It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:20 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 566 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 19  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:34 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
One day Nas will get over Hillary Clinton's loss. Maybe.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.ph ... T#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


Image

Also, Shepherd Smith is a good cat and as far as I can remember always has been.


Are you a fan of Fox News now?


I used to watch his show fairly regularly years ago. Why do you inquire?

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&p=2517519&hilit=NYT#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


You keep hitting this theme that Wikileaks is unreliable when there's not a single instance of them releasing bad info.

And are you suggesting the story you linked isn't accurate?


Did WikiLeaks ever release that information that will get Hillary locked up or was the threat nothing but propaganda.

Yes the story wasn't accurate and the NYT eventually said that.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:40 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&p=2517519&hilit=NYT#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


Image

Also, Shepherd Smith is a good cat and as far as I can remember always has been.


He's probably the best Fox News has.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Don Tiny wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&p=2517519&hilit=NYT#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


Image

Also, Shepherd Smith is a good cat and as far as I can remember always has been.


Are you a fan of Fox News now?


I used to watch his show fairly regularly years ago. Why do you inquire?



I don't believe you're particularly liberal, but it is quite a departure for certain people to suddenly lean on a managing editor at Fox for support. It sort of goes along with the heretofore Marxists who have somehow become staunch nationalists united against the Russian threat. Kind of an upside down world.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&p=2517519&hilit=NYT#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


You keep hitting this theme that Wikileaks is unreliable when there's not a single instance of them releasing bad info.

And are you suggesting the story you linked isn't accurate?


Did WikiLeaks ever release that information that will get Hillary locked up or was the threat nothing but propaganda.

Yes the story wasn't accurate and the NYT eventually said that.


The uranium story I posted was definitely accurate. And I don't know that Wikileaks ever claimed Hillsry would be "locked up".

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.ph ... T#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


Image

Also, Shepherd Smith is a good cat and as far as I can remember always has been.


Are you a fan of Fox News now?


I used to watch his show fairly regularly years ago. Why do you inquire?



I don't believe you're particularly liberal, but it is wuite a departure for certain people to suddenly lean on a managing editor at Fox for support. It sort of goes along with the heretofore Marxists who have somehow become staunch nationalists united against the Russian threat. Kind of an upside down world.

Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


There's certainly a distinction but JLN made a point about CNN's "synopsis" of the document. There's a reason nobody else touched the story. If Sheppard Smith thinks it's legit he should report it himself, shouldn't he?


I still am not sure if you read the CNN story. :lol: There is no CNN "synopsis" - CNN is reporting on a synopsis, not publishing one.

Quote:
Classified documents presented last week to President Obama and President-elect Trump included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump, multiple US officials with direct knowledge of the briefings tell CNN.

The allegations were presented in a two-page synopsis that was appended to a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.



No one else touched the story previously because there was no story until late last week, if by "story" we mean the dossier being presented to Trump and Obama. CNN is bulletproof here.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&p=2517519&hilit=NYT#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


You keep hitting this theme that Wikileaks is unreliable when there's not a single instance of them releasing bad info.

And are you suggesting the story you linked isn't accurate?


Did WikiLeaks ever release that information that will get Hillary locked up or was the threat nothing but propaganda.

Yes the story wasn't accurate and the NYT eventually said that.


The uranium story I posted was definitely accurate. And I don't know that Wikileaks ever claimed Hillsry would be "locked up".



http://www.businessinsider.com/everythi ... dal-2015-4

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/no-vet ... nium-deal/

viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&hilit=NYT&start=0

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:57 pm 
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I would argue, though, that harping on the bad, ugly things alleged in the (then) secret dossier--BUT NOT MAKING ANY CLAIM ABOUT ITS VERACITY--in a story about people being briefed on the existence of the document begins to deviate from ethical journalism.


No question.


I don't recall seeing you post things like this when the NYT kept breaking stories about Hillary that weren't accurate. You dust the cape off for Trump and care about fairness and objectivity now.


