It is currently Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:09 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 10130
pizza_Place: world famous
In a case about electioneering vs. free speech questioning the lawyer on the electioneering side or the arguement. Talk about setting someone up for the kill.

Image
Image

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:05 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80144
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault.


It isn't.

It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Speech is freely available to hermits. Otherwise, not so much.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
He took him behind the woodshed

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
That lawyer sucks. SPIT IT OUT, YOU PUSSY!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38593
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault.


It isn't.

It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place.


Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example.

Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:45 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80144
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault.


It isn't.

It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place.


I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place.

It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government.

The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Seacrest wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault.


It isn't.

It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place.


Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example.

Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under.


What was mentioned was this case being an example of free speech being under assault.

Try and keep up.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault.


It isn't.

It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place.


I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place.

It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government.

The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"?


Maybe.

If everyone had to wear a sport coat to vote, this wouldn't be an issue.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43749
Seacrest wrote:
Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example.

Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under.

This literally has nothing to do with the case being argued to the Supreme Court.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Douchebag wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example.

Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under.

This literally has nothing to do with the case being argued to the Supreme Court.

As well as being totally made up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:51 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38593
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault.


It isn't.

It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place.


Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example.

Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under.


What was mentioned was this case being an example of free speech being under assault.

Try and keep up.


If the lawyer arguing the case won't affirm that wearing a 1st amendment t-shirt isn't political, then, yes, it's under assault there as well.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:51 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80144
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault.


It isn't.

It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place.


I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place.

It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government.

The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"?


Maybe.

If everyone had to wear a sport coat to vote, this wouldn't be an issue.


The 11th Ward guys will need a discount from Men's Wearhouse. They usually vote in their McCormick Place work clothes.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Douchebag wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example.

Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under.

This literally has nothing to do with the case being argued to the Supreme Court.


Seacrest wrote:
Let's say it does.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault.


It isn't.

It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place.


I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place.

It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government.

The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"?


Maybe.

If everyone had to wear a sport coat to vote, this wouldn't be an issue.


The 11th Ward guys will need a discount from Men's Wearhouse. They usually vote in their McCormick Place work clothes.


:lol:

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38593
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault.


It isn't.

It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place.


I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place.

It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government.

The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"?


Maybe.

If everyone had to wear a sport coat to vote, this wouldn't be an issue.


The 11th Ward guys will need a discount from Men's Wearhouse. They usually vote in their McCormick Place work clothes.


$84 to have an 11th Ward "electrician" plug in your sound equipment back in the day.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault.


It isn't.

It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place.


I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place.

It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government.

The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"?


Maybe.

If everyone had to wear a sport coat to vote, this wouldn't be an issue.


The 11th Ward guys will need a discount from Men's Wearhouse. They usually vote in their McCormick Place work clothes.


$84 to have an 11th Ward "electrician" plug in your sound equipment back in the day.


Worth every penny.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 5:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:11 am
Posts: 126
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Because the reason it is not cool to hand out campaign materials 100 feet is to influence a vote or to probably have bribery avoiding.

_________________
Happy Halloween!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23313
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Image

What is this? You're going to wear the shirt of the candidate you're going to vote for? Don't be that guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Hatchetman wrote:
Speech is freely available to hermits.

Well, I've got that goin' for me, which is nice.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Justice Samuel Alito
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72553
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hatchetman wrote:
Speech is freely available to hermits. Otherwise, not so much.

This guy gets it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group