It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 6:58 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Curious Hair wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Wow Feder taking a shot at Goff. He always prints the best reader comment in the DH. Look at this one at the end of that:

"Tuesday’s best comment: Frank Kurtz: Hopefully, with the sidelining of Jason Goff, WSCR is realizing (like we can only hope ESPN will someday) that people watch and listen to sports programming for the sheer enjoyment that sports brings them. People follow sports to be entertained, not to be lectured to about social justice. There are plenty of stations that cover that topic. It’s simple. I don’t watch Fox News to find out how the Cubs or Blackhawks are doing, and I don’t expect to be subjected to SJW [Social Justice Warrior] lectures when I listen to sports programming. Everything has its proper place and time."

Yeah, that choice isn't accidental.


For sure, which is why I posted it. An intentional shot.

I wonder about the back story.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
What is your guys guess on the political leanings of sports radio listeners?

I guess the location matters, so stick to Chicago.

Im thinking 70% right leaning. Im thinking that number would have been closer to 50/50 10 years ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43576
rogers park bryan wrote:
What is your guys guess on the political leanings of sports radio listeners?

I guess the location matters, so stick to Chicago.

Im thinking 70% right leaning. Im thinking that number would have been closer to 50/50 10 years ago.

What about people living in the 815?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Douchebag wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
What is your guys guess on the political leanings of sports radio listeners?

I guess the location matters, so stick to Chicago.

Im thinking 70% right leaning. Im thinking that number would have been closer to 50/50 10 years ago.

What about people living in the 815?

That's a dumb myth. Some of my favorite most liberal leaning Uncle's are in the 815.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
It's not about political leanings but rather why a person tunes into 670. I doubt anyone tunes in to hear the political thoughts of the Score line-up. Even if we were all right leaning, we would have tons of disagreements on specific issues- military interventions, structure of tax cuts, deficit spending, etc, etc. But we would rather debate the Bears free agent signings.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
The comments in that piece are dumb. The one guy that works at Marquette Bank, Bob Warja, is really a treasure. You have people all over this board saying for many reasons Goff sucks but his entire reason for commenting is that anyone that says that is an old white racist.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10109
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
denisdman wrote:
Wow Feder taking a shot at Goff. He always prints the best reader comment in the DH. Look at this one at the end of that:

"Tuesday’s best comment: Frank Kurtz: Hopefully, with the sidelining of Jason Goff, WSCR is realizing (like we can only hope ESPN will someday) that people watch and listen to sports programming for the sheer enjoyment that sports brings them. People follow sports to be entertained, not to be lectured to about social justice. There are plenty of stations that cover that topic. It’s simple. I don’t watch Fox News to find out how the Cubs or Blackhawks are doing, and I don’t expect to be subjected to SJW [Social Justice Warrior] lectures when I listen to sports programming. Everything has its proper place and time."

Funny thing is that Feder is quite liberal himself, but I think he's pointing out the 'time and place' thing. But that brought out a firestorm of comments accusing him of being a racist.

What's the old Michael Jordan line, "Republicans buy sneakers too?" Same goes for all the silly products which Bernstein hawks, with the exception of the Cameron Hughes wine. No self-respecting Republican would buy that.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
denisdman wrote:
It's not about political leanings but rather why a person tunes into 670. I doubt anyone tunes in to hear the political thoughts of the Score line-up. Even if we were all right leaning, we would have tons of disagreements on specific issues- military interventions, structure of tax cuts, deficit spending, etc, etc. But we would rather debate the Bears free agent signings.

I disagree.

I think the target audience largely leans one way and the hosts were going another.

Im not saying that constant right leaning talk would be good. They definitely over did it no matter what side you're on.

But I think they could get away with the right leaning stuff in spots more than the left stuff.

For example, if theyre stance was that players SHOULD stand for the anthem, I dont think they'd get too much "stop talking politics!" comments. Not as many as taking up Kaepernick's cause anyway.


The country is changing, dman.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
B&G would dedicate entire shows, sometimes for days on end, to social issues. Similar to Cable News, they just beat that horse until the next talking point came along. That's a terrible formula for a sports radio show.

You want to touch on something during a segment, great. Then move on...and not back to national NBA talk.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Last edited by GoldenJet on Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:56 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79571
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
I'd say the younger listener is likely to be liberal and chances are good the NBA is his favorite sport.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Personally, I don't mind some NBA talk, hell I don't mind if Mully wants to talk soccer some. Variety is the spice of life. If I want to listen to national MLB talk, I have a station that does it well. Same goes for NHL, NBA, PGA. I do like a little of all of it on the Score...for the most part though, keep it local.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'd say the younger listener is likely to be liberal and chances are good the NBA is his favorite sport.

I'd agree on the NBA but does the younger radio listener exist?

