It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:00 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 108 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32448
pizza_Place: What??
conns7901 wrote:
If the NBA wants to get away from players clustering in a few cities they need to go to a hard salary cap.

It is a hard salary cap for a new team picking up a FA. Kawhi took less to go to LA. A lot less from what I read.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93124
Location: To the left of my post
conns7901 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I think the big concern is that the trend seems to be that even well run organizations have no real way of keeping superstars. Kawhi literally had a championship winning team around him and left to go to the LA Clippers who are better run but still mostly a punchline even in their hometown. The second winner of free agency was a very poorly run franchise that just so happens to be in a cool place to live. Last year, the Lakers who have been run pretty horribly for years got LeBron because it was easier to film Space Jam 2. Then, when you are a team and realize this reality you get the league office getting on you for tanking games going after Zion Williamson, who will likely just end up playing the prime of his career in a more fun area with fellow NBA superstars Ja Morant and Carsen Edwards.

Clippers and Nets are two of the most well run teams in the league.
Is that sarcasm?


This is not ten years ago. They are well run now.

The Nets have one playoff series victory since 2007.
The Clippers have three playoff series victories since 2007.
The Bulls have four playoff series victories since 2007.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I think the big concern is that the trend seems to be that even well run organizations have no real way of keeping superstars. Kawhi literally had a championship winning team around him and left to go to the LA Clippers who are better run but still mostly a punchline even in their hometown. The second winner of free agency was a very poorly run franchise that just so happens to be in a cool place to live. Last year, the Lakers who have been run pretty horribly for years got LeBron because it was easier to film Space Jam 2. Then, when you are a team and realize this reality you get the league office getting on you for tanking games going after Zion Williamson, who will likely just end up playing the prime of his career in a more fun area with fellow NBA superstars Ja Morant and Carsen Edwards.

As FF noted, the Nets have been well run for a while now though, as they climbed out of the rubble of the Celtics trade and built a tough playoff team this year. They jumped the Knicks for much the same reason that the Clippers jumped the Lakers. I also think hometown considerations played a part in both Leonard and Irving's decisions on top of the competence of the teams they went to. The Bulls by contrast had absolutely no interest from hometown kid Davis when he demanded a trade and seem to only be able to use that as a factor for overpaying guys with no other options like Wade and Parker.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93124
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
No, it's true. Over the last couple years almost every single move both teams have made went perfectly and set both franchises up for their moment this offseason. What's the argument against my post?
I don't know enough to argue otherwise, but to me it seems like neither franchise was going anywhere until they got these players.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72517
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I think the big concern is that the trend seems to be that even well run organizations have no real way of keeping superstars. Kawhi literally had a championship winning team around him and left to go to the LA Clippers who are better run but still mostly a punchline even in their hometown. The second winner of free agency was a very poorly run franchise that just so happens to be in a cool place to live. Last year, the Lakers who have been run pretty horribly for years got LeBron because it was easier to film Space Jam 2. Then, when you are a team and realize this reality you get the league office getting on you for tanking games going after Zion Williamson, who will likely just end up playing the prime of his career in a more fun area with fellow NBA superstars Ja Morant and Carsen Edwards.

Clippers and Nets are two of the most well run teams in the league.
Is that sarcasm?


This is not ten years ago. They are well run now.

The Nets have one playoff series victory since 2007.
The Clippers have three playoff series victories since 2007.
The Bulls have four playoff series victories since 2007.

That seems like very poor criteria for determining a well run team.

By your logic the Warriors weren't well run until the very moment they won the NBA title :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72517
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No, it's true. Over the last couple years almost every single move both teams have made went perfectly and set both franchises up for their moment this offseason. What's the argument against my post?
I don't know enough to argue otherwise, but to me it seems like neither franchise was going anywhere until they got these players.

Well, when you purposely build your team around staying competitive AND opening up over $60 million in cap space for the following summer, then yes correct it's pretty much FA or bust. But that's the entire point, those teams got the best FA's while their famous counterparts, the Lakers and Knicks, struck out. And all precisely because the Nets and Clippers are well run.

