It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 1:04 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Do the Bulls make the plaoffs with Thibs
yes 89%  89%  [ 16 ]
no 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
better off with Lottery pick 11%  11%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 18
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Just asking.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Yes, by a comfortable margin.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
No doubt. They would have won a dozen or more games simply based on sound defense.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11005
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
i think they would have made it, but would have lost round 1. this team is deeply flawed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
FavreFan wrote:
Yes, by a comfortable margin.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
we werent a flawed team though. everyone thought this was a powerhouse roster beginning of the year, and if we thought rose would play like he did we would have easily expected a finals appearance.

the fact that we missed the playoffs is an absolute joke. sure, dunleevee and noah out really hurt... but we still had enough for an easy entry into the playoffs.

we all speculated early in the season that hoiberg might not have control of this team, and that was SPOT on. furthermore, we even wondered what the hell kind of ball are we looking at in the PRESEASON... because it looked like shit. THAT WAS A SPOT ON ASSESSMENT.

but in all, with a talented group you should still win because players matter more than the coach. the fact that hoiberg wasnt respected is what killed this team. whatever he said or did, who knows... maybe it was just what thibs did and the players knew that guy CARED, even if they didnt care about him they respected his will to win and it was contagious. with hoiberg, it was the masters tournament and we all take home a hefty purse even if we place 15th.

the guy has got to go. this season was a complete embarrassment. DERRICK ROSE CAME BACK AND NOBODY FUCKING NOTICED BECAUSE THE TEAM HAD ZERO IDENTITY.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:58 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Absolutely. Thibs got them to 50 wins last year. This team will have 42 if they win tomorrow. Thibs is absolutely 8 wins above Fred.

But they still would have lost to Cleveland or maybe even another team before they would have gotten to Cleveland.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
yeah and remember when thibs had rose for a full year? 62 wins and an MVP.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:21 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Of course. He could probably lead any team to the playoffs. Talent usually wins at that point.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
His value just went up this season, no?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
I guess KC Johnson is voting!

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 1:03 pm
Posts: 4328
Location: Lake Wynonah, PA
pizza_Place: Il-Forno in Deerfield
IMU wrote:
His value just went up this season, no?

If you have a win now team (Cleveland), absolutely. If you are looking at the long-term, probably not.
His playing philosphy will have players break down over time. After all, Noah's gone this year and it is most likely a direct result of the last few years.

_________________
Krazy Ivan wrote:
Congrats on being better than me, Psycory.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
bigfan wrote:
I guess KC Johnson is voting!


No shit, there. He was getting his shots in on Thibs the other day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Psycory wrote:
IMU wrote:
His value just went up this season, no?

If you have a win now team (Cleveland), absolutely. If you are looking at the long-term, probably not.
His playing philosphy will have players break down over time. After all, Noah's gone this year and it is most likely a direct result of the last few years.

I'm not sure that's entirely fair. 7 footers with a history of feet problem don't last longer than Noah already has usually anyway.

But I'm also not sure Thibs value has increased. NBA folks probably view it similarly to Alvin Gentry and New Orleans, where it's clear that the new guy is just a terrible head coach.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Psycory wrote:
IMU wrote:
His value just went up this season, no?

If you have a win now team (Cleveland), absolutely. If you are looking at the long-term, probably not.
His playing philosphy will have players break down over time. After all, Noah's gone this year and it is most likely a direct result of the last few years.

No I think this is still conceding too much to the front office's spin given the organization-wide dysfunction surrounding injuries. The Bulls medical staff screwed up on multiple occasions before Thibs got here and they did this year as well.

Your example of Noah is one such case since we know since he was cleared after the bare minimum amount of time for the sprained shoulder that would become the torn labrum. Rose was clearly still compromised by the eye injury to start the year, yet there was no hesitation throwing him out there. Likewise, Butler's second injury this year was the result of being rushed back too quickly from his first injury of the year. He's likewise continued to be among the league leaders in minutes per game for players' coach Hoiberg (down one whopping minute compared to Thibodeau), yet for some reason the work rate of the players hasn't been a talking point this year.

