It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 2:23 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
veganfan21 wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Right now, this isn’t debatable because Watson looks like a generational talent. If he keeps his current pace, there’s likely no way (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can compete with it. That’s not a knock of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


FF and others would say that's a knock on Pace though.


If Watson is a generational talent, how could it not be a knock on Pace?


Last edited by Peoria Matt on Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
leashyourkids wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Right now, this isn’t debatable because Watson looks like a generational talent. If he keeps his current pace, there’s likely no way (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can compete with it. That’s not a knock of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


FF and others would say that's a knock on Pace though.


I don’t read threads anymore. I just comment and let the chips fall where they may.


Beardown = LYK match?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Peoria Matt wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Right now, this isn’t debatable because Watson looks like a generational talent. If he keeps his current pace, there’s likely no way (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can compete with it. That’s not a knock of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


veganfan21 wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Right now, this isn’t debatable because Watson looks like a generational talent. If he keeps his current pace, there’s likely no way (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can compete with it. That’s not a knock of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


FF and others would say that's a knock on Pace though.


If Watson is a generational talent, how could it not be a knock on Pace?


It's a question of epistemology I think. If Watson turns out to be a legend, then can we say Pace knowingly/intentionally passed over a legend? Had this debate with FF and a few others regarding drafting in general, and the consensus seems to be that they'd say Pace did in fact knowingly pass over a legend in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Peoria Matt wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Right now, this isn’t debatable because Watson looks like a generational talent. If he keeps his current pace, there’s likely no way (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can compete with it. That’s not a knock of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


FF and others would say that's a knock on Pace though.


If Watson is a generational talent, how could it not be a knock on Pace?
I think you can give him a pass if you simply chose the wrong of two similarly rated quarterbacks. The big problem is that he was so desperate not to get Watson that he spent a ton of picks to trade up one spot. It's pretty clear that Pace thought Watson wasn't very good.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Watson has 21 TD's with 9 games remaining. If Watson doesn't get injured, he will wind up with what......40 TDs minimum? (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky will never match that. I'm hoping Mitch can someday get to 21 TDs in a season.

It's probably going to end up being a case of "smartest guy in the room" syndrome. Obvious pick was sitting there and Pace went with the other guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Peoria Matt wrote:
Watson has 21 TD's with 9 games remaining. If Watson doesn't get injured, he will wind up with what......40 TDs minimum? (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky will never match that. I'm hoping Mitch can someday get to 21 TDs in a season.

It's probably going to end up being a case of "smartest guy in the room" syndrome. Obvious pick was sitting there and Pace went with the other guy.


In no scenario did folks expect (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to come in and light up the NFL. He hardly played in college. Watson looks great. But let's wait until such a time where (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky has adjusted to the NFL and has some real targets. This isn't some mutually exclusive outcome- both guys could be great or terrible.

When I watched Goff last year, I thought he was the worst QB pick ever. He has already showed a ton of improvement. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's development cycle should be longer than your typical first round draft pick given his lack of college starts.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
I think most everyone agrees that, despite your preferred QB, there was no reason to move from 3 to 2.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Where the Bears are concerned it's "Watson Plus" because if they drafted Watson with the 3rd pick (If (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky WAS picked before him),they would have had a fantastic rookie QB and those draft picks they pissed away.

I think Mitch looks ok but Watson has been fantastic.....so far.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
IMU wrote:
I think most everyone agrees that, despite your preferred QB, there was no reason to move from 3 to 2.


Yes, it was absurd. BUT, if (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky ends up being great, then everyone will recall Pace for being bold to be sure he got his guy. Now if both Watson and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky are great, then one could argue he could have just taken whoever dropped to 3. It's doubtful they'll both be great.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
denisdman wrote:
In no scenario did folks expect (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to come in and light up the NFL. He hardly played in college. Watson looks great. But let's wait until such a time where (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky has adjusted to the NFL and has some real targets. This isn't some mutually exclusive outcome- both guys could be great or terrible.

When I watched Goff last year, I thought he was the worst QB pick ever. He has already showed a ton of improvement. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's development cycle should be longer than your typical first round draft pick given his lack of college starts.


So do you have faith in Pace to find the next Sean McVay? Forget that....how about a capable OC? Because there is no way Mitch is going to develop into anything close to Watson with this current staff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Peoria Matt wrote:
denisdman wrote:
In no scenario did folks expect (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to come in and light up the NFL. He hardly played in college. Watson looks great. But let's wait until such a time where (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky has adjusted to the NFL and has some real targets. This isn't some mutually exclusive outcome- both guys could be great or terrible.

