It is currently Fri Jan 24, 2025 8:21 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
It would be MUCH harder for an average Joe to make the NBA than the NFL.

Maybe, but if he's not a QB, kicker, or punter, he's going to be a shitload more athletic than the worst NBA player.


Do you really think a guy like Kyle Korver is unathletic? And how are you defining "athletic"? There are 7-footers who you could argue aren't all that athletic, but they're 7 freaking foot. That's a pretty rare attribute to have.

Let's not get all JLN about this. Athletic is what we know it is. Size, speed, hand eye coordination, etc.

Kyle Korver is athletic compared to you and I. He is not whatsoever when compared to the average NFL player (again, that's not a QB, K, or P)


Tons of non athletic players in the NFL. Are you serious? I already mentioned Welker. A lot of possession receivers aren't as athletic as average NBA players. Same goes for Ol and DL players.

It wouldn't even be hard for me to name a dozen NBA players less athletic than Welker, and he's a retired NFL player. :lol:


Can you name a dozen?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
It would be MUCH harder for an average Joe to make the NBA than the NFL.

Maybe, but if he's not a QB, kicker, or punter, he's going to be a shitload more athletic than the worst NBA player.


Do you really think a guy like Kyle Korver is unathletic? And how are you defining "athletic"? There are 7-footers who you could argue aren't all that athletic, but they're 7 freaking foot. That's a pretty rare attribute to have.

Let's not get all JLN about this. Athletic is what we know it is. Size, speed, hand eye coordination, etc.

Kyle Korver is athletic compared to you and I. He is not whatsoever when compared to the average NFL player (again, that's not a QB, K, or P)


Tons of non athletic players in the NFL. Are you serious? I already mentioned Welker. A lot of possession receivers aren't as athletic as average NBA players. Same goes for Ol and DL players.

It wouldn't even be hard for me to name a dozen NBA players less athletic than Welker, and he's a retired NFL player. :lol:


Yeah but those dozen NBA players you'd name wouldn't be the equivalent of Welker, a four time All Pro an five time pro bowler. And that's the point - you don't need to be freakishly athletic to make it in the NFL. And I don't mean make it to the league, I mean succeed and thrive.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72553
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I'm not sure how athletic a guy like Draymond Green is compared to Welker. I guess we'd have to look up their combine or pre draft workout numbers. But I think you're underestimating Welker's athleticism significantly.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93184
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
Yeah but those dozen NBA players you'd name wouldn't be the equivalent of Welker, a four time All Pro an five time pro bowler. And that's the point - you don't need to be freakishly athletic to make it in the NFL. And I don't mean make it to the league, I mean succeed and thrive.
Who is a good NFL example of this then?

I mean, of course you get guys like Chris Conte who spend a career being bad but even he ran a 4.53 40 yard dash at the combine.

For comparison, Kirk Hinrich did 23.5 yards in 3.10.

It's a little unfair both ways to compare those numbers but I would say it is very likely Chris Conte is much faster than Kirk Hinrich.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
I'm not sure how athletic a guy like Draymond Green is compared to Welker. I guess we'd have to look up their combine or pre draft workout numbers. But I think you're underestimating Welker's athleticism significantly.


He was undrafted - obviously the combine numbers didn't knock anyone's socks off. There are only three NBA players I can think of in recent memory who became all stars, and even flirted with greatness, that were virtually ignored by the league on draft day: Nick Van Exel, Green, and Gilbert Arenas. There are plenty of All Pros in the NFL who were similarly ignored in draft day.

Edit: I'm ignoring Ginobli because he was a foreign player and harder to scout. But even if you include him the point still stands.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72553
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I'm not sure how athletic a guy like Draymond Green is compared to Welker. I guess we'd have to look up their combine or pre draft workout numbers. But I think you're underestimating Welker's athleticism significantly.


He was undrafted - obviously the combine numbers didn't knock anyone's socks off. There are only three NBA players I can think of in recent memory who became all stars, and even flirted with greatness, that were virtually ignored by the league on draft day: Nick Van Exel, Green, and Gilbert Arenas. There are plenty of All Pros in the NFL who were similarly ignored in draft day.