You keep repeating this without any examples. Yesterday there were "millions". You're sort of like Trump in that regard. You seem to think if you keep repeating some bullshit you can make it true.

So you admit Trump is full of shit? And now exactly would one prove that you didn't post something?



I've never said Trump was anything but full of shit. This conversation is about the media. This is what I mean about a lack of objectivity. You apparently feel that anything goes if it's a person you don't like.

And we're nit talking about anything I posted. I'm still waiting for Nas to post just a few of the million fake anti-Clinton stories he claims were published by the NYT.

Lol.

So when Trump is impeached and hauled away in cuffs, how many days will you spend in the fetal position?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:01 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
veganfan21 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


There's certainly a distinction but JLN made a point about CNN's "synopsis" of the document. There's a reason nobody else touched the story. If Sheppard Smith thinks it's legit he should report it himself, shouldn't he?


I still am not sure if you read the CNN story. :lol: There is no CNN "synopsis" - CNN is reporting on a synopsis, not publishing one.

Quote:
Classified documents presented last week to President Obama and President-elect Trump included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump, multiple US officials with direct knowledge of the briefings tell CNN.

The allegations were presented in a two-page synopsis that was appended to a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.



No one else touched the story previously because there was no story until late last week, if by "story" we mean the dossier being presented to Trump and Obama. CNN is bulletproof here.


Trump is claiming it was never presented to him. Of course, it wouldn't surprise me if he were lying.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Baby McNown wrote:
Lol.

So when Trump is impeached and hauled away in cuffs, how many days will you spend in the fetal position?

None.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&p=2517519&hilit=NYT#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


You keep hitting this theme that Wikileaks is unreliable when there's not a single instance of them releasing bad info.

And are you suggesting the story you linked isn't accurate?


Did WikiLeaks ever release that information that will get Hillary locked up or was the threat nothing but propaganda.

Yes the story wasn't accurate and the NYT eventually said that.


The uranium story I posted was definitely accurate. And I don't know that Wikileaks ever claimed Hillsry would be "locked up".



http://www.businessinsider.com/everythi ... dal-2015-4

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/no-vet ... nium-deal/

viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&hilit=NYT&start=0


Mistakes in its accounting. :lol: :lol:

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13465
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
Here is Objective JORR'S reaction when something about Hillary may be wrong:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Julian Assange and the NYT are lying. Yeah, everything is a smear of the Clintons. It's a vast right-wing conspiracy.


viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570&p=2517519&hilit=NYT#p2517519

We've all seen how he reacts even when things about Trump are true.


Image

Also, Shepherd Smith is a good cat and as far as I can remember always has been.


Are you a fan of Fox News now?


I used to watch his show fairly regularly years ago. Why do you inquire?



I don't believe you're particularly liberal, but it is quite a departure for certain people to suddenly lean on a managing editor at Fox for support. It sort of goes along with the heretofore Marxists who have somehow become staunch nationalists united against the Russian threat. Kind of an upside down world.
Certain people? Odd phrasing.

Sheppard Smith was quoted because he publicly commented on a subject being discussed on this board. He clearly has some level of understanding on the matter and also can't be dismissed as partisan. Knowing how hugely unbiased you are I'm guessing a Rachel Maddow thought wouldn't have met your scrupulously high standards.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:18 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Odd phrasing.

Sheppard Smith was quoted because he publicly commented on a subject being discussed on this board. He clearly has some level of understanding on the matter and also can't be dismissed as partisan. Knowing how hugely unbiased you are I'm guessing a Rachel Maddow thought wouldn't have met your scrupulously high standards.


Do you make a habit of quoting a managing editor of Fox News? I don't believe you do. I know Nas doesn't. But suddenly that guy is the authority to whom you're appealing. That's what's odd.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Some of JORR's points about guys not being able to recognize their biases with regard to media coverage of Trump are true (myself included), but on the other hand he's drawing a false equivalency between questionable reports from otherwise credible outlets and the guys who publish very popular stories about Hillary Clinton and John Podesta meeting up with Lucifer in the basement of a DC-area Fudruckers to plot a hostile takeover of the American government. It's stories of the latter type that were disproportionately soaked up by large swathes of Trump diehard fans.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Odd phrasing.

