It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:48 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 5
  [ 146 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
America
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
https://www.instagram.com/p/3JrCt6S1mL/
Top
 Profile  
 
RFDC
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
America wrote:
https://www.instagram.com/p/3JrCt6S1mL/

:lol: Nice.

That is way more impressive than jumping out of a pool

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:57 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
America wrote:
I have a bigger problem giving up a pick to trade up for Jackson than I do the trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


You're insane. They literally did not have to trade anyone in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
America wrote:
I do not like Fox. I do not think Pace likes Fox either, but the head coach decision is one that is now made by McCaskey and Phillips in the wake of the Trestman disaster. You cant blame Pace for the shitty coach he is forced to work with.




Fox would not be the one trying to re-create the Saints team that doesn't make any sense to you tho.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
I have a bigger problem giving up a pick to trade up for Jackson than I do the trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


You're insane. They literally did not have to trade anyone in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.




*Allegedly

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
RFDC wrote:
I am curious to hear Doc and dolphins thoughts on the 4th round picks


They were pretty shitty.

_________________
You know me like that.
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
America wrote:
NME wrote:
Wasn't Peterman the QB that got the Brees comps tho?

Well Peterman is still out there so who knows, but I dont put that much stock in comparisons between established Hall of Fame pros and incoming rookies. If Peterman was really the next Brees the Browns would've taken him #1 overall.

I do not have a problem with aspiring for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to mimic the career of Drew Brees, I do have a problem with the Bears trying to mimic the roster of an era of New Orleans Saints football that really only had a couple decent seasons.




My point is that Peterman (if I'm not mistaken) was said to have similar traits to Brees, while (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky doesn't. So wouldn't it make more sense if you want Drew Brees lite, to look for a QB with similar comps?

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
America
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
I have a bigger problem giving up a pick to trade up for Jackson than I do the trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


You're insane. They literally did not have to trade anyone in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Yea but (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could possibly be the franchise for then next 15 years. A great KR is nice to have but unless he is Hester (fat chance) he's not going to meaningfully change the fortunes of the Bears single-handedly. And even if he is great the shelf life of a great returner is like 5 years at most.
Top
 Profile  
 
RFDC
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
:lol: Mayock going off on these stupid stunts....enough with the ZOO is this good TV? :lol:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
America wrote:
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
I have a bigger problem giving up a pick to trade up for Jackson than I do the trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


You're insane. They literally did not have to trade anyone in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Yea but (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could possibly be the franchise for then next 15 years. A great KR is nice to have but unless he is Hester (fat chance) he's not going to meaningfully change the fortunes of the Bears single-handedly. And even if he is great the shelf life of a great returner is like 5 years at most.




I doubt the long con with Jackson is for him to be a returner -they signed aging players with disposable contracts at the position he plays

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
America wrote:
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
I have a bigger problem giving up a pick to trade up for Jackson than I do the trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


You're insane. They literally did not have to trade anyone in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Yea but (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could possibly be the franchise for then next 15 years. A great KR is nice to have but unless he is Hester (fat chance) he's not going to meaningfully change the fortunes of the Bears single-handedly. And even if he is great the shelf life of a great returner is like 5 years at most.


I'm not disputing what (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could be, they didn't need to trade up to get him though.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
RFDC
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
I have a bigger problem giving up a pick to trade up for Jackson than I do the trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


You're insane. They literally did not have to trade anyone in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Yea but (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could possibly be the franchise for then next 15 years. A great KR is nice to have but unless he is Hester (fat chance) he's not going to meaningfully change the fortunes of the Bears single-handedly. And even if he is great the shelf life of a great returner is like 5 years at most.


I'm not disputing what (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could be, they didn't need to trade up to get him though.

you really have no way of knowing that...no one knows for sure.

Pace got his guy, lets see what happens with him

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.
Top
 Profile  
 
RFDC
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I am curious to hear Doc and dolphins thoughts on the 4th round picks


They were pretty shitty.

:|

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.
Top
 Profile  
 
America
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
NME wrote:
America wrote:
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
I have a bigger problem giving up a pick to trade up for Jackson than I do the trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


You're insane. They literally did not have to trade anyone in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Yea but (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could possibly be the franchise for then next 15 years. A great KR is nice to have but unless he is Hester (fat chance) he's not going to meaningfully change the fortunes of the Bears single-handedly. And even if he is great the shelf life of a great returner is like 5 years at most.




I doubt the long con with Jackson is for him to be a returner -they signed aging players with disposable contracts at the position he plays

He cant stay healthy enough to be a defensive starter in the NFL, but even if he somehow finds durability his sole qualification to be a defensive back is his ability to just reap the benefits of a dominant Bama front 7.
Top
 Profile  
 
America
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
It is stupid how long these picks take with all these ridiculous pick readings
Top
 Profile  
 
RFDC
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
Butt lasted to the 5th round.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
I have a bigger problem giving up a pick to trade up for Jackson than I do the trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


You're insane. They literally did not have to trade anyone in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Yea but (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could possibly be the franchise for then next 15 years. A great KR is nice to have but unless he is Hester (fat chance) he's not going to meaningfully change the fortunes of the Bears single-handedly. And even if he is great the shelf life of a great returner is like 5 years at most.


