It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 1:24 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:05 am
Posts: 2953
Location: DuPage
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Jay Zawaski was day dreaming some possibilities in acquiring Ladd. One of which was somehow, some way getting someone to eat Bickell's cash and then Kruger to LTIR until playoffs. The other was trading Shaw and a couple prospects. I dont see Bickell as seeing possible because of his play and his money owed. The shaw one was an interesting idea in that I dont think i would make that trade.

_________________
'Your AT&T Universal Card has arrived'? Oh God, Kick-fucking-ass, I got a Master Card! I don't believe it, man. Life is kinda cool sometimes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38683
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
Jay Zawaski was day dreaming some possibilities in acquiring Ladd. One of which was somehow, some way getting someone to eat Bickell's cash and then Kruger to LTIR until playoffs. The other was trading Shaw and a couple prospects. I dont see Bickell as seeing possible because of his play and his money owed. The shaw one was an interesting idea in that I dont think i would make that trade.

I'd trade Shaw for Ladd in a heartbeat .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Ladd's a goner in Winnipeg for sure, with the captaincy shifting to Blake Wheeler, but they're not going to take on Bickell's money to help us out. Just within the division alone, they could put the screws to fast-fading Minnesota or Nashville and get more for him than we could.

I'd say that we should look to New Jersey or Carolina for one of their plentiful expiring contracts, but both teams think they're still in the race. Mason Raymond out of Calgary might be as good as it gets.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Last edited by Curious Hair on Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Would love Ladd back...but might be hard to swing.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Oh, I almost forgot, now more than ever with Pietrangelo hurt, St. Louis will be madly flailing to improve their roster (Armstrong and Hitchcock have to be gone with one more first-round out). They could overpay for Ladd.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38683
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Give them The CI's li little darling Teuvo too. Not impressed .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
I would only trade Shaw for Ladd if I knew I wouldn't lose Ladd in the offseason.

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
badrogue17 wrote:
Give them The CI's li little darling Teuvo too. Not impressed .


This would not displease me

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Minooka Meatball wrote:
I would only trade Shaw for Ladd if I knew I wouldn't lose Ladd in the offseason.

You would and you should, so don't.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:03 am
Posts: 214
pizza_Place: nino's
Minooka Meatball wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Give them The CI's li little darling Teuvo too. Not impressed .


This would not displease me

disagree.

need to keep cheap forwards given kane and toews decided to fuck the Hawks by putting them in cap hell for next 7 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38683
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Arlington Hts Archie wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Give them The CI's li little darling Teuvo too. Not impressed .


This would not displease me

disagree.

need to keep cheap forwards given kane and toews decided to fuck the Hawks by putting them in cap hell for next 7 years.

Yeah it's really affected their on ice success .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I'm not giving up on Teravainen yet, being just over 21 years old with just under 100 regular-season games.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40641
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Arlington Hts Archie wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Give them The CI's li little darling Teuvo too. Not impressed .


This would not displease me

disagree.

need to keep cheap forwards given kane and toews decided to fuck the Hawks by putting them in cap hell for next 7 years.



This is really a stupid thought. The really smart thing would have been to have them test free agency and match offers. :lol:

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:03 am
Posts: 214
pizza_Place: nino's
badrogue17 wrote:
Arlington Hts Archie wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Give them The CI's li little darling Teuvo too. Not impressed .


This would not displease me

disagree.

need to keep cheap forwards given kane and toews decided to fuck the Hawks by putting them in cap hell for next 7 years.

Yeah it's really affected their on ice success .

makes no sense long term. he'll signed next year under $1M and then is a RFA.

i don't want to live in world where stan has to scrape by with the fernando pisanis and ryan potulnys of the league


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Carolina is three points over .500 with a -12 differential and two teams to pass for a wild card. Once someone disabuses these chucklefucks of their playoff delusions, we should be able to scrape someone decent off their roster.

Speaking of disabused delusions, the Coyotes (two points over, one to pass, -23). Someone's gonna give up a lot for Boedker and really warp-speed their rebuild.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:03 am
Posts: 214
pizza_Place: nino's
Curious Hair wrote:
Carolina is three points over .500 with a -12 differential and two teams to pass for a wild card. Once someone disabuses these chucklefucks of their playoff delusions, we should be able to scrape someone decent off their roster.

