It is currently Tue Feb 25, 2025 1:58 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 230 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:21 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80573
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
GoldenJet wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
And I never said it was "wrong". It's just a more extreme example of a mental disorder


...ok


I'm not sure what your ok means, but obviously this discussion is getting far afield. Clearly, a nose job or a tattoo isn't the same as a sex change. Rick brought those things up and I clumsily attempted to address them. My point was simply that in an ideal world we'd all be happy with exactly who we are and the way we are.

Tattoos have become so interwoven with modern fashion they shouldn't be part of the discussion. (Still, I know many people for whom tattoos/body mods have become an obsession. Very few people stop at just one.)

But with regard to plastic surgeries, obviously we're talking about people who feel their natural looks are inadequate in some regard. That in itself is a problem society would be well-served to address.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'm a live and let live guy. I don't care what anyone does as long as it doesn't affect me. But I think Juice's has laid out a good case on why reassignment surgery isn't a great idea. If a man could have his junk lopped off and ride happily off into the sunset as a woman, what kind of monster would disagree with that? Unfortunately, that isn't usually how it works.
Why is that our business?

I mean, if the medical profession decides that it is unacceptable that is different but it seems like the modern ideas about it are that it is a good but not complete solution. Ironically, much of the issues around it seem to come from how society treats them.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:24 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80573
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'm a live and let live guy. I don't care what anyone does as long as it doesn't affect me. But I think Juice's has laid out a good case on why reassignment surgery isn't a great idea. If a man could have his junk lopped off and ride happily off into the sunset as a woman, what kind of monster would disagree with that? Unfortunately, that isn't usually how it works.
Why is that our business?


Why is any mental illness our business? You sound like Rahm Emanuel. Fuck 'em. Let 'em wander the streets.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19347
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
I don't get transgender people, I think it's odd but I also don't give a flying fuck where they want to piss and shit.


You don't "get them" because they're not normal, so you can drop the pretense that you're not clear on what normal is.

Like you, I don't care where anyone pisses or shits. As long as it's not on my floor or my couch. But there are obviously many people that do care. I see guys in the men's room all the time that piss in a stall, which I find odd. Obviously they have issues pissing at the urinal next to me. I'm sure we have more than one or two members of this form who simply are incapable of shitting in a public restroom. This is a very personal thing. I'll ask again, why is the man wearing a dress entitled to more comfort than Spaulding? And do you really think Spaulding is a bigot because she would be uncomfortable walking into the ladies' room and seeing Sharon Needles with her cock out?


If you read my response to pittmike that's my answer. As I understand it it's more than just comfort the person is getting by using the woman's bathroom.

I have a divorce case right now where opposing counsel and her client are transgender. They are both assholes. They are also both people. I see the looks they get as they walk through the courthouse. I see how the clerks and judges react to them. I've had multiple lawyers come up and ask me "what it's like to have a case with those freaks". The people that aren't openly hostile to them will talk shit about them behind their backs.

I don't get why someone who has male genitals would want to be a woman, but I'm not going to begrudge someone for feeling that way. I don't think Spaulding is a bigot for feeling uncomfortable sharing a bathroom with a man who believes he is a woman. She and everyone else has got a right to feel however they want about anything. However, if personal comfort is the only reason that Spaulding and others can come up with as to why a trans person shouldn't be allowed to use a bathroom, then it's not a compelling reason.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Then the only right solution was already posted and the thread should be over.

Hatchetman wrote:
I'm all for making all facilities co-ed. Would eliminate all these problems and irrational fears.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Brick - in heels you'd be like 7 feet tall and could easily look right over stall walls. Problem?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:13 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80573
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
SpiralStairs wrote:
I have a divorce case right now where opposing counsel and her client are transgender. They are both assholes. They are also both people. I see the looks they get as they walk through the courthouse. I see how the clerks and judges react to them.


What judge is it in front of?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19347
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
I have a divorce case right now where opposing counsel and her client are transgender. They are both assholes. They are also both people. I see the looks they get as they walk through the courthouse. I see how the clerks and judges react to them.


What judge is it in front of?


I've said too much already.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:18 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80573
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
I have a divorce case right now where opposing counsel and her client are transgender. They are both assholes. They are also both people. I see the looks they get as they walk through the courthouse. I see how the clerks and judges react to them.


What judge is it in front of?


I've said too much already.


:lol: Yeah, probably. But I doubt any Circuit Court judges are reading this. When dolphin gets appointed to the federal bench he'll be our first CSFMB judge.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
rogers park bryan wrote:
I really dont know what to say about all this.