Giannis also has not made any fuss about leaving. Probably because the Bucks are well run and surrounded him with a coaching staff and roster that allows him to compete.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93124
Location: To the left of my post
ZephMarshack wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I think the big concern is that the trend seems to be that even well run organizations have no real way of keeping superstars. Kawhi literally had a championship winning team around him and left to go to the LA Clippers who are better run but still mostly a punchline even in their hometown. The second winner of free agency was a very poorly run franchise that just so happens to be in a cool place to live. Last year, the Lakers who have been run pretty horribly for years got LeBron because it was easier to film Space Jam 2. Then, when you are a team and realize this reality you get the league office getting on you for tanking games going after Zion Williamson, who will likely just end up playing the prime of his career in a more fun area with fellow NBA superstars Ja Morant and Carsen Edwards.

As FF noted, the Nets have been well run for a while now though, as they climbed out of the rubble of the Celtics trade and built a tough playoff team this year. They jumped the Knicks for much the same reason that the Clippers jumped the Lakers. I also think hometown considerations played a part in both Leonard and Irving's decisions on top of the competence of the teams they went to. The Bulls by contrast had absolutely no interest from hometown kid Davis when he demanded a trade and seem to only be able to use that as a factor for overpaying guys with no other options like Wade and Parker.

Going 42-40 and losing in the playoffs 4-1 doesn't sound all that impressive.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93124
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
That seems like very poor criteria for determining a well run team.

By your logic the Warriors weren't well run until the very moment they won the NBA title :lol:
Season and playoff results don't matter I guess.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72517
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I think the big concern is that the trend seems to be that even well run organizations have no real way of keeping superstars. Kawhi literally had a championship winning team around him and left to go to the LA Clippers who are better run but still mostly a punchline even in their hometown. The second winner of free agency was a very poorly run franchise that just so happens to be in a cool place to live. Last year, the Lakers who have been run pretty horribly for years got LeBron because it was easier to film Space Jam 2. Then, when you are a team and realize this reality you get the league office getting on you for tanking games going after Zion Williamson, who will likely just end up playing the prime of his career in a more fun area with fellow NBA superstars Ja Morant and Carsen Edwards.

As FF noted, the Nets have been well run for a while now though, as they climbed out of the rubble of the Celtics trade and built a tough playoff team this year. They jumped the Knicks for much the same reason that the Clippers jumped the Lakers. I also think hometown considerations played a part in both Leonard and Irving's decisions on top of the competence of the teams they went to. The Bulls by contrast had absolutely no interest from hometown kid Davis when he demanded a trade and seem to only be able to use that as a factor for overpaying guys with no other options like Wade and Parker.

Going 42-40 and losing in the playoffs 4-1 doesn't sound all that impressive.

Name a more impressive team that had $65 million in cap space this summer. I'll wait.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72517
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That seems like very poor criteria for determining a well run team.

By your logic the Warriors weren't well run until the very moment they won the NBA title :lol:
Season and playoff results don't matter I guess.

That's a strange conclusion to this conversation.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93124
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No, it's true. Over the last couple years almost every single move both teams have made went perfectly and set both franchises up for their moment this offseason. What's the argument against my post?
I don't know enough to argue otherwise, but to me it seems like neither franchise was going anywhere until they got these players.

Well, when you purposely build your team around staying competitive AND opening up over $60 million in cap space for the following summer, then yes correct it's pretty much FA or bust. But that's the entire point, those teams got the best FA's while their famous counterparts, the Lakers and Knicks, struck out. And all precisely because the Nets and Clippers are well run.
But once again, the primary factor for both seemed to be geographic location.

FavreFan wrote:
Giannis also has not made any fuss about leaving. Probably because the Bucks are well run and surrounded him with a coaching staff and roster that allows him to compete.
When can he sign an extension in Milwaukee? Lots of guys signed that first extension, including Anthony Davis.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72517
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No, it's true. Over the last couple years almost every single move both teams have made went perfectly and set both franchises up for their moment this offseason. What's the argument against my post?
I don't know enough to argue otherwise, but to me it seems like neither franchise was going anywhere until they got these players.

Well, when you purposely build your team around staying competitive AND opening up over $60 million in cap space for the following summer, then yes correct it's pretty much FA or bust. But that's the entire point, those teams got the best FA's while their famous counterparts, the Lakers and Knicks, struck out. And all precisely because the Nets and Clippers are well run.
But once again, the primary factor for both seemed to be geographic location.

