It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 2:17 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think you bolded the wrong sentence. Bikes are allowed- even encouraged- on the Natchez Trace. Ogie seems to be suggesting that a motorist can drive full speed around a blind corner and has a right to slam into whatever happens to be on the other side.
No one is saying they weren't allowed. It was that the bikes are required to be single file and to be over to the right unless needed.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SUVs are wider and they make it more difficult to see. Why are you inconveniencing me with an SUV when I am trying to get to work?
This is not correct though. I'll use two personal examples. We have a Chevy Equinox. It is listed as 73 inches wide. The delta 88 my parents had as a kid is listed as 76.8 inches wide. This is incredibly common on all but the most extreme SUV's many of which are not even made now. SUV's have been a more logical replacement for the huge sedans that used to exist that actually provide more functionality with less width and length.



The giant station wagons of late 70's and 80's are all of .7 inches more narrow than a suburban. And I'd argue the Buick Enclave and chevy whatever are significantly smaller and are more just an evolution of those wagons than of The truck suv's like the early bronco's and Cherokee's.

Now, it's stupid as hell to see a single person driving an Escalade as a daily driver but whatever.

We recently went to a car museum and it is amazing how cars used to be. They seem like battleships compared to what is on the road today.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:34 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have seen MANY cyclists blow right thru stop signs, red lights, and break other basic traffic laws.


I could sit at the corner of Albany and Waveland or Lunt and Sacramento or name any side street intersection on the North side and watch car after car blow through the stop signs.
Why do you keep bringing up what motorists do while ignoring what cyclists do? I'm not talking about drivers violating rules and laws. If you want to start a separate thread for that discussion, go ahead and do so.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:34 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
:lol: Then what the fuck is your point?
The cyclist was improperly riding. This probably would have cleared the driver had he not left especially with seemingly no injury.


I don't believe he was riding improperly. He can take the full lane and two guys can ride abreast in a lane (even two motorcycles). Are you defending a motorist that came around a bend too fast and then drove away after running a guy over? That seems pretty silly.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:35 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have seen MANY cyclists blow right thru stop signs, red lights, and break other basic traffic laws.


I could sit at the corner of Albany and Waveland or Lunt and Sacramento or name any side street intersection on the North side and watch car after car blow through the stop signs.
Why do you keep bringing up what motorists do while ignoring what cyclists do? I'm not talking about drivers violating rules and laws. If you want to start a separate thread for that discussion, go ahead and do so.


:lol: Come on, Frank.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:36 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't believe he was riding improperly.
Then you believe wrong.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:39 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't believe he was riding improperly.
Then you believe wrong.



This isn't difficult to understand:

Quote:
In Mississippi and Tennessee, bicyclists are allowed to use the full lane of traffic to ride in when necessary.



A frustrated driver saw cyclists in front of him and ran one down in a fit of rage and then drove away. It's very simple.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7939
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
My Dad had a big Buick Riviera back in mid80's to about 1994 or so. He would drive me and two friends over to Wrigley from the west suburbs and we would slide around in the back seat it was so big. Those Sedans just don't exist anymore and the closest to it are the 7 class BMW or the A8 Audi or whatever the Mercedes equivalent is. Irregardless of that those are 100k cars that are still significantly smaller.

My moms old yellow Pontiac (I think) wagon was huge as was that diesel Oldsmobile. Fucking battle ships.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
:lol: Then what the fuck is your point?
The cyclist was improperly riding. This probably would have cleared the driver had he not left especially with seemingly no injury.


I don't believe he was riding improperly. He can take the full lane and two guys can ride abreast in a lane (even two motorcycles). Are you defending a motorist that came around a bend too fast and then drove away after running a guy over? That seems pretty silly.
The article states he was to be riding single file and to the right unless necessary. He was not doing either.

The guy should not have drove away, however, he may have avoided charges based on the improper cyclists activity if he hadn't.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't believe he was riding improperly.
Then you believe wrong.



This isn't difficult to understand:

Quote:
In Mississippi and Tennessee, bicyclists are allowed to use the full lane of traffic to ride in when necessary.



