It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 11:25 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 215 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57247
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas even has agreed with me its more important than SF.



So does that mean if given the choice between Chris Paul and LeBron James you would go with Paul?


I already said LeBron is the probably the most unique SF probably ever. He doesnt play like an SF. He's a PG in a PF's body. That said, yes I'd rather have Paul than LeBron.


Ok, fair enough.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas even has agreed with me its more important than SF.



So does that mean if given the choice between Chris Paul and LeBron James you would go with Paul?


I already said LeBron is the probably the most unique SF probably ever. He doesnt play like an SF. He's a PG in a PF's body. That said, yes I'd rather have Paul than LeBron.


:o :shock: It's official you have gone insane.


:lol: We'll see who wins a title first. I know this word is overused in sports, but I'm not positive Bron is a "winner".

I dont blame anyone for wanting LeBron over Paul, but I dont think Im insane for preferring Paul.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
So let me get this straight Nas. You think Gooden was held back in Cleveland and with a PG like Paul he could be a 20-10 guy, right? Given this, you'd rather have LeBron? I understand he is arguably the most talented player in the league, although I think thats Kobe, but Paul himself is one of the most talented players in the league also, makes his teammates better more than Bron, and I would say is more clutch.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:25 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
So Nas no longer believes Deng is as good as Lebron?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I cant wait for Nas's reaction is the rumors are true and the Heat pass on Beasley and take Mayo.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:56 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
What would it take for the Bulls to get Beasley in addition to Rose?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Tall Midget wrote:
What would it take for the Bulls to get Beasley in addition to Rose?

The Heat's pick. ;)

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57247
Tall Midget wrote:
What would it take for the Bulls to get Beasley in addition to Rose?


A new GM :x

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
I think his ceiling is higher but not by much. The thing is his floor is lower than the difference between their ceilings. That scares me. When it's that close I would always go with the guy that has the higher floor. When you add Chicago into the mix I think it is going to be tough for Rose. He is a good kid but he is going to have a lot of pressure and outside influence. Watching Beasley dominate in his first year will put even more pressure on him and guys like Mariotti and North won't do him any favors. No 19 year old is mentally tough enough to deal with that. In 3 years this may be the best draft pick since MJ (Scottie was traded) but I wouldn't want to take that chance.

If you don't think Beasley has a low floor then you are crazy. There is a long list of college scoring machines who were absolute busts in the NBA. Add in the fact that Beasley has some character issues and I could make a case that Rose is the safer pick. Beasley will be a tweener in the NBA. Sometimes that works out well, but sometimes that makes great players average. If he can't guard a 3 or 4 on defense, it's not going to work well for him.

This isn't Lebron James we are talking about here. Beasley is FAR from the sure thing you make him out to be. It is likely that he'll be the best scoring rookie in the league. He'll probably win rookie of the year, especially if he goes to Miami where he can rely on Wade.

Even though everyone discounts this, Beasley's floor is Marcus Fizer. His celing is Elton Brand.
Derrick Rose's floor is better than Kirk Hinrich, and his ceiling is Chris Paul.

Neither one is a sure thing.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
It is being reported that the Miami Heat are not very high on Beasley. They may be looking to swap out of the spot and would prefer to get Mayo or someone else.

Beasley is not the sure thing that everyone is making him out to be.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:37 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Even though everyone discounts this, Beasley's floor is Marcus Fizer. His celing is Elton Brand.


Where is the similarity between Brand and Beasley? They are radically dissimilar players. The Fizer comparison is closer, but Beasley is more athletic, more explosive, a better ballhandler, and has a much more complete, polished offensive game than Fizer had coming out of college. B&B have compared Beasley to Derrick Coleman--that reference strikes me as a much more accurate starting point for projecting what Beasley might become in the pros.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:39 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
What would it take for the Bulls to get Beasley in addition to Rose?



Giving up some young talent and taking back a bad contract.


I assume you mean Deng and Noah? If so, I would make that trade.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:57 pm
Posts: 476
If Rose wasn't in this draft and I were the Bulls, I would take Mayo over Beasley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
What would it take for the Bulls to get Beasley in addition to Rose?



Giving up some young talent and taking back a bad contract.


I assume you mean Deng and Noah? If so, I would make that trade.


It would take more than that and who the hell would play C for us? Gooden? Gray?