No. The primary factor for Kawhi the entire time was a competent front office. It's why he froze out the Lakers and told the Raptors and Clippers what it would take to sign him. Raptors wouldn't commit that much and Clippers would. That's pretty much the story.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
ZephMarshack wrote:
IMU wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Fuck these fans who express outrage at trade demands or free agency strategizing. If the fan quits his job to work in a better location or for more money then ain't no one gonna complain about that. So shut the fuck up.

These players are only signing supermax contracts with current teams and then getting traded a year later. There should be a monetary penalty. You should lose the extra year and guaranteed salary that only the current team can offer a FA if you demand a trade within the first 2 years of a deal, or something like that.

Should there be a monetary penalty for teams that trade a player who's signed the max and wants to stay with their current team but gets shipped off anyway within the first two years of their deal?

The player would not take a salary or guarantee hit in that scenario.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 2:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
IMU wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
IMU wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Fuck these fans who express outrage at trade demands or free agency strategizing. If the fan quits his job to work in a better location or for more money then ain't no one gonna complain about that. So shut the fuck up.

These players are only signing supermax contracts with current teams and then getting traded a year later. There should be a monetary penalty. You should lose the extra year and guaranteed salary that only the current team can offer a FA if you demand a trade within the first 2 years of a deal, or something like that.

Should there be a monetary penalty for teams that trade a player who's signed the max and wants to stay with their current team but gets shipped off anyway within the first two years of their deal?

The player would not take a salary or guarantee hit in that scenario.

So what? OKC didn't take any kind of value hit from Paul George's demand at all and got a greater haul than would have been expected on the open market for him alone because the Clippers were essentially trading assets for him and Kawhi.

Blake Griffin had his ass shipped off to Detroit less than a year after his team gave him a max and Ballmer declared him a Clipper for life. If we're so scandalized by players asking for trades, I see no reason not to be equally angry about the similar lack of loyalty from front offices.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93124
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No, it's true. Over the last couple years almost every single move both teams have made went perfectly and set both franchises up for their moment this offseason. What's the argument against my post?
I don't know enough to argue otherwise, but to me it seems like neither franchise was going anywhere until they got these players.

Well, when you purposely build your team around staying competitive AND opening up over $60 million in cap space for the following summer, then yes correct it's pretty much FA or bust. But that's the entire point, those teams got the best FA's while their famous counterparts, the Lakers and Knicks, struck out. And all precisely because the Nets and Clippers are well run.
But once again, the primary factor for both seemed to be geographic location.

No. The primary factor for Kawhi the entire time was a competent front office. It's why he froze out the Lakers and told the Raptors and Clippers what it would take to sign him. Raptors wouldn't commit that much and Clippers would. That's pretty much the story.

The story all year was Kawhi was LA bound. The Raptors winning the title may have given him a reason to consider them but it seems clear that LA won based in large part on geography.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
ZephMarshack wrote:
So what? OKC didn't take any kind of value hit from Paul George's demand at all and got a greater haul than would have been expected on the open market for him alone because the Clippers were essentially trading assets for him and Kawhi.

Blake Griffin had his ass shipped off to Detroit less than a year after his team gave him a max and Ballmer declared him a Clipper for life. If we're so scandalized by players asking for trades, I see no reason not to be equally angry about the similar lack of loyalty from front offices.

The Clippers chose to move him. Blake Griffin is still getting paid the whole deal. Everyone is happy.

The Thunder were at the mercy of one player and a boatload of tampering. They could have started the rebuild a year earlier by never signing PG at all. Or they could have aligned themselves to be players in signing two of these starts themselves this offseason. PG committed to them and reneged less than a season later. In fact, reports have Kawhi and PG discussing and planning this last offseason. The least that can be done is to say "okay, PG, you wanted to play for another team all along. Well then your supermax is now a simple max and the years and salary are now synced up to what they would have been had you signed with any other team in the first place."

THE ENTIRE POINT of supermaxes was to keep players with their teams. The spirit of the rule has been defeated, so the rule should be tweaked.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72517
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No, it's true. Over the last couple years almost every single move both teams have made went perfectly and set both franchises up for their moment this offseason. What's the argument against my post?
I don't know enough to argue otherwise, but to me it seems like neither franchise was going anywhere until they got these players.

