It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:51 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 1:53 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72531
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
Mitchell is more likely to be Allen Iverson than Ben Gordon

Always knew you were one of the good ones.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18494
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
If we are starting threads for bums like Fultz let's give someone great a thread.

Kicks off his MVP campaign against the Kings tomorrow night. Gonna be a glorious year


I might just go with Fultz being a better pro than one trick pony Mitchell.

:lol: :lol:

Please do. You have enough bad Mitchell thoughts on record here but this may take the cake.



Mitchell for MVP is the silliest thought currently going. Saying a lot when factor in the foolishness that is WWN's thoughts

Image

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Undersized scoring two guards never make it big. The only ones I can think of in recent memory are Wade and Iverson. Mitchell is probably gonna be a better Ben Gordon. Meh

:lol:


Look it up. It's a good comp. High volume scorer and less than 4 boards and assists. Not really that special of a prototype. Ain't my fault you get super infatuated with small sample sizes.


Yep. He is Ronald "Flip" Murray with more hype and a slightly larger sample size. FF is infatuated with him because he is trying to move on from the Lonzo debacle and his miscalculation involving Lauri. Mitchell is cool. Probably will make an All Star team or two. Top 10 guy or even top 15 I don't see in his future. He is a one dimensional scorer. Doesn't impact the game in any other meaningful way. In order to be dynamic with his game you'd have to drop 25 or better a game. He isn't the guy for that.

You're all over the place here. Is he Flip Murray/Dion Waiters or is he a future All Star? Can't have it both ways, amigo.

I don't know what your Lonzo and Lauri comment means. I've said since the first week of last regular season I think both will be good players and nothing I saw from them all rookie year changes that.



The Lakers have pulled back on the Lonzo love if you haven't noticed and it is really quite obvious that most people around the league merely think that he is a guy. He hasn't done anything which demonstrates that he will be anything more than a role player at best. Lakers feel the same as Lebron was brought in to replace him and Rondo was brought in as insurance.

As far as Mitchell goes he isn't that special. He exceeded what was expected of him as a rookie and that is good but to think that he is about to rip the league up is a stretch. There are a lot of holes in his game which need to be corrected in order to reach the lofty status that you seem to have reserved for him. In addition you can't assume that he will acquire all of these things with age either. You know special players when you first see them more often than not.


If you are going to use the "in the future" argument as your rationale than I can use the same argument for Cameron Payne also.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I like Mitchell and wanted him to win Rookie of the Year. That being said, while I certainly wouldn't go as far as vegan and ltg, I do think there's good reason to be concerned about him unless he's able to improve the other facets of his game. The honeymoon period is a lot shorter for high volume scoring guards than it was 10-15 years ago.


What's so extreme about saying he's probably a better Ben Gordon?

Because what he did last year as a rookie (especially in the playoffs) was arguably more impressive than anything Gordon or Waiters have ever done. And because (as FF said) it strikes me as hasty to not just fear but outright conclude that he's doomed to forever repeat his rookie year production.


Ben Gordon's series against Boston was more impressive than what Mitchell did against OKC. Mitchell was extremely pedestrian against Houston and sort of got exposed as a guy that struggles to get his own look. Rubio is helping to make him.

:lol:

You're still mad he owned your Thunder. It's all good.


He stunk against Houston which you have yet to ever acknowledge.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I like Mitchell and wanted him to win Rookie of the Year. That being said, while I certainly wouldn't go as far as vegan and ltg, I do think there's good reason to be concerned about him unless he's able to improve the other facets of his game. The honeymoon period is a lot shorter for high volume scoring guards than it was 10-15 years ago.


What's so extreme about saying he's probably a better Ben Gordon?

It's ridiculously stupid and assumes he will not only not improve, but actually get worse as his career progresses.


Guys get worse (See Flip Murray) as their career goes. The term "flash in the pan" was created specifically for guys like that.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41439
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
LTG running circles around WWN, again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:37 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72531
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I like Mitchell and wanted him to win Rookie of the Year. That being said, while I certainly wouldn't go as far as vegan and ltg, I do think there's good reason to be concerned about him unless he's able to improve the other facets of his game. The honeymoon period is a lot shorter for high volume scoring guards than it was 10-15 years ago.


What's so extreme about saying he's probably a better Ben Gordon?

It's ridiculously stupid and assumes he will not only not improve, but actually get worse as his career progresses.


Guys get worse (See Flip Murray) as their career goes. The term "flash in the pan" was created specifically for guys like that.

Flip Murray was good for like a 20 game stretch. It's not comparable to what Mitchell did last year.