When I watched Goff last year, I thought he was the worst QB pick ever. He has already showed a ton of improvement. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's development cycle should be longer than your typical first round draft pick given his lack of college starts.


So do you have faith in Pace to find the next Sean McVay? Forget that....how about a capable OC? Because there is no way Mitch is going to develop into anything close to Watson with this current staff.


I've posted a lot of Pace thoughts around here. The jury is definitely still out on his ability to spot talent.

As for coaches, I think it is the same level of uncertainty. The biggest problem that I see is that the Bears as an organization do not make sound decisions. I suspect they will hire another consultant because they lack the internal processes and sounding boards to make an informed decision. So I worry less about Pace and more about the organizational ineptitude.

I'd be more inclined to give the job to Fangio or go throw gobs of money at Bill Cowher. Let Cowher groom a young successor.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
denisdman wrote:
As for coaches, I think it is the same level of uncertainty. The biggest problem that I see is that the Bears as an organization do not make sound decisions. I suspect they will hire another consultant because they lack the internal processes and sounding boards to make an informed decision. So I worry less about Pace and more about the organizational ineptitude.


Agreed but there is no way ( I hope ) that Pace isn't allowed to pick the next coach.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Pace picked Gase, that's who our hc should be.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
312player wrote:
Pace picked Gase, that's who our hc should be.


Obviously we all see why Fox wore out his welcome in Denver. But at the point he was hired, Fox had done two quick turnarounds in Carolina and Denver. So I understand why he was brought here.

The task for Fox and Pace was difficult. There was nothing here. I am slightly encouraged by the rapid and strong turnaround of the defense. They are literally a top five looking group with tons of playmakers. The O line and RB situation is decent as well. There's lots of work to be done, but they are a lot better than I figured at the beginning of this year.

Simms, Glennon- worthless signings. Jackson, Cohen, Howard, Whitehair- solid draft picks. Floyd, Trubisky- jury still out. Shaheen- I dunno, seems like a waste.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
denisdman wrote:
312player wrote:
Pace picked Gase, that's who our hc should be.


Obviously we all see why Fox wore out his welcome in Denver. But at the point he was hired, Fox had done two quick turnarounds in Carolina and Denver. So I understand why he was brought here.

The task for Fox and Pace was difficult. There was nothing here. I am slightly encouraged by the rapid and strong turnaround of the defense. They are literally a top five looking group with tons of playmakers. The O line and RB situation is decent as well. There's lots of work to be done, but they are a lot better than I figured at the beginning of this year.

Simms, Glennon- worthless signings. Jackson, Cohen, Howard, Whitehair- solid draft picks. Floyd, Trubisky- jury still out. Shaheen- I dunno, seems like a waste.




I never wanted that old fuck here, if your team has to fire you to win a ring..you are bad at your job.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Right now, this isn’t debatable because Watson looks like a generational talent. If he keeps his current pace, there’s likely no way (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can compete with it. That’s not a knock of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


veganfan21 wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Right now, this isn’t debatable because Watson looks like a generational talent. If he keeps his current pace, there’s likely no way (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can compete with it. That’s not a knock of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


FF and others would say that's a knock on Pace though.


If Watson is a generational talent, how could it not be a knock on Pace?


It's a question of epistemology I think. If Watson turns out to be a legend, then can we say Pace knowingly/intentionally passed over a legend? Had this debate with FF and a few others regarding drafting in general, and the consensus seems to be that they'd say Pace did in fact knowingly pass over a legend in order to draft (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

You just can't resist misframing the debate.

It's not about knowingly passing up a legend. It's about misevaluating which player would be better, plain and simple. And of course one evaluation doesn't matter, it's the entire body of work that matters. Pace has been solid.


Anyway, just came here to bump this and say Watson still probably finishes with more TD passes than Mitch this year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
This is so weird. I was just having a conversation with a buddy of mine last week about how all this immediate success for Watson had the feel of RGIII to it. I even mentioned (jokingly) that we need to wait to pass judgement until after we see how he bounces back from the ACL injury (he wound up injuring his MCL, but still).


This sucks tho, I really like Watson and hope he can bounce back from this. Was hoping we'd get to witness some crazy historic season by him where he winds up hoisting the Lombardi trophy over his head at the end of it all.


Another bummer. What a shit year for injuries.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group