Well, I'd disagree with that. It's like saying a TV show is "harassing" you. You're free to turn it off any time.

I rarely troll.

Here's Webster on "harassment"



Certainly not #1, as the tweets numbered 4 and were sent within moments of each other. Maybe #2, maybe? What was the "unpleasant or hostile situation" created by Julie seeing vile things on her phone? Unpleasant, sure, but is it a "situation" if you can just put your phone down and the "harassment" is abated, or block the guy and never see him tweet something at you again? Uninvited? Hardly, she created a public account, and has numerous times refused to protect her tweets, twitter's most viable way of dealing with trolls.

There's absolutely zero credibility to anything even remotely threatening said by that asshole, so any feeling of hostility or fear is unreasonable and irrational.

Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Mitch, Julie will have to stay home until she knows this guy is incarcerated.

they'll just give her an ISDN line so she can misspeak from home. I find julie annoying, bad at her job, and her SJW/"look at me taking twitter abuse shtick" to be obnoxious.... but nobody deserves to be talked to in that manner and i would call that harassment.

they'll just give her an ISDN line so she can misspeak from home. I find julie annoying, bad at her job, and her SJW/"look at me taking twitter abuse shtick" to be obnoxious.... but nobody deserves to be talked to in that manner and i would call that harassment.

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Some guy saying he's going to re-rape Julie is abhorrent and a childish way to deal with a weird fascination with defending Kobe Bryant, but it's not a "threat" in any reasonable interpretation of the term.

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

Not it isn't. I mean, literally, it isn't anything like that. Not even a tiny bit.

I rarely troll.

JORR vs BRick heating up!

Its also not a threat because technically you can't re-rape someone who's never been raped.

And we already proved in the last thread that her rape story had more holes in it than a upstate NY evidence bag.

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

It is pretty simple. If he had called her cell phone and said those things we'd all think it is harassment. If your wife or girlfriend got a call that was saying that you'd be thinking she was being harassed.

But, for some reason, with twitter, she should stop being so dramatic.

Julie DiCaroVerified account
‏@JulieDiCaro Julie DiCaro Retweeted Lukas Mikelionis
Thankfully, the Guardian piece at issue proved it's a gender issue, genius.Julie DiCaro added,
Lukas Mikelionis @LukasMikelionis
Thankfully, there's always a feminist who will make this a gender issue

Apples and bowling balls, BRick, come on. A telephone number is a quasi-private (and in some cases literally private) means of direct communication, given out at the discretion of the owner at the time. A public twitter account is indexed and searchable, its tweets able to be seen, and intended to be seen, by anyone with an internet connection.

If my wife or girlfriend was publishing her phone number on the internet regularly for the express purpose of having people interact with her via the telephone, I would say they have quite the weaker position of outrage at having people say things they don't like on the phone.

Apples and bowling balls, BRick, come on. A telephone number is a quasi-private (and in some cases literally private) means of direct communication, given out at the discretion of the owner at the time. A public twitter account is indexed and searchable, its tweets able to be seen, and intended to be seen, by anyone with an internet connection.

If my wife or girlfriend was publishing her phone number on the internet regularly for the express purpose of having people interact with her via the telephone, I would say they have quite the weaker position of outrage at having people say things they don't like on the phone.

Fine. Let's say someone says that to her in a public park? Is it harassment?

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

That guy needs to be banned. We can all criticize Julie for plenty of stuff related to on air performance or the some of the silly stuff she tweets. But that guy went way over the line. To make it worse, he continued it with several tweets and even referenced Chicago.

Let's not allow our dislike of her opinions blind us from people being way out of line.

And to equate what goes around here (where we sorta know one another and get the jokes) to that type of stuff on Twitter is pretty off base.

I'm confused. Did the dude threaten to rape her? If so, it's wrong and should be shouted down by everyone. There is really no context needed. The method of communication is irrelevant.

We're not discussing whether the guy is a jerk-off. That isn't in question. We're discussing whether it's harassment, a traumatic event, a real threat.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.