It is currently Fri Jan 24, 2025 12:49 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:21 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I don't believe 1 man or 1 action should make folks lose respect for the office. He won't occupy that seat forever.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
leashyourkids wrote:
Nas wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I do think we should thank Trump for removing the illusion that the Presidency (or any elected office) is to be respected just by virtue of being an elected office. It is a seldom few of our elected officials who are worthy of respect. Most of them could drop dead tomorrow and I'd say we would be better off.


The office still should be respected. Hopefully the president learns how to do it.


There is nothing to respect. He actually had a couple "okay" weeks, and now he's back to being a national embarrassment.

Little rocket man? Jesus Christ, I agree with Caller Bob. Someone have at this asshole.


All that does is make him a martyr and inspire millions more to be like him.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Nas wrote:
I don't believe 1 man or 1 action should make folks lose respect for the office. He won't occupy that seat forever.


Yes, but while he's in it, it deserves no respect. When he shows the slightest bit of respect to anyone, maybe we can reconsider.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Terry's Peeps wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Nas wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I do think we should thank Trump for removing the illusion that the Presidency (or any elected office) is to be respected just by virtue of being an elected office. It is a seldom few of our elected officials who are worthy of respect. Most of them could drop dead tomorrow and I'd say we would be better off.


The office still should be respected. Hopefully the president learns how to do it.


There is nothing to respect. He actually had a couple "okay" weeks, and now he's back to being a national embarrassment.

Little rocket man? Jesus Christ, I agree with Caller Bob. Someone have at this asshole.


All that does is make him a martyr and inspire millions more to be like him.


Shut up.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Hopefully some coyote takes a shot at leash.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38593
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
leashyourkids wrote:
There is nothing to respect. He actually had a couple "okay" weeks, and now he's back to being a national embarrassment.

Little rocket man? Jesus Christ, I agree with Caller Bob. Someone have at this asshole.


Good to see you are back leash.

You are having a HUGE week around here btw!!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Seacrest wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
There is nothing to respect. He actually had a couple "okay" weeks, and now he's back to being a national embarrassment.

Little rocket man? Jesus Christ, I agree with Caller Bob. Someone have at this asshole.


Good to see you are back leash.

You are having a HUGE week around here btw!!


I am not Jesus.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Hopefully some coyote takes a shot at leash.


I don't really want him shot. Just roughed up.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Hopefully some coyote takes a shot at leash.

Image

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:35 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38593
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
leashyourkids wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
There is nothing to respect. He actually had a couple "okay" weeks, and now he's back to being a national embarrassment.

Little rocket man? Jesus Christ, I agree with Caller Bob. Someone have at this asshole.


Good to see you are back leash.

You are having a HUGE week around here btw!!


I am not Jesus.



We know. It's OK.

I'll rough up a coyote for you too.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:38 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
leashyourkids wrote:
Nas wrote:
I don't believe 1 man or 1 action should make folks lose respect for the office. He won't occupy that seat forever.


Yes, but while he's in it, it deserves no respect. When he shows the slightest bit of respect to anyone, maybe we can reconsider.


I think you can respect the office even if you don't respect the person occupying the seat. It's unlikely that I will ever respect Trump

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17309
pizza_Place: Pequods
Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Nas wrote:
I don't believe 1 man or 1 action should make folks lose respect for the office. He won't occupy that seat forever.


Yes, but while he's in it, it deserves no respect. When he shows the slightest bit of respect to anyone, maybe we can reconsider.


I think you can respect the office even if you don't respect the person occupying the seat. It's unlikely that I will ever respect Trump

Why should any man who has occupied the office during my lifetime be respected? They are all murderers who bombed countries posing no existential threat to us and stomped on our Constitutional rights here at home.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56502
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
"Respecting the office" sounds a little too monarchical for me and should for anyone else.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23315
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Curious Hair wrote:
"Respecting the office" sounds a little too monarchical for me and should for anyone else.


In some respects, sure, but a lack of respect for the office of the president is exactly how we arrive at US DC judges in the 9th Circuit, and the 9th Circuit as well, disregarding the 9th's own precedent on the matter of how much power the president has to unilaterally change immigration protocol, and which review standards to use. Disrespecting the man in the office isn't proper standing to disregard settled matters of law, especially when such law was decided—and thus binding—in your own circuit. Our system doesn't work without stare decisis, but that lack of respect for the office has now been used to cut at the heart of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas is making all kinds of sense here.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
"Respecting the office" sounds a little too monarchical for me and should for anyone else.


