It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 12:38 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 189 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Caller Bob wrote:
Brees was very good in 2004, so I'm not sure I agree with your football analysis work there, Lou.


He had a very good year because he had an anomaly in his INTs. Otherwise, we had the same stats as Mitch this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Brees was very good in 2004, so I'm not sure I agree with your football analysis work there, Lou.


He had a very good year because he had an anomaly in his INTs. Otherwise, we had the same stats as Mitch this year.


Different era of passing rules even back then so that has to be considered.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Anyways, not that I really care, fuck Brees, fuck that shitstain on his face and fuck that cock sucker Rivers too. Pick a town Chargers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:19 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Pretty good. I still do not believe he is a finished product. He was better this year, and better from week one to week three, and from week five to week seventeen. That is huge IMO.

I expect big things out of him next year. Maybe not quite 5000 yards and 50 TDs, but he has to be a gamechanger next year.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Pretty good. I still do not believe he is a finished product. He was better this year, and better from week one to week three, and from week five to week seventeen. That is huge IMO.

I expect big things out of him next year. Maybe not quite 5000 yards and 50 TDs, but he has to be a gamechanger next year.


I pretty much agree with you. He did not have a good game. It changes nothing I think about the future really.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Big Chicagoan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Drew Brees sucked ass for 4 seasons, you never know with QB's. If he can learn to get through his progressions a bit quicker, he will be fine. He's good enough to get to playoffs year in and year out with the Bear's D now. If either he or the D gets a little bit better, than can compete for a SB.

Not true. Had one mediocre year, one bad one and two good ones in SD.


Looking at Mitch's stats, this year stacks up pretty nicely with Brees' first 4 seasons in SD. And Mitch is younger.

Way different league with different rules. Did you not watch the NFL back then? Brees was good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Big Chicagoan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Drew Brees sucked ass for 4 seasons, you never know with QB's. If he can learn to get through his progressions a bit quicker, he will be fine. He's good enough to get to playoffs year in and year out with the Bear's D now. If either he or the D gets a little bit better, than can compete for a SB.

Not true. Had one mediocre year, one bad one and two good ones in SD.


And he was in SD for 5 seasons.

He played 1 game his rookie year. Kinda silly to count that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Encouraging:

- Mobility AND pocket presence, which aren't the same. He would make any O-line look better because he can sense pressure and knows where to go to avoid it

- Physical tools - he has plenty of arm and good wheels

- Attitude - he seems almost child-like in his enthusiasm. Sometimes it can come off as "dumb," but that's what you want in a leader. He is not cynical. He will buy into anything the coach tells him. That makes for a good leader.

- Resilience - He doesn't unravel into a pile of Jay Cutler when he makes a mistake

- His lack of college experience makes it more likely that he has room to grow (I hope, anyway)

- He has a good hard count, but he needs to start snapping the ball after the defender jumps so he can have some free plays

Needs Work:

- Inconsistent accuracy on all levels (short, medium, deep). He is frequently high or out in front on crossing patterns and often overthrows or leads his receiver out of bounds on deep balls

- Still seems uncomfortable in standard drop-back situations. He can't roll out every play

- He still locks on to receivers. He made progress this year, but he still needs to do better.

- Still has trouble reading defenses, which leads to throws that are sometimes baffling, like the near-pick in the end zone yesterday

- He can still be slow on the draw when a receiver breaks open which is what leads him to run more in certain games/situations

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31619
pizza_Place: What??
Let's not forget a good deal of Mitch's offense was with his legs. He also seems pretty accurate when he's on the run. That's a nice skillset moving forward


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
rogers park bryan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Drew Brees sucked ass for 4 seasons, you never know with QB's. If he can learn to get through his progressions a bit quicker, he will be fine. He's good enough to get to playoffs year in and year out with the Bear's D now. If either he or the D gets a little bit better, than can compete for a SB.

Not true. Had one mediocre year, one bad one and two good ones in SD.


Looking at Mitch's stats, this year stacks up pretty nicely with Brees' first 4 seasons in SD. And Mitch is younger.

Way different league with different rules. Did you not watch the NFL back then? Brees was good.


No, he wasn't. Everyone thought he sucked, including SD. That's why they drafted Rivers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:52 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Agree, leash. With your "needs work" category, 99% of that can be improved upon with practice and coaching.

Quote:
- Attitude - he seems almost child-like in his enthusiasm.
This can be huge IMO. He also seems to command his huddle, and he appears to have bought in to Nagy's offense. I'm not saying that Nagy & Mitch is going to turn into Brady Belichick, but they appear to have the building blocks in place for future success.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14924
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Big Chicagoan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Drew Brees sucked ass for 4 seasons, you never know with QB's. If he can learn to get through his progressions a bit quicker, he will be fine. He's good enough to get to playoffs year in and year out with the Bear's D now. If either he or the D gets a little bit better, than can compete for a SB.

