It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:20 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 562 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Glad to hear Devante Parker has feeling in his extremities.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
I miss Doug Buffone.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZsdP7NwGuQ

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10112
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
My god, the Bears are down 28 and Green Bay had 11 in the box on one play.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
This is the end. If (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky doesn't start next game, I'm fuxking done with these stupid pieces of shit.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Nas wrote:
Can't play Mitch this game.



:lol: :lol: Nice Avatar

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Tarik Cohen will be dead in a year's time.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Unconscionable that Glennon is still in the game. He's got to be benched just for performance reasons. If (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky isn't ready then bring in Sanchez - I don't care. Glennon isn't useful enough to keep in the game. Send a message to his dumb ass (and to Pace) by benching him because he sucks.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
Obviously this loss is on Glennon - GB did nothing special. The Pack and Bears are virtually tied in all major team offense stats. Around the same total yards along with yards per play. The difference, of course, is Glennon's four TOs. Also, the Pack seemed to have done a good job against the Bears' running game. But I can't tell if that's because Glennon's TOs made us go pass heavy, or because the run game was generally ineffective.

Your last sentence isn't an either/or thing. It's both. Bears got outclassed

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
Unconscionable that Glennon is still in the game. He's got to be benched just for performance reasons. If (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky isn't ready then bring in Sanchez - I don't care. Glennon isn't useful enough to keep in the game. Send a message to his dumb ass (and to Pace) by benching him because he sucks.

Relax. They're hoping he gets hurt so it's an easier conversation with Glennon tomorrow.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Glennon should hang hinself with his own neck. Just loop it around or something.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOSAFPhr0mg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osIzg4zyKVM


Seems perfect for how tonight's game has gone

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
:lol: So Nas is officially off the Glennon and playoffs bandwagon. Another year you were wrong, but wont admit down the road.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Obviously this loss is on Glennon - GB did nothing special. The Pack and Bears are virtually tied in all major team offense stats. Around the same total yards along with yards per play. The difference, of course, is Glennon's four TOs. Also, the Pack seemed to have done a good job against the Bears' running game. But I can't tell if that's because Glennon's TOs made us go pass heavy, or because the run game was generally ineffective.

Your last sentence isn't an either/or thing. It's both. Bears got outclassed


Not necessarily. Glennon spotted them 21 spots by himself. You all have 35 points and barely 250 total yards. Think about that. That's Glennon.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Smart...bring in Jordan Howard

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
veganfan21 wrote:
Unconscionable that Glennon is still in the game. He's got to be benched just for performance reasons. If (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky isn't ready then bring in Sanchez - I don't care. Glennon isn't useful enough to keep in the game. Send a message to his dumb ass (and to Pace) by benching him because he sucks.


If Sanchez is listed as the 3rd QB, then he can't play unless the other two are injured.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:57 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
RFDC wrote:
:lol: So Nas is officially off the Glennon and playoffs bandwagon. Another year you were wrong, but wont admit down the road.


I was right about the Glennon signing.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
SpiralStairs wrote:
Glad to hear Devante Parker has feeling in his extremities.


I'm sure the Dolphins are happy to hear that

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: So Nas is officially off the Glennon and playoffs bandwagon. Another year you were wrong, but wont admit down the road.


I was right about the Glennon signing.

:lol: you said he was going to lead them to the playoffs

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10112
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
FrankDrebin wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
I miss Doug Buffone.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZsdP7NwGuQ

That was fun. Better than watching the game.

This is the best moment of 670 radio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOSAFPhr0mg

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Chus wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Unconscionable that Glennon is still in the game. He's got to be benched just for performance reasons. If (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky isn't ready then bring in Sanchez - I don't care. Glennon isn't useful enough to keep in the game. Send a message to his dumb ass (and to Pace) by benching him because he sucks.


If Sanchez is listed as the 3rd QB, then he can't play unless the other two are injured.


Then bench him and go with no QB.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: So Nas is officially off the Glennon and playoffs bandwagon. Another year you were wrong, but wont admit down the road.


I was right about the Glennon signing.

:lol: you said he was going to lead them to the playoffs


Was I wrong about the signing? Not at all.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Obviously this loss is on Glennon - GB did nothing special. The Pack and Bears are virtually tied in all major team offense stats. Around the same total yards along with yards per play. The difference, of course, is Glennon's four TOs. Also, the Pack seemed to have done a good job against the Bears' running game. But I can't tell if that's because Glennon's TOs made us go pass heavy, or because the run game was generally ineffective.

Your last sentence isn't an either/or thing. It's both. Bears got outclassed


Not necessarily. Glennon spotted them 21 spots by himself. You all have 35 points and barely 250 total yards. Think about that. That's Glennon.

But it's a chicken and egg thing. You can't criticize the packers for not gaining a lot of yards when they have a 28 point lead without needing to. (Also missing their top 2 RBs and 5 OTs)

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
It's wildly irresponsible to keep playing Howard at this point

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Why isn't Cunningham getting every carry here?

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
I miss Doug Buffone.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZsdP7NwGuQ

That was fun. Better than watching the game.

This is the best moment of 670 radio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOSAFPhr0mg


I just posted that :lol: :lol:

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The receivers still suck too.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
You don't want (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky against the Vikings defense. Wait until Week 6.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Obviously this loss is on Glennon - GB did nothing special. The Pack and Bears are virtually tied in all major team offense stats. Around the same total yards along with yards per play. The difference, of course, is Glennon's four TOs. Also, the Pack seemed to have done a good job against the Bears' running game. But I can't tell if that's because Glennon's TOs made us go pass heavy, or because the run game was generally ineffective.

Your last sentence isn't an either/or thing. It's both. Bears got outclassed


Not necessarily. Glennon spotted them 21 spots by himself. You all have 35 points and barely 250 total yards. Think about that. That's Glennon.

But it's a chicken and egg thing. You can't criticize the packers for not gaining a lot of yards when they have a 28 point lead without needing to. (Also missing their top 2 RBs and 5 OTs)


That's not a criticism. You all don't have many yards because Glennon gave you short fields. We don't know what would have happened had Glennon not helped you all out.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
IMU wrote:
You don't want (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky against the Vikings defense. Wait until Week 6.


11 days off and a home game

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Packers
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Obviously this loss is on Glennon - GB did nothing special. The Pack and Bears are virtually tied in all major team offense stats. Around the same total yards along with yards per play. The difference, of course, is Glennon's four TOs. Also, the Pack seemed to have done a good job against the Bears' running game. But I can't tell if that's because Glennon's TOs made us go pass heavy, or because the run game was generally ineffective.

Your last sentence isn't an either/or thing. It's both. Bears got outclassed


Not necessarily. Glennon spotted them 21 spots by himself. You all have 35 points and barely 250 total yards. Think about that. That's Glennon.

But it's a chicken and egg thing. You can't criticize the packers for not gaining a lot of yards when they have a 28 point lead without needing to. (Also missing their top 2 RBs and 5 OTs)


That's not a criticism. You all don't have many yards because Glennon gave you short fields. We don't know what would have happened had Glennon not helped you all out.

We have a pretty good idea :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 562 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Curious Hair, The Doctor Of Style and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group