It is currently Tue Dec 03, 2024 12:27 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 198 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
If you want to cut down on the K's, tell these guys quit swinging for the fences every pitch. When ya get 2 strikes, choke up and make contact. When they put a shift on, bunt.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2514
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
312player wrote:
If you want to cut down on the K's, tell these guys quit swinging for the fences every pitch. When ya get 2 strikes, choke up and make contact. When they put a shift on, bunt.


That's true, there are two players involved in every strike out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31723
pizza_Place: What??
Warren Newson wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Nate Silver has weighed in and claims that forcing pitchers to face three batters is not the answer. Instead, he thinks limiting the number of pitchers on a roster to 10, plus one emergency pitcher (like a hockey emergency goalie) will speed up the game and cut down on strike outs. Not a bad read. For those interested, the link is here:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/re ... to-fix-it/

Relief pitchers are already treated like shit. Limiting them to 10 would make it worse. 1) Even MORE overuse 2) shipping guys back and forth from the minors. Starters are where the investment is. Those are the guys treated with kid gloves. Everyone else other than the closer is fodder.


His basic point is that if a guy pitches one inning or less, he's going to give max effort on every pitch and just try to strike guys out. If he pitches more than one inning his velocity goes down and his use of the slider goes down. Therefore, we should see fewer strike outs and a faster game if teams had to be more judicious about their use of pitchers because there were fewer of them available.

Who knows how it would play out in real life, but I'm up for trying anything that stems the parade of relievers we see late in games.

Relievers need their own union. I'm not kidding. Someone needs to point out paying Hamels 20 million to go 5 innings every 5th day is STEALIN'! Meanwhile, Relievers are making 70-80 appearances.It really doesn't matter if it's 1 inning, they are up and throwing hard 4 days a week. 95% of them are washed up by age 30 if not younger.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Nardi wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Nate Silver has weighed in and claims that forcing pitchers to face three batters is not the answer. Instead, he thinks limiting the number of pitchers on a roster to 10, plus one emergency pitcher (like a hockey emergency goalie) will speed up the game and cut down on strike outs. Not a bad read. For those interested, the link is here:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/re ... to-fix-it/

Relief pitchers are already treated like shit. Limiting them to 10 would make it worse. 1) Even MORE overuse 2) shipping guys back and forth from the minors. Starters are where the investment is. Those are the guys treated with kid gloves. Everyone else other than the closer is fodder.


His basic point is that if a guy pitches one inning or less, he's going to give max effort on every pitch and just try to strike guys out. If he pitches more than one inning his velocity goes down and his use of the slider goes down. Therefore, we should see fewer strike outs and a faster game if teams had to be more judicious about their use of pitchers because there were fewer of them available.

Who knows how it would play out in real life, but I'm up for trying anything that stems the parade of relievers we see late in games.

Relievers need their own union. I'm not kidding. Someone needs to point out paying Hamels 20 million to go 5 innings every 5th day is STEALIN'! Meanwhile, Relievers are making 70-80 appearances.It really doesn't matter if it's 1 inning, they are up and throwing hard 4 days a week. 95% of them are washed up by age 30 if not younger.


World needs ditch diggers, too. If they don’t like it, be a starting pitcher. See how long their career is then.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31723
pizza_Place: What??
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Nate Silver has weighed in and claims that forcing pitchers to face three batters is not the answer. Instead, he thinks limiting the number of pitchers on a roster to 10, plus one emergency pitcher (like a hockey emergency goalie) will speed up the game and cut down on strike outs. Not a bad read. For those interested, the link is here:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/re ... to-fix-it/

Relief pitchers are already treated like shit. Limiting them to 10 would make it worse. 1) Even MORE overuse 2) shipping guys back and forth from the minors. Starters are where the investment is. Those are the guys treated with kid gloves. Everyone else other than the closer is fodder.


His basic point is that if a guy pitches one inning or less, he's going to give max effort on every pitch and just try to strike guys out. If he pitches more than one inning his velocity goes down and his use of the slider goes down. Therefore, we should see fewer strike outs and a faster game if teams had to be more judicious about their use of pitchers because there were fewer of them available.

Who knows how it would play out in real life, but I'm up for trying anything that stems the parade of relievers we see late in games.

