Is it about publicity...?
Yeah LL bean has only one store that sells some guns maybe and they're making a press release to change the age requirements.
Yeah. That kind of seals the deal.

I believe they sell merchandise for a company that makes AR15's

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

Another win for the 'activity=accomplishment' crowd.

And apparently Customer interactions on social media = publicity seeking.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

And apparently Customer interactions on social media = publicity seeking.

How is it not? Theoretically there might be other reasons for a given interaction, but ultimately any public corporate communication is PR related in some form or fashion.

Legal experts said they saw no likely challenges to Dick’s decision to stop selling assault-style rifles. But the decision to stop selling weapons to anyone under 21, however, could be tested in court.

Adam Winkler, a professor of constitutional law at the School of Law of the University of California, Los Angeles, said Dick’s could be challenged in lawsuits claiming a violation of laws that bar age discrimination. Although federal civil rights laws do not apply, some states, including New York, prohibit businesses from denying goods and services on the basis of age.

“Don’t be surprised if an aggressive attorney general of a gun-friendly state brings an age-discrimination claim against Dick’s,” Professor Winkler wrote in an email response to questions.

The company said that it believed its decision was in accordance with the law and that it was instituting the policy immediately.

I arrived at my stated premise in this thread independent of any article quoting legal scholars or judges, perhaps even before any were posted, this is merely affirming that my thought process was not at all unusual, wrong, illogical, misunderstood (except by you two, maybe), etc.

Celebrating winning an argument with Caller Bob or Baby McNown. Oy

What's next? Celebrating putting on your socks correctly?

Wins against the Reds still count.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

How is it not? Theoretically there might be other reasons for a given interaction, but ultimately any public corporate communication is PR related in some form or fashion.

Typical dipshit gun owner / freak reply - Hopefully you shoot yourself in the head next time your cleaning you AR.

Lol.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

Ah, Lemonparty, the 8th sacrament.

I knew that gay cake was gonna come back to bite the left.

I knew that gay cake was gonna come back to bite the left.

There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.

Why?

My guess is the left understands that if the laws are that way then Dicks is going to be forced to sell to them, though from the sound of it in most states if they lose they can simply have a "surcharge" for those under 21.

Haha yeah!

Fuck those guys. It's our team's turn to win!

Ah, Lemonparty, the 8th sacrament.

Why is because they are seeing in a different way they also cannot discrinate when they think they have the high ground. I am not saying refusing to bake a gay cake is right or just.

As far as surcharges idk you can’t make a gay cake surcharge I am sure. Either way they will just have dad or uncle etc get the gun or bullets.

I don't know what you are saying here. If it's illegal to discriminate based on age, or sexual orientation, then you shouldn't.

No, you can't do a surcharge based on sexual orientation because they are a federally protected class.

Age is not federally protected?

Only 40+.

That seemed challengable.

That seemed challengable.