A frustrated driver saw cyclists in front of him and ran one down in a fit of rage and then drove away. It's very simple.
He had to ride single file. Also, why was it necessary for him to be that far over? The other cyclist is literally on the path he should have been too so it was not necessary to be that far over.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:42 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
:lol: Then what the fuck is your point?
The cyclist was improperly riding. This probably would have cleared the driver had he not left especially with seemingly no injury.


I don't believe he was riding improperly. He can take the full lane and two guys can ride abreast in a lane (even two motorcycles). Are you defending a motorist that came around a bend too fast and then drove away after running a guy over? That seems pretty silly.
The article states he was to be riding single file and to the right unless necessary. He was not doing either.

The guy should not have drove away, however, he may have avoided charges based on the improper cyclists activity if he hadn't.


What do you think "necessary" means in such a context? I can tell you it's necessary to take the full lane when a lunatic in an SUV is likely to attempt to pass you in the same lane in a tight spot.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't believe he was riding improperly.
Then you believe wrong.



This isn't difficult to understand:

Quote:
In Mississippi and Tennessee, bicyclists are allowed to use the full lane of traffic to ride in when necessary.



A frustrated driver saw cyclists in front of him and ran one down in a fit of rage and then drove away. It's very simple.
He had to ride single file. Also, why was it necessary for him to be that far over? The other cyclist is literally on the path he should have been too so it was not necessary to be that far over.


He doesn't have to ride single file. He and the other cyclist (or two motorcyclists) may ride abreast in the same lane. Why can't the driver wait for a safe and legal time to pass? I'll tell you why. Because he's angry the bikes are there.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:44 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
https://www.bikelaw.com/2014/06/18/riding-two-abreast/

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
He doesn't have to ride single file. He and the other cyclist (or two motorcyclists) may ride abreast in the same lane.
see bolded text again.
Quote:
"In Mississippi and Tennessee, bicyclists are allowed to use the full lane of traffic to ride in when necessary. Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file, and riders are encouraged to move to the right to allow for vehicles to pass," Farmer said. "It is also highly recommended riders wear high-visibility clothing and flashing front and rear lights. Vehicle drivers must provide a safe distance when overtaking and passing a bicyclist."

To make it more clear:
Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file.
Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file.
Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file.

Unless the article is wrong...

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:49 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
He doesn't have to ride single file. He and the other cyclist (or two motorcyclists) may ride abreast in the same lane.
see bolded text again.
Quote:
"In Mississippi and Tennessee, bicyclists are allowed to use the full lane of traffic to ride in when necessary. Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file, and riders are encouraged to move to the right to allow for vehicles to pass," Farmer said. "It is also highly recommended riders wear high-visibility clothing and flashing front and rear lights. Vehicle drivers must provide a safe distance when overtaking and passing a bicyclist."

To make it more clear:
Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file.
Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file.
Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file.

Unless the article is wrong...



Since bike riding isn't addressed in the Constitution, I'll say the article is wrong.

Seriously:

Explicitly Allowed
In 39 states, the law specifically allows cyclists to ride two abreast. In 21 of these states, cyclists may ride two up only if they are not impeding traffic. Three states—Massachusetts, New York and Virginia—specifically require cyclists to roll single file when being overtaken by a passing vehicle. Even if your state allows riding two abreast, be aware that there may be nuances to the law, and that local and state regulations might differ: Some cities or municipalities prohibit two-up riding, even though it is legal elsewhere in the state. And if your ride takes you through an Indian reservation, tribal law trumps state law. (Sometimes the laws on the books are so nuanced that even the police officers get them mixed up.) Be sure to check on the bike safety laws in your area before heading out.

Generally Prohibited
A few states still restrict riding two abreast, generally prohibiting the practice but allowing some exceptions. In Nebraska, cyclists must ride single file, except when on the shoulder. In Hawaii, you must ride single file except when a bicycle lane is wide enough to permit riding two abreast and traffic flow is unimpeded. In Montana, you can ride two abreast in a single lane, but only if there are at least two lanes in each direction, and only if you are not impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic any more than you would be if you were riding single file.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:51 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't believe he was riding improperly.
Then you believe wrong.