Relievers need their own union. I'm not kidding. Someone needs to point out paying Hamels 20 million to go 5 innings every 5th day is STEALIN'! Meanwhile, Relievers are making 70-80 appearances.It really doesn't matter if it's 1 inning, they are up and throwing hard 4 days a week. 95% of them are washed up by age 30 if not younger.


World needs ditch diggers, too. If they don’t like it, be a starting pitcher. See how long their career is then.

I'd like to see a better way to get more out of them for a longer time. Johnny Blue Chip Starter needs to go 7 innings so Greg Counsell doesn't wreck every pitcher in the organization.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Craig Counsell pitching management is exactly what's going wrong with MLB right now.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10124
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
I said something similar to #1 a few pages ago:

1. Change the option system (to be known as the Iowa Shuttle rule)
a. If you get optioned before April 15, you can come back up after 5 days. Allows for screwed up situations with early season weather.
b. The first time you get optioned in a season after April 15, you can get called up after 10 days, or if there is a player that goes on the DL.
c. The next time you get optioned in a season, you can get called up after 14 days, or after 4 days if there is a player that goes on the DL.
d. The third and subsequent times you get optioned in a season, you can get called up after 30 days. If they want to call you up sooner, they have to expose you to waivers first.

2. Let the major league roster go to 27 players, but only 13 of them are allowed to have pitched more than 5 innings at either MLB or AAA in the previous 365 days.

3. Adopt the NHL rules about "burning a year towards free agency" - you get called up, you burn a year. None of this 7 is greater than 6, or Super Two bullshit.

4. Limited free agency choice for the player in the last arbitration year, but only a 2 year deal and team has right to match

5. Regardless of arbitration years, you get free agency in the offseason after you turn 31. If you were found to lie about your age, in either direction, you lose all free agency, permanent arbitration.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
2019: One trade deadline, All Star Election Day, and $1M HR derby winner
2020: 26 man roster, 3 batter minimum for pitchers

I wonder how the minimum works if there are less than 3 outs left in the game?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 1:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19397
Big Chicagoan wrote:
2019: One trade deadline, All Star Election Day, and $1M HR derby winner
2020: 26 man roster, 3 batter minimum for pitchers

I wonder how the minimum works if there are less than 3 outs left in the game?


I believe it is 3 batter minimum or finish an inning. Whichever happens first.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 6:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Big Chicagoan wrote:
2019: One trade deadline, All Star Election Day, and $1M HR derby winner
2020: 26 man roster, 3 batter minimum for pitchers

I wonder how the minimum works if there are less than 3 outs left in the game?


He has to start the next game, obviously.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 7:15 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
GoldenJet wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
2019: One trade deadline, All Star Election Day, and $1M HR derby winner
2020: 26 man roster, 3 batter minimum for pitchers

I wonder how the minimum works if there are less than 3 outs left in the game?

He has to start the next game, obviously.
He's on the team for next year!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 7:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16499
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
I am dumbfounded that they are actually going with the 3-batter minimum.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40659
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I am dumbfounded that they are actually going with the 3-batter minimum.


Me too. Seems a little ham handed in forcing the issue. On the other hand maybe there were others that were so inflexible trying to figure out what to do about shortening the games MLB said screw it. Basically, I can see managers not wanting to have hands tied in any way and this is a hammer on them. The right, left, right three pitchers in one inning sucks the life out of games at times.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Awful idea.


I wouldn't be surprised if they went back on that before next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 8:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43586
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I am dumbfounded that they are actually going with the 3-batter minimum.

If the goal is to shorten the game, making drastic changes to the rules is just stupid. There are ways to speed up pace of play without stupid changes like this.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
2019: One trade deadline, All Star Election Day, and $1M HR derby winner
2020: 26 man roster, 3 batter minimum for pitchers

I wonder how the minimum works if there are less than 3 outs left in the game?

He has to start the next game, obviously.
He's on the team for next year!

:lol:

Well played.

3 batter minimum is dumber than RPB's idea to turn the NFL into the arena league

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
2019: One trade deadline, All Star Election Day, and $1M HR derby winner
2020: 26 man roster, 3 batter minimum for pitchers

I wonder how the minimum works if there are less than 3 outs left in the game?

He has to start the next game, obviously.
He's on the team for next year!

:lol:

Well played.

3 batter minimum is dumber than RPB's idea to turn the NFL into the arena league

It's already the arena league. Did you watch Rams-Chiefs on MNF?

Dont fight it.