Well, the NFL roster is 4.5x that of the NBA, so you'd have to account for that.

Carlos Boozer and Manu Ginobli off the top of my head are two others who were basically ignored on draft day and went on to have very good careers.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:13 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80160
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
I think the issue depends upon how we define "athleticism". When you take a guy like Shaq or Wilt and look at the things they could do at their size, that's extreme athleticism. Are those non-hitting motherfuckers that Kenny Williams loves to draft more "athletic" than a guy like Kyle Schwarber who clearly has far superior hand-eye coordination even though he is a fat little dumpling?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the issue depends upon how we define "athleticism". When you take a guy like Shaq or Wilt and look at the things they could do at their size, that's extreme athleticism. Are those non-hitting motherfuckers that Kenny Williams loves to draft more "athletic" than a guy like Kyle Schwarber who clearly has far superior hand-eye coordination even though he is a fat little dumpling?


That's exactly the point I was trying to make initially but FF conveniently tried to sweep under the rug. The conversation is wholly dependent on what we consider athleticism.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72553
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the issue depends upon how we define "athleticism". When you take a guy like Shaq or Wilt and look at the things they could do at their size, that's extreme athleticism. Are those non-hitting motherfuckers that Kenny Williams loves to draft more "athletic" than a guy like Kyle Schwarber who clearly has far superior hand-eye coordination even though he is a fat little dumpling?


That's exactly the point I was trying to make initially but FF conveniently tried to sweep under the rug. The conversation is wholly dependent on what we consider athleticism.

Its not that difficult to figure out unless you are new to following sports. Every draft they talk about skill vs athleticism. Schwarber is a fat shit but he can crush the ball. That's skill. That guy who could base jump out of swimming pools that the Bears drafted but couldn't play a down in the league - that's athleticism. It's tangible physical attributes like strength, speed, agility, hand eye coordination, endurance, etc, with your height and weight factored in. It's not "shooting threes" and "hitting home runs". I thought all of this was a given.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the issue depends upon how we define "athleticism". When you take a guy like Shaq or Wilt and look at the things they could do at their size, that's extreme athleticism. Are those non-hitting motherfuckers that Kenny Williams loves to draft more "athletic" than a guy like Kyle Schwarber who clearly has far superior hand-eye coordination even though he is a fat little dumpling?


That's exactly the point I was trying to make initially but FF conveniently tried to sweep under the rug. The conversation is wholly dependent on what we consider athleticism.

Its not that difficult to figure out unless you are new to following sports. Every draft they talk about skill vs athleticism. Schwarber is a fat shit but he can crush the ball. That's skill. That guy who could BASE jump out of swimming pools that the Bears drafted but couldn't play a down in the league - that's athleticism. It's tangible physical attributes like strength, speed, agility, hand eye coordination, endurance, sox, with your height and weight factored in. It's not "shooting threes" and "hitting home runs". I thought all of this was a given.


So Kyle Schwarber can crush a baseball simply because he worked hard? Or is it due to natural ability? If it's natural ability, how is it not athleticism?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:22 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80160
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the issue depends upon how we define "athleticism". When you take a guy like Shaq or Wilt and look at the things they could do at their size, that's extreme athleticism. Are those non-hitting motherfuckers that Kenny Williams loves to draft more "athletic" than a guy like Kyle Schwarber who clearly has far superior hand-eye coordination even though he is a fat little dumpling?


That's exactly the point I was trying to make initially but FF conveniently tried to sweep under the rug. The conversation is wholly dependent on what we consider athleticism.

Its not that difficult to figure out unless you are new to following sports. Every draft they talk about skill vs athleticism. Schwarber is a fat shit but he can crush the ball. That's skill. That guy who could BASE jump out of swimming pools that the Bears drafted but couldn't play a down in the league - that's athleticism. It's tangible physical attributes like strength, speed, agility, hand eye coordination, endurance, sox, with your height and weight factored in. It's not "shooting threes" and "hitting home runs". I thought all of this was a given.