Sheppard Smith was quoted because he publicly commented on a subject being discussed on this board. He clearly has some level of understanding on the matter and also can't be dismissed as partisan. Knowing how hugely unbiased you are I'm guessing a Rachel Maddow thought wouldn't have met your scrupulously high standards.


Do you make a habit of quoting a managing editor of Fox News? I don't believe you do. I know Nas doesn't. But suddenly that guy is the authority to whom you're appealing. That's what's odd.


The point he's making is real conservative journalist and real liberal journalist are in agreement. #BipartisanAgreement

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:30 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
veganfan21 wrote:
Some of JORR's points about guys not being able to recognize their biases with regard to media coverage of Trump are true (myself included), but on the other hand he's drawing a false equivalency between questionable reports from otherwise credible outlets and the guys who publish very popular stories about Hillary Clinton and John Podesta meeting up with Lucifer in the basement of a DC-area Fudruckers to plot a hostile takeover of the American government. It's stories of the latter type that were disproportionately soaked up by large swathes of Trump diehard fans.


I'm actually not drawing that equivalency but I do believe the line between is getting blurrier all the time.

https://youtu.be/-e7geD-uSWM

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13465
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Odd phrasing.

Sheppard Smith was quoted because he publicly commented on a subject being discussed on this board. He clearly has some level of understanding on the matter and also can't be dismissed as partisan. Knowing how hugely unbiased you are I'm guessing a Rachel Maddow thought wouldn't have met your scrupulously high standards.


Do you make a habit of quoting a managing editor of Fox News? I don't believe you do. I know Nas doesn't. But suddenly that guy is the authority to whom you're appealing. That's what's odd.

Your reasoning is odd. I explained why I quoted him. Your immediate reaction was dismissive because it went against your narrative. Is there some unwritten rule that we can only quote from sources that match what you've deemed to be our ideological leanings? And for the record, I've never had a problem with Sheppard Smith. Believe it or not but it is possible for "certain people" to distinguish between individuals and their brethren.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:48 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Odd phrasing.

Sheppard Smith was quoted because he publicly commented on a subject being discussed on this board. He clearly has some level of understanding on the matter and also can't be dismissed as partisan. Knowing how hugely unbiased you are I'm guessing a Rachel Maddow thought wouldn't have met your scrupulously high standards.


Do you make a habit of quoting a managing editor of Fox News? I don't believe you do. I know Nas doesn't. But suddenly that guy is the authority to whom you're appealing. That's what's odd.

Your reasoning is odd. I explained why I quoted him. Your immediate reaction was dismissive because it went against your narrative. Is there some unwritten rule that we can only quote from sources that match what you've deemed to be our ideological leanings? And for the record, I've never had a problem with Sheppard Smith. Believe it or not but it is possible for "certain people" to distinguish between individuals and their brethren.


Baier is solid too but Smith is the best.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Clapper setting the record straight by publicly calling Trump a liar.


http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/ ... sia-brief/

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Nas wrote:
Clapper setting the record straight by publicly calling Trump a liar.


http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/ ... sia-brief/

Have you made a habit of quoting Jim Clapper previously? If not, I don't know why you would do so now.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
Clapper setting the record straight by publicly calling Trump a liar.


http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/ ... sia-brief/

Have you made a habit of quoting Jim Clapper previously? If not, I don't know why you would do so now.


I don't think I have but I shared the story from the Washington Times so I could be fair and balanced.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 6:30 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Odd phrasing.

Sheppard Smith was quoted because he publicly commented on a subject being discussed on this board. He clearly has some level of understanding on the matter and also can't be dismissed as partisan. Knowing how hugely unbiased you are I'm guessing a Rachel Maddow thought wouldn't have met your scrupulously high standards.