Well, when you purposely build your team around staying competitive AND opening up over $60 million in cap space for the following summer, then yes correct it's pretty much FA or bust. But that's the entire point, those teams got the best FA's while their famous counterparts, the Lakers and Knicks, struck out. And all precisely because the Nets and Clippers are well run.
But once again, the primary factor for both seemed to be geographic location.

No. The primary factor for Kawhi the entire time was a competent front office. It's why he froze out the Lakers and told the Raptors and Clippers what it would take to sign him. Raptors wouldn't commit that much and Clippers would. That's pretty much the story.

The story all year was Kawhi was LA bound. The Raptors winning the title may have given him a reason to consider them but it seems clear that LA won based in large part on geography.

I don't see how that's clear at all. The Lakers were reportedly not in consideration in the final few days. It seems rather clear to me that geography was, at best, a secondary consideration for him.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 3:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
IMU wrote:
The Clippers chose to move him. Blake Griffin is still getting paid the whole deal. Everyone is happy.
Blake's not if he wouldn't have agreed to a max deal to play in Detroit in the first place. Seems pretty disloyal for front offices to collude with each other via the trade mechanism and leave a player like Blake in a worse off position.
Quote:
The Thunder were at the mercy of one player and a boatload of tampering. They could have started the rebuild a year earlier by never signing PG at all.
With none of the boatload of assets they just got for re-signing him. This idea that Presti and OKC are any kind of victims in this after getting the closest thing to a Herschel Walker deal in the history of the league is mindboggling to me.
Quote:
Or they could have aligned themselves to be players in signing two of these starts themselves this offseason. PG committed to them and reneged less than a season later. In fact, reports have Kawhi and PG discussing and planning this last offseason. The least that can be done is to say "okay, PG, you wanted to play for another team all along. Well then your supermax is now a simple max and the years and salary are now synced up to what they would have been had you signed with any other team in the first place."
How did George renege if he merely requested a trade and OKC had every right to determine whether to trade him or not? And if that's the definition that we're using for reneging, then the Clippers unquestionably reneged by calling Griffin a Clipper for life when pitching why he should sign there and then shipping him off to Detroit; Blake had no say in the matter the way OKC did. Maybe the least we can do in that case is to say they still have to pay his salary and have it count against their cap space despite his no longer being there. We have to incentivize loyalty both ways after all.
Quote:
THE ENTIRE POINT of supermaxes was to keep players with their teams. The spirit of the rule has been defeated, so the rule should be tweaked.
I agree they're not working as intended, but those same owners were the ones who wanted to do away with non-capped salaries and even longer contracts in the first place. And the biggest reason those contracts aren't working as intended has little to do with player collusion or anything like that but comes down to front office assessments of value alone. Most of the teams with eligible supermax players are shipping them out before they become eligible (Butler and the Bulls), simply winding the clock down and not offering it (Walker and the Hornets), or massively regretting offering them at all (Westbrook and Wall).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93124
Location: To the left of my post
During the NBA finals one of the biggest discussions I saw was if winning the title gave Toronto any hope of him staying rather than going to LA.

He did play the Lakers though. Reports by basketball expert IMU are now the Clippers thing including PG started last offseason.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93124
Location: To the left of my post
To cite my argument, there is a NBA reporter named Adrian Wojnarowski who seems pretty well connected who felt strong enough to come out and say that warm weather and playing at home was his top priority.

https://clipperholics.com/2018/12/17/la-clippers-rumors-kawhi-still-wants-los-angeles/

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72517
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
To cite my argument, there is a NBA reporter named Adrian Wojnarowski who seems pretty well connected who felt strong enough to come out and say that warm weather and playing at home was his top priority.

https://clipperholics.com/2018/12/17/la-clippers-rumors-kawhi-still-wants-los-angeles/


That was written 6 months ago :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93124
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
To cite my argument, there is a NBA reporter named Adrian Wojnarowski who seems pretty well connected who felt strong enough to come out and say that warm weather and playing at home was his top priority.

https://clipperholics.com/2018/12/17/la-clippers-rumors-kawhi-still-wants-los-angeles/


That was written 6 months ago :lol:
It proved 100% correct.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72517
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
To cite my argument, there is a NBA reporter named Adrian Wojnarowski who seems pretty well connected who felt strong enough to come out and say that warm weather and playing at home was his top priority.

https://clipperholics.com/2018/12/17/la-clippers-rumors-kawhi-still-wants-los-angeles/


That was written 6 months ago :lol:
It proved 100% correct.