You seem to be going back and forth there though. Agility and hand-eye coordination obviously play a big part in Schwarber being able to strike the ball where "more athletic" guys like Courtney Hawkins cannot, which suggests to me that perhaps Hawkins isn't actually more athletic at all.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72553
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the issue depends upon how we define "athleticism". When you take a guy like Shaq or Wilt and look at the things they could do at their size, that's extreme athleticism. Are those non-hitting motherfuckers that Kenny Williams loves to draft more "athletic" than a guy like Kyle Schwarber who clearly has far superior hand-eye coordination even though he is a fat little dumpling?


That's exactly the point I was trying to make initially but FF conveniently tried to sweep under the rug. The conversation is wholly dependent on what we consider athleticism.

Its not that difficult to figure out unless you are new to following sports. Every draft they talk about skill vs athleticism. Schwarber is a fat shit but he can crush the ball. That's skill. That guy who could BASE jump out of swimming pools that the Bears drafted but couldn't play a down in the league - that's athleticism. It's tangible physical attributes like strength, speed, agility, hand eye coordination, endurance, sox, with your height and weight factored in. It's not "shooting threes" and "hitting home runs". I thought all of this was a given.


So Kyle Schwarber can crush a baseball simply because he worked hard? Or is it due to natural ability? If it's natural ability, how is it not athleticism?

Some people are naturally great at mathematics and playing the piano. How are mathematicians and pianists not athletes?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the issue depends upon how we define "athleticism". When you take a guy like Shaq or Wilt and look at the things they could do at their size, that's extreme athleticism. Are those non-hitting motherfuckers that Kenny Williams loves to draft more "athletic" than a guy like Kyle Schwarber who clearly has far superior hand-eye coordination even though he is a fat little dumpling?


That's exactly the point I was trying to make initially but FF conveniently tried to sweep under the rug. The conversation is wholly dependent on what we consider athleticism.

Its not that difficult to figure out unless you are new to following sports. Every draft they talk about skill vs athleticism. Schwarber is a fat shit but he can crush the ball. That's skill. That guy who could BASE jump out of swimming pools that the Bears drafted but couldn't play a down in the league - that's athleticism. It's tangible physical attributes like strength, speed, agility, hand eye coordination, endurance, sox, with your height and weight factored in. It's not "shooting threes" and "hitting home runs". I thought all of this was a given.


So Kyle Schwarber can crush a baseball simply because he worked hard? Or is it due to natural ability? If it's natural ability, how is it not athleticism?

Some people are naturally great at mathematics and playing the piano. How are mathematicians and pianists not athletes?


Because that's not remotely close to hitting a baseball. You cited hand-eye coordination as an athletic attribute. Is it not safe to assume that any good professional hitter has great hand-eye coordination?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Here you go, FF. This is only ten players, seven if you exclude the QBs. Regardless, this proves the NBA has a higher ceiling when it comes to physical traits than the NFL does. You can make it in the NFL if you have some basic athletic ability, intelligence, and a good system around you. In the NBA you need height and/or above average athleticism. I've got more players to point to but this is only the tip of the iceberg. This would never happen in the NBA:

http://www.foxsports.com/southwest/gall ... ory-040716

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72553
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the issue depends upon how we define "athleticism". When you take a guy like Shaq or Wilt and look at the things they could do at their size, that's extreme athleticism. Are those non-hitting motherfuckers that Kenny Williams loves to draft more "athletic" than a guy like Kyle Schwarber who clearly has far superior hand-eye coordination even though he is a fat little dumpling?


That's exactly the point I was trying to make initially but FF conveniently tried to sweep under the rug. The conversation is wholly dependent on what we consider athleticism.

Its not that difficult to figure out unless you are new to following sports. Every draft they talk about skill vs athleticism. Schwarber is a fat shit but he can crush the ball. That's skill. That guy who could BASE jump out of swimming pools that the Bears drafted but couldn't play a down in the league - that's athleticism. It's tangible physical attributes like strength, speed, agility, hand eye coordination, endurance, sox, with your height and weight factored in. It's not "shooting threes" and "hitting home runs". I thought all of this was a given.