In some respects, sure, but a lack of respect for the office of the president is exactly how we arrive at US DC judges in the 9th Circuit, and the 9th Circuit as well, disregarding the 9th's own precedent on the matter of how much power the president has to unilaterally change immigration protocol, and which review standards to use. Disrespecting the man in the office isn't proper standing to disregard settled matters of law, especially when such law was decided—and thus binding—in your own circuit. Our system doesn't work without stare decisis, but that lack of respect for the office has now been used to cut at the heart of it.


And 5 (edit: 4 and a befuddled 5th) completely dogmatic Supremes that agree with your types' politics

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:53 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
There are only three Supremes.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23315
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Regular Reader wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
"Respecting the office" sounds a little too monarchical for me and should for anyone else.


In some respects, sure, but a lack of respect for the office of the president is exactly how we arrive at US DC judges in the 9th Circuit, and the 9th Circuit as well, disregarding the 9th's own precedent on the matter of how much power the president has to unilaterally change immigration protocol, and which review standards to use. Disrespecting the man in the office isn't proper standing to disregard settled matters of law, especially when such law was decided—and thus binding—in your own circuit. Our system doesn't work without stare decisis, but that lack of respect for the office has now been used to cut at the heart of it.


And 5 (edit: 4 and a befuddled 5th) completely dogmatic Supremes that agree with your types' politics


What "type" is that? And what issues do you have with stare decisis? Was the issue of rational basis review for presidential decrees on immigration, even when said decrees discriminate on otherwise protected lines, not decided in the affirmative by the 9th [EDIT: before they disregarded their own precedent this year]?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
"Respecting the office" sounds a little too monarchical for me and should for anyone else.


In some respects, sure, but a lack of respect for the office of the president is exactly how we arrive at US DC judges in the 9th Circuit, and the 9th Circuit as well, disregarding the 9th's own precedent on the matter of how much power the president has to unilaterally change immigration protocol, and which review standards to use. Disrespecting the man in the office isn't proper standing to disregard settled matters of law, especially when such law was decided—and thus binding—in your own circuit. Our system doesn't work without stare decisis, but that lack of respect for the office has now been used to cut at the heart of it.


And 5 (edit: 4 and a befuddled 5th) completely dogmatic Supremes that agree with your types' politics


What "type" is that? And what issues do you have with stare decisis? Was the issue of rational basis review for presidential decrees on immigration, even when said decrees discriminate on otherwise protected lines, not decided in the affirmative by the 9th?

Stare decisis is only good when political judges can ignore their own politics or the bigoted, anachronistic views of their sponsors and their ill informed sycophants.

Political speech and the constitutional rights of corporations were well settled issues until self centered, cynical wanna be oligarchs paid off legal tools to do their amoral bidding. You know that type, hell you take every craven effort to defend it.

And you still have no idea what rational basis means in the legal world

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23315
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Regular Reader wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
"Respecting the office" sounds a little too monarchical for me and should for anyone else.


In some respects, sure, but a lack of respect for the office of the president is exactly how we arrive at US DC judges in the 9th Circuit, and the 9th Circuit as well, disregarding the 9th's own precedent on the matter of how much power the president has to unilaterally change immigration protocol, and which review standards to use. Disrespecting the man in the office isn't proper standing to disregard settled matters of law, especially when such law was decided—and thus binding—in your own circuit. Our system doesn't work without stare decisis, but that lack of respect for the office has now been used to cut at the heart of it.


And 5 (edit: 4 and a befuddled 5th) completely dogmatic Supremes that agree with your types' politics


What "type" is that? And what issues do you have with stare decisis? Was the issue of rational basis review for presidential decrees on immigration, even when said decrees discriminate on otherwise protected lines, not decided in the affirmative by the 9th?

Stare decisis is only good when political judges can ignore their own politics or the bigoted, anachronistic views of their sponsors and their I'll informed sycophants.

Political speech and the constitutional rights of corporations were well settled issues until self centered, cynical wanna be oligarchs paid off legal tools to do their amoral bidding. You know that type, he'll you take every craven effort to defend it


Totally agree on political speech by corporations, however I think there is a bit of a distinction between such a monumental declaration, and disregarding binding precedent on which test applies to a given action.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
"Respecting the office" sounds a little too monarchical for me and should for anyone else.


In some respects, sure, but a lack of respect for the office of the president is exactly how we arrive at US DC judges in the 9th Circuit, and the 9th Circuit as well, disregarding the 9th's own precedent on the matter of how much power the president has to unilaterally change immigration protocol, and which review standards to use. Disrespecting the man in the office isn't proper standing to disregard settled matters of law, especially when such law was decided—and thus binding—in your own circuit. Our system doesn't work without stare decisis, but that lack of respect for the office has now been used to cut at the heart of it.


