It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 8:53 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1686 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 ... 57  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 3:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
You can't say a guy with over 50% passing and 333 yards had a bad game!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92055
Location: To the left of my post
Almost had an Aaron Rodgers style comeback.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 3:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14924
pizza_Place: Grazianos
ZephMarshack wrote:
You can't say a guy with over 50% passing and 333 yards had a bad game!


No you can't. Yeah he made some bad passes but so did Brady. I really do not get the negativity about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. He basically lost a year of development from the two retards coaching him last year and does look like a legitimate franchise quarterback down the road.

I have a lot of concern though with the lack of a good running game. Howard looks slow and Cohen can't run between the tackles. I think that is what is the only concern I have with the offense.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
ZephMarshack wrote:
You can't say a guy with over 50% passing and 333 yards had a bad game!

If you consider 50% passing good, then we can't even start an argument.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14924
pizza_Place: Grazianos
newper wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
You can't say a guy with over 50% passing and 333 yards had a bad game!

If you consider 50% passing good, then we can't even start an argument.


Noone said that he had a "good game". But to ignore 333 yards passing and almost 100 yards rushing is ridiculous. It wasn't (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that allowed a 95 yard kick return and a long punt return for TDs. Even his two ints were the result of the defender outfighting the receiver for the ball. Neither was on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as for fault.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
The Hawk wrote:
newper wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
You can't say a guy with over 50% passing and 333 yards had a bad game!

If you consider 50% passing good, then we can't even start an argument.


Noone said that he had a "good game". But to ignore 333 yards passing and almost 100 yards rushing is ridiculous. It wasn't (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that allowed a 95 yard kick return and a long punt return for TDs. Even his two ints were the result of the defender outfighting the receiver for the ball. Neither was on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as for fault.

Makes up for the 2 that were dropped in the end zone by the Patriots that would have taken points off the board for the Bears and one would've been returned for 6. Try again.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
The Hawk wrote:
newper wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
You can't say a guy with over 50% passing and 333 yards had a bad game!

If you consider 50% passing good, then we can't even start an argument.


Noone said that he had a "good game". But to ignore 333 yards passing and almost 100 yards rushing is ridiculous. It wasn't (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that allowed a 95 yard kick return and a long punt return for TDs. Even his two ints were the result of the defender outfighting the receiver for the ball. Neither was on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as for fault.

The "rushing" yards are really scrambling yards, so I guess if you like that, you can claim it. Guess how many games this year a QB has thrown for over 330 yards (excluding this week)? 51 games. And that's just looking at 6 weeks. Not a stat I would hang my hat on. And if 50% means nothing to you, then why bring it up? Howard averaged over 1.5 YPC, why are you overlooking that?

Agreed that Mitch didn't lose the game, but he certainly didn't win it. And the second INT was his fault, it is a TD if he places it better.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14924
pizza_Place: Grazianos
badrogue17 wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
newper wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
You can't say a guy with over 50% passing and 333 yards had a bad game!


If you consider 50% passing good, then we can't even start an argument.


Noone said that he had a "good game". But to ignore 333 yards passing and almost 100 yards rushing is ridiculous. It wasn't (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that allowed a 95 yard kick return and a long punt return for TDs. Even his two ints were the result of the defender outfighting the receiver for the ball. Neither was on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as for fault.


Makes up for the 2 that were dropped in the end zone by the Patriots that would have taken points off the board for the Bears and one would've been returned for 6. Try again.


Bunk. Over 400 yards of total offense for a quarterback is something considerable, especially for a 2nd year qb or ANY qb for that matter. You try again.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
A lot of catchable balls were dropped.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
A lot of catchable balls were dropped.

As well as a lot of uncatchable balls. But really, the only balls dropped I am concerned about is Tuesday night!

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
I'm not giving up on him or anything. He has periods where he looks great, and he clearly has all the physical tools. But there are definite concerns.

I think he needs to trust what he sees. Maybe that comes with more experience. He's holding it too long and either running or throwing it very late (which is where he gets in trouble around the end zone because it's too cluttered). Seems like this might be correctable.

His accuracy is inconsistent at best. Some throws he hits them right in stride, and on others he's not even close. I don't know how correctable that is. His deep balls haven't been too consistent either.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
He can't read a well schemed defense.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23839
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
He goes mental in the Red Zone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
KDdidit wrote:
He goes mental in the Red Zone.

That's a symptom of the diabetes contagion he got from Cutty.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:49 pm
Posts: 4492
pizza_Place: Rosati's
leashyourkids wrote:
His accuracy is inconsistent at best. Some throws he hits them right in stride, and on others he's not even close. I don't know how correctable that is. His deep balls haven't been too consistent either.


The 2 passes that stick out are the ones to Miller. Both should have been TDs. One underthrown, the other overthrown. Could he have done something different mechanically to hit Miller in stride? Is it nerves/confidence? Can you teach or improve accuracy?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Ron Wolfley wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
His accuracy is inconsistent at best. Some throws he hits them right in stride, and on others he's not even close. I don't know how correctable that is. His deep balls haven't been too consistent either.