Anyway, no use in further arguing before he plays any more games this year. I think he's going to be great, you think he's Dion Waiters/Flip Murray. We aren't even close and we aren't changing eachother's mind so let's just see who ends up being more right. It's why this thread was created.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I like Mitchell and wanted him to win Rookie of the Year. That being said, while I certainly wouldn't go as far as vegan and ltg, I do think there's good reason to be concerned about him unless he's able to improve the other facets of his game. The honeymoon period is a lot shorter for high volume scoring guards than it was 10-15 years ago.


What's so extreme about saying he's probably a better Ben Gordon?

It's ridiculously stupid and assumes he will not only not improve, but actually get worse as his career progresses.


Guys get worse (See Flip Murray) as their career goes. The term "flash in the pan" was created specifically for guys like that.

Flip Murray was good for like a 20 game stretch. It's not comparable to what Mitchell did last year.

Anyway, no use in further arguing before he plays any more games this year. I think he's going to be great, you think he's Dion Waiters/Flip Murray. We aren't even close and we aren't changing eachother's mind so let's just see who ends up being more right. It's why this thread was created.


I can always say that I wasn't really being "serious" can't I?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I like Mitchell and wanted him to win Rookie of the Year. That being said, while I certainly wouldn't go as far as vegan and ltg, I do think there's good reason to be concerned about him unless he's able to improve the other facets of his game. The honeymoon period is a lot shorter for high volume scoring guards than it was 10-15 years ago.


What's so extreme about saying he's probably a better Ben Gordon?

It's ridiculously stupid and assumes he will not only not improve, but actually get worse as his career progresses.


You're underrating Ben Gordon, and I suggested Gordon is the floor anyway and not the ceiling. Ben Gordon could drop 20 at his best on any given night. Not bad. Also not useful for much else beyond that 20. Can Mitchell add more value than that?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18494
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Caller Bob wrote:
LTG running circles around WWN, again.

Image

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41439
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
LTG running circles around WWN, again.

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 5:38 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72531
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I like Mitchell and wanted him to win Rookie of the Year. That being said, while I certainly wouldn't go as far as vegan and ltg, I do think there's good reason to be concerned about him unless he's able to improve the other facets of his game. The honeymoon period is a lot shorter for high volume scoring guards than it was 10-15 years ago.


What's so extreme about saying he's probably a better Ben Gordon?

It's ridiculously stupid and assumes he will not only not improve, but actually get worse as his career progresses.


You're underrating Ben Gordon, and I suggested Gordon is the floor anyway and not the ceiling. Ben Gordon could drop 20 at his best on any given night. Not bad. Also not useful for much else beyond that 20. Can Mitchell add more value than that?

Of course he can. You should've paid more attention to his progression last year and you would've known the answer to your last question.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
ZephMarshack wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I like Mitchell and wanted him to win Rookie of the Year. That being said, while I certainly wouldn't go as far as vegan and ltg, I do think there's good reason to be concerned about him unless he's able to improve the other facets of his game. The honeymoon period is a lot shorter for high volume scoring guards than it was 10-15 years ago.


What's so extreme about saying he's probably a better Ben Gordon?

Because what he did last year as a rookie (especially in the playoffs) was arguably more impressive than anything Gordon or Waiters have ever done. And because (as FF said) it strikes me as hasty to not just fear but outright conclude that he's doomed to forever repeat his rookie year production.


I believe in different prototypes of NBA players. FF said he believes this dude is the "first Donovan Mitchell." We've seen an undersized scoring two guard before. If scoring is your only thing as a 6'3 SG then I'm sorry but we've seen you before and your name is either Ben Gordon or Allen Iverson.

Mitchell doesn't get to the line enough or finish in traffic to fit the Iverson prototype. Guys that do are people like Steve Francis, Marbury, etc. He also doesn't make plays like they did. This is why I see him closer to the Gordon prototype, who is more of a scoring specialist rather than a scorer who can also make plays. Yes he can obviously develop but if you're not a playmaker to start with then it's very unlikely you'll develop that later on. I say that because you need vision and superior athleticism at that size to be a truly dangerous playmaker.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I like Mitchell and wanted him to win Rookie of the Year. That being said, while I certainly wouldn't go as far as vegan and ltg, I do think there's good reason to be concerned about him unless he's able to improve the other facets of his game. The honeymoon period is a lot shorter for high volume scoring guards than it was 10-15 years ago.


What's so extreme about saying he's probably a better Ben Gordon?

It's ridiculously stupid and assumes he will not only not improve, but actually get worse as his career progresses.