I'm not disputing what (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could be, they didn't need to trade up to get him though.

you really have no way of knowing that...no one knows for sure.

Pace got his guy, lets see what happens with him


Commonsense my friend. Andy Reid wanted Mahomes and the Texans didn't have enough to offer to move up.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
RFDC wrote:
Butt lasted to the 5th round.


He gets paid from his insurance.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Peoria Matt
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
I have a bigger problem giving up a pick to trade up for Jackson than I do the trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


You're insane. They literally did not have to trade anyone in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Yea but (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could possibly be the franchise for then next 15 years. A great KR is nice to have but unless he is Hester (fat chance) he's not going to meaningfully change the fortunes of the Bears single-handedly. And even if he is great the shelf life of a great returner is like 5 years at most.


I'm not disputing what (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could be, they didn't need to trade up to get him though.

you really have no way of knowing that...no one knows for sure.

Pace got his guy, lets see what happens with him


Hub, FWIW, said he was able to contact his guys from 28 of the 32 teams and everybody said there were no other offers on the table.
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
America wrote:
NME wrote:
America wrote:
Nas wrote:
America wrote:
I have a bigger problem giving up a pick to trade up for Jackson than I do the trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


You're insane. They literally did not have to trade anyone in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Yea but (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky could possibly be the franchise for then next 15 years. A great KR is nice to have but unless he is Hester (fat chance) he's not going to meaningfully change the fortunes of the Bears single-handedly. And even if he is great the shelf life of a great returner is like 5 years at most.




I doubt the long con with Jackson is for him to be a returner -they signed aging players with disposable contracts at the position he plays

He cant stay healthy enough to be a defensive starter in the NFL, but even if he somehow finds durability his sole qualification to be a defensive back is his ability to just reap the benefits of a dominant Bama front 7.




Health is his only issue imo. He has good size, speed and is a ball hawk. He started out as a corner and has solid coverage skills. If he stays healthy, he'll play at the FS spot for the Bears. But not sure that happens right away with Demps there.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
RFDC
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
Yeah I heard Hub say that on the SCORE.

People criticize Hub on here all the time for being full of shit.

Does he know what he is talking about on this one?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.
Top
 Profile  
 
Peoria Matt
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
RFDC wrote:
Yeah I heard Hub say that on the SCORE.

People criticize Hub on here all the time for being full of shit.

Does he know what he is talking about on this one?


That's why I put in FWIW
Top
 Profile  
 
America
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
NME wrote:
Health is his only issue imo. He has good size, speed and is a ball hawk. He started out as a corner and has solid coverage skills. If he stays healthy, he'll play at the FS spot for the Bears. But not sure that happens right away with Demps there.

He has a broken leg and a torn ACL already from his years at Bama...there really isn't much chance he stays healthy in the pros. Perhaps in the limited role as a KR, but he cant play safety every down or he'll break.
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Fucking hell, I know they drafted Jackson but why not take a flyer on King there? A lot of draft projections I saw had that kid listed as a 2nd to 3rd round talent. Load up at Safety and see which one can play.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Last edited by NME on Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
America wrote:
NME wrote:
Health is his only issue imo. He has good size, speed and is a ball hawk. He started out as a corner and has solid coverage skills. If he stays healthy, he'll play at the FS spot for the Bears. But not sure that happens right away with Demps there.

He has a broken leg and a torn ACL already from his years at Bama...there really isn't much chance he stays healthy in the pros. Perhaps in the limited role as a KR, but he cant play safety every down or he'll break.




We'll see. In any event -King was still on the board in the 5th and the Bears passed on him for another D II pick it looks like lol

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
I think this is the 1st draft I've pretty much hated all the way through by the Bears lol. Even with some of the players I'm ok with that they've grabbed, they did head scratching things to get them.

Whatever. As a fan, I hope it all works out. Maybe (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky takes over a shit team next year halfway through the season and at least gives us a prospect to keep an eye on to hold our interest.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
RFDC wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I am curious to hear Doc and dolphins thoughts on the 4th round picks


They were pretty shitty.

:|


I don't like Jackson at all. Preinjured and wouldn't be sniffing the 4th round if he played anywhere but Alabama.

I'd have rather had Wilson or Jerome. I'd have taken Malone instead of Cohen.

_________________
You know me like that.
Top
 Profile  
 
Caller Bob
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Tarik Cohen is less Darren Sproles and more Garret Wolfe.
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Caller Bob wrote:
Tarik Cohen is less Darren Sproles and more Garret Wolfe.




Haha.. Wolfe is a solid comp too. I ran with Johnny Baily (think he set records at div II level as well, and was undersized)

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
NME
 Post subject: Re: Round 4
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

I don't like Jackson at all. Preinjured and wouldn't be sniffing the 4th round if he played anywhere but Alabama.

I'd have rather had Wilson or Jerome. I'd have taken Malone instead of Cohen.




Any take on Lawson or King (even tho the Bears didn't grab either one)?


I really liked Lawson, especially mid round as far as value goes. Can never have too many pass rushers imo. He has a lot of health concerns too tho.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 5
  [ 146 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group