It is currently Fri Jan 24, 2025 1:45 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 844 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 29  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 2:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
The point of the thread seems to be that Mac is stupid to not like and talk more NBA.
If this comment doesn't bring back Gloopan, than nothing will.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Terry's Peeps wrote:
The point of the thread seems to be that Mac is stupid to not like and talk more NBA.


False. This thread has no point.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Another thorn in the proverbial backside of NBA bashers?
Popularity is actually on a major uptick. Oh shit.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradadgate ... r-the-nba/


But I mean, who started this topic, really?!

Also: NOBODY IS SAYING THAT ABSOLUTELY NOBODY CARES ABOUT NATIONAL NBA DISCUSSION.



Come on "Woke" man. Surely you can do better.

Or is it Woke Bae? Far be it from to mischaracterize.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Wed May 30, 2018 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

Yes, of course, but that doesn't mean that an NBA sudden death tourney would "crush" college basketball. There are a lot of college sports fans out there, and one of the reasons the tournament is popular is because college basketball is just popular.

I'm open to the idea I'm wrong here but it seems to me college basketball has one of the largest disparities between postseason and regular season ratings. To me that indicates the format of the postseason is a factor.


I'll take "things never uttered on this message board" for 1,000.

March Madness is incredibly popular, so that's probably true. But I think it also has a number of things that the NBA couldn't do as well. There would be no huge Cinderellas with a bunch of honkeys from Pennsylvania going to the Final Four in the NBA. You also wouldn't have nearly as many teams. I actually think upsets in the NBA playoffs would hurt more than they would help. If you had a Finals that was, say, Toronto and New Orleans, this year, very few would be watching. You run the risk that the final game wouldn't even have any superstars. They are two very different events with very different fan bases. I can't say that the NBA would necessarily beat them.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
leashyourkids wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
The point of the thread seems to be that Mac is stupid to not like and talk more NBA.


False. This thread has no point.



There is a very clear point to be made.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Another thorn in the proverbial backside of NBA bashers?
Popularity is actually on a major uptick. Oh shit.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradadgate ... r-the-nba/


But I mean, who started this topic, really?!

Also: NOBODY IS SAYING THAT ABSOLUTELY NOBODY CARES ABOUT NATIONAL NBA DISCUSSION.



Come on "Woke" man. Surely you can do better.

Or is it Woke Bae? Far be it from to mischaracterize.


Woke Bae's Lecture Notes would be a good mult.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Jbi11s wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Another thorn in the proverbial backside of NBA bashers?
Popularity is actually on a major uptick. Oh shit.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradadgate ... r-the-nba/


But I mean, who started this topic, really?!

Also: NOBODY IS SAYING THAT ABSOLUTELY NOBODY CARES ABOUT NATIONAL NBA DISCUSSION.



Come on "Woke" man. Surely you can do better.

Or is it Woke Bae? Far be it from to mischaracterize.


Woke Bae's Lecture Notes would be a good mult.


Define "good".

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23315
pizza_Place: Giordano's
long time guy wrote:
Far be it from to mischaracterize.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72553
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

Yes, of course, but that doesn't mean that an NBA sudden death tourney would "crush" college basketball. There are a lot of college sports fans out there, and one of the reasons the tournament is popular is because college basketball is just popular.

I'm open to the idea I'm wrong here but it seems to me college basketball has one of the largest disparities between postseason and regular season ratings. To me that indicates the format of the postseason is a factor.


I'll take "things never uttered on this message board" for 1,000.

March Madness is incredibly popular, so that's probably true. But I think it also has a number of things that the NBA couldn't do as well. There would be no huge Cinderellas with a bunch of honkeys from Pennsylvania going to the Final Four in the NBA. You also wouldn't have nearly as many teams. I actually think upsets in the NBA playoffs would hurt more than they would help. If you had a Finals that was, say, Toronto and New Orleans, this year, very few would be watching. You run the risk that the final game wouldn't even have any superstars. They are two very different events with very different fan bases. I can't say that the NBA would necessarily beat them.

I disagree about the small markets in a one game tournament. I think any two teams would draw massive ratings that easily beat a game 7 of GS/Cleveland.

