It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:16 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1486 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 50  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
By placing Butler in that role you essentially stunt Town's development as the best player. Wiggins also. They are still the most talented guys on the team.

I'm struggling to understand how someone can watch the NBA all of last year and this year and still come to the conclusion Wiggins is more talented than Butler. Sorry man but that is an asinine thought.


Huh? You may not have noticed but Butler isn't all that talented. Wiggins is much more talented than Butler. His athletic ability alone separates him from Butler. He also has a better off the dribble game too. better finisher. Wiggins is generally regarded as very talented player. No one ever said that about Butler before he became good. No one was waiting for him to "put it all together". That has always been out there about Wiggins.

So you're saying Wiggins is more talented because he was drafted higher and expected to be better coming into the league. That's an interesting take. Is Wiggins also more talented than Kawhi Leonard?

Butler is a better defender, shooter, rebounder, and passer. He's a better scorer AND a more efficient scorer. Outside of pre-NBA hype, you can't find one solid thing to suggest Wiggins is better at basketball than Butler. This year there is a very stark difference in their performance.

Take the L on this one man. It's a bad look insisting a player is more talented than another player who beats him in every single category.


You obviously don't know the difference between Better player and better talent. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone who'd go on the record and say that Butler is more talented than Wiggins. I don't think you know what constitutes talent.

Educate me.

To be clear, you are saying scoring, rebounding, passing, and defensive ability don't constitute talent, correct? Because Butler is clearly superior to Wiggins in every one of those categories.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
By placing Butler in that role you essentially stunt Town's development as the best player. Wiggins also. They are still the most talented guys on the team.

I'm struggling to understand how someone can watch the NBA all of last year and this year and still come to the conclusion Wiggins is more talented than Butler. Sorry man but that is an asinine thought.


Huh? You may not have noticed but Butler isn't all that talented. Wiggins is much more talented than Butler. His athletic ability alone separates him from Butler. He also has a better off the dribble game too. better finisher. Wiggins is generally regarded as very talented player. No one ever said that about Butler before he became good. No one was waiting for him to "put it all together". That has always been out there about Wiggins.

So you're saying Wiggins is more talented because he was drafted higher and expected to be better coming into the league. That's an interesting take. Is Wiggins also more talented than Kawhi Leonard?

Butler is a better defender, shooter, rebounder, and passer. He's a better scorer AND a more efficient scorer. Outside of pre-NBA hype, you can't find one solid thing to suggest Wiggins is better at basketball than Butler. This year there is a very stark difference in their performance.

Take the L on this one man. It's a bad look insisting a player is more talented than another player who beats him in every single category.


You obviously don't know the difference between Better player and better talent. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone who'd go on the record and say that Butler is more talented than Wiggins. I don't think you know what constitutes talent.

Educate me.

To be clear, you are saying scoring, rebounding, passing, and defensive ability don't constitute talent, correct? Because Butler is clearly superior to Wiggins in every one of those categories.



It doesn't mean he is more talented. It means he is a better player. Wiggins actually scored the same amount of points as Butler last season. How is Butler a better scorer with that being the case? He also is 5 years younger and Butler was nowhere near the player Wiggins is at 23. He is a better finisher at the rim and he is better at getting his shot off.

Butler is nowhere near the athlete Wiggins is either. Wiggins is a great athlete. Butler isn't.

Butler is the better player. Wiggins is a better talent.

Wiggins has the talent to be good at all those things.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
You failed to explain to me what talent is in that response. And Butler is 10x the finisher that Wiggins is. It’s his best trait and it’s why he’s been the Wolves go to guy down the stretch this year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
So talent is age and athleticism and has nothing to do with shooting, scoring, rebounding, or passing. Got it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
You failed to explain to me what talent is in that response. And Butler is 10x the finisher that Wiggins is. It’s his best trait and it’s why he’s been the Wolves go to guy down the stretch this year.



