It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 3:53 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Nas wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Nas wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
4@$100-110m would be good for both. If Jake performs decently, he'd be up for one more contract at age 35, or maybe move on to one year deals around $10-15mil/yr. I'd take him over Darvish.


Jake didn't look like he had much left. I'm not giving him nearly $28M a year. Despite a couple month stretch I don't see him as a #1 going forward.

Also performed well in post season for 3rd straight year


I wouldn't say that. Good enough to win with but he walked about 20 batters. Control was a big issue.

.625 W% 3.08 ERA 2 WS wins

You wouldn't say "he performed well" ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:31 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
rogers park bryan wrote:
Nas wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Nas wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
4@$100-110m would be good for both. If Jake performs decently, he'd be up for one more contract at age 35, or maybe move on to one year deals around $10-15mil/yr. I'd take him over Darvish.


Jake didn't look like he had much left. I'm not giving him nearly $28M a year. Despite a couple month stretch I don't see him as a #1 going forward.

Also performed well in post season for 3rd straight year


I wouldn't say that. Good enough to win with but he walked about 20 batters. Control was a big issue.

.625 W% 3.08 ERA 2 WS wins

You wouldn't say "he performed well" ?


I was talking about performing well in the postseason last year. He walked 10 batters in 2 outings. They could have won both gamea BUT that isn't the Arrieta we know and most importantly that isn't the guy you want to give $28M a year to.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:43 pm
Posts: 2609
pizza_Place: Lucio's
312player wrote:
We've gotten the best out of Jake, I wouldn't sign him for 4-110$.. I'd roll the dice on somebody else..I'd take Cobb or Lynn for 4 years for less dough.. The 5 innin outings and 112 pitches was a huge red flag. No Thanx Jake


That is the great unknown. Can he regain control? Cobb seemingly was on his way here (and still may be) before he's gotten greedy wanting 17M per and 4 years min. For 13M/4 yeah not bad but 17?? Lynn is just a 3/4 so not really interested in him.

It's all a big game of who blinks first now. All teams are wary of offering crazy money/years now unless it's a Kershaw...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 11:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10096
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
'77Cubs wrote:
If in fact both the Cubs and Cards both are offering 4/110 what is Jake waiting for?? Will he jump to STL for 4/120??
The guys on MLB Radio were saying this afternoon that they felt that Boras was still holding out for a 5th year and betting that the Cardinals would crack and give it to him. I guess that means 5/130.

I could see Theo offering Jake a 5th year which vests with performance which is consistent with being a solid #2 for 4 straight years (e.g top 15 starter in IP, FIP, etc.), but with the flipside being a cheap 5th year team option (like $5M) if it doesn't vest or if he spends more than 100 games on the DL.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
'77Cubs wrote:
312player wrote:
We've gotten the best out of Jake, I wouldn't sign him for 4-110$.. I'd roll the dice on somebody else..I'd take Cobb or Lynn for 4 years for less dough.. The 5 innin outings and 112 pitches was a huge red flag. No Thanx Jake


That is the great unknown. Can he regain control? Cobb seemingly was on his way here (and still may be) before he's gotten greedy wanting 17M per and 4 years min. For 13M/4 yeah not bad but 17?? Lynn is just a 3/4 so not really interested in him.

It's all a big game of who blinks first now. All teams are wary of offering crazy money/years now unless it's a Kershaw...

Jake is just a really good 3 at this juncture so money being money go younger or less for more so Lynn makes sense for a couple or 3 cheap. He ain't getting paid big by nobody this go round.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2017 12:58 pm
Posts: 589
pizza_Place: papa johns
I'll pass on jake


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Lot of people being dumb.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 3899
Location: Tinley Park
pizza_Place: zzzzzz
Cubs need to stick 4 years. Club-friendly 5th-year option might be necessary for optics though.

_________________
Lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
DAC wrote:
Cubs need to stick 4 years. Club-friendly 5th-year option might be necessary for optics though.

