It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:01 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 138 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93137
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Of course genetics is responsible when we're discussing true gender dysphoria. And that's exactly why "gender fluidity" is bullshit. You don't get to choose. That's called fashion.
That is a contradiction. The same genetics that is making them a man or a woman is also telling them they are the other kind.


That's the Brain-Sex Theory on transsexualism. The research confirming it (and forming much of our newer policy on how to handle feelings of gender dysphoria) has been thoroughly refuted. Gender dysphoria walks and talks like a psychological disorder, but we seem hell-bent on making it an issue of brain structure, and thus, genetics.
I don't think you can say anything has been thoroughly refuted. We still honestly just don't know what causes it or if it is something that needs to be corrected or simply accepted.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Of course genetics is responsible when we're discussing true gender dysphoria. And that's exactly why "gender fluidity" is bullshit. You don't get to choose. That's called fashion.
That is a contradiction. The same genetics that is making them a man or a woman is also telling them they are the other kind.


That's the Brain-Sex Theory on transsexualism. The research confirming it (and forming much of our newer policy on how to handle feelings of gender dysphoria) has been thoroughly refuted. Gender dysphoria walks and talks like a psychological disorder, but we seem hell-bent on making it an issue of brain structure, and thus, genetics.
I don't think you can say anything has been thoroughly refuted. We still honestly just don't know what causes it or if it is something that needs to be corrected or simply accepted.


I don't think anyone is saying it's "unacceptable", but if we are at the point that we are "gender fluid" then I don't see how we can condemn this lady for being racially fluid.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93137
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
I don't think anyone is saying it's "unacceptable", but if we are at the point that we are "gender fluid" then I don't see how we can condemn this lady for being racially fluid.

Even though the concept of race is flawed it is defined purely by genetics. Gender is not defined purely by genetics.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23297
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Of course genetics is responsible when we're discussing true gender dysphoria. And that's exactly why "gender fluidity" is bullshit. You don't get to choose. That's called fashion.
That is a contradiction. The same genetics that is making them a man or a woman is also telling them they are the other kind.


That's the Brain-Sex Theory on transsexualism. The research confirming it (and forming much of our newer policy on how to handle feelings of gender dysphoria) has been thoroughly refuted. Gender dysphoria walks and talks like a psychological disorder, but we seem hell-bent on making it an issue of brain structure, and thus, genetics.
I don't think you can say anything has been thoroughly refuted. We still honestly just don't know what causes it or if it is something that needs to be corrected or simply accepted.


I'm not saying the theory itself has been refuted, but the research that says to confirm it. The studies looking at the brain structure in MtF trans people completely failed to account for the fact that all participants had undergone full courses of HRT, which has been shown to change brain structure, the specific structure being examined, in the exact way it was observed to be different in the trans participants.

http://www.annelawrence.com/brain-sex_critique.html
(this particular scientist goes off the rails towards the end, but her debunking of the science confirming the brain sex theory is spot on)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
As a black man on a message board, this shit offends me.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
I don't think anyone is saying it's "unacceptable", but if we are at the point that we are "gender fluid" then I don't see how we can condemn this lady for being racially fluid.

Even though the concept of race is flawed it is defined purely by genetics. Gender is not defined purely by genetics.


I haven't been following along, but this statement makes no sense.

Your genetics make you white, but you can act Hispanic. You can dye your hair and tan yourself to look more of the part.

Your genetics make you male, but you can act like a female. You can dye your hair and take hormones to look more the part.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32113
pizza_Place: Milano's
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40819
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Disclaimer for those that need one: This post draws no conclusion nor does it make any judgement. It matters not whether someone is gay, transgender or trans anything else. It further makes no difference what I or anyone else thinks or believes.

Now with that said, there is an important angle to this entire matter as it pertains to society from a political perspective. Regardless on where in the LBGT spectrum your concern lies it is important from a certain standpoint to be seen as "born that way" rather than choosing or feeling to be that way. If someone is born a certain way or biologically determined to be some way then along with that comes inalienable rights so to speak. If someone is choosing or feeling something then they can possibly be treated differently legally and socially.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93137
Location: To the left of my post
Killer V wrote:
Your genetics make you white, but you can act Hispanic. You can dye your hair and tan yourself to look more of the part.
I can act like a bird too. It doesn't mean I'm a bird. Race is defined by genetics. You are born a certain race and you always will be.

Killer V wrote:
Your genetics make you male, but you can act like a female. You can dye your hair and take hormones to look more the part.
Your sex will always be male. Your gender is not necessarily XX or XY though most of the time it does work that way.

There are societies that have more than two genders. There are certain genetic conditions that would make genetic classification of gender difficult. Genders have many societal factors the define the role in which you are in.

