It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 7:42 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 598 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 20  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Turner is not a prospect. He was a rookie this year. Giolito is their best prospect. Robles is their #2. And when Turner was a prospect, he was #2 behind Giolito.

So, Sox would be getting their best prospect.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Sale would join NL Cy Young award winner Max Scherzer to form baseball best righty-lefty rotation tandem in baseball

Lester and Hendricks disagree.


And they would be wrong


The analysts? I agree.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:43 pm
Posts: 2609
pizza_Place: Lucio's
America wrote:
http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=21-0597630963614228341-4

Any hope you may have held that the rest of the deal after Giolito and Robles would be the next 5 best players in the Nats system is evaporating quickly. They are going to get straight up fleeced.


Hahn is a fool.

Giolito and Robles and a low level minor leaguer?

What a joke.

Go fleece Houston - gotta get at least 3 top level prospects and another piece or two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6549
pizza_Place: Giordano's
'77Cubs wrote:
America wrote:
http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=21-0597630963614228341-4

Any hope you may have held that the rest of the deal after Giolito and Robles would be the next 5 best players in the Nats system is evaporating quickly. They are going to get straight up fleeced.


Hahn is a fool.

Giolito and Robles and a low level minor leaguer?

What a joke.

Go fleece Houston - gotta get at least 3 top level prospects and another piece or two.



I don't want any part of this type of trade.

I might be with Jorr on this. Acquire guys and make a run. You have a nice 3 man front with Sale, Q, and Rodon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:01 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Turner is not a prospect. He was a rookie this year. Giolito is their best prospect. Robles is their #2. And when Turner was a prospect, he was #2 behind Giolito.

So, Sox would be getting their best prospect.



Whatever. I'm not interested in a semantic discussion of the word "prospect". Turner is a guy with 350 big league at-bats. He hasn't even played a full season.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:05 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Cashman wrote:
'77Cubs wrote:
America wrote:
http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=21-0597630963614228341-4

Any hope you may have held that the rest of the deal after Giolito and Robles would be the next 5 best players in the Nats system is evaporating quickly. They are going to get straight up fleeced.


Hahn is a fool.

Giolito and Robles and a low level minor leaguer?

What a joke.

Go fleece Houston - gotta get at least 3 top level prospects and another piece or two.



I don't want any part of this type of trade.

I might be with Jorr on this. Acquire guys and make a run. You have a nice 3 man front with Sale, Q, and Rodon.


Now it looks like they're gonna make a trade just to make it. You're getting a pitcher who at his best will never be close to as good as Sale and a teenage outfielder. Unless Robles turns out to be Mike Trout four years from now this is a disaster.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6549
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Cashman wrote:
'77Cubs wrote:
America wrote:
http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=21-0597630963614228341-4

Any hope you may have held that the rest of the deal after Giolito and Robles would be the next 5 best players in the Nats system is evaporating quickly. They are going to get straight up fleeced.


Hahn is a fool.

Giolito and Robles and a low level minor leaguer?

What a joke.

Go fleece Houston - gotta get at least 3 top level prospects and another piece or two.



I don't want any part of this type of trade.

I might be with Jorr on this. Acquire guys and make a run. You have a nice 3 man front with Sale, Q, and Rodon.


Now it looks like they're gonna make a trade just to make it. You're getting a pitcher who at his best will never be close to as good as Sale and a teenage outfielder. Unless Robles turns out to be Mike Trout four years from now this is a disaster.



You are right. I am not interested in doing this, and I am not sure what is going through their heads. They are going to drive more Sox fans away with doing this. If they got a haul for Sale, I would be on board. And like I said before, there is not an untouchable when trying to acquire Sale, maybe Q but not Sale.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:42 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Cashman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Cashman wrote:
'77Cubs wrote:
America wrote:
http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=21-0597630963614228341-4

Any hope you may have held that the rest of the deal after Giolito and Robles would be the next 5 best players in the Nats system is evaporating quickly. They are going to get straight up fleeced.