Not true. Had one mediocre year, one bad one and two good ones in SD.


Looking at Mitch's stats, this year stacks up pretty nicely with Brees' first 4 seasons in SD. And Mitch is younger.

Way different league with different rules. Did you not watch the NFL back then? Brees was good.


No, he wasn't. Everyone thought he sucked, including SD. That's why they drafted Rivers.


You are wrong. He got hurt which is why they gave Rivers the job. HE sure as hell didn't suck. He was very good. I hoped like hell that the Bears would have signed him back then. With him and that defense, the Bears would have been in 2-3 Super Bowls.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Big Chicagoan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Drew Brees sucked ass for 4 seasons, you never know with QB's. If he can learn to get through his progressions a bit quicker, he will be fine. He's good enough to get to playoffs year in and year out with the Bear's D now. If either he or the D gets a little bit better, than can compete for a SB.

Not true. Had one mediocre year, one bad one and two good ones in SD.


Looking at Mitch's stats, this year stacks up pretty nicely with Brees' first 4 seasons in SD. And Mitch is younger.

Way different league with different rules. Did you not watch the NFL back then? Brees was good.


No, he wasn't. Everyone thought he sucked, including SD. That's why they drafted Rivers.

Ok so it's clear you didnt follow the league back then. You have no clue what you're talking about.

But yea, keep holding the opinion that a QB with a QB rating of 104 "sucked ass"


Like I correctly said. He had one mediocre year, one bad one, then he was good and never looked back. (lowest QB rating since his first two years was 89)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
rogers park bryan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Drew Brees sucked ass for 4 seasons, you never know with QB's. If he can learn to get through his progressions a bit quicker, he will be fine. He's good enough to get to playoffs year in and year out with the Bear's D now. If either he or the D gets a little bit better, than can compete for a SB.

Not true. Had one mediocre year, one bad one and two good ones in SD.


Looking at Mitch's stats, this year stacks up pretty nicely with Brees' first 4 seasons in SD. And Mitch is younger.

Way different league with different rules. Did you not watch the NFL back then? Brees was good.


No, he wasn't. Everyone thought he sucked, including SD. That's why they drafted Rivers.

Ok so it's clear you didnt follow the league back then. You have no clue what you're talking about.

But yea, keep holding the opinion that a QB with a QB rating of 104 "sucked ass"


Like I correctly said. He had one mediocre year, one bad one, then he was good and never looked back. (lowest QB rating since his first two years was 89)


He sucked his first three seasons. They drafted Rivers to replace him because they thought he sucked. He then had his 104 season in his FOURTH season. Then SD had a problem on their hands because they drafted Rivers. But the decision was made easier when Brees destroyed his shoulder in the last game of his following season of which he had an 89 rating because his INTs skyrocketed again.

You just can't remember this because his career really took off after he moved to the Saints and became a HOFer because of the Saints offense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
No one thought Brees sucked when he left the Chargers. That's why New Orleans gave him a 6-yeae, $60 million contract, which at the time was one of the highest in the league. He struggled his first couple years, but his last two years in San Diego, he was Pro Bowl caliber.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Only question about Brees when he left SD was his shoulder. Not one person/analyst/team/GM doubted his talent by that point.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
leashyourkids wrote:
No one thought Brees sucked when he left the Chargers. That's why New Orleans gave him a 6-yeae, $60 million contract, which at the time was one of the highest in the league. He struggled his first couple years, but his last two years in San Diego, he was Pro Bowl caliber.


Exactly, but in his first 3 seasons, he was not good. So, my point is, how can anyone judge how good Mitch will be when he has only played two seasons and is younger than Brees was before he broke out?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Big Chicagoan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
No one thought Brees sucked when he left the Chargers. That's why New Orleans gave him a 6-yeae, $60 million contract, which at the time was one of the highest in the league. He struggled his first couple years, but his last two years in San Diego, he was Pro Bowl caliber.


Exactly, but in his first 3 seasons, he was not good. So, my point is, how can anyone judge how good Mitch will be when he has only played two seasons and is younger than Brees was before he broke out?


You can't completely, but it seems like expectations for young QB's has changed dramatically even just since Brees was a pup.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
No one thought Brees sucked when he left the Chargers. That's why New Orleans gave him a 6-yeae, $60 million contract, which at the time was one of the highest in the league. He struggled his first couple years, but his last two years in San Diego, he was Pro Bowl caliber.


Exactly, but in his first 3 seasons, he was not good. So, my point is, how can anyone judge how good Mitch will be when he has only played two seasons and is younger than Brees was before he broke out?


You can't completely, but it seems like expectations for young QB's has changed dramatically even just since Brees was a pup.

have changed

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
No one thought Brees sucked when he left the Chargers. That's why New Orleans gave him a 6-yeae, $60 million contract, which at the time was one of the highest in the league. He struggled his first couple years, but his last two years in San Diego, he was Pro Bowl caliber.


