Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Time for some timely analysis.
I am really excited about the actual pick. They did exactly what you should do in terms of who they picked. He seemed to be the consensus #1 QB in the draft. Now, I'm surprised that Watson didn't pass him but there probably is a reason for that. It seemed like everyone expected (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to be the first pick in the draft and we got him. That's truly a great move. Now, anyone who wants to misquote me later can stop reading now.
How Pace went about it is a fireable offense. He completely changed the expectation level required for him. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky needs to be a stud. He needs to be a borderline top 5 guy now. They gave up a lot to move up one spot when they were already using a high pick. The upside was they locked in that they could get (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky instead of Watson. My thought all along is that except in rare circumstances high quarterback draft picks have somewhat similar odds of becoming the franchise changing quarterback you need to have in the NFL. I can't see a case where the difference between (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Watson(or Mahomes) is so massive that you can't live with the chance that you miss on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. Now, maybe (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky becomes our Matt Ryan and we are very happy. Now, the 49ers claim they had a backup plan to not draft Thomas but I find that hard to believe.
All along, I said I wanted the best QB available with a first round grade. This is where Pace failed. There were two of them available and the odds were very good that he would be choosing from any of them as I doubt the 49ers are giving up the second spot otherwise. Most reporting seems to indicate that the 49ers played the Bears.
The thing is that taking a QB in the first round and it not working is not the franchise destroying thing it once was. The salary is much lower than it used to be. The "value" of a pick, especially at #3 normally doesn't have the can't miss prospect that you can't live without and if it did they you pretty much just pick that can't miss prospect instead. As I believe America pointed out, you can even consider drafting the top QB next year if he is an Andrew Luck-type player as the trade market for young quarterbacks is still strong especially if (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky sits all season.
Pace just seems over his head. I don't care he "got the picks back" because that is a made up excuse anyways. You can't ever "get the picks back" because you could have done that either way. It's like if I burn a $100 bill for no reason and then go and sell my watch for $100. I didn't get the $100 back.
So, Pace did the "right thing" in getting (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and did it in the complete wrong way and failed in what should have been one of the easiest "wins" that a GM can get. He also got taken by a guy who was an announcer with no experience which makes the whole "He's young" excuse impossible too.
So, very happy with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky but unhappy with the GM who failed even when making the right choice. If the other picks don't look good I think a strong case can be made to fire Pace even if (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky seems to be a good building block for the future after the season.
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was considered a far more accurate quarterback than Watson, which seems to be why Pace was soon tuned into him. That said, I do not see the need to trade up. If Pace had to get (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky why wait to see what the Browns do at 1? I don't get the logic of trading to "make sure they got their guy".
_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.