Hahn is a fool.

Giolito and Robles and a low level minor leaguer?

What a joke.

Go fleece Houston - gotta get at least 3 top level prospects and another piece or two.



I don't want any part of this type of trade.

I might be with Jorr on this. Acquire guys and make a run. You have a nice 3 man front with Sale, Q, and Rodon.


Now it looks like they're gonna make a trade just to make it. You're getting a pitcher who at his best will never be close to as good as Sale and a teenage outfielder. Unless Robles turns out to be Mike Trout four years from now this is a disaster.



You are right. I am not interested in doing this, and I am not sure what is going through their heads. They are going to drive more Sox fans away with doing this. If they got a haul for Sale, I would be on board. And like I said before, there is not an untouchable when trying to acquire Sale, maybe Q but not Sale.


I would have no problem with Giolito and Robles for Q.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 6302
Location: Calumet City
pizza_Place: Johns in Cal City
Apologist wrote:
Do the Natinals have throwback jerseys?

Image

_________________
STU-GOTZ wrote:
Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Cashman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Cashman wrote:
'77Cubs wrote:
America wrote:
http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=21-0597630963614228341-4

Any hope you may have held that the rest of the deal after Giolito and Robles would be the next 5 best players in the Nats system is evaporating quickly. They are going to get straight up fleeced.


Hahn is a fool.

Giolito and Robles and a low level minor leaguer?

What a joke.

Go fleece Houston - gotta get at least 3 top level prospects and another piece or two.



I don't want any part of this type of trade.

I might be with Jorr on this. Acquire guys and make a run. You have a nice 3 man front with Sale, Q, and Rodon.


Now it looks like they're gonna make a trade just to make it. You're getting a pitcher who at his best will never be close to as good as Sale and a teenage outfielder. Unless Robles turns out to be Mike Trout four years from now this is a disaster.



You are right. I am not interested in doing this, and I am not sure what is going through their heads. They are going to drive more Sox fans away with doing this. If they got a haul for Sale, I would be on board. And like I said before, there is not an untouchable when trying to acquire Sale, maybe Q but not Sale.


I would have no problem with Giolito and Robles for Q.

:lol:

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Levine just said this Washington thing is not some done deal.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
pittmike wrote:
Levine just said this Washington thing is not some done deal.


Shit.

That means it's all but announced.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Here are two separate Top 100 Prospect lists:

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2016?list=prospects

http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/m ... 0v5rqfc.97

Both list Giolito and Robles in the top-15 in baseball, one has Giolito ahead of Turner, and the other has Giolito and Robles in the top-10.

What's more, both lists have Reynaldo Lopez in the top-50, and if he is included in this deal (I can't see why he wouldn't be), that would mean the Sox have 3 of the 50 "best" prospects in baseball, and 3 of the Nationals' best 5. It could be 4 of their best 5 if they include Erick Fedde, which would result in the Sox having 4 of baseball's best prospects in return for Sale.

But no, it's a bad deal because it doesn't include Trea Turner. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6549
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Here are two separate Top 100 Prospect lists:

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2016?list=prospects

http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/m ... 0v5rqfc.97

Both list Giolito and Robles in the top-15 in baseball, one has Giolito ahead of Turner, and the other has Giolito and Robles in the top-10.

What's more, both lists have Reynaldo Lopez in the top-50, and if he is included in this deal (I can't see why he wouldn't be), that would mean the Sox have 3 of the 50 "best" prospects in baseball, and 3 of the Nationals' best 5. It could be 4 of their best 5 if they include Erick Fedde, which would result in the Sox having 4 of baseball's best prospects in return for Sale.

But no, it's a bad deal because it doesn't include Trea Turner. :roll:



Tell me the difference between a prospect and a player that has played in the MLB.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11008
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
A condition of the trade should be the nats must continue to develop the prospects in their system as if they were their own, then when the nats deem them major league ready the Sox can call them up


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Cashman wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Here are two separate Top 100 Prospect lists:

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2016?list=prospects

http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/m ... 0v5rqfc.97

Both list Giolito and Robles in the top-15 in baseball, one has Giolito ahead of Turner, and the other has Giolito and Robles in the top-10.

