It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 3:22 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Unanimous top 3 among league insiders is freak, Harden and LBJ. Maybe porzingus. Irving isn't anywhere close, especially when he has about five more assists than his starting pf. At best he's playing well enough to be featured on the cover of NBA Live 2018. Tatum is the player that you'll have to pay to unlock though.

Feel free to join the Kyrie Trade Results thread anytime :D



These guys really are loading up at the batrack in order to admit they were wrong about this stuff. To think that if you listen to MANY on here you'd think that this sort of denial was relegated to a small group of people that post here.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Unanimous top 3 among league insiders is freak, Harden and LBJ. Maybe porzingus. Irving isn't anywhere close, especially when he has about five more assists than his starting pf. At best he's playing well enough to be featured on the cover of NBA Live 2018. Tatum is the player that you'll have to pay to unlock though.

Feel free to join the Kyrie Trade Results thread anytime :D


I'll bump the DB thread soon. To much unwarranted love for a guy whose best skills is dribbling between his legs.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
Unanimous top 3 among league insiders is freak, Harden and LBJ.

LBJ isnt top 3. #9 seeds dont get to have MVP candidates. Its a law

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Unanimous top 3 among league insiders is freak, Harden and LBJ.

LBJ isnt top 3. #9 seeds dont get to have MVP candidates. Its a law


"#9 seed" :lol:

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Unanimous top 3 among league insiders is freak, Harden and LBJ.

LBJ isnt top 3. #9 seeds dont get to have MVP candidates. Its a law


"#9 seed" :lol:

http://www.espn.com/nba/standings :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Unanimous top 3 among league insiders is freak, Harden and LBJ.

LBJ isnt top 3. #9 seeds dont get to have MVP candidates. Its a law


"#9 seed" :lol:

http://www.espn.com/nba/standings :lol:


November, 17 2017. :lol:

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Unanimous top 3 among league insiders is freak, Harden and LBJ.

LBJ isnt top 3. #9 seeds dont get to have MVP candidates. Its a law


"#9 seed" :lol:

http://www.espn.com/nba/standings :lol:


November, 17 2017. :lol:

I didn't think it was necessary to point out what day it is. I figured we both knew it already.

You are aware the discussion is about MVPs through the current season so far, yeah?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
Minnesota also lost to Phoenix with him playing.
And Boston's losses this season came with Irving playing.

Quote:
What you keep ignoring is that reports were that Ainge wasn't really all that enamored with Butler the player. Zach Lowe reported this months ago.
He was whining about the George trade catching him off guard though. Kind of impossible to pretend he was waiting for a better player when no one had the slightest idea Irving was available.

Quote:
As far as Irving goes you really aren't making much sense.

They are on a 14 game winning streak in which he has played 12. He also is the undisputed go to guy in crunch time.
The Celtics had the best record in the conference last year without Kyrie. They won games this season without him. There's some stats that suggest that Horford has been more valuable to the team this year. You seem to be in quite a rush to declare him a superstar and the trade a clear win for Boston when his number most definitely aren't superstar level and the trade is not any kind of win if they don't do any better in the playoffs.

If you want to say Irving's doing the little things or making the important things for Boston, fine, but you don't get to then wave away the things Butler is doing for the Wolves (including crunch time buckets, as FavreFan explained to you a few days ago) and myopically focus on the stats to criticize him.

Quote:
As far as GarPax goes there is no way they spot Markannen if they are as incompetent as you keep suggesting. I really don't care for Forman so I should refrain from GarPax. Paxson knows basketball.

They don't spot Markannen if they are that bad. I don't recall you touting the pick either.
:roll: I'm glad all it takes is one good draft pick for a front office to be regarded as brilliant talent evaluators for life evidently.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Unanimous top 3 among league insiders is freak, Harden and LBJ.

LBJ isnt top 3. #9 seeds dont get to have MVP candidates. Its a law


"#9 seed" :lol:

http://www.espn.com/nba/standings :lol:


November, 17 2017. :lol:

I didn't think it was necessary to point out what day it is. I figured we both knew it already.

You are aware the discussion is about MVPs through the current season so far, yeah?