I think the big problem is that many people think gender = sex. It does not.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Last edited by Brick on Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93137
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
Disclaimer for those that need one: This post draws no conclusion nor does it make any judgement. It matters not whether someone is gay, transgender or trans anything else. It further makes no difference what I or anyone else thinks or believes.

Now with that said, there is an important angle to this entire matter as it pertains to society from a political perspective. Regardless on where in the LBGT spectrum your concern lies it is important from a certain standpoint to be seen as "born that way" rather than choosing or feeling to be that way. If someone is born a certain way or biologically determined to be some way then along with that comes inalienable rights so to speak. If someone is choosing or feeling something then they can possibly be treated differently legally and socially.
What are you talking about?

What inalienable rights are we concerned about here?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Furious Styles wrote:
As a black man on a message board, this shit offends me.


Image

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40819
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Disclaimer for those that need one: This post draws no conclusion nor does it make any judgement. It matters not whether someone is gay, transgender or trans anything else. It further makes no difference what I or anyone else thinks or believes.

Now with that said, there is an important angle to this entire matter as it pertains to society from a political perspective. Regardless on where in the LBGT spectrum your concern lies it is important from a certain standpoint to be seen as "born that way" rather than choosing or feeling to be that way. If someone is born a certain way or biologically determined to be some way then along with that comes inalienable rights so to speak. If someone is choosing or feeling something then they can possibly be treated differently legally and socially.
What are you talking about?

What inalienable rights are we concerned about here?


The easiest parallel is something that is already settled save for some religious hold outs. People are born homosexual. Whether inalienable was the right word to use politically and legally they have all the same rights as everyone else (or should have). Further, and I am not sure how this works exactly, they have a status that affords them protection i.e. non-discrimination laws.

For some other concern (pick one) if it is determined that you were not born that way but choose to be that way there is a less rock solid base to try to gain political or legal standing.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93137
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Disclaimer for those that need one: This post draws no conclusion nor does it make any judgement. It matters not whether someone is gay, transgender or trans anything else. It further makes no difference what I or anyone else thinks or believes.

Now with that said, there is an important angle to this entire matter as it pertains to society from a political perspective. Regardless on where in the LBGT spectrum your concern lies it is important from a certain standpoint to be seen as "born that way" rather than choosing or feeling to be that way. If someone is born a certain way or biologically determined to be some way then along with that comes inalienable rights so to speak. If someone is choosing or feeling something then they can possibly be treated differently legally and socially.
What are you talking about?

What inalienable rights are we concerned about here?


The easiest parallel is something that is already settled save for some religious hold outs. People are born homosexual. Whether inalienable was the right word to use politically and legally they have all the same rights as everyone else (or should have). Further, and I am not sure how this works exactly, they have a status that affords them protection i.e. non-discrimination laws.

For some other concern (pick one) if it is determined that you were not born that way but choose to be that way there is a less rock solid base to try to gain political or legal standing.
This is where I am confused. If gay people are "choosing" to be gay what rights should be taken away?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23297
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
There are certain genetic conditions that would make genetic classification of gender difficult.


Those disorders are so infrequent it would be foolish to toss aside the binary sex model. Perhaps 2% of the human population cannot be classified as a binary sex. We don't need a whole new construct forced on the 98% for which it works.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40819
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Disclaimer for those that need one: This post draws no conclusion nor does it make any judgement. It matters not whether someone is gay, transgender or trans anything else. It further makes no difference what I or anyone else thinks or believes.

Now with that said, there is an important angle to this entire matter as it pertains to society from a political perspective. Regardless on where in the LBGT spectrum your concern lies it is important from a certain standpoint to be seen as "born that way" rather than choosing or feeling to be that way. If someone is born a certain way or biologically determined to be some way then along with that comes inalienable rights so to speak. If someone is choosing or feeling something then they can possibly be treated differently legally and socially.
What are you talking about?

What inalienable rights are we concerned about here?


The easiest parallel is something that is already settled save for some religious hold outs. People are born homosexual. Whether inalienable was the right word to use politically and legally they have all the same rights as everyone else (or should have). Further, and I am not sure how this works exactly, they have a status that affords them protection i.e. non-discrimination laws.

For some other concern (pick one) if it is determined that you were not born that way but choose to be that way there is a less rock solid base to try to gain political or legal standing.
This is where I am confused. If gay people are "choosing" to be gay what rights should be taken away?


You are really being a goof. I am saying gays do not choose. I am saying other concerns (pick any) would have advantages similar to gays being defined in the born that way class rather than the choose to be something class.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93137
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
There are certain genetic conditions that would make genetic classification of gender difficult.