If it was 100% correct then the debate would have been between the Lakers and Clippers. Instead it was between the Raptors and Clippers. Out of those three teams the Raptors and Clippers both have a reputation of being first class organizations and the Lakers are a clown show. Seems like the evidence he values competency the most is much stronger than the evidence he values geography the most.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No, it's true. Over the last couple years almost every single move both teams have made went perfectly and set both franchises up for their moment this offseason. What's the argument against my post?
I don't know enough to argue otherwise, but to me it seems like neither franchise was going anywhere until they got these players.



Put the bulls in the west and they'd have zero playoff series wins.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19532
Nardi wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
If the NBA wants to get away from players clustering in a few cities they need to go to a hard salary cap.

It is a hard salary cap for a new team picking up a FA. Kawhi took less to go to LA. A lot less from what I read.


Hard cap for everyone. If you couldn't go above the cap to sign your own players the league would look a lot different.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93124
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
To cite my argument, there is a NBA reporter named Adrian Wojnarowski who seems pretty well connected who felt strong enough to come out and say that warm weather and playing at home was his top priority.

https://clipperholics.com/2018/12/17/la-clippers-rumors-kawhi-still-wants-los-angeles/


That was written 6 months ago :lol:
It proved 100% correct.

If it was 100% correct then the debate would have been between the Lakers and Clippers. Instead it was between the Raptors and Clippers. Out of those three teams the Raptors and Clippers both have a reputation of being first class organizations and the Lakers are a clown show. Seems like the evidence he values competency the most is much stronger than the evidence he values geography the most.

6 months ago he said it was the Clippers because of weather and proximity to home. He signed with the Clippers. I will continue to think geography was what drove the decision. You can think it is because the Clippers are a first class organization even though he chose to leave two other first class organizations so far in his career.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
ZephMarshack wrote:
IMU wrote:
The Clippers chose to move him. Blake Griffin is still getting paid the whole deal. Everyone is happy.
Blake's not if he wouldn't have agreed to a max deal to play in Detroit in the first place. Seems pretty disloyal for front offices to collude with each other via the trade mechanism and leave a player like Blake in a worse off position.
Quote:
The Thunder were at the mercy of one player and a boatload of tampering. They could have started the rebuild a year earlier by never signing PG at all.
With none of the boatload of assets they just got for re-signing him. This idea that Presti and OKC are any kind of victims in this after getting the closest thing to a Herschel Walker deal in the history of the league is mindboggling to me.
Quote:
Or they could have aligned themselves to be players in signing two of these starts themselves this offseason. PG committed to them and reneged less than a season later. In fact, reports have Kawhi and PG discussing and planning this last offseason. The least that can be done is to say "okay, PG, you wanted to play for another team all along. Well then your supermax is now a simple max and the years and salary are now synced up to what they would have been had you signed with any other team in the first place."
How did George renege if he merely requested a trade and OKC had every right to determine whether to trade him or not? And if that's the definition that we're using for reneging, then the Clippers unquestionably reneged by calling Griffin a Clipper for life when pitching why he should sign there and then shipping him off to Detroit; Blake had no say in the matter the way OKC did. Maybe the least we can do in that case is to say they still have to pay his salary and have it count against their cap space despite his no longer being there. We have to incentivize loyalty both ways after all.
Quote:
THE ENTIRE POINT of supermaxes was to keep players with their teams. The spirit of the rule has been defeated, so the rule should be tweaked.
I agree they're not working as intended, but those same owners were the ones who wanted to do away with non-capped salaries and even longer contracts in the first place. And the biggest reason those contracts aren't working as intended has little to do with player collusion or anything like that but comes down to front office assessments of value alone. Most of the teams with eligible supermax players are shipping them out before they become eligible (Butler and the Bulls), simply winding the clock down and not offering it (Walker and the Hornets), or massively regretting offering them at all (Westbrook and Wall).