Kris Versteeg? :lol: :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Riley Nash seems like a decent player. Stempniak is the guy I want at the deadline, but I wanted Vermette for years and then he kinda blew most of the time, so I'm trying to outthink myself and pick a mundane player to overperform with a change of scenery.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
(Shaw fanboy disclaimer)

I responded earlier without knowing that Shaw is RFA after this season. He's making $2.5M this season, so I would imagine he'll get a bump to at the very least 3 for his next deal. Ladd's hit is currently $4.5M, but this season his numbers are off from a stellar season a year ago. Still, I can't see him signing for much less, unless he is willing to accept a one-year low-ball offer to stick with a contender he is familiar with, while not hog-tieing the cap.

Teuvo is still young at 21, but I have not seen much progression from him (relatively short NHL career noted). While he has some talent, the level of talent he has shown is not enough to overcome his lack of size (as opposed to the Kanes, Panarins and Shaws of this world). I don't think his ceiling is very high; even so, once his current deal is over, he will get more than $1M from someone - I just don't know if it will be the Hawks.

Shaw, IMO, and a couple of recent games notwithstanding, has matured a bit, especially once he was moved to the top line to help spark it. He also is one of the few on the team that is willing to stand in front of the net and pay the price, let alone be physical when needed. He still has the tendency to make a boneheaded play, but not nearly as much as previous years. He never seems to take a game off, unlike others.

Ladd is bigger and can produce more than Shaw (providing this season is an anomaly), but again, he's 30 and more expensive down the road if you wish to keep him. There must be a reason why the Jets are hitching their wagon to Big Buff (also 30) for $8M, and apparently willing to listen to deals for their captain.

If you are going to go after Ladd as a rent-a-player, I would be much more willing to give up guys like Teuvo, Rassmussen, Mash, et, al, than a proven X-factor like Shaw. If you know you can keep Ladd for an extra season or two and not destroy what little cap space you have, then go ahead and let Shaw go.

_________________
Not a mult.


Last edited by Minooka Meatball on Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Minooka Meatball wrote:
There must be a reason why the Jets are hitching their wagon to Big Buff (also 30) for $8M, and apparently willing to listen to deals for their captain.


Wheeler's been the real captain for months. Ladd just has it on tenure.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33809
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Minooka Meatball wrote:
(Shaw fanboy disclaimer)

I responded earlier without knowing that Shaw is RFA after this season. He's making $2.5M this season, so I would imagine he'll get a bump to at the very least 3 for his next deal. Ladd's hit is currently $4.5M, but this season his numbers are off from a stellar season a year ago. Still, I can't see him signing for much less, unless he is willing to accept a one-year low-ball offer to stick with a contender he is familiar with, while not hog-tieing the cap.

Teuvo is still young at 21, but I have not seen much progression from him (relatively short NHL career noted). While he has some talent, the level of talent he has shown is not enough to overcome his lack of size (as opposed to the Kanes, Panarins and Shaws of this world). I don't think his ceiling is very high; even so, once his current deal is over, he will get more than $1M from someone - I just don't know if it will be the Hawks.

Shaw, IMO, and a couple of recent games notwithstanding, has matured a bit, especially once he was moved to the top line to help spark it. He also is one of the few on the team that is willing to stand in front of the net and pay the price, let alone be physical when needed. He still has the tendency to make a boneheaded play, but not nearly as much as previous years. He never seems to take a game off, unlike others.

Ladd is bigger and can produce more than Shaw (providing this season is an anomaly), but again, he's 30 and more expensive down the road if you wish to keep him. There must be a reason why the Jets are hitching their wagon to Big Buff (also 30) for $8M, and apparently willing to listen to deals for their captain.

If you are going to go after Ladd as a rent-a-player, I would be much more willing to give up guys like Teuvo, Rassmussen, Mash, et, al, than a proven X-factor like Shaw. If you know you can keep Ladd for an extra season or two and not destroy what little cap space you have, then go ahead and let Shaw go.


Teuvo as been good defensively and I don't know that comparisons to Kane and panarin are fair. I'm not all about him, I don't notice him most of the time, but that may not be a bad thing.

I love shaw and would be sad to see him go. I liked Ladd but haven't kept track of him.

I hate saying this, I think our problem with the first line is hossa. I'd like to see Teuvo on the first line just to see but I'd hate it at the same time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Spaulding wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
(Shaw fanboy disclaimer)

I responded earlier without knowing that Shaw is RFA after this season. He's making $2.5M this season, so I would imagine he'll get a bump to at the very least 3 for his next deal. Ladd's hit is currently $4.5M, but this season his numbers are off from a stellar season a year ago. Still, I can't see him signing for much less, unless he is willing to accept a one-year low-ball offer to stick with a contender he is familiar with, while not hog-tieing the cap.

