long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
BRick beating down LTG, although let's be honest, everyone does that.

Yet another guy lacking an ability to comprehend.
yeah keep saying that as you repeatedly get owned in just about every discussion in which you partake.
Yeah your Poland and the Cold War references were truly a prime example of this.
huh huh, tell me more about Mossad terrorist attacks. You got laughed out of that thread.

Also, do you deny the Soviets violated the agreements made at Yalta? I'm pretty sure violating the agreements there to turn all of Eastern Europe into Soviet satellite states started the Cold War, but you just ignore that so that you can apologize for Stalin and blame the US. Typical LTG.
I provided sources which clearly stated that the Mossad provided financial supports to groups (MEK) which commit terrorist attacks. I also provided evidence that the Mossad engaged in terrorist attacks themselves. You ignored the sources because they didn't support your argument.
You did the same thing with the Cold War discussion. I provide a source and you still claim that it was wrong. Your game is to simply debunk the source. Regardless of credibility that is your angle.
The Soviets violated the Yalta agreements but that doesn't mean that the Yalta agreements started the Cold War. The U.S. were comfortable with Stalin's renege in Poland because they wanted him to stay out of Japan. Poland wasn't important enough to start an international conflict over. In Fact the Polish believed that they'd been sold out by the U.S.
You display a tremendous amount of naivete by continuously stating something that is incorrect. Yes that occurred first but that doesn't mean that it sparked a conflict. To be honest I don't believe that you really know what the Cold War was truly about. If you believe that it was about free elections in Poland then I'm convinced that you don't know.
You used a fucking InfoWars conspiracy blog and called it a source. (once again, I doubt you have any academic credentials if you consider such a source to be fact based) Would you like me to post the screenshot again from your conspiracy blog to see if others think it is a credible source?
As for MEK, I provided sourced material showing they were had not been classed as a terrorist attack. In the end, you could not name a single event which was classed by any non-Iranian party to be a terrorist attack. Then you ran from the thread like a bitch when I used facts to debunk your bullshit assertions, as is your MO on this board.
PS, I think BRick and others are still waiting for some answers in the thread you started last night.