You are not viewing the Thunder as a business, and that is your problem. You have no idea how this will affect future revenues and a multitude of other factors. How many millions did they specifically put into Paul George/Thunder marketing after they signed him to the contract? What spending did the organization do since they were counting on a certain level of ticket and merchandising sales over the course of George's contract?

On the basketball side, first round draft picks are still lottery tickets. The Clippers aren't going to be in the lottery anytime soon, and I don't even know what protections were placed on any of them.

OKC was told they would have an unhappy star player on their team if they did not trade PG. They had a gun to their head, and you can attempt to (and fail to) spin it however you like.

I'm going to guess that as an individual you're very 'pro Labor?'

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72517
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
IMU wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
IMU wrote:
The Clippers chose to move him. Blake Griffin is still getting paid the whole deal. Everyone is happy.
Blake's not if he wouldn't have agreed to a max deal to play in Detroit in the first place. Seems pretty disloyal for front offices to collude with each other via the trade mechanism and leave a player like Blake in a worse off position.
Quote:
The Thunder were at the mercy of one player and a boatload of tampering. They could have started the rebuild a year earlier by never signing PG at all.
With none of the boatload of assets they just got for re-signing him. This idea that Presti and OKC are any kind of victims in this after getting the closest thing to a Herschel Walker deal in the history of the league is mindboggling to me.
Quote:
Or they could have aligned themselves to be players in signing two of these starts themselves this offseason. PG committed to them and reneged less than a season later. In fact, reports have Kawhi and PG discussing and planning this last offseason. The least that can be done is to say "okay, PG, you wanted to play for another team all along. Well then your supermax is now a simple max and the years and salary are now synced up to what they would have been had you signed with any other team in the first place."
How did George renege if he merely requested a trade and OKC had every right to determine whether to trade him or not? And if that's the definition that we're using for reneging, then the Clippers unquestionably reneged by calling Griffin a Clipper for life when pitching why he should sign there and then shipping him off to Detroit; Blake had no say in the matter the way OKC did. Maybe the least we can do in that case is to say they still have to pay his salary and have it count against their cap space despite his no longer being there. We have to incentivize loyalty both ways after all.
Quote:
THE ENTIRE POINT of supermaxes was to keep players with their teams. The spirit of the rule has been defeated, so the rule should be tweaked.
I agree they're not working as intended, but those same owners were the ones who wanted to do away with non-capped salaries and even longer contracts in the first place. And the biggest reason those contracts aren't working as intended has little to do with player collusion or anything like that but comes down to front office assessments of value alone. Most of the teams with eligible supermax players are shipping them out before they become eligible (Butler and the Bulls), simply winding the clock down and not offering it (Walker and the Hornets), or massively regretting offering them at all (Westbrook and Wall).

You are not viewing the Thunder as a business, and that is your problem. You have no idea how this will affect future revenues and a multitude of other factors. How many millions did they specifically put into Paul George/Thunder marketing after they signed him to the contract? What spending did the organization do since they were counting on a certain level of ticket and merchandising sales over the course of George's contract?

On the basketball side, first round draft picks are still lottery tickets. The Clippers aren't going to be in the lottery anytime soon, and I don't even know what protections were placed on any of them.

OKC was told they would have an unhappy star player on their team if they did not trade PG. They had a gun to their head, and you can attempt to (and fail to) spin it however you like.

I'm going to guess that as an individual you're very 'pro Labor?'

:lol:

Nobody is happier with how this offseason went than Sam Presti. This is a very amusing spin.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 4:57 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80087
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't know enough to argue otherwise


That's never stopped you before. Go get 'em, kid!

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32448
pizza_Place: What??
conns7901 wrote:
Nardi wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
If the NBA wants to get away from players clustering in a few cities they need to go to a hard salary cap.

It is a hard salary cap for a new team picking up a FA. Kawhi took less to go to LA. A lot less from what I read.


Hard cap for everyone. If you couldn't go above the cap to sign your own players the league would look a lot different.

I guess I'm not following your train of thought. How does a hard salary cap stop LeBron, Durant, Kawhi, Irving, Butler etc from leaving? Teams will still find ways to find salary space for the tip-toppiest of top players, will they not?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 108 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group