It is currently Fri Jan 31, 2025 3:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 305 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:42 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
He's an all time great in his prime that redifined a position.


He redefined the position?

In what way?

RBs being used in the slot and as WRs even when they are “franchise” RBs. The way Gurley, David Johnson, and Kamara are used is directly related to success Pittsburgh has had using Bell in a variety of positions.


Pretty sure Forte was doing this when Bell was in high school.

No he wasn't. He never lined up in the slot nearly as frequently as Bell has. If he was as productive as Bell the current RB usage trend would have started earlier.


He was top 3 in yards from scrimmage for the first half of his career. Well before Bell came.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
The Steelers seem just...done. Tuitt and Heyward both look beat, replacing Shazier with Bostic has torn out their heart, Haden can barely keep up anymore and he's their best secondary player by far. Dupree and Watt are just not productive pass rushers and with Heyward and Tuitt so spent they look even worse.

Offensively AB is very simply not the best WR in football anymore. 35th in yards and his yards per reception is runningback tier. Moreso he just doesn't look the part anymore. Ben still has it somehow but he's still not what he once was. They are a dying star with or without Bell and if they lose to Atlanta this week I don't see them climbing out of a 1-4-1 crater.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I was going to go back to Roger Craig but I don't recall where he lined up predominantly. I seem to recall him mostly coming out of the backfield.

But, I don't have a strong opinion on slot RBs and when it started.

But it's increase in usage is undeniably attributed to the last 5 years & same time as Pitt started using him as a dual threat primarily and not as a check down option.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
My point is Bell isn't going to save them and wouldn't be able to even if he started the season with them. He's not an all-time great either. That's crazy talk. Marshall Faulk, a player much better than Bell, fell off after 28. I would not guarantee any money to Bell after that age 28 season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48806
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I'll give you that the alignment is different in recent years.

But Craig wasn't a check down 80 times a year. They were designing that as part of their offense.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
There's nothing so far to suggest Bell is not in Faulk's area. His per game numbers are insane. But yes that's who we are talking about here and its crazy Pitt isn't working that into the next two years window at most they have with Ben anyway. I think Brown is gonna be great for awhile regardless but unless they get lucky this window ends with Ben. It's dumb they aren't keeping Bell to finish it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I'll give you that the alignment is different in recent years.

But Craig wasn't a check down 80 times a year. They were designing that as part of their offense.

I wasn't trying to say it was unprecedented. Just that the frequency and effectiveness of it league wide has been and I think it's fair to attribute a lot of that to the success Pitt has had using Bell in a copycat league.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48806
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
FavreFan wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I'll give you that the alignment is different in recent years.

But Craig wasn't a check down 80 times a year. They were designing that as part of their offense.

I wasn't trying to say it was unprecedented. Just that the frequency and effectiveness of it league wide has been and I think it's fair to attribute a lot of that to the success Pitt has had using Bell in a copycat league.


I will agree to agree.

Are we allowed to do that here?

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
You have to admit that AB has taken a big step back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Le'veon has played in 16 games once (he has played in 15 games too, which I'll mention). Reliability is part of the equation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
You have to admit that AB has taken a big step back.

Nope. He's as good as ever. WR2's next to star WR1's performing great is a league wide trend. I also agree with the commonly expressed concern they aren't going down field to him enough. But again, that can also be directly traced to Bell not occupying the middle of the defense's attention.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
You have to admit that AB has taken a big step back.

Nope. He's as good as ever. WR2's next to star WR1's performing great is a league wide trend. I also agree with the commonly expressed concern they aren't going down field to him enough. But again, that can also be directly traced to Bell not occupying the middle of the defense's attention.

He's not and the Steelers are very plainly telling you that with their playcalling and offensive scheme.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Not really. See my previous post.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10248
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
I respect the player's right to exercise his collectively bargained rights.

I respect the player's teammates being allowed to express their opinion on the matter without fear of union retribution, even if the teammates' opinion is that he's a giant asswipe who is costing them a chance at playing meaningful playoff football while they risk getting hurt each week.

I think both the union leadership and the owners are complete dumbasses for collectively bargaining that a player can hold out until week 11. A tagged player should have until the end of week 4 (so 11:59pm Pacific on Monday) to decide to return to the team under the tag or Al Harris the year but become a free agent at the end of it unless he is tagged again.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
It's time for the franchise tag to go.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
It's time for the franchise tag to go.