What person under 25 is listening to terrestrial radio?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:05 am 
Anybody have a copy of the Greenburg article to post? Sounds like he went even deeper on contracts and stuff.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:11 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79571
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
GoldenJet wrote:
Personally, I don't mind some NBA talk, hell I don't mind if Mully wants to talk soccer some. Variety is the spice of life. If I want to listen to national MLB talk, I have a station that does it well. Same goes for NHL, NBA, PGA. I do like a little of all of it on the Score...for the most part though, keep it local.



Yeah, it just has to make sense for the audience. They shouldn't ignore the NBA Finals. And I think they should talk about Daytona, the Indy 500 (in spite of its decline), the Kentucky Derby, the Masters, and Wimbledon. Those are big important traditional events. But I don't want to hear Rozner spend three hours on the Buick Open just because he likes golf. It's like Telander writing about the Dartmouth Women's Swimming Team. Self-indulgent as fuck.

Look, I don't like pro football, but I'm smart enough to know that a Chicago sports show should probably be about 40-50% Bears talk.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Robert Feder update: I just deleted today’s “best comment.” I understand why I should not have highlighted it and I will try to do better next time.
:?

A person of any stripe really has to put in work to make Feder out to be a bad guy.

'Racist' as a word has no actual meaning anymore. Goff is s racist towards white people. People that didn't like Goff are racist. Racist, racist, racist. It's the new 'boy who cried wolf' (not Bruce).

Bunch of intellectually challenged asswipes everywhere a person looks anymore.

Not to mention that somehow along the way 'racist' got conflated (part laziness, part penchant for hyperbolic invective as a part of normal speech) with 'racially insensitive', which is another discussion altogether.

I hate people.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Don Tiny wrote:
I hate people.


Racist!

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17223
pizza_Place: Pequods
Don Tiny wrote:
Robert Feder update: I just deleted today’s “best comment.” I understand why I should not have highlighted it and I will try to do better next time.
:?

A person of any stripe really has to put in work to make Feder out to be a bad guy.

'Racist' as a word has no actual meaning anymore. Goff is s racist towards white people. People that didn't like Goff are racist. Racist, racist, racist. It's the new 'boy who cried wolf' (not Bruce).

Bunch of intellectually challenged asswipes everywhere a person looks anymore.

Not to mention that somehow along the way 'racist' got conflated (part laziness, part penchant for hyperbolic invective as a part of normal speech) with 'racially insensitive', which is another discussion altogether.

I hate people.
Throwing out accusations like "racist" is just a way to shut up debate and lazily shame an opponent without directly refuting their point.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33816
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Douchebag wrote:
Polecat666 wrote:


From the article:
Tuesday’s best comment: Frank Kurtz: Hopefully, with the sidelining of Jason Goff, WSCR is realizing (like we can only hope ESPN will someday) that people watch and listen to sports programming for the sheer enjoyment that sports brings them. People follow sports to be entertained, not to be lectured to about social justice. There are plenty of stations that cover that topic. It’s simple. I don’t watch Fox News to find out how the Cubs or Blackhawks are doing, and I don’t expect to be subjected to SJW [Social Justice Warrior] lectures when I listen to sports programming. Everything has its proper place and time.

What a fucking snowflake. So this guy watches Fox News so he can listen to them hammer their bullshit, but god forbid someone expresses a different political opinion than his own on a local radio show. This is what the world is coming to. A complete joke.


Should they be stuffed in an airplane overhead compartment?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43576
Spaulding wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Polecat666 wrote:


From the article:
Tuesday’s best comment: Frank Kurtz: Hopefully, with the sidelining of Jason Goff, WSCR is realizing (like we can only hope ESPN will someday) that people watch and listen to sports programming for the sheer enjoyment that sports brings them. People follow sports to be entertained, not to be lectured to about social justice. There are plenty of stations that cover that topic. It’s simple. I don’t watch Fox News to find out how the Cubs or Blackhawks are doing, and I don’t expect to be subjected to SJW [Social Justice Warrior] lectures when I listen to sports programming. Everything has its proper place and time.

What a fucking snowflake. So this guy watches Fox News so he can listen to them hammer their bullshit, but god forbid someone expresses a different political opinion than his own on a local radio show. This is what the world is coming to. A complete joke.


Should they be stuffed in an airplane overhead compartment?

That would be acceptable.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Robert Feder update: I just deleted today’s “best comment.” I understand why I should not have highlighted it and I will try to do better next time.
:?

A person of any stripe really has to put in work to make Feder out to be a bad guy.

'Racist' as a word has no actual meaning anymore. Goff is s racist towards white people. People that didn't like Goff are racist. Racist, racist, racist. It's the new 'boy who cried wolf' (not Bruce).

Bunch of intellectually challenged asswipes everywhere a person looks anymore.