You're underrating Ben Gordon, and I suggested Gordon is the floor anyway and not the ceiling. Ben Gordon could drop 20 at his best on any given night. Not bad. Also not useful for much else beyond that 20. Can Mitchell add more value than that?

Of course he can. You should've paid more attention to his progression last year and you would've known the answer to your last question.



Lets look at the Rookie numbers of both. Something tells me Ben's Per 36 were eerily similar if not better.

He also is nowhere near the shooter that Ben was. He is more athletic and has wingspan that all the GMs love. He is closer to Ben Gordon than you might think.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:07 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72531
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Vegan thinks Mitchell doesn't finish in traffic well :lol: :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I like Mitchell and wanted him to win Rookie of the Year. That being said, while I certainly wouldn't go as far as vegan and ltg, I do think there's good reason to be concerned about him unless he's able to improve the other facets of his game. The honeymoon period is a lot shorter for high volume scoring guards than it was 10-15 years ago.


What's so extreme about saying he's probably a better Ben Gordon?

It's ridiculously stupid and assumes he will not only not improve, but actually get worse as his career progresses.


You're underrating Ben Gordon, and I suggested Gordon is the floor anyway and not the ceiling. Ben Gordon could drop 20 at his best on any given night. Not bad. Also not useful for much else beyond that 20. Can Mitchell add more value than that?

Of course he can. You should've paid more attention to his progression last year and you would've known the answer to your last question.



His "progression" involved scoring and nothing else. You said he was a point guard but after the Houston series the best response for that is "oops". :lol: :lol:

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:16 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72531
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
He's much closer to Oladipo than Flip Murray, Dion Waiters, and Ben Gordon. You guys are bad at comps.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:16 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72531
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
I like Mitchell and wanted him to win Rookie of the Year. That being said, while I certainly wouldn't go as far as vegan and ltg, I do think there's good reason to be concerned about him unless he's able to improve the other facets of his game. The honeymoon period is a lot shorter for high volume scoring guards than it was 10-15 years ago.


What's so extreme about saying he's probably a better Ben Gordon?

It's ridiculously stupid and assumes he will not only not improve, but actually get worse as his career progresses.


You're underrating Ben Gordon, and I suggested Gordon is the floor anyway and not the ceiling. Ben Gordon could drop 20 at his best on any given night. Not bad. Also not useful for much else beyond that 20. Can Mitchell add more value than that?

Of course he can. You should've paid more attention to his progression last year and you would've known the answer to your last question.



His "progression" involved scoring and nothing else. You said he was a point guard but after the Houston series the best response for that is "oops". :lol: :lol:

I never said he was a PG. I said he played the position well after being forced into it with Rubio's injury. That is true and most analysts were saying the same thing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:

What's so extreme about saying he's probably a better Ben Gordon?

It's ridiculously stupid and assumes he will not only not improve, but actually get worse as his career progresses.


You're underrating Ben Gordon, and I suggested Gordon is the floor anyway and not the ceiling. Ben Gordon could drop 20 at his best on any given night. Not bad. Also not useful for much else beyond that 20. Can Mitchell add more value than that?

Of course he can. You should've paid more attention to his progression last year and you would've known the answer to your last question.



His "progression" involved scoring and nothing else. You said he was a point guard but after the Houston series the best response for that is "oops". :lol: :lol:

I never said he was a PG. I said he played the position well after being forced into it with Rubio's injury. That is true and most analysts were saying the same thing.



Which analyst said that? He played the position during the Houston series and he struggled mightily and the numbers, eyetest or whatever you want to look at supports that.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:24 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72531
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
Which analyst said that? He played the position during the Houston series and he struggled mightily and the numbers, eyetest or whatever you want to look at supports that.

Kenny Smith on TNT said it and it was a common talking point among NBA analysts after the game 2 win where he had 11 assists.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Even his playoff #s are overhyped. 22 shots to avg 24 points on 42% shooting 31% from 3.

4 assists with 3 turnovers per game is playing well?

He is a volume chucker and little else.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Which analyst said that? He played the position during the Houston series and he struggled mightily and the numbers, eyetest or whatever you want to look at supports that.

Kenny Smith on TNT said it and it was a common talking point among NBA analysts after the game 2 win where he had 11 assists.



That was an outlier though. His assists numbers weren't that great avg wise. He struggled at the point for the most part.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:39 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72531
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Which analyst said that? He played the position during the Houston series and he struggled mightily and the numbers, eyetest or whatever you want to look at supports that.

Kenny Smith on TNT said it and it was a common talking point among NBA analysts after the game 2 win where he had 11 assists.



That was an outlier though. His assists numbers weren't that great avg wise. He struggled at the point for the most part.