Who cares. Freak LBJ Harden will remain top 5 for the whole year. No surprises. LBJ isn't missing the playoffs.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Things like Garpax drafting Markennen if he turns out good just prove my thesis that there's very little skill involved in drafting. Thanks, Garpax!

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Minnesota also lost to Phoenix with him playing.
And Boston's losses this season came with Irving playing.

Quote:
What you keep ignoring is that reports were that Ainge wasn't really all that enamored with Butler the player. Zach Lowe reported this months ago.
He was whining about the George trade catching him off guard though. Kind of impossible to pretend he was waiting for a better player when no one had the slightest idea Irving was available.

Quote:
As far as Irving goes you really aren't making much sense.

They are on a 14 game winning streak in which he has played 12. He also is the undisputed go to guy in crunch time.
The Celtics had the best record in the conference last year without Kyrie. They won games this season without him. There's some stats that suggest that Horford has been more valuable to the team this year. You seem to be in quite a rush to declare him a superstar and the trade a clear win for Boston when his number most definitely aren't superstar level and the trade is not any kind of win if they don't do any better in the playoffs.

If you want to say Irving's doing the little things or making the important things for Boston, fine, but you don't get to then wave away the things Butler is doing for the Wolves (including crunch time buckets, as FavreFan explained to you a few days ago) and myopically focus on the stats to criticize him.

Quote:
As far as GarPax goes there is no way they spot Markannen if they are as incompetent as you keep suggesting. I really don't care for Forman so I should refrain from GarPax. Paxson knows basketball.

They don't spot Markannen if they are that bad. I don't recall you touting the pick either.
:roll: I'm glad all it takes is one good draft pick for a front office to be regarded as brilliant talent evaluators for life evidently.



The Boston as best team argument is rather weak since there are only 4 players from last year's team that are still on the roster. This is a team that has undergone a complete makeover. 2nd is the fact that they are missing their 2nd best player.

Irving will be an All star and a 1st or 2nd team All NBA. Butler won't. Butler also isn't the best guy on his own team Irving is.

This argument is done unless Irving becomes injured.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 9:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
The Boston as best team argument is rather weak since there are only 4 players from last year's team that are still on the roster. This is a team that has undergone a complete makeover. 2nd is the fact that they are missing their 2nd best player.

Irving will be an All star and a 1st or 2nd team All NBA. Butler won't. Butler also isn't the best guy on his own team Irving is.

This argument is done unless Irving becomes injured.

They have the same coach who's was regarded as one of the best in the NBA, the best guy in the draft, and Horford, who the numbers say has in face been more valuable than Kyrie so far this season. Trying to frame this as some kind of carry job is disingenuous rubbish, particularly given the weak numbers Irving is averaging so far.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Boston as best team argument is rather weak since there are only 4 players from last year's team that are still on the roster. This is a team that has undergone a complete makeover. 2nd is the fact that they are missing their 2nd best player.

Irving will be an All star and a 1st or 2nd team All NBA. Butler won't. Butler also isn't the best guy on his own team Irving is.

This argument is done unless Irving becomes injured.

They have the same coach who's was regarded as one of the best in the NBA, the best guy in the draft, and Horford, who the numbers say has in face been more valuable than Kyrie so far this season. Trying to frame this as some kind of carry job is disingenuous rubbish, particularly given the weak numbers Irving is averaging so far.


Week numbers yet somehow he is in the MVP race. He is avg 20 per game and it's obvious where the Ball will be at the end of the game. He also is on his way to being 1st or 2nd team All NBA.

Will Jimmy Butler be All NBA? I will hangup and listen for my Answer.


Here is how weak your argument happens to be. Horford has missed more games than Irving and yet the team has won each and every one of them.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Boston as best team argument is rather weak since there are only 4 players from last year's team that are still on the roster. This is a team that has undergone a complete makeover. 2nd is the fact that they are missing their 2nd best player.

Irving will be an All star and a 1st or 2nd team All NBA. Butler won't. Butler also isn't the best guy on his own team Irving is.

This argument is done unless Irving becomes injured.