Andrew Wiggins has a better handle and he gets his shot off with greater ease than Butler. That's talent. He also is more talented scorer overall than Butler.

What are Butler's talents as a player?

What does he do well? Don't give me stats. Break his game down.

Butler isn't a more talented shot creator than Wiggins. Have you seen him try and do it. It's painful sometimes.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
You failed to explain to me what talent is in that response. And Butler is 10x the finisher that Wiggins is. It’s his best trait and it’s why he’s been the Wolves go to guy down the stretch this year.



Andrew Wiggins has a better handle and he gets his shot off with greater ease than Butler. That's talent. He also is more talented scorer overall than Butler.

What are Butler's talents as a player?

What does he do well? Don't give me stats. Break his game down.

But that’s not true. Butler never has trouble getting his shot off, and the eye test and stats indicate he’s clearly better at shooting and scoring/finishing than Wiggins. It’s why he’s more efficient from literally every area on the court than Wiggins.

Butlers talents as a player are that he’s a great defender and finisher, he’s an elite rebounder for his size and position, and he’s a very good passer and shooter. His ball handling skills are probably his weakest trait and he’s still above average for a forward in that area. Was this a serious question on your part? :scratch:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
LeBron is the most physically gifted and talented player in the history of the game. Michael Jordan was a better player. I understand what LTG is saying but Wiggins will run out of excuses if he doesn't turn the corner in a couple of years.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
You failed to explain to me what talent is in that response. And Butler is 10x the finisher that Wiggins is. It’s his best trait and it’s why he’s been the Wolves go to guy down the stretch this year.



Andrew Wiggins has a better handle and he gets his shot off with greater ease than Butler. That's talent. He also is more talented scorer overall than Butler.

What are Butler's talents as a player?

What does he do well? Don't give me stats. Break his game down.

But that’s not true. Butler never has trouble getting his shot off, and the eye test and stats indicate he’s clearly better at shooting and scoring/finishing than Wiggins. It’s why he’s more efficient from literally every area on the court than Wiggins.

Butlers talents as a player are that he’s a great defender and finisher, he’s an elite rebounder for his size and position, and he’s a very good passer and shooter. His ball handling skills are probably his weakest trait and he’s still above average for a forward in that area. Was this a serious question on your part? :scratch:



Very good shooter? Butler shoots 32%-33% from three for his career. He also doesn't handle well. Yeah. You're not faring well. The very good shooter part was an immediate disqualifier to be honest.

Butler is a better player at this stage of both their careers. It doesn't mean he is more talented.

Wiggins is a better ball handler and last I checked they are similar from 3 point range. At the same age it's no comparison as to who the better player happened to be. No contest.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Butler is shooting 36% from the 3 last year and this year. Once again, youth is not a talent, so stop bringing up their ages. This discussion is and always has been about who is "more talented" currently, not who was better at age 23.

So yeah, Butler is shooting 36% from 3, Wiggins is shooting 30%. Clear advantage for Butler there. Butler is also shooting 43% on 2 point shots from 18-22 feet, which is currently 17th in the entire NBA. So yeah, he's a very good shooter. Deal with it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Butler is shooting 36% from the 3 last year and this year. Once again, youth is not a talent, so stop bringing up their ages. This discussion is and always has been about who is "more talented" currently, not who was better at age 23.

So yeah, Butler is shooting 36% from 3, Wiggins is shooting 30%. Clear advantage for Butler there. Butler is also shooting 43% on 2 point shots from 18-22 feet, which is currently 17th in the entire NBA. So yeah, he's a very good shooter. Deal with it.


You're not making much sense. Talent is always relative to age. Where did you ever get such foolishness from? You're comparing a 28 year old to a 22 year old and saying that age shouldn't be factored in. That makes no sense.




When people discuss talent it's usually relative to age. This is dumb.

Butler at 22 was nowhere near the talent or player that Wiggins is now. This is stupid.

