It is currently Fri Jan 31, 2025 6:52 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis


I dunno. I get why people are saying you can't let what happened yesterday happen again, but this seems like it could be a shitshow in application full time. There's arguably PI on almost every deep route.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57615
yeah pretty much every passing play could be reviewed.

Fuck that.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
I think it has to be in the last 2 minutes, and they need to keep it indisputable and make them stick to that concept.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Yes. Hell yes.

Show the subjective nature of these fucking refs to the whole world.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11115
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
my idea of replay coaches challenge 2 per game is slightly less dumb than this one


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
FavreFan wrote:


I dunno. I get why people are saying you can't let what happened yesterday happen again, but this seems like it could be a shitshow in application full time. There's arguably PI on almost every deep route.


You can't review this. PI is subjective. You're going to be asking refs to determine if certain receivers possess the talent to catch a ball if they weren't bumped/jammed.

Dumb. We need less replay not more

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7342
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
i think that there should be a replay official in the booth for every game whose sole responsibility is to look for egregious errors in officiating, and this official has the authority to stop the game and take a closer look if he or she deems it necessary. This would not require constant stoppages of play, as there is typically plenty of time between most plays to see at least a quick replay or two to determine if there is a legit problem. If the official sees that the offense is purposely hurrying to the line for no other reason than to prevent him or her from doing their job, they stop the play until they have a clear enough look to ensure the call is correct. coaches having to "buy" challenges and getting penalized for daring to question them and losing the challenge and timeouts is bullshit. If you are going to have replay, you need to do it right and make sure all horseshit calls are rectified when possible.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7342
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
You can't review this. PI is subjective. You're going to be asking refs to determine if certain receivers possess the talent to catch a ball if they weren't bumped/jammed.


i agree with this part for sure, that is why downfield PI should NOT be a spot foul. Just assuming someone was going to catch the 50-yard contested bomb is ridiculous.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Agree with everyone regarding what a bad idea this is. Also I have no idea why pass interference should be any more privileged for review than some of the roughing the passer nonsense we saw this year or offensive holding or any other penalty really. Well I do have an idea why and it's because of people just being over-the-top in their reactions to Saints-Rams and because it will allow the NFL to tip the scales even further in favor of the offense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
You can't review this. PI is subjective. You're going to be asking refs to determine if certain receivers possess the talent to catch a ball if they weren't bumped/jammed.
Outside of the "uncatchable" part of it, which shouldn't exist anyways, there are plenty of PI penalties that aren't subjective.

This isn't perfect, but you could say that PI can be called if "the ball is between the quarterback and the wide receiver and the defender is contacting the outstretched arms or taking the player to the ground".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:45 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I think a good compromise could be that during the last two minutes of any playoff game, along with the entire 4th quarter as well, the replay official in the booth should be able to buzz the referee to look at something that was blatant and obvious that was not called. The same can be done for the reversal of a call like the Roughing the passer on Brady late in the game, where the KC defender clearly grabbed all jersey and shoulder pads, and didn't touch Brady's helmet.

I don't see how you can let coaches challenge to scrutinize and look for little ticky tack penalties that may not have been called. With how gambling is becoming more and more legal/mainstream, you simply cannot have a penalty that was a clear as the one on the Saints yesterday that is NOT called.
viewtopic.php?f=90&t=116056#p3146210

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7342
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
if you aren't going to use it to its full potential, then you should just dump replay completely and get things moving again. I dont mind a replay delay if it is a bad call and it needs to get overturned, but if there aren't rules in place to fix obvious wrongs even though the technology exists to make it right, then avoid all of the complaining by just killing review altogether an maybe add an extra official or two to the field and play ball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:48 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I don't necessarily disagree, but the NFL doesn't need to add officials. The league prints money. Make the officials full time employees, pay them as such, and they likely will get a lot better at their jobs.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
ZephMarshack wrote:
Agree with everyone regarding what a bad idea this is. Also I have no idea why pass interference should be any more privileged for review than some of the roughing the passer nonsense we saw this year or offensive holding or any other penalty really. Well I do have an idea why and it's because of people just being over-the-top in their reactions to Saints-Rams and because it will allow the NFL to tip the scales even further in favor of the offense.
If it was done with a clear clarification of how a defender is "supposed" to defend them then it wouldn't really tip the scales. Make it so it isn't pass interference unless you have your arms at an angle towards the player or something. Basketball has a similar rule about having your arms straight up when going for a block and it works well enough.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Image

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
GoldenJet wrote:
Image

That's just good hard-nosed football. Ideally even a review would confirm such.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24453
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese


Adding more things to review doesn’t fix the problem. You have part-time refs you get part-time calls. Add a ref or 2 to the field and make them full time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
If you really cared about making the best call on the field, you would give the officials the option of saying "Hey, we aren't sure, can we see it on video?" and then they make the call they think is best. I would only allow this in the last two minutes though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
The NFL already has the rule that if the defender is making a clear play on a catchable ball, it's not interference, and vice versa.