They have the same coach who's was regarded as one of the best in the NBA, the best guy in the draft, and Horford, who the numbers say has in face been more valuable than Kyrie so far this season. Trying to frame this as some kind of carry job is disingenuous rubbish, particularly given the weak numbers Irving is averaging so far.


Week numbers yet somehow he is in the MVP race. He is avg 20 per game and it's obvious where the Ball will be at the end of the game. He also is on his way to being 1st or 2nd team All NBA.

Will Jimmy Butler be All NBA? I will hangup and listen for my Answer.


Here is how weak your argument happens to be. Horford has missed more games than Irving and yet the team has won each and every one of them.

I posted the stats that indicate the Celtics play far better on both ends of the court with Horford in the game than they do with Kyrie. This is also borne out by advanced stats like RPM, which likewise have Horford ahead of Irving. The only reason we were discussing team records at all is because you latched onto the Celtics' team success since there's no reason to celebrate Irving on the basis of individual numbers.

Irving is nowhere near close to being "on his way" to first team all NBA. Pretending that's a realistic possibility given how he's played so far is laughable. His numbers are even worse than last year, when didn't even make third team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Boston as best team argument is rather weak since there are only 4 players from last year's team that are still on the roster. This is a team that has undergone a complete makeover. 2nd is the fact that they are missing their 2nd best player.

Irving will be an All star and a 1st or 2nd team All NBA. Butler won't. Butler also isn't the best guy on his own team Irving is.

This argument is done unless Irving becomes injured.

They have the same coach who's was regarded as one of the best in the NBA, the best guy in the draft, and Horford, who the numbers say has in face been more valuable than Kyrie so far this season. Trying to frame this as some kind of carry job is disingenuous rubbish, particularly given the weak numbers Irving is averaging so far.


Week numbers yet somehow he is in the MVP race. He is avg 20 per game and it's obvious where the Ball will be at the end of the game. He also is on his way to being 1st or 2nd team All NBA.

Will Jimmy Butler be All NBA? I will hangup and listen for my Answer.


Here is how weak your argument happens to be. Horford has missed more games than Irving and yet the team has won each and every one of them.

I posted the stats that indicate the Celtics play far better on both ends of the court with Horford in the game than they do with Kyrie. This is also borne out by advanced stats like RPM, which likewise have Horford ahead of Irving. The only reason we were discussing team records at all is because you latched onto the Celtics' team success since there's no reason to celebrate Irving on the basis of individual numbers.

Irving is nowhere near close to being "on his way" to first team all NBA. Pretending that's a realistic possibility given how he's played so far is laughable. His numbers are even worse than last year, when didn't even make third team.


You were in favor of mentioning records until you weren't. You'd be hard pressed to find 2% of the people associated with the NBA who believe Al Horford is more valuable than Kyrie Irving. You aren't making much sense.

The They play better when he is in the game argument is the same one they used when he was in Cleveland. How is that working for Cleveland?


Again will or won't Butler be All NBA? Irving will be unless he is hurt. Butler won't.

Boston has won 14 straight with Irving as the best player yet you are arguing what exactly?


He is the best player on the team with the best record. That will automatically place in on at least All NBA second team.

He is shooting 43%. that isn't atrocious by the way. He is in the running currently for MVP yet he is nowhere near 1st team MVP. Again you aren't making sense.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The guy that can't beat out Grant (though he was well on his way prior to injury) dropped 22 in 26 minutes tonight.

This Minnesota trade is about to blow up in Thibodeau's face. No doubt about it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
You were in favor of mentioning records until you weren't.
No the only reason I brought up records is because you're making a big to-do about Boston's record and downplaying Irving's individual stats while doing the exact opposite for Butler.
Quote:
The They play better when he is in the game argument is the same one they used when he was in Cleveland. How is that working for Cleveland?
It's hilarious how you accuse me of not making much sense and write sentences like this. The Cavs indisputably played far worse last season when Irving was on and Lebron was off in the playoffs. I also don't know why you're celebrating Cleveland's struggles when it's not like they're unprecedented and it's not like they're especially relevant to the playoffs at this point. After all, Boston still finished with a better record last year too, back when the Cavs retained the services of Kyrie.
Quote:
Again will or won't Butler be All NBA? Irving will be unless he is hurt. Butler won't.
I think it's far too early in the season to make any such declarations, as opposed to you declaring winners and losers of trades, MVP votes, etc. as you seem to enjoy doing. I definitely don't think it's out of the realm of possibility, especially if Minnesota keeps winning and maintains a top 3 spot in the West. As I've told you before, many Minnesota fans think Butler is the biggest reason for their improvement this year, and that's even with a poor shooting start.
Quote:
He is shooting 43%. that isn't atrocious by the way. He is in the running currently for MVP yet he is nowhere near 1st team MVP. Again you aren't making sense.