The 2 passes that stick out are the ones to Miller. Both should have been TDs. One underthrown, the other overthrown. Could he have done something different mechanically to hit Miller in stride? Is it nerves/confidence? Can you teach or improve accuracy?

The sad thing is you can always get a top WR or RB in free agency, but you can't get a QB there typically. I -hope- (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can learn how to throw better, but there's no guarantee that this changes.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
He's coming along. Im more optimistic than I was before the year starts.


I dont know what to think of the overthrows though. I hope he's rushing or something and the game will keep slowing down for him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31623
pizza_Place: What??
rogers park bryan wrote:
He's coming along. Im more optimistic than I was before the year starts.


I dont know what to think of the overthrows though. I hope he's rushing or something and the game will keep slowing down for him.

Playing QB is a nightmare. Ain't a single one of us who wouldn't have a shitstain within 2 plays.
Mitch is doing alright. He's doing better than alright considering his limited big time experience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 7:46 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Anyone who views (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as a problem is nuts. He was just as productive (more yards 1 less touchdown) as the great Mahomes against the same Patriots defense. Even though he has less talent to work with on offense. The way Howard looks the Bears may not score 10 points if it were because of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. Everyone should be excited about a quarterback who is still raw increasing offensive scoring by 2 touchdowns in 1 year.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 7:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
In 6 games:

1800 pass/rushing yards
13 touchdowns passing
2 rushing touchdowns
98 QB rating
6 interceptions
70% completion

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Nas wrote:
In 6 games:

1800 pass/rushing yards
13 touchdowns passing
2 rushing touchdowns
98 QB rating
6 interceptions
70% completion


Yeah he's been fine. He could be the reason the team wins with Les Interceptions but he's been okay for a second year QB.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Those aggregate stats of Yrubisky's are very misleading. Without the Tampa Bay game, the numbers wouldn't even resemble those. I'm not hating on Mitch; that's just a fact.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Okay Wanny.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Okay Wanny.


You could do worse than Wanny.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
leashyourkids wrote:
Those aggregate stats of Yrubisky's are very misleading. Without the Tampa Bay game, the numbers wouldn't even resemble those. I'm not hating on Mitch; that's just a fact.


If my aunt had a dick she would be my uncle. You can do the same thing with bad games too. With the exception of about 6 quarters this year he's been solid to great. He's been consistently good for 3 weeks. In those 3 games he has 12 of his 15 touchdowns.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Mitch Quintana

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
badrogue17 wrote:
Mitch Quintana


I expect for you to get on the bandwagon too. The sloppiness of his first 3 games appears to be difficult to get out of MANY fans heads.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
leashyourkids wrote:
Those aggregate stats of Yrubisky's are very misleading. Without the Tampa Bay game, the numbers wouldn't even resemble those. I'm not hating on Mitch; that's just a fact.





He had a really good 2nd half against Miami too. He’s also been the reason the Bears have at least been in position to win the last 3 games -whether passing or using his feet. He’s doing fine imo. The Pats defense made Mahomes look human at times too and beat KC last minute as well. The things I’m seeing out of Mitch right now -the mechanics, the missed reads, the forced passes, trying to do too much.. a lot of that is youth and lack of experience. He has all the tools to be good, and I don’t see this becoming a Cutler scenario where we spend 7 years talking about his ‘tools’ and potential.


We lost to a well coached team that’s at least a year ahead of the Bears development wise, and a well coached HoF QB lead Pats team -both last minute- and Mitch had us in both those games. He’s coming along and he’s gaining a lot of valuable confidence and experience along the way.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
NME wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Those aggregate stats of Yrubisky's are very misleading. Without the Tampa Bay game, the numbers wouldn't even resemble those. I'm not hating on Mitch; that's just a fact.





He had a really good 2nd half against Miami too. He’s also been the reason the Bears have at least been in position to win the last 3 games -whether passing or using his feet. He’s doing fine imo. The Pats defense made Mahomes look human at times too and beat KC last minute as well. The things I’m seeing out of Mitch right now -the mechanics, the missed reads, the forced passes, trying to do too much.. a lot of that is youth and lack of experience. He has all the tools to be good, and I don’t see this becoming a Cutler scenario where we spend 7 years talking about his ‘tools’ and potential.


We lost to a well coached team that’s at least a year ahead of the Bears development wise, and a well coached HoF QB lead Pats team -both last minute- and Mitch had us in both those games. He’s coming along and he’s gaining a lot of valuable confidence and experience along the way.


A lot of that is also because Howard has sucked and Hunt is a stud. The Bears don't have a running game.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
He's nothing like Cutler. He will keep you in games because he actually tends to be conservative. With his draft status, he has to be great, though. Maybe he will. He's still very early in his career, especially given his lack of college experience.

I think it's fair to acknowledge that he missed on a lot of throws today, though, and looked bad at times.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1686 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 ... 57  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group