FavreFan wrote:
This is simply inaccurate. It's revisionist history, and that's being generous. There was nothing routine about the Decision. It actually directly changed the entire way teams are put together, and the current Warriors dynasty is a direct result. There's nothing incoherent about pointing out this substantial change in the direction of the league.
It's revisionist history to you because you're bogged down in every minute detail. Take a step back/zoom out: what was The Decision? It was a team signing two major free agents to max contracts. That's all it was. Forget parades, press conferences, the coverage, etc. That's all noise. How is this different than Boston adding KG and Pierce in 2007? You guys are fixated on the mechanism by which Bosh and James joined Miami (free agency) while I think it's better to focus on the end result: Miami acquiring two star players at or around the same time. Big deal? It's happened before and will happen again.
Boston in 2007
Orlando in 2000
Houston in 1998
OKC in 2017
FavreFan wrote:
The first part once again ignores the pretty significant difference of a player choosing his teammates, not vice versa. All those examples you mentioned include players being put together involuntarily. Yes, star teams have existed before, but it's not only fair, but important, to point out the difference in a player hand selecting his teammates.
What is the difference in real terms? It's not like LBJ had a pick of every star in the league. In hindsight Bosh probably wasn't the best third wheel; they would have been better signing some other big for 60% of the cost and using the rest of the money to surround Wade and James with better players.
And anyway, star players absolutely have a say in where they want to be traded. KG and Ray Allen blessed the trade to Boston. Kobe reportedly blessed his trade to Chicago. Pippen blessed his trade to Houston. If Melo wanted to sign with Chicago in 2014 or whenever it was then he would have directed the Knicks to trade him there.
FavreFan wrote:
Well, Duncan did win a title without Parker and Ginobli. That's your first problem. Also, I love Manu and Parker, but they are not going down as better players than Wade, Bosh, and Kyrie Irving.
Also, you seem to misunderstand the entire argument. "LBJ can only win with good players around him" is not the argument. In fact, I would describe it as lazy and wrong to represent it that way. The argument is "LeBron didn't win/dominate nearly as much as Jordan did despite also playing with good and great players".
Jordan is irrelevant here because I'm talking about the general narrative about James. My argument is there is nothing extraordinary about James' teammates post-Decision. I've already pointed out good to great threesomes throughout recent history. James' teams are not head and shoulders above any one of them.
The Duncan thing is disingenuous. He joined a veteran, playoff-tested team with a still effective but fading David Robinson on the roster. He also won during a shortened season. There are so many variables at play during that season but you're implying he carried his team to victory based on his stardom alone. Please.
FavreFan wrote:
Looks like both sides have plenty of lazy and flat out wrong narratives going for them.
What's lazy is believing Jordan is flawless. Honestly, Jordan is treated like religion around these parts. You can't say anything critical or question anything before immediately being shamed into repenting for blasphemy. Again, guy took longer to find success than James did. His teams won less coming into the league when compared to LBJ, and LBJ won at a younger age. Without any help whatsoever, James went to the finals as a 22 year old. He won 66 games at 23 with Ben Wallace as his second or third best teammate. Every star has no help at some point in their careers. Between Jordan (early mid '80s), Wade (mid-2000s after Shaq left), Bryant (mid to late 2000s after Shaq left), and Shaq (before Penny), guess who enjoyed more success? It's James.
These are all things Jordan didn't do, but there's so much nonsense surrounding his career that we're led to believe he did virtually everything possible on the court. You could walk down any street in Chicago and make shit up about Jordan and people would believe you. It's impossible to discuss him rationally here.
Jordan was a great individual player who owes his championships to Jerry Krause for finding the right talent to surround him. If Krause traded Jordan to the Minnesota Timberwolves in 1989 then "Michael Jordan" as we know him today wouldn't exist. There would be no statue outside the Target Center. You all believe it's the other way around: Jordan was predestined to win regardless of who played with him because he's a god.