You seem to be going back and forth there though. Agility and hand-eye coordination obviously play a big part in Schwarber being able to strike the ball where "more athletic" guys like Courtney Hawkins cannot, which suggests to me that perhaps Hawkins isn't actually more athletic at all.

Well, that's not the right inference to make there. It suggests to me Schwarber is better at baseball. Are you really going to follow this through to it's absurd logical conclusion and suggest Kyle Schwarber is a better athlete than Ashton Eaton because he can hit a baseball further?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93184
Location: To the left of my post
The problem with athleticism is it doesn't really describe a useful skill. It describes something you have that lets you do something useful.

One of the players on Purdue wore a shirt in high school that said "I'll start to dunk when it is worth 3 points". He could have worked on his "athleticism" but that would not have made him the best possible player.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80160
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the issue depends upon how we define "athleticism". When you take a guy like Shaq or Wilt and look at the things they could do at their size, that's extreme athleticism. Are those non-hitting motherfuckers that Kenny Williams loves to draft more "athletic" than a guy like Kyle Schwarber who clearly has far superior hand-eye coordination even though he is a fat little dumpling?


That's exactly the point I was trying to make initially but FF conveniently tried to sweep under the rug. The conversation is wholly dependent on what we consider athleticism.

Its not that difficult to figure out unless you are new to following sports. Every draft they talk about skill vs athleticism. Schwarber is a fat shit but he can crush the ball. That's skill. That guy who could BASE jump out of swimming pools that the Bears drafted but couldn't play a down in the league - that's athleticism. It's tangible physical attributes like strength, speed, agility, hand eye coordination, endurance, sox, with your height and weight factored in. It's not "shooting threes" and "hitting home runs". I thought all of this was a given.


So Kyle Schwarber can crush a baseball simply because he worked hard? Or is it due to natural ability? If it's natural ability, how is it not athleticism?

Some people are naturally great at mathematics and playing the piano. How are mathematicians and pianists not athletes?


Because that's not remotely close to hitting a baseball. You cited hand-eye coordination as an athletic attribute. Is it not safe to assume that any good professional hitter has great hand-eye coordination?


Also, with regard to playing the piano, I'm sure it helps to have extreme agility and hands the size of dinner plates, things I'm sure could be called "athletic" characteristics.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93184
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
Here you go, FF. This is only ten players, seven if you exclude the QBs. Regardless, this proves the NBA has a higher ceiling when it comes to physical traits than the NFL does. You can make it in the NFL if you have some basic athletic ability, intelligence, and a good system around you. In the NBA you need height and/or above average athleticism. I've got more players to point to but this is only the tip of the iceberg. This would never happen in the NBA:

http://www.foxsports.com/southwest/gall ... ory-040716
I think you are missing some nuance here though. The NFL has shorter careers and massive player turnover. There are more chances for that one or two guys who everyone thought was bad to become a good to great player. There may be a Wes Welker type out there that simply never got the chance because there just wasn't enough spots available.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Yeah but those dozen NBA players you'd name wouldn't be the equivalent of Welker, a four time All Pro an five time pro bowler. And that's the point - you don't need to be freakishly athletic to make it in the NFL. And I don't mean make it to the league, I mean succeed and thrive.
Who is a good NFL example of this then?

I mean, of course you get guys like Chris Conte who spend a career being bad but even he ran a 4.53 40 yard dash at the combine.

For comparison, Kirk Hinrich did 23.5 yards in 3.10.

It's a little unfair both ways to compare those numbers but I would say it is very likely Chris Conte is much faster than Kirk Hinrich.


Probably, but since athleticism is so hard to pin down I am trying to go for a broader argument that centers around "production/success." I think it's easier for a guy off the street to succeed in the NFL than it is in the NBA. Part of that is due to the lack of a need in the NFL to be super athletic at certain positions in order to succeed. QB, both lines, and even WRs are examples of that. You can "coach someone up" to be a solid OL or DL player, but you can never coach someone up to be a shooting and driving threat, for example, who is capable of draining a three or dunking on you on any given possession.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:37 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80160
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the issue depends upon how we define "athleticism". When you take a guy like Shaq or Wilt and look at the things they could do at their size, that's extreme athleticism. Are those non-hitting motherfuckers that Kenny Williams loves to draft more "athletic" than a guy like Kyle Schwarber who clearly has far superior hand-eye coordination even though he is a fat little dumpling?