This isn't difficult to understand:

Quote:
In Mississippi and Tennessee, bicyclists are allowed to use the full lane of traffic to ride in when necessary.


A frustrated driver saw cyclists in front of him and ran one down in a fit of rage and then drove away. It's very simple.
I am glad your cherry picked the part of the story to fit your own narrative.

Now, let me quote the rest of the line so you can see how wrong you are.

Quote:
In Mississippi and Tennessee, bicyclists are allowed to use the full lane of traffic to ride in when necessary. Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file, and riders are encouraged to move to the right to allow for vehicles to pass," Farmer said. "It is also highly recommended riders wear high-visibility clothing

1) It was absolutely not necessary to take up the full lane
2) The riders were not riding single file
3) The rider did not move to the right to let vehicles pass
4) He was wearing a black shirt and shorts, which would not be considered "high visibility clothing" under any circumstances outside of standing in room where the walls, ceiling, and floor was white


The driver never should have left the scene of an accident and will likely be charged and punished accordingly. However, had the cyclist made better choices on his own, he probably would not have gotten himself hit.



EDIT- The single file thing appears to have been addressed. That still leaves 3 of 4 items the cyclist violated.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Last edited by Frank Coztansa on Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
He doesn't have to ride single file. He and the other cyclist (or two motorcyclists) may ride abreast in the same lane.
see bolded text again.
Quote:
"In Mississippi and Tennessee, bicyclists are allowed to use the full lane of traffic to ride in when necessary. Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file, and riders are encouraged to move to the right to allow for vehicles to pass," Farmer said. "It is also highly recommended riders wear high-visibility clothing and flashing front and rear lights. Vehicle drivers must provide a safe distance when overtaking and passing a bicyclist."

To make it more clear:
Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file.
Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file.
Federal regulations require bicyclists to ride single file.

Unless the article is wrong...



Since bike riding isn't addressed in the Constitution, I'll say the article is wrong.

Seriously:

Explicitly Allowed
In 39 states, the law specifically allows cyclists to ride two abreast. In 21 of these states, cyclists may ride two up only if they are not impeding traffic. Three states—Massachusetts, New York and Virginia—specifically require cyclists to roll single file when being overtaken by a passing vehicle. Even if your state allows riding two abreast, be aware that there may be nuances to the law, and that local and state regulations might differ: Some cities or municipalities prohibit two-up riding, even though it is legal elsewhere in the state. And if your ride takes you through an Indian reservation, tribal law trumps state law. (Sometimes the laws on the books are so nuanced that even the police officers get them mixed up.) Be sure to check on the bike safety laws in your area before heading out.

Generally Prohibited
A few states still restrict riding two abreast, generally prohibiting the practice but allowing some exceptions. In Nebraska, cyclists must ride single file, except when on the shoulder. In Hawaii, you must ride single file except when a bicycle lane is wide enough to permit riding two abreast and traffic flow is unimpeded. In Montana, you can ride two abreast in a single lane, but only if there are at least two lanes in each direction, and only if you are not impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic any more than you would be if you were riding single file.

Well, the chief Park Ranger said that he was required to be riding single file. I'll stick with what he said.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
It looks like the "federal regulations" part comes from the fact that this is a road is maintained by the National Park Service and is a National Parkway.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Subdivision is falling apart before our eyes!

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7939
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It looks like the "federal regulations" part comes from the fact that this is a road is maintained by the National Park Service and is a National Parkway.


Yes. It's why you can't bring a gun into Yellowstone even though in Montana and a Wyoming it would be legal. Federal law trumps local when it comes to national parks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Frank Coztansa wrote:
If cyclists really want us to "share the road", then they should stop at stop signs and red lights just like drivers do.


