It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:46 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: PER
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72516
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Just another reason why I think this has the be the dumbest created stat. When MJ has the line he had and somehow D-Wade numbers are considered better is simply stupid.

http://proxy.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs20 ... ormances-1


I saw that too. I think its kinda helpful in some scenarios but stat geeks like Hollinger think its the be all and end all of things. I mean, any stat that has Shane Battier as the 42nd ranked Small Forward in the NBA is very inherently flawed. Also someone like James Posey on the C's, you cant measure his impact stat-wise. He is just a damn good ball player that makes big plays(Did I sound enough like John Madden there?)

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72516
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
I've never been a fan of it but ESPN seems to love it. Every year based on the PER some of the best players in the league are considered ok and some ok players are considered great. If I paid attention to a stat like that I might take Loul Deng over Kobe Bryant.


Well that and this same geeky stat was the same one considered "innovative" and "groundbreaking" in 2001 when it said Allen Iverson was the 91st best player in the league, his MVP season. Yeah, Im sure a bunch of GM's could easily rattle off 90 players they would rather have than him that season.

But any stat that proves the greatness of Chris Paul is just alright with me. Did you know he's now better than Isiah and closing in on Magic?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72516
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
I've never been a fan of it but ESPN seems to love it. Every year based on the PER some of the best players in the league are considered ok and some ok players are considered great. If I paid attention to a stat like that I might take Loul Deng over Kobe Bryant.


Well that and this same geeky stat was the same one considered "innovative" and "groundbreaking" in 2001 when it said Allen Iverson was the 91st best player in the league, his MVP season. Yeah, Im sure a bunch of GM's could easily rattle off 90 players they would rather have than him that season.

But any stat that proves the greatness of Chris Paul is just alright with me. Did you know he's now better than Isiah and closing in on Magic?


:lol: It's amazing what one amazing year and a couple good years will do.


:lol: Yeah some of the things I've heard from Hollinger are hilarious. I mean, I might have been bordering on hyperbole during the season, and I respect the "You need to do it for more than a year" philosophy, but I did think it was clear by January who the best PG in the game was. I just think its very ridiculous to start saying he's now better than Isiah. Whoa that thing! He has the next decade to prove if thats the case. It's just another unfortunate example of how ADD-laden our society has become. We NEED to herald every new big thing as "the greatest ever". I can sometimes fall into this trap but I conciously try to avoid it. It's really rampid at ESPN, almost to an insane degree.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 8:53 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57564
What goes into figuring the PER?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
PER is the player's per minute productivity. It's both a per minute formula and pace adjusted. Hollinger sets the league average to 15.00 each year.

The only people it truly helps are stat geeks and simulation players. I use them for my sim league to draft.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group