Honestly I think Minnesota is the best place for Thibodeau, but I hope he doesn't so Jerry has to continue to pay 2 coaches with no playoff revenue next year too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
ZephMarshack wrote:
Honestly I think Minnesota is the best place for Thibodeau, but I hope he doesn't so Jerry has to continue to pay 2 coaches with no playoff revenue next year too.


I hope Minnesota doesn't can their current coach. I think he's earned another year with a very young team. Just like I thought Monty Williams started to turn the corner with the Pelicans last year & (then they all) took it in the moon.

I'd love to see Jerry have to pay two coaches now myself, if only to publicly force a continuing discussion about the worst front office in town.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Peoria Matt wrote:
bigfan wrote:
I guess KC Johnson is voting!


No shit, there. He was getting his shots in on Thibs the other day.


KC looking for Asst coach job?

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The top 7 guys in the Bulls rotation will have missed a combined total of 171 games by the end of this season. In Thibs 1st season coaching he had 7 or 8 guys play in 80 or more games. In his 2nd yr. 6 played in 60 or more games. (Only 66 games).

During the Augustin season which many tout as his most significant coaching achievement, top 7 missed 104 games (72 of them by Rose).

The fact remains that for all the talk regarding next man up his teams were relatively speaking healthy in most cases. In some instances they were remarkably healthy. He probably gets them to their playoffs as an 8th seed if all things are equal. It's not the slam dunk that some believe it to be though. They should have won more than 50 last season.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:39 pm
Posts: 379
Location: Florida
pizza_Place: Dickman's
Firing Thib's is one of the biggest Chicago sports management fuck ups of all time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
The top 7 guys in the Bulls rotation will have missed a combined total of 171 games by the end of this season. In Thibs 1st season coaching he had 7 or 8 guys play in 80 or more games. In his 2nd yr. 6 played in 60 or more games. (Only 66 games).

During the Augustin season which many tout as his most significant coaching achievement, top 7 missed 104 games (72 of them by Rose).

The fact remains that for all the talk regarding next man up his teams were relatively speaking healthy in most cases. In some instances they were remarkably healthy. He probably gets them to their playoffs as an 8th seed if all things are equal. It's not the slam dunk that some believe it to be though. They should have won more than 50 last season.

So Thibs' problem while he was here was that he wasn't conscientious enough about his players' health, and now that he's gone, the problem with comparing him to Hoiberg is that his players were too healthy. Got it.

The two players who missed the most games this year were Noah, who was promptly benched by the boy genius at the start of the season anyway, and Dunleavy, who's scarcely looked better than the craptastic wings who had to fill in for him. Injuries are not a convincing excuse for Hoiberg's performance, and if talent is the issue, then the people who assembled the talent should not be the ones trusted with the opportunity to rebuild the roster.


Last edited by ZephMarshack on Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Mike Dunleavy is like an 11th man on a good team at this point. Let's just stop.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Mike Dunleavy is like an 11th man on a good team at this point. Let's just stop.


The Bulls can't be considered both talent laden and have Mike Dunleavy in their starting lineup. The same goes for Taj Gibson. That is probably the shittiest starting forward combo in the league.

That is why I choose to cut Hoiberg a little slack. He has made mistakes but the biggest issue on this team is talent. There is a major deficit in that area. I overrated some of their guys, namely Mirotic and Snell. I have repeatedly stated that Dunleavy as a starting 3 isn't going to cut it. Taj as your starting 4 wasnt going to do it either. We got both this yr. and the results were not all that surprising.

For what it's worth he is your starting 3 man though so he has to be factored in the top 7 players. He also started for Thibs.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Mike Dunleavy is like an 11th man on a good team at this point. Let's just stop.


The Bulls can't be considered both talent laden and have Mike Dunleavy in their starting lineup. The same goes for Taj Gibson. That is probably the shittiest starting forward combo in the league.

That is why I choose to cut Hoiberg a little slack. He has made mistakes but the biggest issue on this team is talent. There is a major deficit in that area. I overrated some of their guys, namely Mirotic and Snell. I have repeatedly stated that Dunleavy as a starting 3 isn't going to cut it. Taj as your starting 4 wasnt going to do it either. We got both this yr. and the results were not all that surprising.

For what it's worth he is your starting 3 man though so he has to be factored in the top 7 players. He also started for Thibs.