Not to mention that somehow along the way 'racist' got conflated (part laziness, part penchant for hyperbolic invective as a part of normal speech) with 'racially insensitive', which is another discussion altogether.

I hate people.
Throwing out accusations like "racist" is just a way to shut up debate and lazily shame an opponent without directly refuting their point.

Sometimes, yes.

Some times, it's an actual racist getting correctly labeled. Kinda like how if a woman lies about rape, that doesn't mean they all lie.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Hah, funny he deleted it. It was an outlier in anything I had ever seen Feder highlight. I just assumed he didn't like Goff for some reason.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Personally, I don't mind some NBA talk, hell I don't mind if Mully wants to talk soccer some. Variety is the spice of life. If I want to listen to national MLB talk, I have a station that does it well. Same goes for NHL, NBA, PGA. I do like a little of all of it on the Score...for the most part though, keep it local.



Yeah, it just has to make sense for the audience. They shouldn't ignore the NBA Finals. And I think they should talk about Daytona, the Indy 500 (in spite of its decline), the Kentucky Derby, the Masters, and Wimbledon. Those are big important traditional events. But I don't want to hear Rozner spend three hours on the Buick Open just because he likes golf. It's like Telander writing about the Dartmouth Women's Swimming Team. Self-indulgent as fuck.

Look, I don't like pro football, but I'm smart enough to know that a Chicago sports show should probably be about 40-50% Bears talk.


Exactly. Yet, if they want to extend on golf on the weekend mornings, I'm cool with that. It's sort of a tradition anyway...plus I love golf.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Last edited by GoldenJet on Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
so people that don't like Goff are rapists.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
denisdman wrote:
Hah, funny he deleted it. It was an outlier in anything I had ever seen Feder highlight. I just assumed he didn't like Goff for some reason.

Pretty dumb to choose one that specifically mentioned FoxNews knowing that's a certain segment.

I guarantee there were comments about less politics that didn't indicate political affiliation. Dumb move by R-FED.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Hatchetman wrote:
so people that don't like Goff are rapists.


Obviously

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10109
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'd say the younger listener is likely to be liberal and chances are good the NBA is his favorite sport.

And if he has a car, he likely has never found the AM band, but is listing to streams and podcasts instead and watching the NBA games on his phone.

I'm not saying that 670 shouldn't try to cater to them a little bit, otherwise if they don't they become SportsGN with a 70-dead demographic talking about the heyday of Johnny Morris and wasn't Bruce Roberts a nice man who died too young. But a proportionate response and allocation of breath is more appropriate.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43576
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
I'm not saying that 670 shouldn't try to cater to them a little bit, otherwise if they don't they become SportsGN with a 70-dead demographic

That's essentially what yesterday's lineup shake-up has done.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Champaign, IL
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Douchebag wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
I'm not saying that 670 shouldn't try to cater to them a little bit, otherwise if they don't they become SportsGN with a 70-dead demographic

That's essentially what yesterday's lineup shake-up has done.


Don't underestimate the 70-dead demographic! They're the lifeblood of Fox News, after all.

_________________
Quote:
When it comes to the Bears, America is just a slobbering shitwagon. Every single opinion of his regarding this team is the most pristine of doomsday horseshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55959
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Douchebag wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
I'm not saying that 670 shouldn't try to cater to them a little bit, otherwise if they don't they become SportsGN with a 70-dead demographic

That's essentially what yesterday's lineup shake-up has done.

Yes and no. I agree that DeCastro's m.o. as of late appears to be to grow old with the audience and gracefully manage the decline rather than to shake things up and pursue a younger audience. That's probably the right thing to do with AM radio. But he still seems to be hedging that a bit by having millennials in Parkins and McDoink hosting shows. But overall, I think the station is going to get more conservative (in its programming approach, not right-wing) than it got under Mitch, which I don't think was so much a conscious programming direction as it was just letting the talent roam free-range.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17223
pizza_Place: Pequods
Curious Hair wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
I'm not saying that 670 shouldn't try to cater to them a little bit, otherwise if they don't they become SportsGN with a 70-dead demographic

That's essentially what yesterday's lineup shake-up has done.

Yes and no. I agree that DeCastro's m.o. as of late appears to be to grow old with the audience and gracefully manage the decline rather than to shake things up and pursue a younger audience. That's probably the right thing to do with AM radio. But he still seems to be hedging that a bit by having millennials in Parkins and McDoink hosting shows. But overall, I think the station is going to get more conservative (in its programming approach, not right-wing) than it got under Mitch, which I don't think was so much a conscious programming direction as it was just letting the talent roam free-range.

Letting the talent roam free was Mitch's biggest mistake. As others have said, Bernstein needed a producer to step in and end the national NBA talk

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group