Those disorders are so infrequent it would be foolish to toss aside the binary sex model. Perhaps 2% of the human population cannot be classified as a binary sex. We don't need a whole new construct forced on the 98% for which it works.
I noticed you didn't use the term gender and instead used the term sex. Are you aware that sex is not the same thing as gender?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23297
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
There are certain genetic conditions that would make genetic classification of gender difficult.


Those disorders are so infrequent it would be foolish to toss aside the binary sex model. Perhaps 2% of the human population cannot be classified as a binary sex. We don't need a whole new construct forced on the 98% for which it works.
I noticed you didn't use the term gender and instead used the term sex. Are you aware that sex is not the same thing as gender?


I'm saying that "gender = sex" would be accurate for 98% of the population.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93137
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
You are really being a goof. I am saying gays do not choose. I am saying other concerns (pick any) would have advantages similar to gays being defined in the born that way class rather than the choose to be something class.
You are being vague here so I am looking for a solid example that explains what you are saying. I understand you are playing devil's advocate but I'm trying to get a handle on what you are saying.

You mentioned homosexuality so I used that as an example. You can use any group you want to actually explain it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Killer V wrote:
Your genetics make you white, but you can act Hispanic. You can dye your hair and tan yourself to look more of the part.
I can act like a bird too. It doesn't mean I'm a bird. Race is defined by genetics. You are born a certain race and you always will be.

Killer V wrote:
Your genetics make you male, but you can act like a female. You can dye your hair and take hormones to look more the part.
Your sex will always be male. Your gender is not necessarily XX or XY though most of the time it does work that way.

There are societies that have more than two genders. There are certain genetic conditions that would make genetic classification of gender difficult. Genders have many societal factors the define the role in which you are in.

I think the big problem is that many people think gender = sex. It does not.




You're born male and will always be male. But you can dress, act, and identify as a female. Your acceptance into society is currently controversial.

You're born human and you'll always be a human. But you can dress, act, and identify as a bird (using your example; remove flying from the equation). Your acceptance into society would certainly be controversial (but maybe only until other bird-ians come out of the nest).

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82773
race is social, not genetic

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93137
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
There are certain genetic conditions that would make genetic classification of gender difficult.


Those disorders are so infrequent it would be foolish to toss aside the binary sex model. Perhaps 2% of the human population cannot be classified as a binary sex. We don't need a whole new construct forced on the 98% for which it works.
I noticed you didn't use the term gender and instead used the term sex. Are you aware that sex is not the same thing as gender?


I'm saying that "gender = sex" would be accurate for 98% of the population.
You are still wrong. I can post definition after definition of gender that includes non-genetic factors.

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/some-scientific-journals-are-still-confusing-sex-and-gender-180949424/

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93137
Location: To the left of my post
Killer V wrote:
You're born male and will always be male. But you can dress, act, and identify as a female. Your acceptance into society is currently controversial.

You're born human and you'll always be a human. But you can dress, act, and identify as a bird (using your example; remove flying from the equation). Your acceptance into society would certainly be controversial (but maybe only until other bird-ians come out of the nest).
It seems as if you just refuse to even consider that you are referring to sex and not gender here.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93137
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
race is social, not genetic
You are kind of right. It is a social definition of your genetic makeup. The only factor is your genetics which then manifest themselves physically.

If you saw me walking down the street wearing a dress, makeup and a wig you would think I was living life as a woman even if you thought I was a man. Gender = female, sex = male. There is nothing that would do the same to change my race in your eyes.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40819
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
You are really being a goof. I am saying gays do not choose. I am saying other concerns (pick any) would have advantages similar to gays being defined in the born that way class rather than the choose to be something class.
You are being vague here so I am looking for a solid example that explains what you are saying. I understand you are playing devil's advocate but I'm trying to get a handle on what you are saying.

You mentioned homosexuality so I used that as an example. You can use any group you want to actually explain it.


Rick nothing is vague. Being homosexual is not a choice. It is accepted they are born that way. Therefore, they are a protected class. The same for this is true for a minority race. Now follow me closely. If it is debatable whether being another cause, like say a cross dresser to make it simpler for everyone, is a choice or genetic then is not clear they are a protected class. By that I very clearly am stating then without such protection bakers, wing nuts and politicians can deny special accommodation.

So regardless where else this thread goes in the discussion of transgender and genetic versus choice it is a big deal for those reasons. Again, for the sake of this post I am not taking a side. From the transgender side they wish to be viewed as born that way and there is an advantage to that. From the choice side some but not all also gain an advantage to be able to deny transgender in some way.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82773
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
race is social, not genetic
You are kind of right. It is a social definition of your genetic makeup. The only factor is your genetics which then manifest themselves physically.

