It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:17 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 235 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 3:59 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He'll be a PF in the NBA.


Moreso in a couple of years than right away, wouldn't you say?

I can certainly see that. One of the things that scares me about Beasley is that he currently looks like a "tweener" to me. Sometimes it works out really well but sometimes it just doesn't carry over.

I think a lot of it will depend on what team drafts him. If he gets drafted by the Bulls, I think they will want to get Deng at the 3 and let Beasley play the 4.

If he doesn't grow anymore, he probably is always a SF.


I would agree with your assessment. I also think it's a mistake to assume that he will continue growing. How much has he grown in the past year, if at all? Does anywone know? And what is his true height?


We will find out if he is still 6'9" and 235lbs in a week or so. Most people don't stop growing at 18. Deng came into the league at 6'6" and he is almost 6'9". David Robinson grew 6 inches after his 18th birthday. Went to college as a guard came out a center.


From what I've read, men (on average) stop growing by age 20. Between ages 19 and 20, average growth is only around one inch. Beasley is currently about 19.5 years old. If he has grown in the past 6-12 months, it is likely he will continue to grow, but probably not by that much. If not, he may be done. I don't claim any expertise on this issue, but I've read that one's height can be accurately estimated through a medical examination of an individual's growth plates.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Last edited by Tall Midget on Thu May 29, 2008 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:00 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Coach Crapowski wrote:
Nas wrote:
Coach Crapowski wrote:


Even though I thought you were playing it was a good call.


Even then, the best guy available was Collins. I never bought into this whole D'Antony stuff. Show me a trophy that was won because of him. Hell, with a MVP PG, a legit C, and a littany of above average guards, I could coach that team to relative prominence.


Can you show me a trophy that was won because of Collins?

I like Collins, too, but your post seems a little drinky.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
A 6'10" or 6'11" player is a center in the NBA.


So Durant is moving to Center next season? Your size has nothing to do with it, its all about your skill set. Beasley's skill set projects him to be a PF, and most scouting reports say if he does have a secondary positions, its a SF.


Ok let me be clear. A guy that height that is 250-260 is a center. Did that clear anything up?

Kind of like Dirk Nowitzki, and Tim Duncan?


Dirks outside game to go with Duncan's inside game.


http://score670.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=20364

For all we know it could be Dirk's inside game and Duncan's outside game.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:16 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 12:51 pm
Posts: 7044
Location: Southside
pizza_Place: Baracco's
Tall Midget wrote:
Coach Crapowski wrote:
Nas wrote:
Coach Crapowski wrote:


Even though I thought you were playing it was a good call.


Even then, the best guy available was Collins. I never bought into this whole D'Antony stuff. Show me a trophy that was won because of him. Hell, with a MVP PG, a legit C, and a littany of above average guards, I could coach that team to relative prominence.


Can you show me a trophy that was won because of Collins?

I like Collins, too, but your post seems a little drinky.


Just to clarify. I'm not calling for deification or canonization. My point was simple, since Skiles' dismissal, the best guy available other than Skiles was and still is Collins. Unfortunately, not drinky, just looney.

_________________
"It's not exactly a rocket surgery." D.J.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:15 pm
Posts: 4184
Location: Somewhere on I-355
Looks to me that with this hire Pax has determined that the Bulls need a teaching/strategist coach more than a motivator/manager.

The biggest personality clashes will be Collins vs. Hughes and Collins vs. Tyrus.

_________________
“Mmmm. Move over, eggs. Bacon just got a new best friend - fudge.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Any coach worth his weight in salt would clash with Hughes. He's the guard version of Ben Wallace, right down to the contract and everything.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:31 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Nice read fellas. It is nice to see some spirited sports debates, well done.

I don't think anything bad can come of this. Doug knows the game. If Pax has the "character" guys he claims he does, this team will be better when Doug get a hold of them. A little roster tweeking and they're on their way. To where, I'm not sure.

As, I think Midge speculated, I hope this means it will be Rose not Beasly.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:43 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Nas wrote:
I'm having a flashback to 2006 offseason. I was on the Roy has the highest floor of any player that will be around and it would put the Bulls in a position to deal Gordon. A lot of you guys were high on Tyrus Thomas potential. In a way this similar to this debate of Beasley and Rose.


True. I was wrong on Thomas. But I know Rose is way better than Thomas.

Just because we were wrong on that doesn't mean Beasley is better than Rose.

Even the experts back than said Thomas was raw. They, like me, thought he would develop. We were wrong. Thomas doesn't care and won't develop. Rose is a different guy.