Let it be a vesting option. Give him two performance based vesting options. There is no reason the contract can't become a 6 year deal if he is performing well. The reason you want 3 or 4 years guaranteed is to mitigate risk.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
2018: $26MM
2019: $27MM
2020: $29MM
2021: $30MM
2022 (club option or vesting clause): $31MM if he pitches 200 innings in 2021 or 350 innings between 2020 and 2021, or if ranks in top 5 of Cy Young voting in 2019, 2020 or 2021, or starts 3 postseason games in 2021
2023 (club option or vesting clause): $31.5MM if he pitches 180 innings in 2022, ranks in Top 5 of Cy Young voting in 2022, or starts 3 postseason games in 2022

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
IMU wrote:
2018: $26MM
2019: $27MM
2020: $29MM
2021: $30MM
2022 (club option or vesting clause): $31MM if he pitches 200 innings in 2021 or 350 innings between 2020 and 2021, or if ranks in top 5 of Cy Young voting in 2019, 2020 or 2021, or starts 3 postseason games in 2021
2023 (club option or vesting clause): $31.5MM if he pitches 180 innings in 2022, ranks in Top 5 of Cy Young voting in 2022, or starts 3 postseason games in 2022



You're thinking with your heart.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Nas wrote:
IMU wrote:
2018: $26MM
2019: $27MM
2020: $29MM
2021: $30MM
2022 (club option or vesting clause): $31MM if he pitches 200 innings in 2021 or 350 innings between 2020 and 2021, or if ranks in top 5 of Cy Young voting in 2019, 2020 or 2021, or starts 3 postseason games in 2021
2023 (club option or vesting clause): $31.5MM if he pitches 180 innings in 2022, ranks in Top 5 of Cy Young voting in 2022, or starts 3 postseason games in 2022


You're thinking with your heart.

Not at all. I won't deny being a huge fan of his. But out of any 31, almost 32, year old pitcher, I would bet on Jake Arrieta's durability into his mid 30's. 4 years guaranteed is the cost of doing business to sign any #1 or #2 starter, and the Cubs need one. So now that that is out of the way, $112MM isn't an overpay. Darvish would be looking at the same amount. But Arrieta has proven he can pitch and win big postseason games for this team and he is comfortable here. Then 2022 and 2023 only vest if Arrieta continues to pitch that way.

The Cubs are in a window. It isn't my money or your money. The Cubs have it, and it won't prevent Harper next season. They have to pony up and get one of these guys. I prefer Arrieta. However, if you prefer Darvish, those same contract details could be used.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:04 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
If it were a binary choice I would take Arrieta in a heartbeat. I would rather gamble on a Cobb and to a lesser extent Lynn. Not the same upside but definitely less risk of exploding in my face. I love Jake but believe that we would regret the deal in Year 1.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
This is a dumb question but isn't the reason for all the "revenue streams" and ads in Wrigley to be able to pay for guys like this?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Nas wrote:
If it were a binary choice I would take Arrieta in a heartbeat. I would rather gamble on a Cobb and to a lesser extent Lynn. Not the same upside but definitely less risk of exploding in my face. I love Jake but believe that we would regret the deal in Year 1.

You think Lance Lynn is a SAFER option? His peripherals and advanced statistics hint at 5.00+ ERA seasons in his future.

I could agree that, for the cost, Cobb COULD be a safer option. But I'm trying to win a bunch of World Series, and I need a dude with cajones in big pressure situations.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This is a dumb question but isn't the reason for all the "revenue streams" and ads in Wrigley to be able to pay for guys like this?

The Chicago Cubs had the highest Opening Day 25-Man payroll in 2017. The Cubs have increased their payroll in multiple consecutive seasons and seem to be doing the same in 2018 and 2019. However, the Cubs do not want to hit the luxury tax this year as it seems as if they plan on hitting it in 2019 and for a couple of seasons after that. So if they do sign Arrieta or Darvish, that might eliminate some additional moves (bullpen) until the midseason trading deadline, as they have earmarked approximately $10MM for that.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
IMU wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This is a dumb question but isn't the reason for all the "revenue streams" and ads in Wrigley to be able to pay for guys like this?

The Chicago Cubs had the highest Opening Day 25-Man payroll in 2017. The Cubs have increased their payroll in multiple consecutive seasons and seem to be doing the same in 2018 and 2019. However, the Cubs do not want to hit the luxury tax this year as it seems as if they plan on hitting it in 2019 and for a couple of seasons after that. So if they do sign Arrieta or Darvish, that might eliminate some additional moves (bullpen) until the midseason trading deadline, as they have earmarked approximately $10MM for that.
Where are you getting that?

The link I found has them at #8 for 2017 opening day.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Oh I see. The Cubs were 8th in payroll but had less players on the disabled list and other reasons why the opening day roster would be higher. By the end of the year, they were 6th in 25 man payroll.