Exactly, but in his first 3 seasons, he was not good. So, my point is, how can anyone judge how good Mitch will be when he has only played two seasons and is younger than Brees was before he broke out?


You can't completely, but it seems like expectations for young QB's has changed dramatically even just since Brees was a pup.

have changed


Fuck you

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
No one thought Brees sucked when he left the Chargers. That's why New Orleans gave him a 6-yeae, $60 million contract, which at the time was one of the highest in the league. He struggled his first couple years, but his last two years in San Diego, he was Pro Bowl caliber.


Exactly, but in his first 3 seasons, he was not good. So, my point is, how can anyone judge how good Mitch will be when he has only played two seasons and is younger than Brees was before he broke out?


You can't completely, but it seems like expectations for young QB's has changed dramatically even just since Brees was a pup.

have changed



Fans can be morons all they want but Mitch will still have 5 years to show what level he can reach.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Only question about Brees when he left SD was his shoulder. Not one person/analyst/team/GM doubted his talent by that point.
The other question was his height and how it would stop him from becoming an elite quarterback. That's why the Chargers were higher on Rivers to the point that they drafted him instead of trying to help Brees out with another weapon.

It is still funny to think the Bears said "No thanks to even talking to Brees, we have Rex Grossman!".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Only question about Brees when he left SD was his shoulder. Not one person/analyst/team/GM doubted his talent by that point.
The other question was his height and how it would stop him from becoming an elite quarterback. That's why the Chargers were higher on Rivers to the point that they drafted him instead of trying to help Brees out with another weapon.

It is still funny to think the Bears said "No thanks to even talking to Brees, we have Rex Grossman!".


Looking back, it does, but at the time, Grossman had some moments. I still think he threw one of the prettiest balls ever.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Only question about Brees when he left SD was his shoulder. Not one person/analyst/team/GM doubted his talent by that point.
The other question was his height and how it would stop him from becoming an elite quarterback. That's why the Chargers were higher on Rivers to the point that they drafted him instead of trying to help Brees out with another weapon.

It is still funny to think the Bears said "No thanks to even talking to Brees, we have Rex Grossman!".


Looking back, it does, but at the time, Grossman had some moments. I still think he threw one of the prettiest balls ever.



Brees' shoulder injury was ugly. I'm sure many teams were concerned about his ability to throw a football moving forward. Especially for the type of money he was going to get.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Big Chicagoan wrote:
[quote

He sucked his first three seasons. They drafted Rivers to replace him because they thought he sucked. He then had his 104 season in his FOURTH season. Then SD had a problem on their hands because they drafted Rivers. But the decision was made easier when Brees destroyed his shoulder in the last game of his following season of which he had an 89 rating because his INTs skyrocketed again.

You just can't remember this because his career really took off after he moved to the Saints and became a HOFer because of the Saints offense.

The fact that you keep including his rookie season where he played one game is hilarious.

His interceptions didn't skyrocket. He was 24/15 which was fine back then. You're nuts.

The first year he didn't play.

Had a normal first year as a starter season. Then a bad one, then a great one and was good after that.

Its clear you didn't follow the league back them and are attempting to judge him based off stats compiled under far different rules.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6284
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
Mitch will have to limit the amount of times he runs the ball next year. If he continues to use it as a crutch he will suffer more and more injuries.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Mitch improved quite a bit from his 1st season to his 2nd. His improvement to season 3 will be more nuanced imo, but it will be enough to be a consistently ‘good’ QB (and maybe even better than that).


And the way I see it (injury aside) a good QB backed by a great defense can keep you in contention year in and year out.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 5:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:41 am
Posts: 678
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Mitch is definitely going to be good. Possible he might be great. I think his first half of the Eagles game was effected by the play calling.
Another year in the system is going to help a lot. Also, Anthony Miller is probably going to be really good. It should be a fun year next year with him in this offense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Only question about Brees when he left SD was his shoulder. Not one person/analyst/team/GM doubted his talent by that point.
The other question was his height and how it would stop him from becoming an elite quarterback. That's why the Chargers were higher on Rivers to the point that they drafted him instead of trying to help Brees out with another weapon.

It is still funny to think the Bears said "No thanks to even talking to Brees, we have Rex Grossman!".


Looking back, it does, but at the time, Grossman had some moments. I still think he threw one of the prettiest balls ever.




I hated Rex.. but he threw a really nice deep ball. Almost perfect 'touch' on it. I still wonder what would have been if the Bears kept Orton (who had talent as well) and continued to add to that defense/offense in the draft. Give Lovie's defenses a game managing QB (which I think Orton was perfect for) and add some more talent.. imagine keeping that 1st round pick (I think we gave up a couple actually) and grabbing Orakpo, or Clay Mathews?

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Mitch has a ways of improvement to go, but I've seen some really nice things. I do not see him ever being elite, but I think he will be good.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 189 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group