By the way, Tyrus and Collins will not be able to co-exist. Thomas is gonna have to go. Skiles never liked him either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:47 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Nas wrote:
I'm having a flashback to 2006 offseason. I was on the Roy has the highest floor of any player that will be around and it would put the Bulls in a position to deal Gordon. A lot of you guys were high on Tyrus Thomas potential. In a way this similar to this debate of Beasley and Rose.

Nas, you were on the Roy love and I was with you. He looked the part.
I have no real passion with these two. I did not see enough of either to have an informed opinion. I saw Rose more and have always loved big athletic PGs. Beasley would have to be a monster for me to rate him higher than a PG like Rose.
Nas, you may be right and Beasley may be the man. However, I am not sure about him growing more or not. I want to know how tall he really is.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:48 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
The one good thing about this draft: No matter who we take I think everybody agrees that neither will be a complete bust. Neither of them will suck. So at least we have that going for us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
I'm having a flashback to 2006 offseason. I was on the Roy has the highest floor of any player that will be around and it would put the Bulls in a position to deal Gordon. A lot of you guys were high on Tyrus Thomas potential. In a way this similar to this debate of Beasley and Rose.

Tyrus Thomas was very raw. He still is. Rose is a more polished player now than Tyrus Thomas.

You were right then, but if you think that Rose and Tyrus Thomas are anything alike then you are showing a lack of understanding of Derrick Rose's game. He has great potential, but he's already good. Tyrus Thomas wasn't good(for an NBA player) when he was drafted. Derrick Rose will be a starter on Miami or Chicago this season. He's an NBA ready talent.

I hope you use the same criteria for your judging of QB prospects based off of your assessment of Rex Grossman.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:50 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
I think Beasley will average around 20 points/game in his rookie season. Not sure what Rose will do early.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Beardown wrote:
The one good thing about this draft: No matter who we take I think everybody agrees that neither will be a complete bust. Neither of them will suck. So at least we have that going for us.

I agree. I'd be just as excited with the 2nd pick and we get whoever else.

Both players will have good long careers.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Tall Midget wrote:
I think Beasley will average around 20 points/game in his rookie season. Not sure what Rose will do early.


I agree but theres a huge difference between a Kevin Durant 20 ppg and a Tim Duncan 20 ppg as a rookie. Im not worried about his scoring, Im worried about the rest of his game.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:01 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
If Rose gets 32 minutes per game he'll average 17 and 8 his rookie year. You can book that. 2.2 steals per game.

That will get better each year. He'll evenually be a 22 and 11 guy that can beat you when the games on the line. With a shot, drive or pass.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:03 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Beardown wrote:
If Rose gets 32 minutes per game he'll average 17 and 8 his rookie year. You can book that. 2.2 steals per game.

That will get better each year. He'll evenually be a 22 and 11 guy that can beat you when the games on the line. With a shot, drive or pass.


agreed.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:15 pm
Posts: 4184
Location: Somewhere on I-355
Tall Midget wrote:
I think Beasley will average around 20 points/game in his rookie season. Not sure what Rose will do early.


He will not.
Durant barely did it this season on a team completely devoid of any stars.
If Beasley goes to the Heat he'll be at best the 3rd option after Wade and Marion, and he might not even start over Haslem.
If he comes to the Bulls he'll have the 14 & 9 that Gooden had this season.

Either way 12-15 pts & 7-9 boards would be a great rookie season.

_________________
“Mmmm. Move over, eggs. Bacon just got a new best friend - fudge.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:57 pm
Posts: 476
I disagree with the 2006 comparison.

In 2006, there was no consensus "can't miss" prospects. Here, it's either Rose or Beasley.

Plus, those two have received loads of exposure during the entire college season. In 2006, Roy and TT didn't become household names until the tournament started.

Rose and Beasleys floor/ceiling are both higher than anyone from 2006


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Beardown wrote:
If Rose gets 32 minutes per game he'll average 17 and 8 his rookie year. You can book that. 2.2 steals per game.


Im not quite sure you realize how lofty those numbers are. You are saying he will be better than Jason Kidd or Chris Paul as a rookie. Im not ready to go there, just like Im definitely not ready to say Beasley will match Duncan's lofty rookie numbers. Those are almost exactly Isiah Thomas's rookie stats. Lets curb our enthusiasm a bit here.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Beardown wrote:
If Rose gets 32 minutes per game he'll average 17 and 8 his rookie year. You can book that. 2.2 steals per game.


Im not quite sure you realize how lofty those numbers are. You are saying he will be better than Jason Kidd or Chris Paul as a rookie. Im not ready to go there, just like Im definitely not ready to say Beasley will match Duncan's lofty rookie numbers.


No way. He didn't even do that in college with the best team in the nation. Not going to happen in his first 3 years.


It took seven pages but we agree on something Nas.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:11 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Mustang Rob wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
I think Beasley will average around 20 points/game in his rookie season. Not sure what Rose will do early.