What's more, both lists have Reynaldo Lopez in the top-50, and if he is included in this deal (I can't see why he wouldn't be), that would mean the Sox have 3 of the 50 "best" prospects in baseball, and 3 of the Nationals' best 5. It could be 4 of their best 5 if they include Erick Fedde, which would result in the Sox having 4 of baseball's best prospects in return for Sale.

But no, it's a bad deal because it doesn't include Trea Turner. :roll:



Tell me the difference between a prospect and a player that has played in the MLB.


I get it, you really want Trea Turner in a deal for Sale, so do I, so does everyone. The thing is, if for whatever reason the Nationals are hell-bent on not moving him, they still have the pieces to make giving up Sale a worthwhile gamble for the Sox (acquiring prospects for proven MLB-dominant talent is always a gamble).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
There was an ESPN report that the deal was basically Giolito, Robles and a couple low level prospects. Explicitly said that there was no Lopez and I can surmise that there was no Turner either. So yea, whatever deal that supposedly came close to happening last night was a pretty shitty deal for us.

But nothing happened. So I can safely step back off the ledge and hope that Hahn came to the realization that they were getting hosed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:16 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Keep in mind the Sox also have a history of getting deals done with word not leaking out until it happened. IIRC, nobody knew about the deals for Melky, Dunn, Robertson, Griffey, or Shark until they were made public. I know it was a different day and age, but the same can be said of the Vazquez and Thome trades as well.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Keep in mind the Sox also have a history of getting deals done with word not leaking out until it happened. IIRC, nobody knew about the deals for Melky, Dunn, Robertson, Griffey, or Shark until they were made public. I know it was a different day and age, but the same can be said of the Vazquez and Thome trades as well.


That could also be local media just sucking way out loud, no? This is the town of Scoop Johnson, after all, and Cowley doesn't cover the Sox anymore.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6549
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Cashman wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Here are two separate Top 100 Prospect lists:

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2016?list=prospects

http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/m ... 0v5rqfc.97

Both list Giolito and Robles in the top-15 in baseball, one has Giolito ahead of Turner, and the other has Giolito and Robles in the top-10.

What's more, both lists have Reynaldo Lopez in the top-50, and if he is included in this deal (I can't see why he wouldn't be), that would mean the Sox have 3 of the 50 "best" prospects in baseball, and 3 of the Nationals' best 5. It could be 4 of their best 5 if they include Erick Fedde, which would result in the Sox having 4 of baseball's best prospects in return for Sale.

But no, it's a bad deal because it doesn't include Trea Turner. :roll:



Tell me the difference between a prospect and a player that has played in the MLB.


I get it, you really want Trea Turner in a deal for Sale, so do I, so does everyone. The thing is, if for whatever reason the Nationals are hell-bent on not moving him, they still have the pieces to make giving up Sale a worthwhile gamble for the Sox (acquiring prospects for proven MLB-dominant talent is always a gamble).



Yeah, but every team they are talking to has these untouchables. That is a problem. Hang the fucking phone up as soon as they say untou.......CLICK!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57247
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Keep in mind the Sox also have a history of getting deals done with word not leaking out until it happened. IIRC, nobody knew about the deals for Melky, Dunn, Robertson, Griffey, or Shark until they were made public. I know it was a different day and age, but the same can be said of the Vazquez and Thome trades as well.

That would be really hard with everyone so focused on Sale as the big mover of this off season

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Quote:
Mark Zuckerman Verified account
‏@MarkZuckerman

#Nats have made their offer, now waiting for #WhiteSox to take it or leave it:
https://t.co/jTfEJYvbrv

A DC beat guy. Tell the Nats to fuck off. Their leaked offers have been insulting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Kirkwood wrote:
Quote:
Mark Zuckerman Verified account
‏@MarkZuckerman

#Nats have made their offer, now waiting for #WhiteSox to take it or leave it:
https://t.co/jTfEJYvbrv

A DC beat guy. Tell the Nats to fuck off. Their leaked offers have been insulting.