It doesn't get more clear that the defender wasn't making a play on a catchable ball.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
You can't review this. PI is subjective. You're going to be asking refs to determine if certain receivers possess the talent to catch a ball if they weren't bumped/jammed.
Outside of the "uncatchable" part of it, which shouldn't exist anyways, there are plenty of PI penalties that aren't subjective.

This isn't perfect, but you could say that PI can be called if "the ball is between the quarterback and the wide receiver and the defender is contacting the outstretched arms or taking the player to the ground".


How in the hell would a CB break up a catch?

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Agree with everyone regarding what a bad idea this is. Also I have no idea why pass interference should be any more privileged for review than some of the roughing the passer nonsense we saw this year or offensive holding or any other penalty really. Well I do have an idea why and it's because of people just being over-the-top in their reactions to Saints-Rams and because it will allow the NFL to tip the scales even further in favor of the offense.
If it was done with a clear clarification of how a defender is "supposed" to defend them then it wouldn't really tip the scales. Make it so it isn't pass interference unless you have your arms at an angle towards the player or something. Basketball has a similar rule about having your arms straight up when going for a block and it works well enough.

Even if you write a sufficiently clear rule about what defenders are supposed to do (something I have little faith in the league actually being able to achieve given recent hits like "surviving the ground" and "body weight on the quarterback"), this would still tip the scales in favor of the offense by allowing uncalled offensive penalties to escape the scrutiny we're now applying to defensive pass interference.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
You can't review this. PI is subjective. You're going to be asking refs to determine if certain receivers possess the talent to catch a ball if they weren't bumped/jammed.
Outside of the "uncatchable" part of it, which shouldn't exist anyways, there are plenty of PI penalties that aren't subjective.

This isn't perfect, but you could say that PI can be called if "the ball is between the quarterback and the wide receiver and the defender is contacting the outstretched arms or taking the player to the ground".


How in the hell would a CB break up a catch?
I don't really understand the question. They aren't breaking up a catch if the ball is between the QB and the WR.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Zeph is killing it. Too bad the offensive loving brainlets at the league will push this through

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 2:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
GoldenJet wrote:
Image
Even if you don't call the clear PI, in this day and age, how can the one of the officials not throw the flag for the helmet to helmet hit?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
You can't review this. PI is subjective. You're going to be asking refs to determine if certain receivers possess the talent to catch a ball if they weren't bumped/jammed.
Outside of the "uncatchable" part of it, which shouldn't exist anyways, there are plenty of PI penalties that aren't subjective.

This isn't perfect, but you could say that PI can be called if "the ball is between the quarterback and the wide receiver and the defender is contacting the outstretched arms or taking the player to the ground".


How in the hell would a CB break up a catch?
I don't really understand the question. They aren't breaking up a catch if the ball is between the QB and the WR.

What exactly is between the QB and WR in terms of body position?

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
ZephMarshack wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Agree with everyone regarding what a bad idea this is. Also I have no idea why pass interference should be any more privileged for review than some of the roughing the passer nonsense we saw this year or offensive holding or any other penalty really. Well I do have an idea why and it's because of people just being over-the-top in their reactions to Saints-Rams and because it will allow the NFL to tip the scales even further in favor of the offense.
If it was done with a clear clarification of how a defender is "supposed" to defend them then it wouldn't really tip the scales. Make it so it isn't pass interference unless you have your arms at an angle towards the player or something. Basketball has a similar rule about having your arms straight up when going for a block and it works well enough.

Even if you write a sufficiently clear rule about what defenders are supposed to do (something I have little faith in the league actually being able to achieve given recent hits like "surviving the ground" and "body weight on the quarterback"), this would still tip the scales in favor of the offense by allowing uncalled offensive penalties to escape the scrutiny we're now applying to defensive pass interference.

Not really. It's already heavily biased towards the offense. If you are really concerned about that then you simply provide more actions for the defense to play without penalty. I'll use the basketball example again. When you are blocking a shot, it is never supposed to be a foul when your arms are completely vertical. You could give the defensive player the option of putting his arms either to his side or straight up without knocking the WR over.

The real issue with PI is that defenders are pretty much trained to grab the arms of the WR whenever they think they are going to catch it with the hope that the official doesn't call it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
On top of it, he clearly targeted the head with a helmet to helmet hit. That can be a stand alone personal foul penalty. Like going back to review if a guy stomped on someone's neck.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
You can't review this. PI is subjective. You're going to be asking refs to determine if certain receivers possess the talent to catch a ball if they weren't bumped/jammed.
Outside of the "uncatchable" part of it, which shouldn't exist anyways, there are plenty of PI penalties that aren't subjective.

This isn't perfect, but you could say that PI can be called if "the ball is between the quarterback and the wide receiver and the defender is contacting the outstretched arms or taking the player to the ground".


How in the hell would a CB break up a catch?
I don't really understand the question. They aren't breaking up a catch if the ball is between the QB and the WR.

What exactly is between the QB and WR in terms of body position?
It doesn't have to do with body position. It has to do with the ball being between the QB and the WR.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis


That's a solid headline

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Review PI?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Brick, defenders reach around to deflect passes all the time. The ball is between the qb and the wr. You want that contact to be a penalty? Isn't that a defender making a play on the ball?

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group