It is currently Thu Jan 23, 2025 3:47 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
If it were to actually happen most people in the world would die and the idea of "winning" would seem quaint in comparison to the horror. That's the real reason it won't happen.

Countries that are not democracies start wars they can't win all the time. See World War II.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93181
Location: To the left of my post
America wrote:
If it were to actually happen most people in the world would die and the idea of "winning" would seem quaint in comparison to the horror. That's the real reason it won't happen.

Countries that are not democracies start wars they can't win all the time. See World War II.
There is absolutely no basis for this thought.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Uh democratic peace theory and mutually assured destruction are pretty established ideas.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93181
Location: To the left of my post
America wrote:
Uh democratic peace theory and mutually assured destruction are pretty established ideas.
What are you talking about?

The only way China "wins" in WWIII is if they are allied with us.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23312
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
America wrote:
Uh democratic peace theory and mutually assured destruction are pretty established ideas.
What are you talking about?

The only way China "wins" in WWIII is if they are allied with us.


Today on Can BRick Argue... we see if BRick can argue the feasibility of SIOP in a nuclear exchange with the world's only other superpower!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33208
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
America wrote:
Uh democratic peace theory and mutually assured destruction are pretty established ideas.
What are you talking about?

The only way China "wins" in WWIII is if they are allied with us.


Today on Can BRick Argue... we see if BRick can argue the feasibility of SIOP in a nuclear exchange with the world's only other superpower!


WHAT ABOUT THE TRIAD?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23312
pizza_Place: Giordano's
denisdman wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
America wrote:
Uh democratic peace theory and mutually assured destruction are pretty established ideas.
What are you talking about?

The only way China "wins" in WWIII is if they are allied with us.


Today on Can BRick Argue... we see if BRick can argue the feasibility of SIOP in a nuclear exchange with the world's only other superpower!


WHAT ABOUT THE TRIAD?


Remember when Julie thought there were three strategic arms delivery platforms when there were actually four?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33208
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
America wrote:
Uh democratic peace theory and mutually assured destruction are pretty established ideas.
What are you talking about?

The only way China "wins" in WWIII is if they are allied with us.


Today on Can BRick Argue... we see if BRick can argue the feasibility of SIOP in a nuclear exchange with the world's only other superpower!


WHAT ABOUT THE TRIAD?


Remember when Julie thought there were three strategic arms delivery platforms when there were actually four?


Look at those quads!

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
America wrote:
There is absolutely no basis for this thought.

If you think states won't be belligerent with each in violation of mutual benefit I refer you to the year 1914 when Europe willingly demolished their world order and sewed the seeds of their reduced global relevance.
There is plenty of basis.

The first is that the United States would easily "win" against them. The second is that the war would be fought almost entirely on their continent. The third is that the United States would cancel all debt we owe them even after the war. The fourth is that every neighbor they have would join our side immediately outside of Russia, and even Russia in the event of a true world war may very well decide that we are better allies than enemies given that Europe would all join up with us too and Russia needs Europe for the future of their economy just as bad as China needs us.

I don't know; name five more reasons.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17309
pizza_Place: Pequods
You cannot win a war with 2 nuclear powers involved. Each side would employ high altitude blasts to create EMPs, which would in the end lead to mass starvation of any "survivors"

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:25 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102661
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Don Tiny wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
America wrote:
There is absolutely no basis for this thought.

If you think states won't be belligerent with each in violation of mutual benefit I refer you to the year 1914 when Europe willingly demolished their world order and sewed the seeds of their reduced global relevance.
There is plenty of basis.

The first is that the United States would easily "win" against them. The second is that the war would be fought almost entirely on their continent. The third is that the United States would cancel all debt we owe them even after the war. The fourth is that every neighbor they have would join our side immediately outside of Russia, and even Russia in the event of a true world war may very well decide that we are better allies than enemies given that Europe would all join up with us too and Russia needs Europe for the future of their economy just as bad as China needs us.

I don't know; name five more reasons.
We're taller?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Great nuclear war today.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93181
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
America wrote:
Uh democratic peace theory and mutually assured destruction are pretty established ideas.
What are you talking about?

The only way China "wins" in WWIII is if they are allied with us.


Today on Can BRick Argue... we see if BRick can argue the feasibility of SIOP in a nuclear exchange with the world's only other superpower!

What is SIOP?

And yes, if there is a nuclear war that destroys most of the world then China doesn't win either. It's like you guys never saw the movie Wargames. If we assume that WWIII is not nuclear war(because then it doesn't matter who is on what side) then China if it wants to "win" is with us.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65988
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
You cannot win a war with 2 nuclear powers involved.

Let's assume you could.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What is SIOP?

It's the ISOP for dyslexics.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23312
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
America wrote:
Uh democratic peace theory and mutually assured destruction are pretty established ideas.
What are you talking about?

The only way China "wins" in WWIII is if they are allied with us.


Today on Can BRick Argue... we see if BRick can argue the feasibility of SIOP in a nuclear exchange with the world's only other superpower!