That's exactly the point I was trying to make initially but FF conveniently tried to sweep under the rug. The conversation is wholly dependent on what we consider athleticism.

Its not that difficult to figure out unless you are new to following sports. Every draft they talk about skill vs athleticism. Schwarber is a fat shit but he can crush the ball. That's skill. That guy who could BASE jump out of swimming pools that the Bears drafted but couldn't play a down in the league - that's athleticism. It's tangible physical attributes like strength, speed, agility, hand eye coordination, endurance, sox, with your height and weight factored in. It's not "shooting threes" and "hitting home runs". I thought all of this was a given.


You seem to be going back and forth there though. Agility and hand-eye coordination obviously play a big part in Schwarber being able to strike the ball where "more athletic" guys like Courtney Hawkins cannot, which suggests to me that perhaps Hawkins isn't actually more athletic at all.

Well, that's not the right inference to make there. It suggests to me Schwarber is better at baseball. Are you really going to follow this through to it's absurd logical conclusion and suggest Kyle Schwarber is a better athlete than Ashton Eaton because he can hit a baseball further?


But what is it that makes him better at baseball? It's not magic. It's a certain kind of athletic ability. It's a type of athleticism that's more important in baseball.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72553
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the issue depends upon how we define "athleticism". When you take a guy like Shaq or Wilt and look at the things they could do at their size, that's extreme athleticism. Are those non-hitting motherfuckers that Kenny Williams loves to draft more "athletic" than a guy like Kyle Schwarber who clearly has far superior hand-eye coordination even though he is a fat little dumpling?


That's exactly the point I was trying to make initially but FF conveniently tried to sweep under the rug. The conversation is wholly dependent on what we consider athleticism.

Its not that difficult to figure out unless you are new to following sports. Every draft they talk about skill vs athleticism. Schwarber is a fat shit but he can crush the ball. That's skill. That guy who could BASE jump out of swimming pools that the Bears drafted but couldn't play a down in the league - that's athleticism. It's tangible physical attributes like strength, speed, agility, hand eye coordination, endurance, sox, with your height and weight factored in. It's not "shooting threes" and "hitting home runs". I thought all of this was a given.


You seem to be going back and forth there though. Agility and hand-eye coordination obviously play a big part in Schwarber being able to strike the ball where "more athletic" guys like Courtney Hawkins cannot, which suggests to me that perhaps Hawkins isn't actually more athletic at all.

Well, that's not the right inference to make there. It suggests to me Schwarber is better at baseball. Are you really going to follow this through to it's absurd logical conclusion and suggest Kyle Schwarber is a better athlete than Ashton Eaton because he can hit a baseball further?


But what is it that makes him better at baseball? It's not magic. It's a certain kind of athletic ability. It's a type of athleticism that's more important in baseball.

At this point you're simply talking about skill. Athleticism would have to apply to more than one specific sport. Strength, speed, jumping ability, endurance, etc. Not "hitting a baseball" or "shooting a 3 pointer". Those are skill attributes, not athletic attributes.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
At this point you're simply talking about skill. Athleticism would have to apply to more than one specific sport. Strength, speed, jumping ability, endurance, etc. Not "hitting a baseball" or "shooting a 3 pointer". Those are skill attributes, not athletic attributes.


Define a "skill attribute."

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72553
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
At this point you're simply talking about skill. Athleticism would have to apply to more than one specific sport. Strength, speed, jumping ability, endurance, etc. Not "hitting a baseball" or "shooting a 3 pointer". Those are skill attributes, not athletic attributes.


Define a "skill attribute."

We might need an Obtuse Leash meme soon. Since I didn't think we needed to clarify skill vs athleticism, I don't really feel like going in depth on it. lets just go with this for now.

http://www.strengthpowerspeed.com/sport ... ism-skill/

Quote:
• Athleticism is the quality of having the strength (as well as other physical qualities) and energy that makes a great athlete.

• Skill is the ability to do something well; expertise.

