It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 1:58 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 487 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
2019 1st
2020 3rd

That's the price I'm willing to pay for Mack.

Yeah, I don't think that offer even gets the negotiating started.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
lol of course it does. This is the NFL. We go through it all the time how covetous teams are of their picks. The money Mack will cost to sign disqualifies half the league.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
lol of course it does. This is the NFL. We go through it all the time how covetous teams are of their picks. The money Mack will cost to sign disqualifies half the league.

Right but you seem to be operating under the impression the Raiders want to trade Mack and/or don't have much leverage here. That's not true. They have significantly more leverage than any team contacting them looking to trade for Mack.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
FF what would the offer need to be?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:19 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
It would have to start with multiple 1st round picks.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
FF what would the offer need to be?

I agree with Nas. Two firsts and a third next year or something similar. Mack is a DPOY in his absolute prime at age 27. He's among the 3-4 most valuable non-QB's in the NFL.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
No team will give up multiple 1sts for anything other than a quarterback. FF is correct that the Raiders will first have to decide to trade Mack before he can be traded. There's no way an NFL front office is going to make that type of crazy offer that makes the Raiders decision for them. If someone were offering multiple 1sts the deal would already be done. Think about it from a FO perspective, you could have two guys who you are certain will be good starters with decent chances at becoming stars at a combined cost less than what you would be paying Mack.

Dont come at me with bust-rates or risk either. You're not thinking like an NFL GM if you think that way. They expect every one of their highly drafted players to work out. If they thought they were drafting a potential bust they wouldn't take them. Make fun of this attitude all you want, I agree its pretty arrogant, but its the way they are.

So yea, if the Raiders decide to cash Mack it'll probably be something like a 1st round pick +, or something crazy like Odell Beckham where its almost a parallel move.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FF what would the offer need to be?

I agree with Nas. Two firsts and a third next year or something similar. Mack is a DPOY in his absolute prime at age 27. He's among the 3-4 most valuable non-QB's in the NFL.

That qualifier matters a ton.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Im not sure of their cap situation but I could see Washington/Snyder offering something crazy....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
No team will give up multiple 1sts for anything other than a quarterback. FF is correct that the Raiders will first have to decide to trade Mack before he can be traded. There's no way an NFL front office is going to make that type of crazy offer that makes the Raiders decision for them. If someone were offering multiple 1sts the deal would already be done. Think about it from a FO perspective, you could have two guys who you are certain will be good starters with decent chances at becoming stars at a combined cost less than what you would be paying Mack.


I think you understand the severe flaw in the logic of the bolded part.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FF what would the offer need to be?

I agree with Nas. Two firsts and a third next year or something similar. Mack is a DPOY in his absolute prime at age 27. He's among the 3-4 most valuable non-QB's in the NFL.

That qualifier matters a ton.

It does but a devastating, top tier pass rusher is the 2nd most coveted asset in the league. You're not stealing Mack for a first round pick and a throwaway future pick. There's just no way the Raiders do that.

For reference, this article suggests GB's two 2019 firsts would only be a starting point:

https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/st ... 979832002/

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
but their guess really is only as good as any other astute observer. They don't have inside knowledge. I side with America. I don't think it would take two firsts. At least, I don't think anyone will offer two firsts.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FF what would the offer need to be?

I agree with Nas. Two firsts and a third next year or something similar. Mack is a DPOY in his absolute prime at age 27. He's among the 3-4 most valuable non-QB's in the NFL.

That qualifier matters a ton.

It does but a devastating, top tier pass rusher is the 2nd most coveted asset in the league. You're not stealing Mack for a first round pick and a throwaway future pick. There's just no way the Raiders do that.

For reference, this article suggests GB's two 2019 firsts would only be a starting point:

https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/st ... 979832002/

No way. Teams are willing to do shit like that but only for QB's. Khalil Mack is 27, you get 2 or 3 years of his prime (provided he doesnt hurt) and then all bets are off. He loses half a step and he could suddenly be average. I have no problem paying Khalil Mack like a QB for this next season, but after that I start to worry. And that's just from a pure money perspective, were not getting into the losing draft picks aspect of it yet.

I think a team decides that they are going to "draft" the right to sign Khalil Mack with a 2019 1st, as opposed to a pass rusher coming out of college that pick would've otherwise been used on, plus a 3rd or something to make their offer stand out to the Raiders.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
The Raiders straight up cannot afford Mack at his current demands. If they could I think he'd be signed by now. Their cap situation is totally fucked.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
America wrote:
The Raiders straight up cannot afford Mack at his current demands. If they could I think he'd be signed by now. Their cap situation is totally fucked.

Fans of a team being "comfortable" with what they give up in a proposed trade are the fucking worst. If you are comfortable with it, it's a pretty good sign the trade is unrealistic. :lol:

You aren't getting Mack on the cheap, dipshits.

The Raiders problem is more cash-flow related then cap related. Penn renegotiated his contract to give them over 3MM this year. Mack signing an extension would greatly help their cap this season. The problem is funding the guarantees and all. Mark Davis is cash-strapped and doesn't have the Vegas bucks yet.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
What NFL have you been watching where teams just forfeit tons of draft picks for anything other than a QB?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
What NFL have you been watching where teams just forfeit tons of draft picks for anything other than a QB?

There's no comparable player to Mack to have supposedly been available in the last 10 years so it's a moot point.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
What NFL have you been watching where teams just forfeit tons of draft picks for anything other than a QB?

There's no comparable player to Mack to have supposedly been available in the last 10 years so it's a moot point.