He will not.
Durant barely did it this season on a team completely devoid of any stars.
If Beasley goes to the Heat he'll be at best the 3rd option after Wade and Marion, and he might not even start over Haslem.
If he comes to the Bulls he'll have the 14 & 9 that Gooden had this season.

Either way 12-15 pts & 7-9 boards would be a great rookie season.


The Bulls are completely devoid of any stars. The only problem for him here will be that Deng already plays small forward, although Beasley already has more offensive skill and pure athleticism than Deng does.

Scoring 20 per game for Miami might be a bit more difficult, but he has the skills to do it....And if you think Beasley won't get starter's minutes for Miami, you're out of your mind.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Last edited by Tall Midget on Thu May 29, 2008 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:12 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I know. College games are only 40 minutes. Longer shot clock. Memphis blew out a lot of teams. I don't think those numbers are lofty.

Calipari said he could have done more but the team didn't need it. Well, the Bulls will need it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Mustang Rob wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
I think Beasley will average around 20 points/game in his rookie season. Not sure what Rose will do early.


He will not.
Durant barely did it this season on a team completely devoid of any stars.
If Beasley goes to the Heat he'll be at best the 3rd option after Wade and Marion, and he might not even start over Haslem.
If he comes to the Bulls he'll have the 14 & 9 that Gooden had this season.

Either way 12-15 pts & 7-9 boards would be a great rookie season.


I agree. I would love to see him average 20 points but I see him putting up 15 points and 10 rebounds. Great numbers for a rookie. He doesn't have a David Robinson to play with so it's unlikely he will put up Duncan like numbers.


Its ridiculous that you keep saying Duncan's rookie season was diminished by playing with the Admiral. He was past his prime at that point and even if he wasnt, that would most likely detract from Duncan's points and rebounds, not add to it. Duncan would have had the same stats had he gone to Boston that season.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:14 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Rose averaged 20 per game in the tourney. That's vs the best college teams. They needed him to do more and he did.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Beardown wrote:
I don't think those numbers are lofty.


Its one thing to say youll think Rose will do that. Its different to say those arent lofty. Thats pretty much a fact. No PG in the past 25 years had put up those numbers as a rookie. How is that not an extremely high expecatations?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:16 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Beardown wrote:
Rose averaged 20 per game in the tourney. That's vs the best college teams. They needed him to do more and he did.


Stats are obviously difficult to predict, but I'm with you, Beardown, in your belief that Rose will be a game-changing player early in his career.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:17 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Stephen Marbury averaged 16 and 8 his rookie year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:15 pm
Posts: 4184
Location: Somewhere on I-355
Beardown wrote:
Rose averaged 20 per game in the tourney. That's vs the best college teams. They needed him to do more and he did.

So you're saying he's capable of doing it for a 6 game stretch.
Great.
Big difference between that and an 82 game season.
No way will he average enough minutes to pull it off.

_________________
“Mmmm. Move over, eggs. Bacon just got a new best friend - fudge.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Mustang Rob wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
I think Beasley will average around 20 points/game in his rookie season. Not sure what Rose will do early.


He will not.
Durant barely did it this season on a team completely devoid of any stars.
If Beasley goes to the Heat he'll be at best the 3rd option after Wade and Marion, and he might not even start over Haslem.
If he comes to the Bulls he'll have the 14 & 9 that Gooden had this season.

Either way 12-15 pts & 7-9 boards would be a great rookie season.


I agree. I would love to see him average 20 points but I see him putting up 15 points and 10 rebounds. Great numbers for a rookie. He doesn't have a David Robinson to play with so it's unlikely he will put up Duncan like numbers.


Its ridiculous that you keep saying Duncan's rookie season was diminished by playing with the Admiral. He was past his prime at that point and even if he wasnt, that would most likely detract from Duncan's points and rebounds, not add to it. Duncan would have had the same stats had he gone to Boston that season.


Robinson wasn't past his prime and because he faced a lot of double teams TD cleaned up. That's not taking anything away from TD. He had a great rookie year and has been great every year since then. I do think David helped develop his game. The Bulls don't have a big or coach to help Beasley's game the same way.


David definitely helped develop his game and showed him how to be the consumate professional, but Im very surprised if you think he was gonna average anything less statistically with a different team. He's one of those all time great special players that has dominated the league since the day he entered it.

And David was past his prime. His numbers dropped that season, and for the most part every year after that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Last edited by FavreFan on Thu May 29, 2008 5:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Beardown wrote:
Stephen Marbury averaged 16 and 8 his rookie year.


I factored your 2.2 spg into the "noone has done that in 25 years" statement.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 235 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group