Obviously we’ll never know.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Another thorn in the proverbial backside of NBA bashers?
Popularity is actually on a major uptick. Oh shit.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradadgate ... r-the-nba/


But I mean, who started this topic, really?!

Also: NOBODY IS SAYING THAT ABSOLUTELY NOBODY CARES ABOUT NATIONAL NBA DISCUSSION.



Come on "Woke" man. Surely you can do better.

Or is it Woke Bae? Far be it from to mischaracterize.


Woke Bae's Lecture Notes would be a good mult.


Define "good".


Somewhere between Long Time Gay and Beerdown.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

Yes, of course, but that doesn't mean that an NBA sudden death tourney would "crush" college basketball. There are a lot of college sports fans out there, and one of the reasons the tournament is popular is because college basketball is just popular.

I'm open to the idea I'm wrong here but it seems to me college basketball has one of the largest disparities between postseason and regular season ratings. To me that indicates the format of the postseason is a factor.


I'll take "things never uttered on this message board" for 1,000.

March Madness is incredibly popular, so that's probably true. But I think it also has a number of things that the NBA couldn't do as well. There would be no huge Cinderellas with a bunch of honkeys from Pennsylvania going to the Final Four in the NBA. You also wouldn't have nearly as many teams. I actually think upsets in the NBA playoffs would hurt more than they would help. If you had a Finals that was, say, Toronto and New Orleans, this year, very few would be watching. You run the risk that the final game wouldn't even have any superstars. They are two very different events with very different fan bases. I can't say that the NBA would necessarily beat them.



Small market big market holds little relevance these days. G.S. is a small market team. There isn't a team in the Finals from a top 5 market yet the ratings will still be huge. NBA is a star driven league but if you have a team that makes it to the Finals then chances are they have a big star on it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 3:21 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
long time guy wrote:
NBA is a star driven league but if you have a team that makes it to the Finals then chances are they have a big star on it.
Hard hitting analysis here.


Teams that get to the Super Bowl probably have a pretty good quarterback.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

Yes, of course, but that doesn't mean that an NBA sudden death tourney would "crush" college basketball. There are a lot of college sports fans out there, and one of the reasons the tournament is popular is because college basketball is just popular.

I'm open to the idea I'm wrong here but it seems to me college basketball has one of the largest disparities between postseason and regular season ratings. To me that indicates the format of the postseason is a factor.


I'll take "things never uttered on this message board" for 1,000.

March Madness is incredibly popular, so that's probably true. But I think it also has a number of things that the NBA couldn't do as well. There would be no huge Cinderellas with a bunch of honkeys from Pennsylvania going to the Final Four in the NBA. You also wouldn't have nearly as many teams. I actually think upsets in the NBA playoffs would hurt more than they would help. If you had a Finals that was, say, Toronto and New Orleans, this year, very few would be watching. You run the risk that the final game wouldn't even have any superstars. They are two very different events with very different fan bases. I can't say that the NBA would necessarily beat them.



Small market big market holds little relevance these days. G.S. is a small market team. There isn't a team in the Finals from a top 5 market yet the ratings will still be huge. NBA is a star driven league but if you have a team that makes it to the Finals then chances are they have a big star on it.


Come on. That's not a small market, and it's team that transcends it's market in terms of interest.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56502
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
G.S. is a small market team.

The Bay Area has 8.6 million people, lol

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 10133
pizza_Place: world famous
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
The point of the thread seems to be that Mac is stupid to not like and talk more NBA.


False. This thread has no point.



There is a very clear point to be made.

Will it be made soon?

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Curious Hair wrote:
long time guy wrote:
G.S. is a small market team.

The Bay Area has 8.6 million people, lol



Its in Oakland however. Its funny that when people talk big market G.S. they never referred to it as a "major market franchise" yet the budding geniuses as per usual know otherwise.

When free agents think Major Market they think NY, LA ChI, Houston and G.S.Huh?


That same "big market" just lost a football team and has struggled to keep its baseball team for years and no one ever thought of it as a "big market" team til when exactly? yeah 2 minutes ago.