So your talent must suck if Dunleavy in your starting lineup, yet a team that won 50 games with him in the starting lineup underachieved?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Mike Dunleavy is like an 11th man on a good team at this point. Let's just stop.


The Bulls can't be considered both talent laden and have Mike Dunleavy in their starting lineup. The same goes for Taj Gibson. That is probably the shittiest starting forward combo in the league.

That is why I choose to cut Hoiberg a little slack. He has made mistakes but the biggest issue on this team is talent. There is a major deficit in that area. I overrated some of their guys, namely Mirotic and Snell. I have repeatedly stated that Dunleavy as a starting 3 isn't going to cut it. Taj as your starting 4 wasnt going to do it either. We got both this yr. and the results were not all that surprising.

For what it's worth he is your starting 3 man though so he has to be factored in the top 7 players. He also started for Thibs.

So your talent must suck if Dunleavy in your starting lineup, yet a team that won 50 games with him in the starting lineup underachieved?


You sure didn't seem to have a problem with FavreFan's assertion that he is an 11th man on a good team.

He was a much better player last season. Having him in your starting lineup didn't kill the Bulls. He looks to be finished this season. If you are arguing that he is a quality NBA player after watching him this season then I don't know what to tell you. He is finished. Taj Gibson isn't that good either. Worse pair of starting forwards in the league.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The top 7 guys in the Bulls rotation will have missed a combined total of 171 games by the end of this season. In Thibs 1st season coaching he had 7 or 8 guys play in 80 or more games. In his 2nd yr. 6 played in 60 or more games. (Only 66 games).

During the Augustin season which many tout as his most significant coaching achievement, top 7 missed 104 games (72 of them by Rose).

The fact remains that for all the talk regarding next man up his teams were relatively speaking healthy in most cases. In some instances they were remarkably healthy. He probably gets them to their playoffs as an 8th seed if all things are equal. It's not the slam dunk that some believe it to be though. They should have won more than 50 last season.

So Thibs' problem while he was here was that he wasn't conscientious enough about his players' health, and now that he's gone, the problem with comparing him to Hoiberg is that his players were too healthy. Got it.

The two players who missed the most games this year were Noah, who was promptly benched by the boy genius at the start of the season anyway, and Dunleavy, who's scarcely looked better than the craptastic wings who had to fill in for him. Injuries are not a convincing excuse for Hoiberg's performance, and if talent is the issue, then the people who assembled the talent should not be the ones trusted with the opportunity to rebuild the roster.



I never blamed Thibs for the injuries so I don't know where you are getting that from. The top 7 guys have missed a combined 171 games this season. Injuries to key guys effect every team in every sport. It doesn't jive with the Hoiberg sucks narrative and thus it must be ignored.

It's not that his players were too healthy either. He never had the injuries that Hoiberg endured this yr. I provided facts not opinions. The Bulls used over 20 different starting lineups this season.

Hoiberg may be a bad coach but when you look at the Bulls you see that this is not a talented team. I think that he would have had this team in the playoffs, but you only need about 2 more wins in order to accomplish this. That isn't really saying much.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:

You sure didn't seem to have a problem with FavreFan's assertion that he is an 11th man on a good team.

He was a much better player last season. Having him in your starting lineup didn't kill the Bulls. He looks to be finished this season. If you are arguing that he is a quality NBA player after watching him this season then I don't know what to tell you. He is finished. Taj Gibson isn't that good either. Worse pair of starting forwards in the league.

I agree Dunleavy sucked this year and indeed said as much in my post. That's why the fact that he missed as many games as anyone bar Noah is not an adequate excuse for Hoiberg's performance. I also don't think he was a very high quality starting 3 last year either though, so even if he was worse this year, there was still a dearth of talent at that position during Thibs' last year.

I'm happy to cut Hoiberg slack on the talent issue rather than the injury excuse, but then I'm left wondering why anyone would want the front office that singlehandedly created this talent issue to stick around to try to fix it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Image

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
I never blamed Thibs for the injuries so I don't know where you are getting that from.
But across the board that was the primary issue between him and the front office cited for his sacking.

