It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 1:24 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:42 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Hawks should trade that godawful Toews guy for a buncha low-round picks and a bag o' pucks, and make Shaw the Captain & #1 center.

That's some sound reasoning right there, Mr. Meatball.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Mr. Reason wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Hawks should trade that godawful Toews guy for a buncha low-round picks and a bag o' pucks, and make Shaw the Captain & #1 center.

That's some sound reasoning right there, Mr. Meatball.


Well, I mean, Shaw's been the only one playing with any fire & pashun, whereas that no-good Toews has done nothing. Absolutely nothing. Will never do nothing, that overpaid bum. What's he EVER done for us???

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:48 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Hawks should trade that godawful Toews guy for a buncha low-round picks and a bag o' pucks, and make Shaw the Captain & #1 center.

That's some sound reasoning right there, Mr. Meatball.


Well, I mean, Shaw's been the only one playing with any fire & pashun, whereas that no-good Toews has done nothing. Absolutely nothing. Will never do nothing, that overpaid bum. What's he EVER done for us???

Yes...yes...can I get an amen?

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
I agree with CH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57225
Hockey Gay wrote:
I agree with CH

Image

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Cut Toews tonight - don't even let him come out for the 3rd!!!!!! :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
HEY!!! Why is Mayers wearing Krugey's number???

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:56 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Hockey Gay wrote:
I agree with CH

Not surprised you'd agree with such sound reasoning as his.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57225
Thank god the season is saved again AGAIN

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Six points back of Dallas and St. Louis (four straight shutouts) with a game in hand means the best-case scenario is holding on to third place and getting throttled by one of them in the 2/3 match.

Back before DUH STREAK when the Hawks were on their first of two extended runs of being a piss-poor team, I said that the Hawks should avoid Central teams they can't beat and drop into the wild cards to cross to the Pacific and get through Los Angeles and one of a weak San Jose/Vancouver/Anaheim/Phoenix blob. Looks like the Hawks may be taking my advice, except since I threw that out there back in December or whenever, the Ducks rounded the corner into one of the best teams in the league, the Sharks turned out to be not so bad, and the Kings recently spanked the Hawks 5-0, so that's probably not a good idea either.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57225
Curious Hair wrote:
Six points back of Dallas and St. Louis (four straight shutouts) with a game in hand means the best-case scenario is holding on to third place and getting throttled by one of them in the 2/3 match.

Back before DUH STREAK when the Hawks were on their first of two extended runs of being a piss-poor team, I said that the Hawks should avoid Central teams they can't beat and drop into the wild cards to cross to the Pacific and get through Los Angeles and one of a weak San Jose/Vancouver/Anaheim/Phoenix blob. Looks like the Hawks may be taking my advice, except since I threw that out there back in December or whenever, the Ducks rounded the corner into one of the best teams in the league, the Sharks turned out to be not so bad, and the Kings recently spanked the Hawks 5-0, so that's probably not a good idea either.

Image

Here is the reality of the situation.

No matter who the Hawks play in the playoffs you are going to predict they are screwed and their season is over.

Just like you did last year. As we are all still waiting for hell to come to breakfast.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19366
RFDC wrote:
No matter who the Hawks play in the playoffs you are going to predict they are screwed and their season is over.

Just like you did last year. As we are all still waiting for hell to come to breakfast.


One of these years he will eventually be correct. :lol:

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Well, the year we only have two NHL-calibre defensemen and a #3 center on our first line ought to be the one.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 3:08 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
I'm inclined to agree with Mr. Hair. I don't see this being the year...too many flaws exposed over the last month.

Just wait till next year.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57225
Mr. Reason wrote:
I'm inclined to agree with Mr. Hair. I don't see this being the year...too many flaws exposed over the last month.



That very well may be the case.

But to proclaim over and over again the season is over, window is shut, etc is just ridiculous.

Enjoy the games. Enjoy the playoffs and see what happens. We have been blessed to have 3 cups. Last year people were saying the same exact things before the playoffs and we all know what happened.

They are capable of winning it again. Maybe they will. Maybe they won't. But there is no reason to live on the edge of the roof every single fucking minute.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55927
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
There's no next year, really. This run was supposed to be over after last year, but then Kane and Crawford pulled career years out of nowhere and propped up a bunch of guys on the downsides of their careers (Toews, Hossa, Seabrook) and assorted bodies who aren't cut out for a division race of this intensity. When the money for Seabrook's fat ass squeezes out even more talent, this won't be pretty. It was a great run, of course.

Seven games left and you have

Vancouver: #3 goalie in the second half of a road back-to-back = loss
Minnesota: road game in the division = loss
Winnipeg: road game in the division but it's the Jets = win
Bruins: haven't seen a passable performance against the Bruins in a long time = loss
Coyotes: home game against a team playing out the string = win
Blues: home game in the division against a team chasing points = loss
Blue Jackets: last game of the year against a tanking team = win
EDIT: that last game is in Columbus so it's possible we don't send a true NHL roster that game and drop it

So you're looking at three wins in the last seven, spot 'em a loser point somewhere in there, that's an even 100 points on the year, which should be enough for our third consecutive third-place finish (EDIT: 98 if they tank the Beej game). Nashville needs ten in seven to pass against the Avs, @Stars, @Pens, Sharks, Avs, Coyotes, @Stars, which is just a shred tougher than the Hawks' slate. (EDIT: make that eight)

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23808
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
I'm a pretty staunch CH defender of always being able to point out the negative side, but I do question that he may put too much effort into it. I mean as much effort as it takes to post on the Internet


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 3:35 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Curious Hair wrote:
There's no next year, really. This run was supposed to be over after last year, but then Kane and Crawford pulled career years out of nowhere and propped up a bunch of guys on the downsides of their careers (Toews, Hossa, Seabrook) and assorted bodies who aren't cut out for a division race of this intensity. When the money for Seabrook's fat ass squeezes out even more talent, this won't be pretty. It was a great run, of course.

Seven games left and you have

Vancouver: #3 goalie in the second half of a road back-to-back = loss
Minnesota: road game in the division = loss
Winnipeg: road game in the division but it's the Jets = win
Bruins: haven't seen a passable performance against the Bruins in a long time = loss
Coyotes: home game against a team playing out the string = win
Blues: home game in the division against a team chasing points = loss
Blue Jackets: last game of the year against a tanking team = win
EDIT: that last game is in Columbus so it's possible we don't send a true NHL roster that game and drop it

So you're looking at three wins in the last seven, spot 'em a loser point somewhere in there, that's an even 100 points on the year, which should be enough for our third consecutive third-place finish (EDIT: 98 if they tank the Beej game). Nashville needs ten in seven to pass against the Avs, @Stars, @Pens, Sharks, Avs, Coyotes, @Stars, which is just a shred tougher than the Hawks' slate. (EDIT: make that eight)

I find it hard to argue with any of your analysis. The only thing is the games are played on the ice, not on paper. I'm not expecting a deep run this year. I wasn't really expecting one last year, either. But I'm a Cub fan, so my lack of optimism is inherent.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33809
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
What happened in this game?

I like shaw.

They've looked no good before, I'm hoping for one more.


Should have won in 2014.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40641
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I don't get this thread. They won and you guys sound like they lost.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: @ Flames
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57225
Curious Hair wrote:
Vancouver: #3 goalie in the second half of a road back-to-back = loss


well what do you know, first try, and CH swings and misses.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group