Forget about looping San Fran in for baseball and Football too. I know that is your angle.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93183
Location: To the left of my post
:lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Franky T wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
The point of the thread seems to be that Mac is stupid to not like and talk more NBA.


False. This thread has no point.



There is a very clear point to be made.

Will it be made soon?



I had a rather eloquent response but my computer bumped it out. Didn't feel like retyping it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

Yes, of course, but that doesn't mean that an NBA sudden death tourney would "crush" college basketball. There are a lot of college sports fans out there, and one of the reasons the tournament is popular is because college basketball is just popular.

I'm open to the idea I'm wrong here but it seems to me college basketball has one of the largest disparities between postseason and regular season ratings. To me that indicates the format of the postseason is a factor.


I'll take "things never uttered on this message board" for 1,000.

March Madness is incredibly popular, so that's probably true. But I think it also has a number of things that the NBA couldn't do as well. There would be no huge Cinderellas with a bunch of honkeys from Pennsylvania going to the Final Four in the NBA. You also wouldn't have nearly as many teams. I actually think upsets in the NBA playoffs would hurt more than they would help. If you had a Finals that was, say, Toronto and New Orleans, this year, very few would be watching. You run the risk that the final game wouldn't even have any superstars. They are two very different events with very different fan bases. I can't say that the NBA would necessarily beat them.



Small market big market holds little relevance these days. G.S. is a small market team. There isn't a team in the Finals from a top 5 market yet the ratings will still be huge. NBA is a star driven league but if you have a team that makes it to the Finals then chances are they have a big star on it.


Come on. That's not a small market, and it's team that transcends it's market in terms of interest.


When did Oakland become a "big market"?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57579
Franky T wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
The point of the thread seems to be that Mac is stupid to not like and talk more NBA.


False. This thread has no point.



There is a very clear point to be made.

Will it be made soon?

:lol:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Frank Coztansa wrote:
long time guy wrote:
NBA is a star driven league but if you have a team that makes it to the Finals then chances are they have a big star on it.
Hard hitting analysis here.


Teams that get to the Super Bowl probably have a pretty good quarterback.



From the guy that thinks he is being revelatory by telling the world that Robin Ventura was a shitty manager a full 2 Years After he has been fired. I will take that as a compliment.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11107
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

Yes, of course, but that doesn't mean that an NBA sudden death tourney would "crush" college basketball. There are a lot of college sports fans out there, and one of the reasons the tournament is popular is because college basketball is just popular.

I'm open to the idea I'm wrong here but it seems to me college basketball has one of the largest disparities between postseason and regular season ratings. To me that indicates the format of the postseason is a factor.


I'll take "things never uttered on this message board" for 1,000.

March Madness is incredibly popular, so that's probably true. But I think it also has a number of things that the NBA couldn't do as well. There would be no huge Cinderellas with a bunch of honkeys from Pennsylvania going to the Final Four in the NBA. You also wouldn't have nearly as many teams. I actually think upsets in the NBA playoffs would hurt more than they would help. If you had a Finals that was, say, Toronto and New Orleans, this year, very few would be watching. You run the risk that the final game wouldn't even have any superstars. They are two very different events with very different fan bases. I can't say that the NBA would necessarily beat them.



Small market big market holds little relevance these days. G.S. is a small market team. There isn't a team in the Finals from a top 5 market yet the ratings will still be huge. NBA is a star driven league but if you have a team that makes it to the Finals then chances are they have a big star on it.


Come on. That's not a small market, and it's team that transcends it's market in terms of interest.


When did Oakland become a "big market"?


It's only the 8th biggest TV market in us. Ltg right again!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7936
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
long time guy wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
long time guy wrote:
NBA is a star driven league but if you have a team that makes it to the Finals then chances are they have a big star on it.
Hard hitting analysis here.


Teams that get to the Super Bowl probably have a pretty good quarterback.



From the guy that thinks he is being revelatory by telling the world that Robin Ventura was a shitty manager a full 2 Years After he has been fired. I will take that as a compliment.


