It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 7:14 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 1/14 @Habs
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55933
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Haha, look at this. Montreal's defense had ONE weakness...

Image

*Beverly Hills Cop chiptune*

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/14 @Habs
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Scorehead was right about this team all along.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/14 @Habs
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55933
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
That team had Trevor Daley and David Rundblad on it. What a HUGE difference retooling the defense has made. I keep hammering it, but I can't get over how for years now Edmonton has sorely needed top-four defensemen, then when they actually draft one in Gustafsson, they don't bother signing him (it wasn't a matter of an impasse, they just let the rights lapse without all that much consideration) and then he gets scooped up by the Blackhawks, where he promptly becomes an able replacement for Johnny Oduya. Frankly, it's a little ridiculous. This was the shit the Red Wings did: their tentacles were so far-reaching in European scouting that no one ever got by them.

I'm pretty optimistic about Richard Panik. Project players get a bad rap, and often from me when it comes to guys like Viktor Stalberg, but if we're to round out a roster with cheap guys out of necessity, let it be with toolsy decent-upside guys like Panik and Rasmussen rather than bums like Bickell and Garbutt. Not quite the same, but if we can get Lee Stempniak out of Jersey for the home stretch, I'll be very happy. Seriously, all that guy does is get traded mid-season and help teams: Winnipeg last year, Pittsburgh and Phoenix before that.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1/14 @Habs
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13328
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Curious Hair wrote:
That team had Trevor Daley and David Rundblad on it. What a HUGE difference retooling the defense has made. I keep hammering it, but I can't get over how for years now Edmonton has sorely needed top-four defensemen, then when they actually draft one in Gustafsson, they don't bother signing him (it wasn't a matter of an impasse, they just let the rights lapse without all that much consideration) and then he gets scooped up by the Blackhawks, where he promptly becomes an able replacement for Johnny Oduya. Frankly, it's a little ridiculous. This was the shit the Red Wings did: their tentacles were so far-reaching in European scouting that no one ever got by them.

I'm pretty optimistic about Richard Panik. Project players get a bad rap, and often from me when it comes to guys like Viktor Stalberg, but if we're to round out a roster with cheap guys out of necessity, let it be with toolsy decent-upside guys like Panik and Rasmussen rather than bums like Bickell and Garbutt. Not quite the same, but if we can get Lee Stempniak out of Jersey for the home stretch, I'll be very happy. Seriously, all that guy does is get traded mid-season and help teams: Winnipeg last year, Pittsburgh and Phoenix before that.


http://forecaster.thehockeynews.com/hoc ... r.php?2922
SCOUTING REPORT
Assets: Can be a special-teams factor, and can even play the point on the power play. Owns good quickness and a sneaky wrister. Can play either wing position and displays goal-scoring acumen.
Flaws: Doesn't have a lot of refinement in his play without the puck. Is somewhat undersized, which hinders his ability to win puck battles consistently. He's too streaky as a scorer.
Career Potential: Veteran depth winger.

Makes around 900k, decent replacement for Garbutt

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group