What is SIOP?

And yes, if there is a nuclear war that destroys most of the world then China doesn't win either. It's like you guys never saw the movie Wargames. If we assume that WWIII is not nuclear war(because then it doesn't matter who is on what side) then China if it wants to "win" is with us.


Single Integrated Operation Plan. For a long time it governed the strategic and tactical implementation of America's (the country) nuclear arms. It has since been replaced by something that sounds a lot less cool.

How are we getting mechanized infantry to China in a conventional war? We can project power incredibly well, but they have a standing army about twice the size of ours.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93181
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
How are we getting mechanized infantry to China in a conventional war? We can project power incredibly well, but they have a standing army about twice the size of ours.
A lot easier than they are getting it here.

Once again, the issue here isn't if we could win a land war against them in China. We may lose there. It still is happening on their soil, with virtually all of their neighbors on our side besides Russia, and if they "beat" us they have ruined their biggest trading partner, have little chance of ever getting their money back that we owed them prior to the war and they still have to contend with all of Europe that would be clearly on our side.

There just isn't a scenario where they are against us that it works out well for them. This is different than Japan in WWII who had a clear path to dominance in the whole region with a win.

In a WWIII scenario, the best case scenario for China would be to come out of it as the victor with us.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
One day, it's a debate over wedding gift etiquette; the next, it's over the potential fallout of nuclear war. This place is really versatile.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7059
Darkside wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
You cannot win a war with 2 nuclear powers involved.

Let's assume you could.


It wouldn't be nuclear war. They have the technology to program killer AI drones that are no bigger then a fidget spinner that seek you out and explode your skull. Sky Net is upon us! Someone call Rick Telander.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7059
SLAUGHTERBOTS MINIATURE DRONES: THEY CANNOT BE STOPPED!!!!!

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=mini+exploding+drones&&view=detail&mid=3EC512F322D58530C4223EC512F322D58530C422&&FORM=VDRVRV

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40822
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
leashyourkids wrote:
One day, it's a debate over wedding gift etiquette; the next, it's over the potential fallout of nuclear war. This place is really versatile.


And some have all the answers! :lol:

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:03 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102661
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
leashyourkids wrote:
One day, it's a debate over wedding gift etiquette; the next, it's over the potential fallout of nuclear war. This place is really versatile.
Also, don't forget, we have an 800lb elephant!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93181
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
One day, it's a debate over wedding gift etiquette; the next, it's over the potential fallout of nuclear war. This place is really versatile.


And some have all the answers! :lol:
We can't all wait for JORR to post to know.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
pittmike wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
One day, it's a debate over wedding gift etiquette; the next, it's over the potential fallout of nuclear war. This place is really versatile.


And some have all the answers! :lol:


If ever there was a perfect spot to use MANY, this was it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
The next arms race is already on. China is racing to get to artificial general intelligence before we do.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38890
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I know its staged and all that but seeing them shake hands at the border was pretty cool


https://youtu.be/7BRuCYcXKJs

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
honestly i thought a toxic masculinity post with "moon man" in the title would sound a little differently =P

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
sinicalypse wrote:
honestly i thought a toxic masculinity post with "moon man" in the title would sound a little differently =P


Image

Your my guy Sini

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24656
pizza_Place: It's gone
Trump did a great on this one

And it’s his approach. He’s not like your regular president that lets the state dept bias influence him.

He’s like why can’t we work this out. I think he can also bring peace between the Israelis and Palestinians if they let him.

Nobel prize? Forget it. He should get one but the establishment will never allow it.

I agree we would already had a war if it was Hillary. But Trumps still got to be careful. There are a lot of evil people in our Gov that don’t want peace anywhere but just war. He knows that and he’s the only one that won’t be pressured by them


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 8:19 pm
Posts: 8264
pizza_Place: Trump Pies delivered by fwank
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
America wrote:
Uh democratic peace theory and mutually assured destruction are pretty established ideas.
What are you talking about?

The only way China "wins" in WWIII is if they are allied with us.


Today on Can BRick Argue... we see if BRick can argue the feasibility of SIOP in a nuclear exchange with the world's only other superpower!

What is SIOP?

And yes, if there is a nuclear war that destroys most of the world then China doesn't win either. It's like you guys never saw the movie Wargames. If we assume that WWIII is not nuclear war(because then it doesn't matter who is on what side) then China if it wants to "win" is with us.


Single Integrated Operation Plan. For a long time it governed the strategic and tactical implementation of America's (the country) nuclear arms. It has since been replaced by something that sounds a lot less cool.

How are we getting mechanized infantry to China in a conventional war? We can project power incredibly well, but they have a standing army about twice the size of ours.

I remember SIOP. It was so highly classified we never even said the word. It's color was red. Blue was satellite imagery. Good times underground outside Omaha, NE.

"bomb them back to the stone age"-Curtis LeMay

_________________
"Change has come to Amerika."- TFG


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group