And 5 (edit: 4 and a befuddled 5th) completely dogmatic Supremes that agree with your types' politics


What "type" is that? And what issues do you have with stare decisis? Was the issue of rational basis review for presidential decrees on immigration, even when said decrees discriminate on otherwise protected lines, not decided in the affirmative by the 9th?

Stare decisis is only good when political judges can ignore their own politics or the bigoted, anachronistic views of their sponsors and their I'll informed sycophants.

Political speech and the constitutional rights of corporations were well settled issues until self centered, cynical wanna be oligarchs paid off legal tools to do their amoral bidding. You know that type, he'll you take every craven effort to defend it


Totally agree on political speech by corporations, however I think there is a bit of a distinction between such a monumental declaration, and disregarding binding precedent on which test applies to a given action.


Remind me where you took this position on speech before. Or how it may not be a massive problem in our recent elections. And a large cause of the mess imo

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23315
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Regular Reader wrote:
Remind me where you took this position on speech before. Or how it may not be a massive problem in our recent elections. And a large cause of the mess imo


Ok: viewtopic.php?f=75&t=102751&p=2571574&hilit=#p2571574

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
End corporate personhood. "Discount Tire Co." has no freedom of speech. It is not involved in, nor has any legitimate concern for, whether human citizens of the United States can buy, possess, and use, marijuana.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Remind me where you took this position on speech before. Or how it may not be a massive problem in our recent elections. And a large cause of the mess imo


Ok: viewtopic.php?f=75&t=102751&p=2571574&hilit=#p2571574

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
End corporate personhood. "Discount Tire Co." has no freedom of speech. It is not involved in, nor has any legitimate concern for, whether human citizens of the United States can buy, possess, and use, marijuana.


Fair enough.

But what's your opinion on Citizens United?

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19490
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Frank Coztansa wrote:
There are only three Supremes.

But 5 Heartbeats!

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19490
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Regular Reader wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Remind me where you took this position on speech before. Or how it may not be a massive problem in our recent elections. And a large cause of the mess imo


Ok: http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.ph ... =#p2571574

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
End corporate personhood. "Discount Tire Co." has no freedom of speech. It is not involved in, nor has any legitimate concern for, whether human citizens of the United States can buy, possess, and use, marijuana.


Fair enough.

But what's your opinion on Citizens United?


Take it a step further,DR what are your thoughts on La Raza?

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93183
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
"Respecting the office" sounds a little too monarchical for me and should for anyone else.


In some respects, sure, but a lack of respect for the office of the president is exactly how we arrive at US DC judges in the 9th Circuit, and the 9th Circuit as well, disregarding the 9th's own precedent on the matter of how much power the president has to unilaterally change immigration protocol, and which review standards to use. Disrespecting the man in the office isn't proper standing to disregard settled matters of law, especially when such law was decided—and thus binding—in your own circuit. Our system doesn't work without stare decisis, but that lack of respect for the office has now been used to cut at the heart of it.

Still mad he lost that one?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23315
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
"Respecting the office" sounds a little too monarchical for me and should for anyone else.


In some respects, sure, but a lack of respect for the office of the president is exactly how we arrive at US DC judges in the 9th Circuit, and the 9th Circuit as well, disregarding the 9th's own precedent on the matter of how much power the president has to unilaterally change immigration protocol, and which review standards to use. Disrespecting the man in the office isn't proper standing to disregard settled matters of law, especially when such law was decided—and thus binding—in your own circuit. Our system doesn't work without stare decisis, but that lack of respect for the office has now been used to cut at the heart of it.

Still mad he lost that one?


I said from the beginning that the decision was bad law and a travesty of stare decisis, and MANY other federal judges (including MANY in the 9th Circus, including SCOTUS) agreed with me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93183
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
"Respecting the office" sounds a little too monarchical for me and should for anyone else.


In some respects, sure, but a lack of respect for the office of the president is exactly how we arrive at US DC judges in the 9th Circuit, and the 9th Circuit as well, disregarding the 9th's own precedent on the matter of how much power the president has to unilaterally change immigration protocol, and which review standards to use. Disrespecting the man in the office isn't proper standing to disregard settled matters of law, especially when such law was decided—and thus binding—in your own circuit. Our system doesn't work without stare decisis, but that lack of respect for the office has now been used to cut at the heart of it.

Still mad he lost that one?


I said from the beginning that the decision was bad law and a travesty of stare decisis, and MANY other federal judges (including MANY in the 9th Circus, including SCOTUS) agreed with me.

So yes.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
I miss the old Donald, the "Rosie's a pig" Donald


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trump over Curry
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/donald-tru ... 05485.html

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group