But yea, the 3 batter thing is terrible and it's taking away a job (loogy)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
2019: One trade deadline, All Star Election Day, and $1M HR derby winner
2020: 26 man roster, 3 batter minimum for pitchers

I wonder how the minimum works if there are less than 3 outs left in the game?

He has to start the next game, obviously.
He's on the team for next year!

:lol:

Well played.

3 batter minimum is dumber than RPB's idea to turn the NFL into the arena league

It's already the arena league. Did you watch Rams-Chiefs on MNF?

Dont fight it.


But yea, the 3 batter thing is terrible and it's taking away a job (loogy)

Did you see the Super Bowl? :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16499
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Have they said what the process would be for when a pitcher has only faced one or two batters and then says his arm hurts? I guess you'd have to either issue intentional walks to satisfy the minimum, or place the guy on the DL....otherwise you'd have rampant faking.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Have they said what the process would be for when a pitcher has only faced one or two batters and then says his arm hurts? I guess you'd have to either issue intentional walks to satisfy the minimum, or place the guy on the DL....otherwise you'd have rampant faking.

I guess the pitcher would have to sit out a few games? See, this rule creates stupid sub-rules to support it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43586
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Have they said what the process would be for when a pitcher has only faced one or two batters and then says his arm hurts? I guess you'd have to either issue intentional walks to satisfy the minimum, or place the guy on the DL....otherwise you'd have rampant faking.

Pitcher has to throw with his other arm for the remaining batters.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:11 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Have they said what the process would be for when a pitcher has only faced one or two batters and then says his arm hurts? I guess you'd have to either issue intentional walks to satisfy the minimum, or place the guy on the DL....otherwise you'd have rampant faking.
The coach then comes out and pitches just like little league.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Douchebag wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Have they said what the process would be for when a pitcher has only faced one or two batters and then says his arm hurts? I guess you'd have to either issue intentional walks to satisfy the minimum, or place the guy on the DL....otherwise you'd have rampant faking.

Pitcher has to throw with his other arm for the remaining batters.

See, I just don't think that's a tenable idea....I like how you focus on a diversity of arm-favoring, though. So politically, I agree with this post. Athletically, not so much.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41382
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Quote:
Pitchers must face a minimum of three batters


This is going to be a disaster.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Who thinks that is a good idea?

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92195
Location: To the left of my post
This 3 batter rule has me interested in baseball again.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41382
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
The three batter rule is bush league little league baseball type shit. Takes strategy out of the game. Manfred is going to fucking ruing the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:06 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
GoldenJet wrote:
Who thinks that is a good idea?
Its awful. I don't care if there are six pitchers used in an inning between both teams. The 3-4 minutes of downtime with every change is the problem. The reliever should jog in from the bullpen, get 10 seconds on the mound to speak with his manager or catcher, throw three warmup pitches, then the game resumes.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
GoldenJet wrote:
Who thinks that is a good idea?

The mentally challenged and people who wouldn't know a horsefly from an infield fly.

Never mind that stupidity in whatever minor-minor-minor league they're dicking around with mound distance during the backend of their season.

Selig looks better every day.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
It's very clear why the games are longer and it's not pitching changes.

Check this out: For SB Nation, Grant Brisbee watched a pair of extremely similar games from 1984 and 2014 to determine what accounted for the extra 35 minutes of game time. The post is hilarious, and the conclusion is definitive:

Time between pitches is the primary villain… That’s it. That’s the secret. It isn’t just the commercials. It isn’t just the left-handed pitchers coming in to face one batter, even though that absolutely makes a huge difference in the games when that does happen.

It’s not like every at-bat in the 2014 game was rotten with hitters doing a Nomar Garciaparra impression between pitches, either. It was a marked difference in the modern players doing absolutely nothing of note. The batter taking an extra breath before he steps back in. The pitcher holding the ball for an extra beat.

As Brisbee notes, the overwhelming majority of people who have played in or watched minor-league games with pitch clocks in recent season report little difference in the baseball experience, beyond the initial adjustment for pitchers. If pace of play is really an issue for Major League Baseball, a pitch clock is the solution. A pitch clock has always been the solution. Not shortening games to seven innings, not outlawing mid-inning pitching changes, not eliminating home-run trots, not banning infield shifts in a misguided effort to bring back the seeing-eye single and entice hitters to put more balls in play. Just a clock to get everyone to move it along, and an understanding that hitters eager to operate on their own, slower schedules will be docked strikes.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 198 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group