Wiggins numbers last year offensively were similar to Butler's. Let's take his talents as a scorer. He scored at the rate Butler scored at as his team's second option. Think about for a second. I will leave it at that.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Butler is shooting 36% from the 3 last year and this year. Once again, youth is not a talent, so stop bringing up their ages. This discussion is and always has been about who is "more talented" currently, not who was better at age 23.

So yeah, Butler is shooting 36% from 3, Wiggins is shooting 30%. Clear advantage for Butler there. Butler is also shooting 43% on 2 point shots from 18-22 feet, which is currently 17th in the entire NBA. So yeah, he's a very good shooter. Deal with it.


You're not making much sense. Talent is always relative to age. Where did you ever get so foolishness from? You're comparing a 28 year old to a 22 year old and saying that age shouldn't be factored in. That makes no sense.


When people discuss talent it's usually relative to age. This is dumb.

Butler at 22 was nowhere near the talent or player that Wiggins is now. This is stupid.

You are literally the only person I've ever heard say being young is a talent. I'm used to bizarre takes from you by now though so no big deal.

Is Kawhi Leonard more talented now than he was five years ago? Why or why not?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Butler is shooting 36% from the 3 last year and this year. Once again, youth is not a talent, so stop bringing up their ages. This discussion is and always has been about who is "more talented" currently, not who was better at age 23.

So yeah, Butler is shooting 36% from 3, Wiggins is shooting 30%. Clear advantage for Butler there. Butler is also shooting 43% on 2 point shots from 18-22 feet, which is currently 17th in the entire NBA. So yeah, he's a very good shooter. Deal with it.


You're not making much sense. Talent is always relative to age. Where did you ever get so foolishness from? You're comparing a 28 year old to a 22 year old and saying that age shouldn't be factored in. That makes no sense.


When people discuss talent it's usually relative to age. This is dumb.

Butler at 22 was nowhere near the talent or player that Wiggins is now. This is stupid.

You are literally the only person I've ever heard say being young is a talent. I'm used to bizarre takes from you by now though so no big deal.

Is Kawhi Leonard more talented now than he was five years ago? Why or why not?



Let's compare their talents at the age of 22. Even now Wiggins is simply a more talented scorer than Butler. Last year proved that.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Is Kawhi Leonard more talented now than he was five years ago? This is an easy question to answer.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Is Kawhi Leonard more talented now than he was five years ago? This is an easy question to answer.



Let's keep it with Wiggins. He has the ability to be a much better offensive player than Butler.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:21 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Is Kawhi Leonard more talented now than he was five years ago? This is an easy question to answer.



Yeah. He couldn't create a shot 5 years ago.

Ok so then younger guys don’t inherently have more talent than guys in their late 20’s. Just making sure we got that cleared up.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Butler is shooting 36% from the 3 last year and this year. Once again, youth is not a talent, so stop bringing up their ages. This discussion is and always has been about who is "more talented" currently, not who was better at age 23.

So yeah, Butler is shooting 36% from 3, Wiggins is shooting 30%. Clear advantage for Butler there. Butler is also shooting 43% on 2 point shots from 18-22 feet, which is currently 17th in the entire NBA. So yeah, he's a very good shooter. Deal with it.


You're not making much sense. Talent is always relative to age. Where did you ever get so foolishness from? You're comparing a 28 year old to a 22 year old and saying that age shouldn't be factored in. That makes no sense.


When people discuss talent it's usually relative to age. This is dumb.

Butler at 22 was nowhere near the talent or player that Wiggins is now. This is stupid.

You are literally the only person I've ever heard say being young is a talent. I'm used to bizarre takes from you by now though so no big deal.

Is Kawhi Leonard more talented now than he was five years ago? Why or why not?



Let's compare their talents at the age of 22. Even now Wiggins is simply a more talented scorer than Butler. Last year proved that.

If Wiggins is a more talented scorer why does Butler score more than he does and why is Butler a lot more efficient as a scorer? You have no answer for this.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Is Kawhi Leonard more talented now than he was five years ago? This is an easy question to answer.