Quote:
The top 7 guys have missed a combined 171 games this season. Injuries to key guys effect every team in every sport. It doesn't jive with the Hoiberg sucks narrative and thus it must be ignored.
Again, over 100 of those games are from Noah, who was benched, and Dunleavy, who was no better than anyone who replaced him. I would also say that the use of top 7 alone is a rather coarse measure given that the loss of #7 weighted no differently from the loss of your top guy.

Quote:
It's not that his players were too healthy either. He never had the injuries that Hoiberg endured this yr. I provided facts not opinions. The Bulls used over 20 different starting lineups this season.
The Bulls missed 188 games due to injury in 2012-2013, with their indisputable best player out for the entirety of the season.

Quote:
Hoiberg may be a bad coach but when you look at the Bulls you see that this is not a talented team. I think that he would have had this team in the playoffs, but you only need about 2 more wins in order to accomplish this. That isn't really saying much.

Again, I'm happy to give Hoiberg slack on the talent issue, but that just indicates gross mismanagement by those responsible for collecting that talent. And given that the Bulls 142.5 games lost due to injury on average over the preceding 4 years, the injuries could be seen neither as unprecedented nor unexpected by the management in question.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 2:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I never blamed Thibs for the injuries so I don't know where you are getting that from.
But across the board that was the primary issue between him and the front office cited for his sacking.

Quote:
The top 7 guys have missed a combined 171 games this season. Injuries to key guys effect every team in every sport. It doesn't jive with the Hoiberg sucks narrative and thus it must be ignored.
Again, over 100 of those games are from Noah, who was benched, and Dunleavy, who was no better than anyone who replaced him. I would also say that the use of top 7 alone is a rather coarse measure given that the loss of #7 weighted no differently from the loss of your top guy.

Quote:
It's not that his players were too healthy either. He never had the injuries that Hoiberg endured this yr. I provided facts not opinions. The Bulls used over 20 different starting lineups this season.
The Bulls missed 188 games due to injury in 2012-2013, with their indisputable best player out for the entirety of the season.

Quote:
Hoiberg may be a bad coach but when you look at the Bulls you see that this is not a talented team. I think that he would have had this team in the playoffs, but you only need about 2 more wins in order to accomplish this. That isn't really saying much.

Again, I'm happy to give Hoiberg slack on the talent issue, but that just indicates gross mismanagement by those responsible for collecting that talent. And given that the Bulls 142.5 games lost due to injury on average over the preceding 4 years, the injuries could be seen neither as unprecedented nor unexpected by the management in question.



You are basically suggesting by the use of the term "weighted", that there isn't any difference between the Bulls best player Butler and there 7th best player Gibson/Dunleavy? Give me a break. Secondly it's obvious that Dunleavy was a better player last season. As was Pau Gasol too for that matter. Gasol at 34 had one of his best seasons. He was a hall of famer that played like a Hall of Famer. The Noah "benched" stuff isn't registering either. The Bulls were 8 games up prior to his injury. If there theoretically isn't much difference between Dunleavy and guys that replaced him, then why is Dunleavy continuing to start? Shouldn't a 35 yr old that is obviously on his last legs be benched because after all there isn't much difference? Obviously he is considered the better player.

Citing the totality of Bulls injuries during selected Thibs yrs (2013) is a misnomer too and a good use of rhetorical sleight of hand. If I were to sight games missed due to injury for the entire roster what would my number be?

Also while Rose was a difficult injury to overcome, the Bulls still had high level players without him. He was there best player, but the Bulls still had Deng and Noah, both All Stars even without him. In addition was Boozer, who was a starting caliber power forward at the time. Gibson isnt.

If the Bulls finish at 42-40 then it's probably safe to say that they make the playoffs in any of the Thibodeau yrs.

I'm not happy with Hoiberg, but this failure is moreso a failure of Garpax. I love how the Bulls such great talent, yet if you'd asked people on here about players like Bairstow, Felicio, and Holiday before the season, no one could have told you anything.

Thibs would probably have made this team a 7th or 8th seed, but he is no miracle worker.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 8:03 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I don't know if your math is correct but all injuries aren't the same. Losing a superstar for the season is worse than losing Dunleavy. Losing a superstar and trading your 2nd best player while you are several games under. 500 usually means you are a lottery team. With the exception of an aging Noah the Bulls didn't lose any important guy for an extended period of time this season.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group