Kirkwood wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
"Wishful Thinking"? The guy has less than a full years pro experience in him along with a limited college experience and yet guys like this bloke says that there is no indication of an upside. So I guess, the Bears need to cut Mitch and get another quarterback. I guess these are the same kinds of guys who recommended that Chase Daniels as the better bet eh? Remember that CRAP on this board? I do.
I find this negativity about Mitch to be pathetic and misplaced. Perhaps these folks would only accept Mahomes as a young qb. Or maybe they wouldn't accept him either because he is too young. WHo then. Can accept Brady, right? Too old. Can't accept Brees, right? Too old. Can't accept, Rodgers, right? Coach killer, right?
So, all you wussies, Who would you accept as your new Bear's qb? I hear that Kraperneck needs a job. Perhaps it will make you happy?
A lot of bad points in this post. People simply recognize Trubinsky is a poor QB who has an excellent HC/OC scheming away his liabilities. The excellent defense also hides a lot of poor play by Trubinsky. It's better to recognize a deficiency and improve before you've married yourself to a bad idea (Jags/Bortles)
"bad points"? Really? Who are these "PEOPLE" who recognize (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky (perhaps who are identifying the wrong quarterback by your misspelling?) as a "poor QB"? And spare us your happy horseshit about hiding the poor play of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and for us to recognize a deficiency.
Clearly you are just a troll trying to piss Bear's fans off with your misspellings and snarky bullshit. Really weak shit on your part, all around.