If you saw me walking down the street wearing a dress, makeup and a wig you would think I was living life as a woman even if you thought I was a man. Gender = female, sex = male. There is nothing that would do the same to change my race in your eyes.


Image

Says who?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93137
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
You are really being a goof. I am saying gays do not choose. I am saying other concerns (pick any) would have advantages similar to gays being defined in the born that way class rather than the choose to be something class.
You are being vague here so I am looking for a solid example that explains what you are saying. I understand you are playing devil's advocate but I'm trying to get a handle on what you are saying.

You mentioned homosexuality so I used that as an example. You can use any group you want to actually explain it.


Rick nothing is vague. Being homosexual is not a choice. It is accepted they are born that way. Therefore, they are a protected class. The same for this is true for a minority race. Now follow me closely. If it is debatable whether being another cause, like say a cross dresser to make it simpler for everyone, is a choice or genetic then is not clear they are a protected class. By that I very clearly am stating then without such protection bakers, wing nuts and politicians can deny special accommodation.

So regardless where else this thread goes in the discussion of transgender and genetic versus choice it is a big deal for those reasons. Again, for the sake of this post I am not taking a side. From the transgender side they wish to be viewed as born that way and there is an advantage to that. From the choice side some but not all also gain an advantage to be able to deny transgender in some way.
Crossdresser is good too. What rights should they not have?

I understand you are not taking a side but you are trying to make a point and I simply want to know what it is. It seems like you are saying that if it is a choice that they should be able to have some rights taken from them. Personally, if someone chooses to or is born with it they should be treated the same way.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
race is social, not genetic
You are kind of right. It is a social definition of your genetic makeup. The only factor is your genetics which then manifest themselves physically.

If you saw me walking down the street wearing a dress, makeup and a wig you would think I was living life as a woman even if you thought I was a man. Gender = female, sex = male. There is nothing that would do the same to change my race in your eyes.


Image

Says who?


Ha. Beat me to it. Talcum X.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Killer V wrote:
You're born male and will always be male. But you can dress, act, and identify as a female. Your acceptance into society is currently controversial.

You're born human and you'll always be a human. But you can dress, act, and identify as a bird (using your example; remove flying from the equation). Your acceptance into society would certainly be controversial (but maybe only until other bird-ians come out of the nest).
It seems as if you just refuse to even consider that you are referring to sex and not gender here.


I'm aware of what I'm referring to. I see no difference between our scenarios.

You're claiming gender is a state of mind, separate from genetics. Being a bird can be just as much of a state of mind, separate from genetics.

I though the correlation was pretty clear.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40819
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
You are really being a goof. I am saying gays do not choose. I am saying other concerns (pick any) would have advantages similar to gays being defined in the born that way class rather than the choose to be something class.
You are being vague here so I am looking for a solid example that explains what you are saying. I understand you are playing devil's advocate but I'm trying to get a handle on what you are saying.

You mentioned homosexuality so I used that as an example. You can use any group you want to actually explain it.


Rick nothing is vague. Being homosexual is not a choice. It is accepted they are born that way. Therefore, they are a protected class. The same for this is true for a minority race. Now follow me closely. If it is debatable whether being another cause, like say a cross dresser to make it simpler for everyone, is a choice or genetic then is not clear they are a protected class. By that I very clearly am stating then without such protection bakers, wing nuts and politicians can deny special accommodation.

So regardless where else this thread goes in the discussion of transgender and genetic versus choice it is a big deal for those reasons. Again, for the sake of this post I am not taking a side. From the transgender side they wish to be viewed as born that way and there is an advantage to that. From the choice side some but not all also gain an advantage to be able to deny transgender in some way.
Crossdresser is good too. What rights should they not have?

I understand you are not taking a side but you are trying to make a point and I simply want to know what it is. It seems like you are saying that if it is a choice that they should be able to have some rights taken from them. Personally, if someone chooses to or is born with it they should be treated the same way.


Im out. Time to commute.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nkechi Amare Diallo!
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80093
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Killer V wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Killer V wrote:
You're born male and will always be male. But you can dress, act, and identify as a female. Your acceptance into society is currently controversial.

You're born human and you'll always be a human. But you can dress, act, and identify as a bird (using your example; remove flying from the equation). Your acceptance into society would certainly be controversial (but maybe only until other bird-ians come out of the nest).
It seems as if you just refuse to even consider that you are referring to sex and not gender here.


I'm aware of what I'm referring to. I see no difference between our scenarios.

You're claiming gender is a state of mind, separate from genetics. Being a bird can be just as much of a state of mind, separate from genetics.

I though the correlation was pretty clear.


There are actually people who identify- or claim to identify- as "otherkin".

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 138 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BigW72, This Ends in Antioch and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group