Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls aren't cheap but there has been a lingering perception that they won't ever go for it if the opportunity presents itself. That's simply fallacious. They haven't lost out on the James's, Wades, Anthony's, Durants, of the world because they refuse to pay. They have lost out because outside of James, the others would rather stay with their own team. The system is rigged so that there won't be much player movement. Why is it really surprising once they decide not to leave?
It's rigged now but people don't forget about the early 2000's when star players repeatedly chose other teams over the Bulls. We feel like the Bulls always finish 2nd. Kinda like the Sox. Aggressive enough to be in the conversation but never good enough to close the deal.
Off the top of my head here are the players in the past 15+ years that said no or the Bulls failed to get in a trade.
McGrady
Grant Hill
Jermaine O'Neal
Kobe
Gasol
Wade
LeBron
Marshmelo
Bosh
This is a classic example of revisionist history. The only person on this list that arguably spurned the Bulls was McGrady. That's it.
Did you read my post before typing?
Against my better judgment I actually did. The only person that the Bulls "failed" to get was McGrady.
I don't consider any of the others a failure on the part of the Bulls. The biggest mistake they made with Gasol was in not drafting him.
Quote:
i kind of agree with LTG on this. Lumping trades in with "missed" free agents is misleading with regard to the primary argument (free agents avoiding the Bull). The problem is that as fans we focus on the Bulls, but the reality is that recent top tier free agents have chosen from only a handful of teams...thus they have "spurned" 3/4 of the league. Further, they have chosen destinations rather than teams. NYC, Orlando, Miami, L.A. And most recently Cleveland. That isn't the fault of Management. You might as well blame Rahm or Daley.
Trades and drafting are a different story but also a different argument.
It is a major conflating of the argument to include trades that no one was able to make, players that colluded to sign with other teams, players that chose to resign for more money with their current team etc. That is not necessarily guys "spurning" the Bulls.
To be honest S.A never signed major free agents when they won championships. Dallas didn't sign one either. Neither did G S. Detroit didn't sign a major free agent the yr they won the championship. Miami's first was not due to a free agent signing either. Emphasis on signing of free agents is fallacious. It's only value lie in tricking said team's fan base into thinking their team is doing whatever it takes to win.
_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.