Yes.

You don't HAVE to trade Sale. No reason to do so unless you are raping someone's system and getting MLB ready talent as well.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6549
pizza_Place: Giordano's
RFDC wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Keep in mind the Sox also have a history of getting deals done with word not leaking out until it happened. IIRC, nobody knew about the deals for Melky, Dunn, Robertson, Griffey, or Shark until they were made public. I know it was a different day and age, but the same can be said of the Vazquez and Thome trades as well.

That would be really hard with everyone so focused on Sale as the big mover of this off season



I think this is going to be the problem. Other teams will lower what they want for lesser talents, driving the market down for what you get for Sale. On the other hand, watch the Sox get a shitty haul for Sale, and the next best pitcher gets the same haul or better. This is an A++ talent, and I don't see a comparable talent out there to him in FA or the trade market.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6549
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Kirkwood wrote:
Quote:
Mark Zuckerman Verified account
‏@MarkZuckerman

#Nats have made their offer, now waiting for #WhiteSox to take it or leave it:
https://t.co/jTfEJYvbrv

A DC beat guy. Tell the Nats to fuck off. Their leaked offers have been insulting.





I would take a picture of my middle finger and text it to the Nats.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:26 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I would have no problem with Giolito and Robles for Q.

:lol:



I don't know what the fuck is so funny about that. If you're suggesting that Jose Quintana is somehow the equal of Chris Sale, you're barking up the wrong tree. Giolito has a good chance of being better than Quintana. He certainly has the tools to be. Chris Sale is the best pitcher in over 100 years of White Sox history. Please don't compare him to some ordinary guy with a career .500 record.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:07 pm
Posts: 3705
heard a Score report that the trade talks between Sox & Nats had "cooled". Good for the Sox.

_________________
Proud to be UNVERIFIED.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6549
pizza_Place: Giordano's
walkrman5 wrote:
heard a Score report that the trade talks between Sox & Nats had "cooled". Good for the Sox.



Hanley this morning almost laughed at the haul the Nats were offering.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:31 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Kirkwood wrote:
Quote:
Mark Zuckerman Verified account
‏@MarkZuckerman

#Nats have made their offer, now waiting for #WhiteSox to take it or leave it:
https://t.co/jTfEJYvbrv

A DC beat guy. Tell the Nats to fuck off. Their leaked offers have been insulting.



The comments section to that article is precious. Sale is a "proven MLB pitcher with an elite upside". :lol: He's been one of the best five pitchers in baseball over the last five seasons.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trading Sale
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:35 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Here are two separate Top 100 Prospect lists:

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2016?list=prospects

http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/m ... 0v5rqfc.97

Both list Giolito and Robles in the top-15 in baseball, one has Giolito ahead of Turner, and the other has Giolito and Robles in the top-10.

What's more, both lists have Reynaldo Lopez in the top-50, and if he is included in this deal (I can't see why he wouldn't be), that would mean the Sox have 3 of the 50 "best" prospects in baseball, and 3 of the Nationals' best 5. It could be 4 of their best 5 if they include Erick Fedde, which would result in the Sox having 4 of baseball's best prospects in return for Sale.

But no, it's a bad deal because it doesn't include Trea Turner. :roll:


A deal for Sale doesn't have to include Trea Turner. The point is that Chris Sale, when all things are considered, is probably the best pitcher ever to go on the trading block in the history of the game. And that isn't some crazy exaggeration. I don't see how you could have a good faith negotiation for such a player when the other team takes some guy with 350 big league at-bats off the table to begin with. The Sox are the ones with the commodity here. The guys they will be getting in return are hopes and wishes.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 598 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group