It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:38 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » THE DAN MCNEIL MEMORIAL FORUM

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Rod
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 3:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Beardown wrote:
They're in a shitty division. So it might only take 92 to win it. Cubs got that. They'll hit a 17 out of 20 win streak or something like that. Pull away and never look back.


I'm gonna go with 87-88 wins. That may be enough.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don
Top
 Profile  
 
pittmike
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40648
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
What's that about .550 the rest of the way.

_________________
Elections have consequences.
Top
 Profile  
 
Scooter
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
walkrman5 wrote:
I know they are not playing good, but I am by no means in any state on panic.


Serious question. How many games must be played before "not playing good" is not being good?

70
Top
 Profile  
 
leashyourkids
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 9:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
I don't know anyone who is saying the Cubs have played well or that there aren't reasons for concern.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby
Top
 Profile  
 
good dolphin
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
When only 3 guys of your regular 8 hitters have an OPS+ above 100, and 2 of those are barely above the league average mark....yeah, it's perfectly fine to panic. Especially when "Babe 'effing Ruth" has about the same OPS+ as the guy with the newly rebuilt swing, for whom being 13% below league average is a marked improvement.

This isn't panic at games 1-15, mind you. 20% of the season has already gone by, and they're barely "meh".


I think far too many people penned in numbers for players who have warranted nothing more than pencil

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
good dolphin
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
walkrman5 wrote:
I know they are not playing good, but I am by no means in any state on panic.


Serious question. How many games must be played before "not playing good" is not being good?


general rule of thumb is 60

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
good dolphin
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
MartyD47 wrote:
Panic time might just be the realization that much of their young talent isn't on the hall of fame career path many envisioned just a few short months ago.


You mean the great five head "sabermatrician" Len might be wrong when he says that Addison Russell is going to be an MVP...and they keep playing that cut over and over again on Score promos.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
good dolphin
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Do you honestly believe they are where they are now because of tough luck losses? If so, yeah, I can see why you don't find reason to panic. But for those that see incredibly poor performances from Baby Ruth and 1/2 of Brizzo, as well as an aging pitching staff faltering start after start, it looks as though every facet of the game is in disarray, and that doesn't bode well.



You and I have different philosophical views about the game, and the conversation you're having right now is one of the issues I have with predictive stats. Most people only like them when they are leading them to their desired conclusion. Cub fans don't want to accept that their are numerous statistical indicators that don't bode well for this team's future, but if the indicators pointed the other way, some of the same guys would be reciting them.

It doesn't sound like you have a problem with predictive stats; it sounds like you have a problem with people who selectively cite them.


Right, but since it's always humans using them it's rare that they're actually used blindly.

I bet a lot of horses and it's taken me a long time not to use numbers to support a conclusion I've already made rather than letting the numbers lead to the conclusion. It's something I always have to guard against.


I'm waiting for the day Dan Bernstein has Watson on for a "make you a better baseball fan" interview and the computer tells him what a dipshit he is.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
good dolphin
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
What is with the St. Louis Cardinals? Year after year I look at them on paper and see a team that should be .500 and every year they wildly overachieve. They are much more annoying than the Yankees with their consistency.

I swear you could throw Cardinal uniforms on nine guys you found on the street and they would be competitive.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
leashyourkids
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
good dolphin wrote:
What is with the St. Louis Cardinals? Year after year I look at them on paper and see a team that should be .500 and every year they wildly overachieve. They are much more annoying than the Yankees with their consistency.

I swear you could throw Cardinal uniforms on nine guys you found on the street and they would be competitive.


To me, they're the most impressive organization in sports.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby
Top
 Profile  
 
good dolphin
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
I think the Cub can sleep their way to 90 wins this year. Then, when you look at the playoffs, their isn't a team in the NL outside of Washington that is intimidating. The AL is another story but that doesn't really matter.

In the playoffs you would have Lester, Hendricks and Arrietta. That is not great right now but Hendricks is on the verge of looking like last year's Hendricks and I think they pick up another starter who pushes Arrietta down to the 4th starter. You then have an imposing playoff pitching staff

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » THE DAN MCNEIL MEMORIAL FORUM

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group