Yeah. He couldn't create a shot 5 years ago.

Ok so then younger guys don’t inherently have more talent than guys in their late 20’s. Just making sure we got that cleared up.



Andrew Wiggins was considered more talented than Butler. That's why he was drafted it 1 and Butler was drafted 30th. You might think that sort of thing doesnt matter but that doesn't mean you're right.

Wiggins is considered to be more gifted offensively than Butler.

You can love Butler and continue to make excuses but I will see you up the road with this stuff. This is Bills and Bagels thread. I will catch you in the Butler threads at some point.

Keep up the bad analysis and the excuse making. I'm out for now.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
:lol:

"You can keep thinking Butler is better because he's shown he's better at every single facet of basketball, I will keep going with Wiggins because he was drafted higher."

Sounds good, amigo.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Butler is shooting 36% from the 3 last year and this year. Once again, youth is not a talent, so stop bringing up their ages. This discussion is and always has been about who is "more talented" currently, not who was better at age 23.

So yeah, Butler is shooting 36% from 3, Wiggins is shooting 30%. Clear advantage for Butler there. Butler is also shooting 43% on 2 point shots from 18-22 feet, which is currently 17th in the entire NBA. So yeah, he's a very good shooter. Deal with it.


You're not making much sense. Talent is always relative to age. Where did you ever get so foolishness from? You're comparing a 28 year old to a 22 year old and saying that age shouldn't be factored in. That makes no sense.


When people discuss talent it's usually relative to age. This is dumb.

Butler at 22 was nowhere near the talent or player that Wiggins is now. This is stupid.

You are literally the only person I've ever heard say being young is a talent. I'm used to bizarre takes from you by now though so no big deal.

Is Kawhi Leonard more talented now than he was five years ago? Why or why not?



Let's compare their talents at the age of 22. Even now Wiggins is simply a more talented scorer than Butler. Last year proved that.

If Wiggins is a more talented scorer why does Butler score more than he does and why is Butler a lot more efficient as a scorer? You have no answer for this.



That stuff has nothing to do with talent. You don't understand what constitutes talent. What's the point of trying to explain it. Butler had to work hard on his game in order to make himself good because he wasn't overly talented. The knock on Wiggins is that he doesn't work as hard because he is overly talented. I really wonder why I have to explain this frankly.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
It seems you don't have any idea what constitutes talent either. I've asked you to explain it to me several times and you haven't been able to. From what I can gather, you think it's based on some combination of youth and athleticism and nothing that has to do with actually playing the sport of basketball.

I don't blame you though. Talent is inherently a nebulous concept. That's why it's easier to just compare who's better on the court, since that's the only thing that matters.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Eddie Curry had more talent than Zach Randolph.

I love ltg. He has the sticktoitedness that others don't.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Eddie Curry had more talent than Zach Randolph.

I love ltg. He has the sticktoitedness that others don't.


That's why TWTW is important. I'll take a guy who has average talent and TWTW over a guy with above average talent and no heart every day of the week.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Eddie Curry had more talent than Zach Randolph.

I love ltg. He has the sticktoitedness that others don't.


That's why TWTW is important. I'll take a guy who has average talent and TWTW over a guy with above average talent and no heart every day of the week.

That's why I've always found it silly to argue about "talent'. It's irrelevant. Was Rasheed Wallace the most talented forward ever? I dunno, maybe. He wasn't nearly the best though so it really doesn't matter.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Eddie Curry had more talent than Zach Randolph.

I love ltg. He has the sticktoitedness that others don't.


It's not about that. I will concede that he is a better player but doesn't mean he is more talented. It becomes a stat conversation too much.

That doesn't relate to which person is more talented. At the same stage Wiggins was far better as a basketball player than Butler. That speaks to his talent.

He has more range on his shot. Better shot creator. Wiggins doesn't struggle to get his shot off. Butler does. Just watch the Boston series from last season.