Agreed. Seems like a shitty compromise on both sides.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48806
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I always thought Todd Bell was the bigger absence that year.

Loved Todd Bell.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I was going to say this week but Atlanta has nobody left, but next time Pittsburgh plays a real secondary see who the #1 CB is on. Bet it won't be AB. 50 and 67 yards against the vaunted Chiefs and Bucs is not the work of the NFL's best WR. He had a nice run.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
but next time Pittsburgh plays a real secondary see who the #1 CB is on. Bet it won't be AB.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Ok. Good talk.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Wasn't Reggie Bush the original Antonio Brown?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
No. No he was not.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I meant Bell

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
pittmike wrote:
You guys always want to pay the players. Always have the owners hold the risk. Never a new idea of sharing the risks.


What exactly is the owners' risk? Only New England and Dallas are sitting in almost totally privately funded stadium complexes. And only a hapless schmo like Mark Davis can fuck up a cash cow. Which is what these teams are with the tv, radio and licensing money.

The third generation Rooney are running things in a manner befitting their collective sense of entitlement. And they're blowing it right now. Boo f-ing hoo.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
So...the players should get paid more because the stadiums are publicly financed? Explain that one to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
You have to admit that AB has taken a big step back.

Nope. He's as good as ever. WR2's next to star WR1's performing great is a league wide trend. I also agree with the commonly expressed concern they aren't going down field to him enough. But again, that can also be directly traced to Bell not occupying the middle of the defense's attention.

He's not and the Steelers are very plainly telling you that with their playcalling and offensive scheme.


AB does look a step slow, but it may be frustration. The bigger problems are that the OL needed Bell than the other way and it's more apparent each week, and that Big Ben is about as consistent or accurate as 2017 (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
312player wrote:
I meant Bell

Sure. That's not unfair. When I think receiving RB's usually I think of little guys like Westbrook and Ray Rice but Bell and Bush were two guys who were not so diminutive in size but still had that burst and quickness. Even Faulk doesn't quite have that same receiver's build those two had, though I would not ever call Marshall Faulk undersized.

Bush had a nice career, Bell's will obviously be better but anyone who says the Saints blew that pick is an idiot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Regular Reader wrote:
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
You have to admit that AB has taken a big step back.

Nope. He's as good as ever. WR2's next to star WR1's performing great is a league wide trend. I also agree with the commonly expressed concern they aren't going down field to him enough. But again, that can also be directly traced to Bell not occupying the middle of the defense's attention.

He's not and the Steelers are very plainly telling you that with their playcalling and offensive scheme.


AB does look a step slow, but it may be frustration. The bigger problems are that the OL needed Bell than the other way and it's more apparent each week, and that Big Ben is about as consistent or accurate as 2017 (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Roethlisberger led the league in passing yards through week 4 (Luck nudged past him on Thursday Night so as of this moment Ben is second) and has completed 65% of his passes. The assertion that Ben has not created enough yards to go around is ridiculous.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
America wrote:
So...the players should get paid more because the stadiums are publicly financed? Explain that one to me.


Mike was referring to the mythical owners risk and that's primarily what I was responding to.

And financing aside, $5MM guaranteed for next year and essentially 0 after that is a ridiculously one sided deal to a team that will ride him to death.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
America wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
You have to admit that AB has taken a big step back.

Nope. He's as good as ever. WR2's next to star WR1's performing great is a league wide trend. I also agree with the commonly expressed concern they aren't going down field to him enough. But again, that can also be directly traced to Bell not occupying the middle of the defense's attention.

He's not and the Steelers are very plainly telling you that with their playcalling and offensive scheme.


AB does look a step slow, but it may be frustration. The bigger problems are that the OL needed Bell than the other way and it's more apparent each week, and that Big Ben is about as consistent or accurate as 2017 (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Roethlisberger led the league in passing yards through week 4 (Luck nudged past him on Thursday Night so as of this moment Ben is second) and has completed 65% of his passes. The assertion that Ben has not created enough yards to go around is ridiculous.


Spoken like someone who hasn't actually watched the games. But yards is a secondary stat imo, more telling about the 1st half failures that force 50-60 throws to catch up. Especially with the guy whose passed are too often way off target.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Le'Veon Bell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
I meant Bell

No.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 305 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group