Maybe we should separate bathrooms by age


Yeah, this is pretty much how I feel. My impulse reaction is usually to side with the "minority" rights because of how childish and judgmental many are in the discussion of gay rights. But I must admit that the transgender argument is much more difficult and has many more potential ramifications like the one being discussed here (I'm not saying the two are the same - it's just similar in a sense that a relatively small group of people is trying to obtain "rights" that decades ago wouldn't have even been considered).

Honestly, the whole thing doesnt "seem" right or that anyone should be able to decide to change genders (just being honest). However, most of the arguments I would use against it would almost certainly make me a hypocrite, given my thoughts on gay rights (comfortability, slippery-slope, etc.) This is a tricky one. All I'm sure about is that I don't want Muslims using my bathroom.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80573
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
SpiralStairs wrote:
However, if personal comfort is the only reason that Spaulding and others can come up with as to why a trans person shouldn't be allowed to use a bathroom, then it's not a compelling reason.


But isn't personal comfort the only reason transgendered people want to be allowed to use a certain bathroom? Why is it such a compelling reason on that side of the argument?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
Hatchetman wrote:
Brick - in heels you'd be like 7 feet tall and could easily look right over stall walls. Problem?
I guess we could have special bathrooms for tall people.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33244
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
It is a tricky question. I think you can equate much of it to the gay rights debate though. From the perspective of a gay or transgender person, their preference (either in partners or their own gender) is not a matter of choice. It is something they were born with and have no control over. So a transgender person born with male physical features would have the "soul" of a female. To them they are a female and have always been a female regardless of how they appear.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32164
pizza_Place: Milano's
I will never understand the bathrooms in this country. Why is it that the doors on the stalls do not come all the way down to the floor?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
I will never understand the bathrooms in this country. Why is it that the doors on the stalls do not come all the way down to the floor?
So you can see if a man is wearing high heels to see you taking a dump.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
walls to the floor would make glory holes much more titillating.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19347
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
However, if personal comfort is the only reason that Spaulding and others can come up with as to why a trans person shouldn't be allowed to use a bathroom, then it's not a compelling reason.


But isn't personal comfort the only reason transgendered people want to be allowed to use a certain bathroom? Why is it such a compelling reason on that side of the argument?


Like I said to pittmike, it's more than just personal comfort. Many people are uneasy seeing a trans person anywhere, let alone a bathroom. If a man dressed as a woman goes to a sporting event, a bar, really any place where there are lots of people and booze around and walks into the men's bathroom there is a very real risk they could be harmed.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
I have a divorce case right now where opposing counsel and her client are transgender. They are both assholes. They are also both people. I see the looks they get as they walk through the courthouse. I see how the clerks and judges react to them.


What judge is it in front of?


I've said too much already.


:lol: Yeah, probably. But I doubt any Circuit Court judges are reading this. When dolphin gets appointed to the federal bench he'll be our first CSFMB judge.

I thought that's who Obama nominated for Scalia's throne.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23574
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
No. You're equivocating like a motherfucker. Words having definitions and meanings and the term human being and outcast had no bias there. I meant them as they are intended to be used.


The false dichotomy of "human being or [some bad term]" is a tired argumentative trope employed the likes of Tumblr otherkin, SJW identity politics, etc. It is used to paint anyone that dares deviate from the dictations of the LGBTQ+ community on how exactly to treat transgender individuals as a bigot right off the bat. And anyone that is in for a penny on "human being" is in for a pound on anything and everything else, because to question would be not treating them as "human beings". Sorry, I'm not engaging on such a dubious front.

Quote:
The fact that you're in such denial about that simple question and have to try to change definitions of words and phrases speaks volumes to how you view transgender people.


See? You did use the terms in that way, and you didn't even know it. Of course I don't think of transsexuals and those suffering gender dysphoria as "less than", come on, nothing I've said in this thread--barring disingenuous interpretations of a metaphor I used concerning statutory rape--has indicated such.

Quote:
Automatically associating them with child molesting predators is probably a terrible way to start a dialogue on this.


Oh, there's the disingenuous interpretation of the metaphor. That was explained earlier in the thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
So a man in drag goes to the men's room and Curt Schilling is cool with it right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23574
pizza_Place: Giordano's
denisdman wrote:
So a transgender person born with male physical features would have the "soul" of a female. To them they are a female and have always been a female regardless of how they appear.


Would you give a bulimic a tongue depressor with which they can induce vomiting easier?

Would you send someone claiming to be Napoleon to a tailor and plastic surgeon to make them shorter?

Does society tell the guy seeking out designer steroids so he can look like a superhero where he can find the good Chinese stuff?

