It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:54 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93122
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
I think they both played a very key role and neither would have won without the other. The same with Mike and Scottie. Kobe did things that Shaq couldn't do and Shaq dominated the inside in a way that no one in history could do. I don't think Shaq would have won a title without Kobe just like I don't think Mike would have won a title without Scottie.

That's changing the discussion. Of course they played a key role. It's a team game. The Bulls probably don't win the last 3 titles without Rodman. They probably don't win the first three without Grant. They would have won a few of those, but no way do the Bulls win 6 titles without Rodman/Grant. My guess would be 4. The Lakers had similar players who filled their roles nicely.

Kobe was needed, but he was not the most important piece of the puzzle. Dwayne Wade stepped right into Kobe's role and filled it better with a Shaq that was already slightly on the decline.

I'm not arguing that Kobe wasn't very important. He was. He just wasn't the best player on his own team for any championship(until he wins it this year). Pretty much every award and accolade shows that. It pretty much drove Kobe Bryant crazy at the end.

I made my final determination that Shaq was the best player on that team when Shaq went to Miami and won the title. It turned out that Wade was a budding superstar, but Shaq once again almost won the MVP award. Nash barely beat him out for it. This was the third guard that Shaq had played with who became a superstar. Not a coincidence.

I have no problem giving Kobe Bryant his due, which he deserves for this season, but I can't go back and re-write history. Kobe Bryant is the best player in basketball, but that was not the case when they won the titles. He wasn't even the best player on his team.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93122
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
I think they both played a very key role and neither would have won without the other. The same with Mike and Scottie. Kobe did things that Shaq couldn't do and Shaq dominated the inside in a way that no one in history could do. I don't think Shaq would have won a title without Kobe just like I don't think Mike would have won a title without Scottie.


Good points and in a couple weeks we will be able to say just like how Kobe would not have won without Gasol or

how Pierce would not have won without Garnett

But no one will argue that Gasol is better than Kobe.
No one will argue that Pierce is better than Garnett.

That's why you can't say "he wouldn't have won without this guy". You can say that he was the best player on a championship team.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93122
Location: To the left of my post
This discussion has gone on long enough. If you want to go against pretty much everything that was said, awards won, and defensive gameplans and think that Kobe was on the same level of Shaq in the three title years that's fine. I understand that Kobe was great. Scottie Pippen was great too. It doesn't change the fact that most of the basketball world agreed that in those title years, Shaq was the more feared, more dominant, and better player. There was no media conspiracy to give Shaq regular season and Finals MVP awards. He was just flat out better.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93122
Location: To the left of my post
Since you want to bring stats into play, here's another post I made about playoff stats.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Shaq's playoff stats for the three titles:
PPG FTM FTA FTP RPG AST APG STL BLK TO
00: 30.7 135 296 .456 15.4 71 3.1 13 55 56
01: 30.4 105 200 .525 15.4 51 3.2 7 38 57
02: 28.5 135 208 .649 12.6 54 2.8 10 48 62

Kobe's playoff stats for the three titles:
PPG FTM FTA FTP RPG AST APG STL BLK TO
00: 21.1 95 126 .754 4.5 97 4.4 32 32 55
01: 29.4 124 151 .821 7.3 97 6.1 25 12 51
02: 26.6 110 145 .759 5.8 87 4.6 27 17 54

Popularity contest?
Shaq scored more. Shaq drew fouls more and made a similar amount of free throws(at a lower percentage). He obviously rebounded more and on the level of some of the greatest players in history.
The rest of the statistics are a slight edge to Kobe(blocks cancel out steals and he wins on assists).

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93122
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This discussion has gone on long enough. If you want to go against pretty much everything that was said, awards won, and defensive gameplans and think that Kobe was on the same level of Shaq in the three title years that's fine. I understand that Kobe was great. Scottie Pippen was great too. It doesn't change the fact that most of the basketball world agreed that in those title years, Shaq was the more feared, more dominant, and better player. There was no media conspiracy to give Shaq regular season and Finals MVP awards. He was just flat out better.


Rick you are the one that said those things meant that X player was better than Y player in the playoffs. It is a fact that Shaq was a media darling. I'm not arguing which player was more dominant because that isn't a argument that I would win. I'm pointing out which player played better in the playoffs and finals. Kobe played better in the playoffs 2 out of the 3 years and played better in 2001 Finals. Duncan is way better than Parker but Parker won the award last year.

I see no playoff season where Kobe outperformed Shaq. Never in scoring and in no category did he have a dominant number like Shaq did in rebounds. Statistics are also on my side.

Also, the fact that Parker won the MVP over Duncan doesn't help your case. If Tony Parker can win a finals MVP over Duncan, why couldn't Kobe win one over Shaq?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:31 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72516
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Kobe was needed, but he was not the most important piece of the puzzle. Dwayne Wade stepped right into Kobe's role and filled it better with a Shaq that was already slightly on the decline.


Slightly different situations because Wade was clearly the best player on that team.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93122
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
I take it you failed to look at their numbers in the 2001 Finals. Damn near triple double in 3 games.

What are you talking about? I assume by 2001 finals you mean from the 2000-2001 season.
Here are Shaq and Kobe's game logs for those 5 games.
Shaq:
Pts Reb Assists
44 20 5
28 20 9
30 12 3
34 14 5
29 13 2

Kobe:
15 3 5
31 8 6
32 6 3
19 10 9
26 12 6

Kobe and Shaq both had one game where they missed a triple double by 1 assist. The rest they hovered with 6 or less assists. Shaq on the other hand had a double double in every game and two games where he put up 20 rebounds. By my rough estimate, Shaq would have averaged about 34 and 17 rebounds. That's all time great numbers for a finals.

I don't really see where you are coming from in this one. Shaq was putting up amazing numbers.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 5:02 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72516
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Plus Daniel Gibson didnt exactly make the degree of difficulty very high last year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 101 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group