It is currently Sat Sep 21, 2024 10:42 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 8:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:31 am
Posts: 53
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
A coworker asked if I heard it. Nope. My "must listen to" portion of WSCR turns off after I shit, shower, and shave in the morning.

I just heard the podcast and here's my take:

1. Lawrence is a whiny little bitch and took a veiled shot at Parkins in the twitter video.
2. Parkins acted like one of them private school little girls feigning innocence when trying to get under someone's skin.

The problem is neither have the nuts to drop the ambiguity and confront someone. Lawrence resents Parkins, but is afraid to show it because that would be "uncouth". Lawrence has worked so hard to get into that white friends circle and dreads of ever being that 'angry black guy' his white friends dismiss and role their eyes at when he tries to make a point.

Parkins is the prep kid using leading questions to get his friends to side with him - "I don't know man, but I think Holmes was talking about me. What do you think?". Parkins is the popular sweater tied around his neck guy and his buds giggle with him so they'll stay in Parkin's circle but really can't stand Parkins (hence their tweeting to stir things up).

And then comes the dance on air - neither Holmes nor Parkins have the balls to say what they really feel and we get 15 minutes of "I was talking about people in general" and "But, who specifically?".

Here's how it should have went -

Parkins - I was wondering who were you talking about when you said "people" have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in the Hall of Fame.

Holmes - I was talking about you.

Parkins - Me? I don't have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in the Hall of Fame.

Holmes - Then stop being (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's little bitch by defending him every time someone criticizes him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43439
This definitely needed it's own thread.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 30446
pizza_Place: What??
FJBlack8 wrote:
A coworker asked if I heard it. Nope. My "must listen to" portion of WSCR turns off after I shit, shower, and shave in the morning.

I just heard the podcast and here's my take:

1. Lawrence is a whiny little bitch and took a veiled shot at Parkins in the twitter video.
2. Parkins acted like one of them private school little girls feigning innocence when trying to get under someone's skin.

The problem is neither have the nuts to drop the ambiguity and confront someone. Lawrence resents Parkins, but is afraid to show it because that would be "uncouth". Lawrence has worked so hard to get into that white friends circle and dreads of ever being that 'angry black guy' his white friends dismiss and role their eyes at when he tries to make a point.

Parkins is the prep kid using leading questions to get his friends to side with him - "I don't know man, but I think Holmes was talking about me. What do you think?". Parkins is the popular sweater tied around his neck guy and his buds giggle with him so they'll stay in Parkin's circle but really can't stand Parkins (hence their tweeting to stir things up).

And then comes the dance on air - neither Holmes nor Parkins have the balls to say what they really feel and we get 15 minutes of "I was talking about people in general" and "But, who specifically?".

Here's how it should have went -

Parkins - I was wondering who were you talking about when you said "people" have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in the Hall of Fame.

Holmes - I was talking about you.

Parkins - Me? I don't have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in the Hall of Fame.

Holmes - Then stop being (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's little bitch by defending him every time someone criticizes him.

Nailed it

_________________
The modern world is divided between those that would numb itself to its meaninglessness through various substances and various hedonisms and those that realize it and go crazy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81442
FJBlack8 wrote:
A coworker asked if I heard it. Nope. My "must listen to" portion of WSCR turns off after I shit, shower, and shave in the morning.

I just heard the podcast and here's my take:

1. Lawrence is a whiny little bitch and took a veiled shot at Parkins in the twitter video.
2. Parkins acted like one of them private school little girls feigning innocence when trying to get under someone's skin.

The problem is neither have the nuts to drop the ambiguity and confront someone. Lawrence resents Parkins, but is afraid to show it because that would be "uncouth". Lawrence has worked so hard to get into that white friends circle and dreads of ever being that 'angry black guy' his white friends dismiss and role their eyes at when he tries to make a point.

Parkins is the prep kid using leading questions to get his friends to side with him - "I don't know man, but I think Holmes was talking about me. What do you think?". Parkins is the popular sweater tied around his neck guy and his buds giggle with him so they'll stay in Parkin's circle but really can't stand Parkins (hence their tweeting to stir things up).

And then comes the dance on air - neither Holmes nor Parkins have the balls to say what they really feel and we get 15 minutes of "I was talking about people in general" and "But, who specifically?".

Here's how it should have went -

Parkins - I was wondering who were you talking about when you said "people" have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in the Hall of Fame.

Holmes - I was talking about you.

Parkins - Me? I don't have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in the Hall of Fame.

Holmes - Then stop being (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's little bitch by defending him every time someone criticizes him.


The hostility towards Parkins by several Score employees has been open and obvious since he arrived. There is no hiding it. Parkins isn't popular because employees mistakenly think he took a job to which they had a right.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:46 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 80113
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Parkins clearly loves what he does and is happy to be there. That's what has been missing for a while. When I first started listening to The Score I got that from North, Bernstein, Murph and Hood.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 81442
Nas wrote:
Parkins clearly loves what he does and is happy to be there. That's what has been missing for a while. When I first started listening to The Score I got that from North, Bernstein, Murph and Hood.


Sir loves his job and his employer. He may be frustrated by his lack of promotion but my guess is that he will retire as a Score employee

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
Parkins clearly loves what he does and is happy to be there. That's what has been missing for a while. When I first started listening to The Score I got that from North, Bernstein, Murph and Hood.


Sir loves his job and his employer. He may be frustrated by his lack of promotion but my guess is that he will retire as a Score employee

Or he will be indicted for murdering Parkins.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 11:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 11:16 am
Posts: 1
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati’s
FJBlack8 wrote:
A coworker asked if I heard it. Nope. My "must listen to" portion of WSCR turns off after I shit, shower, and shave in the morning.

I just heard the podcast and here's my take:

1. Lawrence is a whiny little bitch and took a veiled shot at Parkins in the twitter video.
2. Parkins acted like one of them private school little girls feigning innocence when trying to get under someone's skin.

The problem is neither have the nuts to drop the ambiguity and confront someone. Lawrence resents Parkins, but is afraid to show it because that would be "uncouth". Lawrence has worked so hard to get into that white friends circle and dreads of ever being that 'angry black guy' his white friends dismiss and role their eyes at when he tries to make a point.

Parkins is the prep kid using leading questions to get his friends to side with him - "I don't know man, but I think Holmes was talking about me. What do you think?". Parkins is the popular sweater tied around his neck guy and his buds giggle with him so they'll stay in Parkin's circle but really can't stand Parkins (hence their tweeting to stir things up).

And then comes the dance on air - neither Holmes nor Parkins have the balls to say what they really feel and we get 15 minutes of "I was talking about people in general" and "But, who specifically?".

Here's how it should have went -

Parkins - I was wondering who were you talking about when you said "people" have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in the Hall of Fame.

Holmes - I was talking about you.

Parkins - Me? I don't have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in the Hall of Fame.

Holmes - Then stop being (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's little bitch by defending him every time someone criticizes him.


I searched out this board after I heard Mac mention it on the Podcast. I didn’t know about this on-air fight between Parkins and Holmes until I caught part of Cant Do It on Wednesday so I had to go consume all this stuff yesterday on Podcast form. I have to say you’re take on both men was spot on. The other thread went rally hard on the anti-Holmes rhetoric and I get it, but you nailed it from a Parkins angle too. Kudos to you to really getting behind this “beef”.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group