He is much more talented athletically. Wiggins is a freakish athlete. Butler is merely avg. Butler is a better passer. That's about it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
And 30 out of 30 teams take Butler over Wiggins. Butler is the better basketball player, and the NBA is a basketball league.

But if you were in a locker room, you'd rather check out Wiggins' body. That's cool. No judgement.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Eddie Curry had more talent than Zach Randolph.

I love ltg. He has the sticktoitedness that others don't.


That's why TWTW is important. I'll take a guy who has average talent and TWTW over a guy with above average talent and no heart every day of the week.

That's why I've always found it silly to argue about "talent'. It's irrelevant. Was Rasheed Wallace the most talented forward ever? I dunno, maybe. He wasn't nearly the best though so it really doesn't matter.



Talent matters. TJ McConnell has TWTW. He will never be more than 10th man because he lacks talent. The great ones tend to be talented sorry. I've seen a lot of try hard guys I.E. Hinrich hell Keith Bogans tried hard. You ain't winning shit with them and no talent.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
And 30 out of 30 teams take Butler over Wiggins. Butler is the better basketball player, and the NBA is a basketball league.

But if you were in a locker room, you'd rather check out Wiggins' body. That's cool. No judgement.



At 22 they would not have taken Butler over Wiggins. That speaks to talent.


You thought people would have taken MCW too. What the hell do you know?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Eddie Curry had more talent than Zach Randolph.

I love ltg. He has the sticktoitedness that others don't.


That's why TWTW is important. I'll take a guy who has average talent and TWTW over a guy with above average talent and no heart every day of the week.

That's why I've always found it silly to argue about "talent'. It's irrelevant. Was Rasheed Wallace the most talented forward ever? I dunno, maybe. He wasn't nearly the best though so it really doesn't matter.



Talent matters. TJ McConnell has TWTW. He will never be more than 10th man because he lacks talent. The great ones tend to be talented sorry. I've seen a lot of try hard guys I.E. Hinrich hell Keith Bogans tried hard. You ain't winning shit with them and no talent.


Ben Wallace was an effort guy. Effort guys can be great. I think Noah and to a certain extent Butler were/are effort guys that maximized their God given abilities. All time great guys have talent and TWTW.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72548
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:

He has more range on his shot.

This is patently false and is easy to look up. Not sure why you even tried to sneak this in there :lol:

Quote:
Better shot creator.

NOPE!

Quote:
Wiggins doesn't struggle to get his shot off. Butler does. Just watch the Boston series from last season.

WRONG! Watch any Timberwolves game this year and it's easy to notice Butler is the better iso player. It's one of his strengths and it helped them beat the Blazers last night while Wiggins once again no-showed.
Quote:
He is much more talented athletically. Wiggins is a freakish athlete. Butler is merely avg. Butler is a better passer. That's about it.

:lol: @ "more talented athletically". I agree Wiggins can run faster and jump higher than Butler. Unfortunately, it doesn't help since Butler is still a better rebounder, scorer, and defender.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Eddie Curry had more talent than Zach Randolph.

I love ltg. He has the sticktoitedness that others don't.


That's why TWTW is important. I'll take a guy who has average talent and TWTW over a guy with above average talent and no heart every day of the week.

That's why I've always found it silly to argue about "talent'. It's irrelevant. Was Rasheed Wallace the most talented forward ever? I dunno, maybe. He wasn't nearly the best though so it really doesn't matter.



Talent matters. TJ McConnell has TWTW. He will never be more than 10th man because he lacks talent. The great ones tend to be talented sorry. I've seen a lot of try hard guys I.E. Hinrich hell Keith Bogans tried hard. You ain't winning shit with them and no talent.


Ben Wallace was an effort guy. Effort guys can be great. I think Noah and to a certain extent Butler were/are effort guys that maximized their God given abilities. All time great guys have talent and TWTW.


You aren't winning shit without talent.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1486 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 50  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group