Teuvo is still young at 21, but I have not seen much progression from him (relatively short NHL career noted). While he has some talent, the level of talent he has shown is not enough to overcome his lack of size (as opposed to the Kanes, Panarins and Shaws of this world). I don't think his ceiling is very high; even so, once his current deal is over, he will get more than $1M from someone - I just don't know if it will be the Hawks.

Shaw, IMO, and a couple of recent games notwithstanding, has matured a bit, especially once he was moved to the top line to help spark it. He also is one of the few on the team that is willing to stand in front of the net and pay the price, let alone be physical when needed. He still has the tendency to make a boneheaded play, but not nearly as much as previous years. He never seems to take a game off, unlike others.

Ladd is bigger and can produce more than Shaw (providing this season is an anomaly), but again, he's 30 and more expensive down the road if you wish to keep him. There must be a reason why the Jets are hitching their wagon to Big Buff (also 30) for $8M, and apparently willing to listen to deals for their captain.

If you are going to go after Ladd as a rent-a-player, I would be much more willing to give up guys like Teuvo, Rassmussen, Mash, et, al, than a proven X-factor like Shaw. If you know you can keep Ladd for an extra season or two and not destroy what little cap space you have, then go ahead and let Shaw go.



Teuvo as been good defensively and I don't know that comparisons to Kane and panarin are fair. I'm not all about him, I don't notice him most of the time, but that may not be a bad thing.

I love shaw and would be sad to see him go. I liked Ladd but haven't kept track of him.

I hate saying this, I think our problem with the first line is hossa. I'd like to see Teuvo on the first line just to see but I'd hate it at the same time.


It may be a bit of an unfair comparison, but he hasn't yet shown that he has the skill set to solidify his role yet - he's basically just a guy at this point. He is having only a slightly better season at this point than last year, prorating last year's output. If anything, he's mini-Sharp: has little streaks and spurts ( :wink: ) here-and-there, but then you don't really see him do much a lot of the time. I think the mindset was that he would move up to the first line, but that experiment did not work out at the start of the season, and since the second line has been so successful, there's been no reason to put him there, either. He needs to find a way to get it in gear on the third line.

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16814
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Because of his size its going to take Teuvo another couple years to figure out how to get the time and space he needs to make plays in the NHL. He already has world class vision and anticipation which are things you can't develop. It would be incredibly stupid to give up on him at this point in his development.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33809
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Minooka Meatball wrote:


It may be a bit of an unfair comparison, but he hasn't yet shown that he has the skill set to solidify his role yet - he's basically just a guy at this point. He is having only a slightly better season at this point than last year, prorating last year's output. If anything, he's mini-Sharp: has little streaks and spurts ( :wink: ) here-and-there, but then you don't really see him do much a lot of the time. I think the mindset was that he would move up to the first line, but that experiment did not work out at the start of the season, and since the second line has been so successful, there's been no reason to put him there, either. He needs to find a way to get it in gear on the third line.


He's young and has played maybe 100 games and not a ton of minutes. He's played center, left, and right wing. I don't know how much of a difference left or right wing makes, does it? I think he deserves more of a shot and could be more tha a guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Some site called "The Hockey Press" says Teravainen+ for James van Riemsdyk is imminent. Pyrrhic trade if true.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
The best part of the rumor is that the Blackhawks would be sending Bickell that way as well. The further bad news is that the Hawk would also be giving up a 2nd round pick and a Rockford prospect to be named....

Besides losing Teuvo, there is also the cap restraint (JvR has a 4.75M hit next season).

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Wish we could get Brandon Saad back. I bet he wishes he could come back.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
JVR is not worth Teuvo and picks. Probably a bullshit rumor anyways.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16814
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Hockey Gay wrote:
JVR is not worth Teuvo and picks. Probably a bullshit rumor anyways.


Agreed.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I bet they're in on Boedker on the "he must be good, look how he always beats us" principle that once made me, as a Cub fan, desire Austin Kearns.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Ladd
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 7:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
I bet they're in on Boedker on the "he must be good, look how he always beats us" principle that once made me, as a Cub fan, desire Austin Kearns.


Jason Heyward hits .333 in Wrigley Field. Unfortunately, he no longer gets to face Cub pitching.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group