Due to LTG’s avatar for some reason I hear crambone at the end of all his posts. My wife is giving me more weird looks and shaking her head.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
billypootons wrote:
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I'm open to the idea I'm wrong here but it seems to me college basketball has one of the largest disparities between postseason and regular season ratings. To me that indicates the format of the postseason is a factor.


I'll take "things never uttered on this message board" for 1,000.

March Madness is incredibly popular, so that's probably true. But I think it also has a number of things that the NBA couldn't do as well. There would be no huge Cinderellas with a bunch of honkeys from Pennsylvania going to the Final Four in the NBA. You also wouldn't have nearly as many teams. I actually think upsets in the NBA playoffs would hurt more than they would help. If you had a Finals that was, say, Toronto and New Orleans, this year, very few would be watching. You run the risk that the final game wouldn't even have any superstars. They are two very different events with very different fan bases. I can't say that the NBA would necessarily beat them.



Small market big market holds little relevance these days. G.S. is a small market team. There isn't a team in the Finals from a top 5 market yet the ratings will still be huge. NBA is a star driven league but if you have a team that makes it to the Finals then chances are they have a big star on it.


Come on. That's not a small market, and it's team that transcends it's market in terms of interest.


When did Oakland become a "big market"?


It's only the 8th biggest TV market in us. Ltg right again!!!!



You have to combine S.F. and Oakland which are 2 separate cities and it still is only 8th largest.


Been around this game a long time and i've never heard anytime refer to G.S. as a big market franchise. Budding geniuses know otherwise.

Oakland is a small city. Makes for a small market franchise. Laugh on however.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56502
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
The Warriors air on San Francisco television and radio; there is no standalone Oakland television or radio market. (San Jose is its own radio market.) SF-Oakland-SJ is ranked 6th, by the way.

http://bl.ocks.org/simzou/6459889

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Curious Hair wrote:
The Warriors air on San Francisco television and radio; there is no standalone Oakland television or radio market. (San Jose is its own radio market.) SF-Oakland-SJ is ranked 6th, by the way.

http://bl.ocks.org/simzou/6459889


No one has ever considered them a "big market franchise"

Until now. If you loop it into "Bay Area" then yeah i guess but Oakland is a small market city and always has been. They have to move the franchise because of it.

When it comes to the NBA there are only about 4-5 major markets and everyone knows who they happen to be.

Durant didn't sign there because he believed he was going to a major market.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23315
pizza_Place: Giordano's
long time guy wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
The Warriors air on San Francisco television and radio; there is no standalone Oakland television or radio market. (San Jose is its own radio market.) SF-Oakland-SJ is ranked 6th, by the way.

http://bl.ocks.org/simzou/6459889


No one has ever considered them a "big market franchise"


Facts about market size? Get those the hell out of here, I'm going to appeal to the authority of literally "no one"!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11107
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
LTG asks "when did oakland become a big market". you didnt state "when did GSW become a big market team" you asked about Oakland..... so MANY point out the SF, Oakland, San Jose TV market is actually just one TV market ranked between the 6th and 8th biggest market in the country.....

LTG response to factual information about TV market size Oakland which LTG questioned it being called big?..... says GSW basketball team has never been called a big market team. a clumsy argument pivot at best... par for the course for LTG


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
billypootons wrote:
LTG asks "when did oakland become a big market". you didnt state "when did GSW become a big market team" you asked about Oakland..... so MANY point out the SF, Oakland, San Jose TV market is actually just one TV market ranked between the 6th and 8th biggest market in the country.....

LTG response to factual information about TV market size Oakland which LTG questioned it being called big?..... says GSW basketball team has never been called a big market team. a clumsy argument pivot at best... par for the course for LTG



Damn dude do you even follow the NBA? G.S. has never been regarded as a big market franchise. If that is the case Minnesota is also a big market franchise since theoretically it has the whole State of Minnesota.

There are big market teams. Bay Area doesn't qualify.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56502
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Through the '90s and 2000s, he Warriors were owned by a miser who let the team go to crap after Don Nelson left. I don't think they were regarded as a team with the limited resources of a small market so much as a major market not living up to potential, like the Bulls or the pre-Cuban Mavericks. They certainly haven't been run like a small-market team with Silicon Valley money behind them.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 844 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 29  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group