Do you make a habit of quoting a managing editor of Fox News? I don't believe you do. I know Nas doesn't. But suddenly that guy is the authority to whom you're appealing. That's what's odd.

Your reasoning is odd. I explained why I quoted him. Your immediate reaction was dismissive because it went against your narrative. Is there some unwritten rule that we can only quote from sources that match what you've deemed to be our ideological leanings? And for the record, I've never had a problem with Sheppard Smith. Believe it or not but it is possible for "certain people" to distinguish between individuals and their brethren.


Baier is solid too but Smith is the best.


Baier is the guy who reported that Clinton's indictment was imminent. You guys are all over the place.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 6:33 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Clapper setting the record straight by publicly calling Trump a liar.


http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/ ... sia-brief/



That article doesn't say that Clapper called Trump a liar. Trump isn't saying he wasn't advised of the existence of the document. He's saying he was never shown the document. That article has a pro-Trump spin. The facts were leaked to CNN somehow. I'm sure Trump knows it didn't come from him. So U.S. intel is in a bad position. It appears that either A) they are an organization that cannot keep a secret, a pretty bad thing for an intelligence organization, or B) they purposely leaked the info, in which case Trump is right to be angry.

Here's the thing though. I have NO DOUBT that Trump might be lying. He lies all the time. But I also think it's ENTIRELY POSSIBLE that Clapper is lying. He also has a history of lying. He lied about spying on Americans. In fact, in his case I believe lying is part of his job description.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 6:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Clapper setting the record straight by publicly calling Trump a liar.


http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/ ... sia-brief/



That article doesn't say that Clapper called Trump a liar. Trump isn't saying he wasn't advised of the existence of the document. He's saying he was never shown the document. That article has a pro-Trump spin. The facts were leaked to CNN somehow. I'm sure Trump knows it didn't come from him. So U.S. intel is in a bad position. It appears that either A) they are an organization that cannot keep a secret, a pretty bad thing for an intelligence organization, or B) they purposely leaked the info, in which case Trump is right to be angry.

Here's the thing though. I have NO DOUBT that Trump might be lying. He lies all the time. But I also think it's ENTIRELY POSSIBLE that Clapper is lying. He also has a history of lying. He lied about spying on Americans. In fact, in his case I believe lying is part of his job description.



You never quite had a problem with this leaking of information by U.S. intelligence however. I wonder why.

viewtopic.php?f=47&t=102961&start=210

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 6:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Clapper setting the record straight by publicly calling Trump a liar.


http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/ ... sia-brief/



That article doesn't say that Clapper called Trump a liar. Trump isn't saying he wasn't advised of the existence of the document. He's saying he was never shown the document. That article has a pro-Trump spin. The facts were leaked to CNN somehow. I'm sure Trump knows it didn't come from him. So U.S. intel is in a bad position. It appears that either A) they are an organization that cannot keep a secret, a pretty bad thing for an intelligence organization, or B) they purposely leaked the info, in which case Trump is right to be angry.

Here's the thing though. I have NO DOUBT that Trump might be lying. He lies all the time. But I also think it's ENTIRELY POSSIBLE that Clapper is lying. He also has a history of lying. He lied about spying on Americans. In fact, in his case I believe lying is part of his job description.



You never quite had a problem with this leaking of information by U.S. intelligence however. I wonder why.

http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.ph ... &start=210


I've seen others, including that goof Robbie Mook, try to draw equivalence between the two situations. I'm not a fan of Comey, but he was in a position where he had advised Congress that his investigation was complete. Suddenly he had new information and he thought he needed to advise them that the investigation was being reopened. You seem to forget how Hillary partisans were cheering Comey and how Republicans were grumbling about him when he gave his first report and bent over backward in Clinton's direction.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Clapper setting the record straight by publicly calling Trump a liar.


http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/ ... sia-brief/



That article doesn't say that Clapper called Trump a liar. Trump isn't saying he wasn't advised of the existence of the document. He's saying he was never shown the document. That article has a pro-Trump spin. The facts were leaked to CNN somehow. I'm sure Trump knows it didn't come from him. So U.S. intel is in a bad position. It appears that either A) they are an organization that cannot keep a secret, a pretty bad thing for an intelligence organization, or B) they purposely leaked the info, in which case Trump is right to be angry.