He's scoring 20 points a game. Those are not MVP numbers. Curry and Harden trounce him for first team guard honors based on how this part of the season has transpired and it's not even close really.


Last edited by ZephMarshack on Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
The guy that can't beat out Grant (though he was well on his way prior to injury) dropped 22 in 26 minutes tonight.

This Minnesota trade is about to blow up in Thibodeau's face. No doubt about it.

Is this just like when McDermott or Mirotic would have one good game and everyone would declare them well on their way to becoming the next Paul Pierce or Dirk Nowitzki?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
You were in favor of mentioning records until you weren't.
No the only reason I brought up records is because you're making a big to-do about Boston's record and downplaying Irving's individual stats while doing the exact opposite for Butler.
Quote:
The They play better when he is in the game argument is the same one they used when he was in Cleveland. How is that working for Cleveland?
It's hilarious how you accuse me of not making much sense and write sentences like this. The Cavs indisputably played far worse last season when Irving was on and Lebron was off in the playoffs. I also don't know why you're celebrating Cleveland's struggles when it's not like they're unprecedented and it's not like they're especially relevant to the playoffs at this point. After all, Boston still finished with a better record last year too, back when the Cavs retained the services of Kyrie.
Quote:
Again will or won't Butler be All NBA? Irving will be unless he is hurt. Butler won't.
I think it's far too early in the season to make any such declarations, as opposed to you declaring winners and losers of trades, MVP votes, etc. as you seem to enjoy doing. I definitely don't think it's out of the realm of possibility, especially if Minnesota keeps winning and maintains a top 3 spot in the West. As I've told you before, many Minnesota fans think Butler is the biggest reason for their improvement this year, and that's even with a poor shooting start.
Quote:
He is shooting 43%. that isn't atrocious by the way. He is in the running currently for MVP yet he is nowhere near 1st team MVP. Again you aren't making sense.

He's scoring 20 points a game. Those are not MVP numbers. Curry and Harden trounce him for first team guard honors based on how this part of the season has transpired and it's not even close really.



It's interesting how Butler is viewed by you as a supreme difference maker yet Irving isn't. Boston's record this year trounces what they did last year this far. They are missing an All Star and only have 2 guys that played significant minutes for them last year.

The single biggest reason is Irving. You stated that it would be a loss for Boston and you've already been proven wrong.

You're trying to play the long game because frankly it's the only game you have to play. Your only hope is further injury.

Other than that you don't stand a chance of being proven right.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:


It's interesting how Butler is viewed by you as a supreme difference maker yet Irving isn't. Boston's record this year trounces what they did last year this far. They are missing an All Star and only have 2 guys that played significant minutes for them last year.

The single biggest reason is Irving. You stated that it would be a loss for Boston and you've already been proven wrong.

You're trying to play the long game because frankly it's the only game you have to play. Your only hope is further injury.

Other than that you don't stand a chance of being proven right.
I've never once denied the possibility of Irving as a difference maker. You however have downplayed it repeatedly in the case of Butler to focus on how his individual stats have gone down this season, thereby proving he was overrated last year, yet start copping pleas when Irving is held to the same standard of individual numbers. It's' just like I said several responses ago: If you want to say Irving's doing the little things or making the important plays for Boston, fine, but you don't get to then wave away the things Butler is doing for the Wolves (including crunch time buckets, as FavreFan explained to you a few days ago) and myopically focus on the individual stats alone to criticize him.