For example due to the enhancement of a basketball player’s physical qualities an increase in their vertical jump abilities will likely occur (athleticism). However, what did the increase in vertical jumping ability do to enhance the basketball athlete’s jump shooting accuracy (skill)? The answer is nothing. The basketball player’s jump shooting accuracy will improve by practicing the “skill” of jump shooting. The athlete’s athleticism is demonstrated by their vertical jump abilities and their skill levels are exhibited by their jump shooting accuracy.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
At this point you're simply talking about skill. Athleticism would have to apply to more than one specific sport. Strength, speed, jumping ability, endurance, etc. Not "hitting a baseball" or "shooting a 3 pointer". Those are skill attributes, not athletic attributes.


Define a "skill attribute."

We might need an Obtuse Leash meme soon. Since I didn't think we needed to clarify skill vs athleticism, I don't really feel like going in depth on it. lets just go with this for now.

http://www.strengthpowerspeed.com/sport ... ism-skill/

Quote:
• Athleticism is the quality of having the strength (as well as other physical qualities) and energy that makes a great athlete.

• Skill is the ability to do something well; expertise.

For example due to the enhancement of a basketball player’s physical qualities an increase in their vertical jump abilities will likely occur (athleticism). However, what did the increase in vertical jumping ability do to enhance the basketball athlete’s jump shooting accuracy (skill)? The answer is nothing. The basketball player’s jump shooting accuracy will improve by practicing the “skill” of jump shooting. The athlete’s athleticism is demonstrated by their vertical jump abilities and their skill levels are exhibited by their jump shooting accuracy.


It's not obtuse leash. It's obtuse FavreFan. It's not unreasonable to ask for a common definition before attempting to argue if something falls in that definition.

If you are arguing that Kyle Schwarber's ability to hit a baseball is 100% skill, then you are literally arguing that he is good at hitting a baseball because he practiced more than everybody else.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72553
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I never said its 100% skill. That's you being obtuse again. It's obviously a combination of skill, athleticism, and natural ability.

And yes, pretending like skill and athleticism are not separate discussions when it comes to athletes is about as obtuse as it gets on here.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:10 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80160
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
At this point you're simply talking about skill. Athleticism would have to apply to more than one specific sport. Strength, speed, jumping ability, endurance, etc. Not "hitting a baseball" or "shooting a 3 pointer". Those are skill attributes, not athletic attributes.


To me, a "skill" connotes something that can be developed through practice. But there's a fine line there. I do think that just about anyone can become a scratch golfer- maybe even a pro- with practice and repetition. However, there is some athleticism involved to be the very best. You aren't going to be Tiger or Jack.

But you can practice hitting as much as you want without getting close to being Schwarber.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13440
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
I gotta side with FF on this one. We all know what is meant when someone is called a "great athlete". Pretending otherwise is being obtuse. Mark Grace was a skilled hitter but even he would admit to being a middling athlete.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:30 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80160
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I gotta side with FF on this one. We all know what is meant when someone is called a "great athlete". Pretending otherwise is being obtuse. Mark Grace was a skilled hitter but even he would admit to being a middling athlete.



Well, in that case the greatest athletes are clearly going to be soccer and basketball players. Not fat football players that run 5 yards at a time and then rest for a minute.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72553
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I gotta side with FF on this one. We all know what is meant when someone is called a "great athlete". Pretending otherwise is being obtuse. Mark Grace was a skilled hitter but even he would admit to being a middling athlete.



Well, in that case the greatest athletes are clearly going to be soccer and basketball players. Not fat football players that run 5 yards at a time and then rest for a minute.

:lol:

NFL linemen are just "fat" and Shaq was just "big"

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:36 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80160
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I gotta side with FF on this one. We all know what is meant when someone is called a "great athlete". Pretending otherwise is being obtuse. Mark Grace was a skilled hitter but even he would admit to being a middling athlete.



Well, in that case the greatest athletes are clearly going to be soccer and basketball players. Not fat football players that run 5 yards at a time and then rest for a minute.

:lol:

NFL linemen are just "fat" and Shaq was just "big"



Did you just switch the argument around? :lol:

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group