This whole fucking article is a gold mine!
Sports Mockery wrote:
Tim Graham, our should we call him “star reporter for the accuser,” was briefly the lead media source for information on the case before releasing a multitude of rumors prematurely advocating Kane’s guilt.
We're off to a roaring start.
Sports Mockery wrote:
Now that everybody was convinced that Kane likely raped somebody in his home on the morning of August 2nd, thanks to Graham, the public wanted more information. The only information they received was more false rumors.
But everyone was convinced that Kane raped the girl. What additional information could the public possibly want?
Sports Mockery wrote:
Kane was already painted into a corner as a potential rapist, the accuser was allegedly physically harmed and some Blackhawks fans lost hope. Others, called bullshit.
Fear not Hawks fans, Sports Mockery is here to defend Patrick Kane in the court of public opinion!
Sports Mockery wrote:
The only person, Croce, to publicly support Kane was immediately discredited by Graham which prevented Kane from getting any positive news coverage.
The optics! Won't someone PLEASE think of the optics!
Sports Mockery wrote:
Not only did Graham’s tweet discredit the bar owner, it now introduced a possibility of lying and someone corrupting statements in the case. Graham perpetrated a belief that the bar owner’s comments were made for his own personal gain, to protect Kane. Therefore, it negated the positive report and made people think a conspiracy to protect Kane could be underway. If there’s a conspiracy to protect Kane, he must be guilty, right? That’s what Graham made the public think.
Holy projection Batman!
Sports Mockery wrote:
The public took notice and people started questioning Graham’s motives, it was clear he was bias against Kane since the start.
Sports Mockery wrote:
The next report in The Buffalo News that Graham’s name appeared on was another pro-accuser story. According to the Buffalo News, the accuser never even wanted to go to Kane’s house, it was her friend.
Who talks like this?
Sports Mockery wrote:
“It was a mutual agreement to go hang out at the house,” English said. FINALLY, a positive report for Kane. Right?
Oh God I hope so!
Sports Mockery wrote:
Wrong.
FUCK!
Sports Mockery wrote:
Paul Cambria was expected to represent Kane in this matter. Cambria had represented Kane in the past and is known as one of the nation’s best defense lawyers. Upon hearing this news, what did Graham do? Introduce more conspiracy suggesting Cambria wouldn’t be able to represent Kane because he was partying with him that night at SkyBar. This made people think that Kane would need to find a new lawyer for this case, seemingly making it harder for him to win.
Huh? How would it make people think that? Please show your work.
Sports Mockery wrote:
So … if Kane’s attorney was partying with him that night too – then he would obviously do what it takes to protect him. Right?
You mean to tell me Kane's defense attorney would try to
defend him? HOLY SHIT!
Sports Mockery wrote:
This made the accuser look like the truthful party yet again considering Kane’s expected attorney wouldn’t even be able to represent him according to Graham.
Sports Mockery wrote:
Notice the pattern yet???
Uhhh...
Sports Mockery wrote:
Graham was clearly rooting for a grand jury to hear the trial, mainly because he presumed Kane was guilty. That was apparent by his reporting.
Oh it was, was it?
Sports Mockery wrote:
Not only did Graham’s “reporting,” and rumors, continue to fuel an ongoing public debate on Kane’s guilt,
Oh God not discourse! Anything but discourse!
Sports Mockery wrote:
it also drove a feminist up-rising against #88.
Holy Fuck! The SJWs are coming!
Sports Mockery wrote:
The last time we posted our “score,” based on favorable media reporting during this investigation, it was accuser = 7, Kane = 0. If you use what was #Wrong in Graham’s reporting, and tally those points to Kane, the final score should have been accuser = 1, Kane = 5. Here’s why.
Who does this? Why do this?
Sports Mockery wrote:
It was very difficult for all of us Mr. Cambria, and that’s mainly because Tim Graham wanted to see Kane burned at the stake.
But particularly for those of us at Sport's Mockery.
All in all some A+ reporting.
_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