Peppers

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 11:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Furious Styles wrote:
America wrote:
The Raiders straight up cannot afford Mack at his current demands. If they could I think he'd be signed by now. Their cap situation is totally fucked.

Fans of a team being "comfortable" with what they give up in a proposed trade are the fucking worst. If you are comfortable with it, it's a pretty good sign the trade is unrealistic. :lol:

You aren't getting Mack on the cheap, dipshits.

The Raiders problem is more cash-flow related then cap related. Penn renegotiated his contract to give them over 3MM this year. Mack signing an extension would greatly help their cap this season. The problem is funding the guarantees and all. Mark Davis is cash-strapped and doesn't have the Vegas bucks yet.


Can't they tag him next year and year after? It's what I would do n let him walk after that.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
What NFL have you been watching where teams just forfeit tons of draft picks for anything other than a QB?

There's no comparable player to Mack to have supposedly been available in the last 10 years so it's a moot point.



Peppers

:lol: he was not on the trade market as a 27 year old.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Last edited by FavreFan on Wed Aug 15, 2018 11:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 11:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
What NFL have you been watching where teams just forfeit tons of draft picks for anything other than a QB?

There's no comparable player to Mack to have supposedly been available in the last 10 years so it's a moot point.

Carson Palmer
Peyton Manning
Brett Favre
Albert Haynesworth
Julius Peppers
Marshawn Lynch
Randy Moss

You're off your rocker again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 11:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
What NFL have you been watching where teams just forfeit tons of draft picks for anything other than a QB?

There's no comparable player to Mack to have supposedly been available in the last 10 years so it's a moot point.

Carson Palmer
Peyton Manning
Brett Favre
Albert Haynesworth
Julius Peppers
Marshawn Lynch
Randy Moss

You're off your rocker again.

You’re confusing free agents with trade targets. Of course you don’t have to give up first round picks to sign UFA. Also half that list is wrong and QBs don’t count since my original response was to you saying “anything other than QBs”.

So again, that leaves no one.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 11:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
What NFL have you been watching where teams just forfeit tons of draft picks for anything other than a QB?

There's no comparable player to Mack to have supposedly been available in the last 10 years so it's a moot point.

Carson Palmer
Peyton Manning
Brett Favre
Albert Haynesworth
Julius Peppers
Marshawn Lynch
Randy Moss

You're off your rocker again.

You’re confusing free agents with trade targets. Of course you don’t have to give up first round picks to sign UFA. Also half that list is wrong and QBs don’t count since my original response was to you saying “anything other than QBs”.

So again, that leaves no one.

Moss. The Patriots got him for a 4th. Next year he broke the single season TD record.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2018 11:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Denver has paid Von Miller $70m guaranteed the last two years. Von Miller would be a comparable talent to Khalil Mack (Miller was probably better at age 27, but whatever). Broncos record since?

2016: 9-7
2017: 5-11


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2018 12:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
You calling him the best player available in a decade probably means he's getting more than Von Miller's $70m guaranteed. You dont think that factors in massively to Mack's trade cost?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2018 12:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
What NFL have you been watching where teams just forfeit tons of draft picks for anything other than a QB?

There's no comparable player to Mack to have supposedly been available in the last 10 years so it's a moot point.

Carson Palmer
Peyton Manning
Brett Favre
Albert Haynesworth
Julius Peppers
Marshawn Lynch
Randy Moss

You're off your rocker again.

You’re confusing free agents with trade targets. Of course you don’t have to give up first round picks to sign UFA. Also half that list is wrong and QBs don’t count since my original response was to you saying “anything other than QBs”.

So again, that leaves no one.

Moss. The Patriots got him for a 4th. Next year he broke the single season TD record.

Right and they got him for a 4th because his age and previous production had lowered his value to that point, making it a terrible comparison to Mack. Mack is in his prime and should be a monster for 5-10 more years. He’s shown zero health problems. Not one guy on your list was available as a trade target at a similar age and stature in the league.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2018 12:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I can go back LAST SEASON to Jimmy G garnering only a 2nd from the 49ers. The reason the return was so low was because the 49ers had to turn around to sign him to an amount of money that basically eviscerates whatever flexibility they have with the cap from here on out.

Mack is worth more than Jimmy G. Probably twice as much (to say this in relation to a quarterback is an impressive thing to say about Mack), which still doesn't mean 2 1sts. And Mack may cost more money to sign than Jimmy G.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2018 12:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
Denver has paid Von Miller $70m guaranteed the last two years. Von Miller would be a comparable talent to Khalil Mack (Miller was probably better at age 27, but whatever). Broncos record since?

2016: 9-7
2017: 5-11

And they won a SB in large part because of him even with a worthless QB. But even still that one sample sample size doesn’t mean anything in relation to this argument.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2018 12:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
I can go back LAST SEASON to Jimmy G garnering only a 2nd from the 49ers. The reason the return was so low was because the 49ers had to turn around to sign him to an amount of money that basically eviscerates whatever flexibility they have with the cap from here on out.

Mack is worth more than Jimmy G. Probably twice as much (to say this in relation to a quarterback is an impressive thing to say about Mack), which still doesn't mean 2 1sts. And Mack may cost more money to sign than Jimmy G.

He’s worth considerably more than twice as much as a QB who had like 4 career starts at that point. You’re no longer allowed to accuse anyone else here of being off their rocker. Fuck outta here with that comp. it only looks slightly less insane because of hindsight bias of what he did after the trade.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Last edited by FavreFan on Thu Aug 16, 2018 12:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2018 12:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Right they won a Super Bowl when they had him signed for a pittance. Kinda my point.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 487 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group