Also if we're comparing records from last year to this year, I believe you'll see that Minnesota record this year trounces what they did last year even more than Boston has.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:


It's interesting how Butler is viewed by you as a supreme difference maker yet Irving isn't. Boston's record this year trounces what they did last year this far. They are missing an All Star and only have 2 guys that played significant minutes for them last year.

The single biggest reason is Irving. You stated that it would be a loss for Boston and you've already been proven wrong.

You're trying to play the long game because frankly it's the only game you have to play. Your only hope is further injury.

Other than that you don't stand a chance of being proven right.
I've never once denied the possibility of Irving as a difference maker. You however have downplayed it repeatedly in the case of Butler to focus on how his individual stats have gone down this season, thereby proving he was overrated last year, yet start copping pleas when Irving is held to the same standard of individual numbers. It's' just like I said several responses ago: If you want to say Irving's doing the little things or making the important plays for Boston, fine, but you don't get to then wave away the things Butler is doing for the Wolves (including crunch time buckets, as FavreFan explained to you a few days ago) and myopically focus on the individual stats alone to criticize him.




If Jimmy Butler was generally regarded as a top 10 player as he was on here and fails to make either an All Star game or All NBA doesn't it validate the point that he is overrated?

He was a good player on a crappy team in a weak league. He isn't a great player and this year is demonstrating it. He has helped improve Minnesota's team but they were a 31 team win. He hasn't made them a contender and I think they will finish in the 6th slot in the West. They have played a pretty favorable schedule thus far.


The difference between Irving and Butler is that Irving is universally regarded as the best player on his team. Butler isn't. He is a supplemental piece. He won't make the All Star team. His offense is being overstated by you. There are too many errors in Farve Fan's analysis. His eye test needs a new lense. That's evident given his most recent evaluations.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
long time guy wrote:
If Jimmy Butler was generally regarded as a top 10 player as he was on here and fails to make either an All Star game or All NBA doesn't it validate the point that he is overrated?
He made third team all-NBA last year already. How would this year automatically undermine last year?
Quote:
He was a good player on a crappy team in a weak league. He isn't a great player and this year is demonstrating it. He has helped improve Minnesota's team but they were a 31 team win. He hasn't made them a contender and I think they will finish in the 6th slot in the West. They have played a pretty favorable schedule thus far.
The Wolves' strength of schedule so far is bang average, neither favorable or unfavorable. They're currently the third seed in the West and they've improved more this year compared to last year than Boston has with Irving.

If we're talking about what we'll think will happen rather than what has happened, someone can just as easily suggest that Boston still most definitely won't actually challenge for the title so Irving's early regular season numbers are irrelevant anyway.
Quote:
The difference between Irving and Butler is that Irving is universally regarded as the best player on his team. Butler isn't. He is a supplemental piece. He won't make the All Star team. His offense is being overstated by you. There are too many errors in Farve Fan's analysis. His eye test needs a new lense. That's evident given his most recent evaluations.
No, it's not the case at all that Irving is universally regarded as the best player on the Celtics.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Jimmy Butler was generally regarded as a top 10 player as he was on here and fails to make either an All Star game or All NBA doesn't it validate the point that he is overrated?
He made third team all-NBA last year already. How would this year automatically undermine last year?
Quote:
He was a good player on a crappy team in a weak league. He isn't a great player and this year is demonstrating it. He has helped improve Minnesota's team but they were a 31 team win. He hasn't made them a contender and I think they will finish in the 6th slot in the West. They have played a pretty favorable schedule thus far.
The Wolves' strength of schedule so far is bang average, neither favorable or unfavorable. They're currently the third seed in the West and they've improved more this year compared to last year than Boston has with Irving.

If we're talking about what we'll think will happen rather than what has happened, someone can just as easily suggest that Boston still most definitely won't actually challenge for the title so Irving's early regular season numbers are irrelevant anyway.
Quote:
The difference between Irving and Butler is that Irving is universally regarded as the best player on his team. Butler isn't. He is a supplemental piece. He won't make the All Star team. His offense is being overstated by you. There are too many errors in Farve Fan's analysis. His eye test needs a new lense. That's evident given his most recent evaluations.
No, it's not the case at all that Irving is universally regarded as the best player on the Celtics.