Still though, as IMU once argued that the Cubs didn't spend a ton of money to get their World Series, it is interesting that he is now trying to argue that the Cubs spend more than anyone as they are #1 in opening day 25 man payroll.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:43 pm
Posts: 2609
pizza_Place: Lucio's
IMU wrote:
Nas wrote:
If it were a binary choice I would take Arrieta in a heartbeat. I would rather gamble on a Cobb and to a lesser extent Lynn. Not the same upside but definitely less risk of exploding in my face. I love Jake but believe that we would regret the deal in Year 1.

You think Lance Lynn is a SAFER option? His peripherals and advanced statistics hint at 5.00+ ERA seasons in his future.

I could agree that, for the cost, Cobb COULD be a safer option. But I'm trying to win a bunch of World Series, and I need a dude with cajones in big pressure situations.


Agreed.

Cobb or Arrieta better bets to come through in the post season, so if Cobb wants the big money, why not get a proven front of the rotation guy over a 3/4 who is an unknown in the post season? Or are they putting the Jake offer out there to get Cobb to take less knowing he wants to be here??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
Seems like an odd rumor to me.
I don't want Arrieta at those prices. The only guy he could conceivably replace is Wainwright, who then would be making like $20MM to pitch in the bullpen.

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Oh I see. The Cubs were 8th in payroll but had less players on the disabled list and other reasons why the opening day roster would be higher. By the end of the year, they were 6th in 25 man payroll.

Still though, as IMU once argued that the Cubs didn't spend a ton of money to get their World Series, it is interesting that he is now trying to argue that the Cubs spend more than anyone as they are #1 in opening day 25 man payroll.

I argue that the Cubs did not "buy" their World Series, yes. In 2016, they had the 6th highest payroll. Considering they are a major market team in essentially a one team town, that isn't an enormously large amount of money to spend. My point is that the Cubs have increased player payroll after gaining additional revenue streams. The owner is fiscally responsible and at the same time dedicated to winning. Great franchise.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The Cubs are the second most popular baseball team in the city they play in.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
IMU wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Oh I see. The Cubs were 8th in payroll but had less players on the disabled list and other reasons why the opening day roster would be higher. By the end of the year, they were 6th in 25 man payroll.

Still though, as IMU once argued that the Cubs didn't spend a ton of money to get their World Series, it is interesting that he is now trying to argue that the Cubs spend more than anyone as they are #1 in opening day 25 man payroll.

I argue that the Cubs did not "buy" their World Series, yes. In 2016, they had the 6th highest payroll. Considering they are a major market team in essentially a one team town, that isn't an enormously large amount of money to spend. My point is that the Cubs have increased player payroll after gaining additional revenue streams. The owner is fiscally responsible and at the same time dedicated to winning. Great franchise.

So why mention that they were #1 in payroll in 2017, unless of course you were skewing the numbers and weren't trying to argue that the Cubs spent a ton of money to win a title?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Oh I see. The Cubs were 8th in payroll but had less players on the disabled list and other reasons why the opening day roster would be higher. By the end of the year, they were 6th in 25 man payroll.

Still though, as IMU once argued that the Cubs didn't spend a ton of money to get their World Series, it is interesting that he is now trying to argue that the Cubs spend more than anyone as they are #1 in opening day 25 man payroll.

I argue that the Cubs did not "buy" their World Series, yes. In 2016, they had the 6th highest payroll. Considering they are a major market team in essentially a one team town, that isn't an enormously large amount of money to spend. My point is that the Cubs have increased player payroll after gaining additional revenue streams. The owner is fiscally responsible and at the same time dedicated to winning. Great franchise.

So why mention that they were #1 in payroll in 2017, unless of course you were skewing the numbers and weren't trying to argue that the Cubs spent a ton of money to win a title?

I'm not aware that the Cubs won the title in 2017?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
:lol: You cited the payroll of the team being #1 in MLB in the very first game they played after winning the World Series. Yeah, how dare I think that there may be some connection.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Cubs are the second most popular baseball team in the city they play in.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Cubs are the second most popular baseball team in the city they play in.

:lol:

Frank doesn't recognize anything north of I-55 as being Chicago.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
IMU wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Cubs are the second most popular baseball team in the city they play in.

:lol:

Frank doesn't recognize anything north of I-55 as being Chicago.

It's like 50/50 post 2016 where Frank and I live (deep I'm Sox country)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:49 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
We don't live in Chicago, do we?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jake Arrieta
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
We don't live in Chicago, do we?

Didn't say or imply that we did.

Quote the contrary.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group