Would you send someone saying they've always felt and wanted to present as Asian to that same exotic plastic surgeon?

Do we encourage the guy trying to look like a Ken Doll to keep going to the nose cutter so he can get that bridge juuuuust right?

No, we send all these people the psychiatrist's chair, because those feelings aren't normal. All of those people "feel" a certain dysphoria concerning their bodies and their place in society, but we don't encourage or indulge their behaviors when they cross over into "clinical disorder" territory.

But, for some reason, we tell someone that wants to mutilate their body and its hormone ratio because they've always felt like a woman, to stay off the psychiatrist's chair, and tell them to get right into hormone treatment and the OR. Then we tell the rest of society to now deal with biological males using the same bathroom and locker room facilities as, for lack of a better term, "normal" biological females, because that's how the biological male decided to "present" today. Any attempt to deviate or push back against this is labeled as bigotry and "hate speech" (a statute I just know is coming).

Something is wrong here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93660
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
denisdman wrote:
So a transgender person born with male physical features would have the "soul" of a female. To them they are a female and have always been a female regardless of how they appear.


Would you give a bulimic a tongue depressor with which they can induce vomiting easier?

Would you send someone claiming to be Napoleon to a tailor and plastic surgeon to make them shorter?

Does society tell the guy seeking out designer steroids so he can look like a superhero where he can find the good Chinese stuff?

Would you send someone saying they've always felt and wanted to present as Asian to that same exotic plastic surgeon?

Do we encourage the guy trying to look like a Ken Doll to keep going to the nose cutter so he can get that bridge juuuuust right?

No, we send all these people the psychiatrist's chair, because those feelings aren't normal. All of those people "feel" a certain dysphoria concerning their bodies and their place in society, but we don't encourage or indulge their behaviors when they cross over into "clinical disorder" territory.

But, for some reason, we tell someone that wants to mutilate their body and its hormone ratio because they've always felt like a woman, to stay off the psychiatrist's chair, and tell them to get right into hormone treatment and the OR. Then we tell the rest of society to now deal with biological males using the same bathroom and locker room facilities as, for lack of a better term, "normal" biological females, because that's how the biological male decided to "present" today. Any attempt to deviate or push back against this is labeled as bigotry and "hate speech" (a statute I just know is coming).

Something is wrong here.
This is a guy that doesn't understand that gender is more than XX or XY.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19347
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
denisdman wrote:
So a transgender person born with male physical features would have the "soul" of a female. To them they are a female and have always been a female regardless of how they appear.


Would you give a bulimic a tongue depressor with which they can induce vomiting easier?

Would you send someone claiming to be Napoleon to a tailor and plastic surgeon to make them shorter?

Does society tell the guy seeking out designer steroids so he can look like a superhero where he can find the good Chinese stuff?

Would you send someone saying they've always felt and wanted to present as Asian to that same exotic plastic surgeon?

Do we encourage the guy trying to look like a Ken Doll to keep going to the nose cutter so he can get that bridge juuuuust right?

No, we send all these people the psychiatrist's chair, because those feelings aren't normal. All of those people "feel" a certain dysphoria concerning their bodies and their place in society, but we don't encourage or indulge their behaviors when they cross over into "clinical disorder" territory.

But, for some reason, we tell someone that wants to mutilate their body and its hormone ratio because they've always felt like a woman, to stay off the psychiatrist's chair, and tell them to get right into hormone treatment and the OR. Then we tell the rest of society to now deal with biological males using the same bathroom and locker room facilities as, for lack of a better term, "normal" biological females, because that's how the biological male decided to "present" today. Any attempt to deviate or push back against this is labeled as bigotry and "hate speech" (a statute I just know is coming).

Something is wrong here.


I still have yet to hear a compelling argument as to why this matters at all.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Like I said, I'm all "up" for co-ed locker rooms at the gym. Unfortunately I don't think there will be many women in there.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23574
pizza_Place: Giordano's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
denisdman wrote:
So a transgender person born with male physical features would have the "soul" of a female. To them they are a female and have always been a female regardless of how they appear.


Would you give a bulimic a tongue depressor with which they can induce vomiting easier?

Would you send someone claiming to be Napoleon to a tailor and plastic surgeon to make them shorter?

Does society tell the guy seeking out designer steroids so he can look like a superhero where he can find the good Chinese stuff?

Would you send someone saying they've always felt and wanted to present as Asian to that same exotic plastic surgeon?

Do we encourage the guy trying to look like a Ken Doll to keep going to the nose cutter so he can get that bridge juuuuust right?