Here's the thing though. I have NO DOUBT that Trump might be lying. He lies all the time. But I also think it's ENTIRELY POSSIBLE that Clapper is lying. He also has a history of lying. He lied about spying on Americans. In fact, in his case I believe lying is part of his job description.



You never quite had a problem with this leaking of information by U.S. intelligence however. I wonder why.

viewtopic.php?f=47&t=102961&start=210


I've seen others, including that goof Robbie Mook, try to draw equivalence between the two situations. I'm not a fan of Comey, but he was in a position where he had advised Congress that his investigation was complete. Suddenly he had new information and he thought he needed to advise them that the investigation was being reopened. You seem to forget how Hillary partisans were cheering Comey and how Republicans were grumbling about him when he gave his first report and bent over backward in Clinton's direction.


The first report had nothing to do with breaking protocol and this did. You are exhibiting bias also. You and others were cheering intelligence when this piece of non information was leaked and now you're bashing them. There also was a rush to judgment based on shoddy evidence.

Now you are saying that the media is wrong for reporting it and the intelligence community is bogus for leaking it. Intelligence chief denies being the source of the leak yet according to you he has to be lying.

Your views in both instances are inconsistent and hypocritical. Fact is if the media wanted to jam Trump they'd have leaked this stuff in the Summer right after he'd secured the nomination. People would not have cared if it were true or not. At the very least it would have created doubt in the minds of many

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/ ... index.html

If anyone wants to reread what CNN wrote.

Trump is almost certainly lying, even moreso is Reince Priebis(sp?) When he claims no knowledge of this memo stuff that has been common knowledge in certain circles and floating around for over 6 months.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:33 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
long time guy wrote:
The first report had nothing to do with breaking protocol and this did. You are exhibiting bias also. You and others were cheering intelligence when this piece of non information was leaked and now you're bashing them. There also was a rush to judgment based on shoddy evidence.


I don't think there really was protocol since I don't believe we had ever before had a major presidential candidate who was under investigation by the FBI. Protocol had to be invented.

long time guy wrote:
Now you are saying that the media is wrong for reporting it and the intelligence community is bogus for leaking it. Intelligence chief denies being the source of the leak yet according to you he has to be lying.


I've never said any of those things. If your position is so strong you should be able to make an argument without mischaracterizing what I've said.

First, I don't think the media is ever wrong for reporting facts. But you know very well that reporting isn't simply a fact sheet. There's almost always an angle. People shop for the news they want to hear. You could read the same story in two different places and get two completely different ideas about what happened. Hillary started the "fake news" bullshit and now her supporters are angry because it's cutting the other way.

And I've seen various definitions of what constitutes "fake news" here. Nas suggests it's a story like "Hillary murders Foster". I agree. But I also don't think a news organization gets cover by reporting it like this, "Sources say Hillary murdered Foster. We don't know if it's true but some people are saying it is." That doesn't absolve it from being fake news.

And there are specific reasons intelligence agencies leak things. I like to believe they know what they are doing rather than thinking that they're just a bunch of big mouths. And I certainly never said Clapper "had to be lying". What I said was, he has a history of lying.

long time guy wrote:
Your views in both instances are inconsistent and hypocritical. Fact is if the media wanted to jam Trump they'd have leaked this stuff in the Summer right after he'd secured the nomination. People would not have cared if it were true or not. At the very least it would have created doubt in the minds of many


My views are, in fact, quite consistent. And my views on the media are completely unrelated to Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton. I don't believe anyone who has read your posts on these subjects could honestly say the same about you.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 566 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group