He was playing out of position and had Houston's entire defense solely focused on taking him out of the game. And he was a rookie. And he still averaged 6 apg and won a game against the number 1 seed in the conference. Not too bad.

I agree with you and vegan that if he never improves he won't be very good. Strong take.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Which analyst said that? He played the position during the Houston series and he struggled mightily and the numbers, eyetest or whatever you want to look at supports that.

Kenny Smith on TNT said it and it was a common talking point among NBA analysts after the game 2 win where he had 11 assists.



That was an outlier though. His assists numbers weren't that great avg wise. He struggled at the point for the most part.

He was playing out of position and had Houston's entire defense solely focused on taking him out of the game. And he was a rookie. And he still averaged 6 apg and won a game against the number 1 seed in the conference. Not too bad.

I agree with you and vegan that if he never improves he won't be very good. Strong take.



Great players beat stacked defenses.

On one hand you have already anointed him as that dude hence this thread and on the other hand you seem to be playing the still just a rookie card.

He has a ways to go before you can place him in the class of the truly elite. Joel Embiid was referred to last night as "the best center in the game" by Reggie Miller. He has only played in about 20 more regular season games than Mitchell.

That is what a great young player looks like. Not Mitchell.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 7:09 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72531
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
On one hand you have already anointed him as that dude hence this thread and on the other hand you seem to be playing the still just a rookie card.

That's because I realize those things aren't mutually exclusive.

Do you think Ben Simmons is already a very good player and will be a great player? Do you believe he looked like shit against Boston in the playoffs last year? My answer to both those questions is yes. And Mitchell never scored 1 fuckin point in an entire playoff game.

You're going over the top in your hate of Mitchell simply because I think he's really good, and it's going to cause you to look foolish. Flip Murray :lol: :lol:

For the record, I believe Zeph had reasonable reservations in his initial comment in this thread, and he was still able to acknowledge how good Mitchell was last year and how far past reasonable you and vegan are going in your criticisms.

Sucks we gotta wait two more hours for the Jazz Kings game. You seem as pumped as I am for it to start.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
On one hand you have already anointed him as that dude hence this thread and on the other hand you seem to be playing the still just a rookie card.

That's because I realize those things aren't mutually exclusive.

Do you think Ben Simmons is already a very good player and will be a great player? Do you believe he looked like shit against Boston in the playoffs last year? My answer to both those questions is yes. And Mitchell never scored 1 fuckin point in an entire playoff game.

You're going over the top in your hate of Mitchell simply because I think he's really good, and it's going to cause you to look foolish. Flip Murray :lol: :lol:

For the record, I believe Zeph had reasonable reservations in his initial comment in this thread, and he was still able to acknowledge how good Mitchell was last year and how far past reasonable you and vegan are going in your criticisms.

Sucks we gotta wait two more hours for the Jazz Kings game. You seem as pumped as I am for it to start.


You were overboard in your effusive praise of Simmons last season too.

As far as Flip Murray goes i am half way joking but i am trying to provide a little perspective. I am not the one saying things like "he's awesome". He is a good player but he isn't a special player and saying things like he is special while simultaneously tempering it with comments like he ain't yet but could be later is contradictory and just a means of kicking the proverbial can down the road.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 8:47 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72531
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

Do you think Ben Simmons is already a very good player and will be a great player? Do you believe he looked like shit against Boston in the playoffs last year?


You were overboard in your effusive praise of Simmons last season too.

Answer the questions

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I'm being very respectful of Mitchell here. I ain't the one bringing up Flip Murray so don't go there.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 8:58 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72531
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
I'm being very respectful of Mitchell here. I ain't the one bringing up Flip Murray so don't go there.

I dunno man. A better Ben Gordon is pretty vague and doesn't sound complimentary. Also, his one elite skill is driving and finishing. Even LTG acknowledged that last year. Not sure you've been too fair in pigeonholing Mitchell into a specific type of complimentary player.

We'll find out a lot more this season though. One of the many reasons Im not a "skip to the conference finals" NBA fan

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Donovan Mitchell
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I'm being very respectful of Mitchell here. I ain't the one bringing up Flip Murray so don't go there.

I dunno man. A better Ben Gordon is pretty vague and doesn't sound complimentary. Also, his one elite skill is driving and finishing. Even LTG acknowledged that last year. Not sure you've been too fair in pigeonholing Mitchell into a specific type of complimentary player.



We'll find out a lot more this season though. One of the many reasons Im not a "skip to the conference finals" NBA fan


When I mention Gordon I'm referring to his best years. I'm definitely a skip to the conference finals person until the league contracts about seven to ten teams. That will make the playoffs about 200% more enjoyable.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group