And stop riding side by side down Mack Rd. in Warrenville at 5:00 PM. Jerkoffs.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's something you don't need. Families used to have 6-10 kids and got by without a fucking Hummer. They make driving difficult for everyone else.
You also don't "need" to be riding a bike in the middle of the road with a double yellow line.

You say you want your three fucking feet, but then there are other laws and courteous acts that cyclists flat out ignore. If the guy in the video was riding his bike closer to the shoulder of the road, he likely would not have gotten hit.



The average motorist is far from courteous.


Most drivers are assholes who don't pay attention to anything happening around them.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
People are using the term SUV very liberally. Most vehicles you refer to are crossovers, and do not have a truck chassis / platform or suspension. They are simply raised sedans...they do not have any off-road capabilities above and beyond what a Camry or Fusion can normally do...outside of their body behind a few inches higher so you're less likely to scrape or bottom out.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Last edited by IMU on Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:02 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43866
Chus wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
If cyclists really want us to "share the road", then they should stop at stop signs and red lights just like drivers do.


And stop riding side by side down Mack Rd. in Warrenville at 5:00 PM. Jerkoffs.

Yeah, that is aggravating.

The worst though are the schmucks who ride on Batavia Rd when there is a paved bike trail that is parallel to the fucking road. The funniest part is that when they ride into Fermilab they have to stop at the security gate because they are on the road. If they just ride the trail into that area, they wouldn't have to stop and show ID. I'm not even sure where they put an ID with the spandex suit they have on either.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
This is turning out like the win loss record for jorr, 98% - 2% against.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:08 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
312player wrote:
This is turning out like the win loss record for jorr, 98% - 2% against.



:lol: What?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Douchebag wrote:
Chus wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
If cyclists really want us to "share the road", then they should stop at stop signs and red lights just like drivers do.


And stop riding side by side down Mack Rd. in Warrenville at 5:00 PM. Jerkoffs.

Yeah, that is aggravating.

The worst though are the schmucks who ride on Batavia Rd when there is a paved bike trail that is parallel to the fucking road. The funniest part is that when they ride into Fermilab they have to stop at the security gate because they are on the road. If they just ride the trail into that area, they wouldn't have to stop and show ID. I'm not even sure where they put an ID with the spandex suit they have on either.


Probably in their fanny packs. Ghey.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:10 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80527
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Chus wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Chus wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
If cyclists really want us to "share the road", then they should stop at stop signs and red lights just like drivers do.


And stop riding side by side down Mack Rd. in Warrenville at 5:00 PM. Jerkoffs.

Yeah, that is aggravating.

The worst though are the schmucks who ride on Batavia Rd when there is a paved bike trail that is parallel to the fucking road. The funniest part is that when they ride into Fermilab they have to stop at the security gate because they are on the road. If they just ride the trail into that area, they wouldn't have to stop and show ID. I'm not even sure where they put an ID with the spandex suit they have on either.


Probably in their fanny packs. Ghey.



I agree that a fanny pack is gay but I find such an observation a little odd coming from a pro-mandals guy. :lol:

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Chus wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Chus wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
If cyclists really want us to "share the road", then they should stop at stop signs and red lights just like drivers do.


And stop riding side by side down Mack Rd. in Warrenville at 5:00 PM. Jerkoffs.

Yeah, that is aggravating.

The worst though are the schmucks who ride on Batavia Rd when there is a paved bike trail that is parallel to the fucking road. The funniest part is that when they ride into Fermilab they have to stop at the security gate because they are on the road. If they just ride the trail into that area, they wouldn't have to stop and show ID. I'm not even sure where they put an ID with the spandex suit they have on either.


Probably in their fanny packs. Ghey.


I agree that a fanny pack is gay but I find such an observation a little odd coming from a pro-mandals guy. :lol:



You're going to compare a full spandex cycling suit and a fanny pack to a pair of Tevas? :lol:

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7939
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
I was gifted two Jerseys when I started biking a few years ago. An arrogant bastard one and a bright yellow one from some bar in Portland. They have pockets on the back for ids. I've never worn them although the yelllow one would definitely be high Viz.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The non-savage bikers should be wearing suitcoats.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group