No, we send all these people the psychiatrist's chair, because those feelings aren't normal. All of those people "feel" a certain dysphoria concerning their bodies and their place in society, but we don't encourage or indulge their behaviors when they cross over into "clinical disorder" territory.

But, for some reason, we tell someone that wants to mutilate their body and its hormone ratio because they've always felt like a woman, to stay off the psychiatrist's chair, and tell them to get right into hormone treatment and the OR. Then we tell the rest of society to now deal with biological males using the same bathroom and locker room facilities as, for lack of a better term, "normal" biological females, because that's how the biological male decided to "present" today. Any attempt to deviate or push back against this is labeled as bigotry and "hate speech" (a statute I just know is coming).

Something is wrong here.


I still have yet to hear a compelling argument as to why this matters at all.


I still have yet to hear a compelling argument as to why the comfort of transgender individuals is more important than the comfort of, again for lack of a better term, "normal" adults using the same facilities.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33907
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
However, if personal comfort is the only reason that Spaulding and others can come up with as to why a trans person shouldn't be allowed to use a bathroom, then it's not a compelling reason.


But isn't personal comfort the only reason transgendered people want to be allowed to use a certain bathroom? Why is it such a compelling reason on that side of the argument?


If it shouldn't matter to me, then why does it matter to the the transgendered people where they pee? Why can't they use any bathroom?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19347
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
denisdman wrote:
So a transgender person born with male physical features would have the "soul" of a female. To them they are a female and have always been a female regardless of how they appear.


Would you give a bulimic a tongue depressor with which they can induce vomiting easier?

Would you send someone claiming to be Napoleon to a tailor and plastic surgeon to make them shorter?

Does society tell the guy seeking out designer steroids so he can look like a superhero where he can find the good Chinese stuff?

Would you send someone saying they've always felt and wanted to present as Asian to that same exotic plastic surgeon?

Do we encourage the guy trying to look like a Ken Doll to keep going to the nose cutter so he can get that bridge juuuuust right?

No, we send all these people the psychiatrist's chair, because those feelings aren't normal. All of those people "feel" a certain dysphoria concerning their bodies and their place in society, but we don't encourage or indulge their behaviors when they cross over into "clinical disorder" territory.

But, for some reason, we tell someone that wants to mutilate their body and its hormone ratio because they've always felt like a woman, to stay off the psychiatrist's chair, and tell them to get right into hormone treatment and the OR. Then we tell the rest of society to now deal with biological males using the same bathroom and locker room facilities as, for lack of a better term, "normal" biological females, because that's how the biological male decided to "present" today. Any attempt to deviate or push back against this is labeled as bigotry and "hate speech" (a statute I just know is coming).

Something is wrong here.


I still have yet to hear a compelling argument as to why this matters at all.


I still have yet to hear a compelling argument as to why the comfort of transgender individuals is more important than the comfort of, again for lack of a better term, "normal" adults using the same facilities.


As I've said multiple times in this thread it is more than just comfort that a trans person is provided when they use a bathroom. If a man dressed as a woman were to use the men's bathroom there is a very real possibility that they could be harmed, either verbally or physically. The right to use a bathroom without the risk of being verbally or physically assaulted trumps the right to not feel offended by the sight of a person who looks like a man using the women's bathroom.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80573
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
SpiralStairs wrote:
As I've said multiple times in this thread it is more than just comfort that a trans person is provided when they use a bathroom. If a man dressed as a woman were to use the men's bathroom there is a very real possibility that they could be harmed, either verbally or physically. The right to use a bathroom without the risk of being verbally or physically assaulted trumps the right to not feel offended by the sight of a person who looks like a man using the women's bathroom.


I think this is where we're hitting the disconnect. I highly doubt Spaulding is offended by the sight of a penis.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Spaulding wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
However, if personal comfort is the only reason that Spaulding and others can come up with as to why a trans person shouldn't be allowed to use a bathroom, then it's not a compelling reason.


But isn't personal comfort the only reason transgendered people want to be allowed to use a certain bathroom? Why is it such a compelling reason on that side of the argument?


[b][b]If it shouldn't matter to me, then why does it matter to the the transgendered people where they pee? Why can't they use any bathroom?[/b][/b]


Because they kick and scream louder.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
SpiralStairs wrote:
As I've said multiple times in this thread it is more than just comfort that a trans person is provided when they use a bathroom. If a man dressed as a woman were to use the men's bathroom there is a very real possibility that they could be harmed, either verbally or physically. The right to use a bathroom without the risk of being verbally or physically assaulted trumps the right to not feel offended by the sight of a person who looks like a man using the women's bathroom.



Then there must be zero chance the women in that bathroom a transgender uses would verbally assault them either?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 230 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group