Charles Barkley agrees.

https://clutchpoints.com/celtics-news-c ... rving-mvp/

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Yeah if there's one guy known for sober-minded, insightful, and definitely not reactionary analysis of the NBA, it's Charles Barkley!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
long time guy wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Minnesota also lost to Phoenix with him playing.
And Boston's losses this season came with Irving playing.

Quote:
What you keep ignoring is that reports were that Ainge wasn't really all that enamored with Butler the player. Zach Lowe reported this months ago.
He was whining about the George trade catching him off guard though. Kind of impossible to pretend he was waiting for a better player when no one had the slightest idea Irving was available.

Quote:
As far as Irving goes you really aren't making much sense.

They are on a 14 game winning streak in which he has played 12. He also is the undisputed go to guy in crunch time.
The Celtics had the best record in the conference last year without Kyrie. They won games this season without him. There's some stats that suggest that Horford has been more valuable to the team this year. You seem to be in quite a rush to declare him a superstar and the trade a clear win for Boston when his number most definitely aren't superstar level and the trade is not any kind of win if they don't do any better in the playoffs.

If you want to say Irving's doing the little things or making the important things for Boston, fine, but you don't get to then wave away the things Butler is doing for the Wolves (including crunch time buckets, as FavreFan explained to you a few days ago) and myopically focus on the stats to criticize him.

Quote:
As far as GarPax goes there is no way they spot Markannen if they are as incompetent as you keep suggesting. I really don't care for Forman so I should refrain from GarPax. Paxson knows basketball.

They don't spot Markannen if they are that bad. I don't recall you touting the pick either.
:roll: I'm glad all it takes is one good draft pick for a front office to be regarded as brilliant talent evaluators for life evidently.



The Boston as best team argument is rather weak since there are only 4 players from last year's team that are still on the roster. This is a team that has undergone a complete makeover. 2nd is the fact that they are missing their 2nd best player. so there goes your tanking theory

Irving will be an All star and a 1st or 2nd team All NBA. Butler won't. Butler also isn't the best guy on his own team Irving is.

This argument is done unless Irving becomes injured.

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Quote:
ZephMarshack wrote:

Irving is nowhere near close to being "on his way" to first team all NBA. Pretending that's a realistic possibility given how he's played so far is laughable
.

77 points in his last 2 games on 26 for 34 shooting.

I'd say he is on his way to first team All NBA status. I'd don't believe that too many would laugh at the assertion either.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Fire Hoiberg and sign Fizdale


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
Quote:
ZephMarshack wrote:

Irving is nowhere near close to being "on his way" to first team all NBA. Pretending that's a realistic possibility given how he's played so far is laughable
.

77 points in his last 2 games on 26 for 34 shooting.

I'd say he is on his way to first team All NBA status. I'd don't believe that too many would laugh at the assertion either.



He'd only get it because John wall is injured. Irving also averages as many assists as his starting power forward. Not exactly earth shattering.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Quote:
ZephMarshack wrote:

Irving is nowhere near close to being "on his way" to first team all NBA. Pretending that's a realistic possibility given how he's played so far is laughable
.

77 points in his last 2 games on 26 for 34 shooting.

I'd say he is on his way to first team All NBA status. I'd don't believe that too many would laugh at the assertion either.



He'd only get it because John wall is injured. Irving also averages as many assists as his starting power forward. Not exactly earth shattering.

:lol:

John Wall has never made an All NBA second team, and he's the guy in Kyrie's way for a first team spot? Your "Wall is great but Kyrie is not" take is truly bizarre.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Historically Bad!
PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Quote:
ZephMarshack wrote:

Irving is nowhere near close to being "on his way" to first team all NBA. Pretending that's a realistic possibility given how he's played so far is laughable
.

77 points in his last 2 games on 26 for 34 shooting.

I'd say he is on his way to first team All NBA status. I'd don't believe that too many would laugh at the assertion either.



He'd only get it because John wall is injured. Irving also averages as many assists as his starting power forward. Not exactly earth shattering.

:lol:

John Wall has never made an All NBA second team, and he's the guy in Kyrie's way for a first team spot? Your "Wall is great but Kyrie is not" take is truly bizarre.


Best PG in the league.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group