This is Chicago, my friend. Anything can happen."

Top

Dewskie

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:33 pm

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Champaign, IL
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th

Curious Hair wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

Curious Hair wrote:

Great, now we'll have to deal with BEAARRSSSS!!!!!! assholes because these chucklefucks won by a point.

Who hates sports more, you or Berns?

I like sports, I hate the Bears. Tired of them monopolizing the sports landscape the way they do; no team in pro sports does less with more.

For hating them so much you sure do feel it's important to comment on them. Poorly at that. Just ignore it if it's such a burden.

_________________

Quote:

When it comes to the Bears, America is just a slobbering shitwagon. Every single opinion of his regarding this team is the most pristine of doomsday horseshit.

Top

sinicalypse

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:37 pm

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?

Curious Hair wrote:

I like sports, I hate the Bears. Tired of them monopolizing the sports landscape the way they do; no team in pro sports does less with more.

with an attitude like that have i got a team for you...

holy lol if you search on chicago fire you get 0 image results unless you search on chicago fire soccer!

yeah im sure some ppl would call me tommy mctoughnuts arsenal plastic du jour, but hey over here in arsenalville i had a great fucking morning. idk how i'll survive without the possibility of 2 more CL games this year [SEASON OVER!]

also i cant wait for bernstein to suck out any joy i had with THEY SHOULDA LOST THAT GAME TO GET THEM CLOSER TO A CHAMPIONSHIP TOMORROW. i remember what dr ken said about watching this season and i'm with him on that.

_________________

Curious Hair wrote:

Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?

Top

Quadrophenia

Post subject: Re: Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:37 pm

Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:35 am
Posts: 447

Godfella wrote:

I'll take theW because we needed one badly.

Love the Del Rio smirk at the end.

Why did we need one badly? What does this win get us? Closer to 5-6 wins and a 8th-10th draft pick?

Maybe we can resign Forte and keep him for 4 years?

A loss and a potential 0-5 helps more than winning these stupid games. Some people are playing checkers, others are playing chess.

Top

Page 3 of 4

[ 117 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next

Bears vs Raiders Game 4 of 16

Who is online