I dont think we should give up Noah, his value isnt high enough and hes more valuable to us than he would be to most other teams.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
Tall Midget wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Even though everyone discounts this, Beasley's floor is Marcus Fizer. His celing is Elton Brand.


Where is the similarity between Brand and Beasley? They are radically dissimilar players. The Fizer comparison is closer, but Beasley is more athletic, more explosive, a better ballhandler, and has a much more complete, polished offensive game than Fizer had coming out of college. B&B have compared Beasley to Derrick Coleman--that reference strikes me as a much more accurate starting point for projecting what Beasley might become in the pros.

Derrick Coleman is probably closer. My Brand comparison partly comes because I could see Beasley putting up a quiet 20/10. Elton Brand always strikes me as a player that puts up good numbers but is never considered to be dominating a game. You almost don't realize that Brand is doing as well as he is.

I see Brand being better than Derrick Coleman and I also see Beasley being better than Derrick Coleman. I can't put Beasley up to a level of Tim Duncan or even probably Karl Malone so Elton Brand is the closest one I can get to. It's not a perfect comparison I know.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:57 pm
Posts: 476
Beasley won't be a PF, he will be more like a Antawn Jamison. A Tweener


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
What would it take for the Bulls to get Beasley in addition to Rose?

Giving up some young talent and taking back a bad contract.

I assume you mean Deng and Noah? If so, I would make that trade.

That'd be exciting, but damn: talk about a youth movement.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:49 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:

I wouldn't trade Deng for a draft pick. No chance in hell unless you tell me the next LeBron is available. I would give up Tyrus and someone else (can't trade Gordon or Deng yet) and take back a bad contract.


To me, the question is this: Will Beasley be good enough to be a #1 or #2 on a championship team? If the answere is yes, then you should have no compunctions about trading Deng, who is at best a #3.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:51 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
MattInTheCrown wrote:
That'd be exciting, but damn: talk about a youth movement.


I'm ready to burn this roster down. It's full of role players and devoid of stars. Pax has built his team by focusing on the periphery rather than the core; his thinking needs to be reversed.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:05 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
FavreFan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:

I assume you mean Deng and Noah? If so, I would make that trade.


It would take more than that and who the hell would play C for us? Gooden? Gray?

I dont think we should give up Noah, his value isnt high enough and hes more valuable to us than he would be to most other teams.


I would make the trade because I am looking for flat out, stone-cold killers. With his athleticism and broad range of skills, Beasley can be such a player, in my opinion (as can Rose). If I have Rose and Beasley on my team, I will have the cornerstones for my championship team in place. The question of who will play center is thus somewhat peripheral. That position could be addressed by trading Hinrich and Gordon or through next year's draft when a good low post player might be available to them, especially since a team starting Rose and Beasley is unlikely to make the playoffs. I would fully advocate sucking for a year to develop Rose and Beasley (and Thabo and Tyrus, to see what they can do) and then getting another reasonable draft pick next year to acquire my third core player.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:19 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:

Where is the similarity between Brand and Beasley? They are radically dissimilar players. The Fizer comparison is closer, but Beasley is more athletic, more explosive, a better ballhandler, and has a much more complete, polished offensive game than Fizer had coming out of college. B&B have compared Beasley to Derrick Coleman--that reference strikes me as a much more accurate starting point for projecting what Beasley might become in the pros.

Derrick Coleman is probably closer. My Brand comparison partly comes because I could see Beasley putting up a quiet 20/10. Elton Brand always strikes me as a player that puts up good numbers but is never considered to be dominating a game. You almost don't realize that Brand is doing as well as he is.

I see Brand being better than Derrick Coleman and I also see Beasley being better than Derrick Coleman. I can't put Beasley up to a level of Tim Duncan or even probably Karl Malone so Elton Brand is the closest one I can get to. It's not a perfect comparison I know.


I think Derrick Coleman could have been better than Malone if he would have stayed healthy. He had the ability to do what no other PF could do at the time. When healthy he used to make guys like Barkley and Malone look foolish. If Beasley can become a healthy Coleman I would want a guy like that on my team.

The Brand comparison probably has more to do with size. I can't see Beasley quietly putting up 20 and 10. Brand is cut from the mold of a guy like Duncan where you rarely see them show a lot of emotion. Beasley is an in your face kind of guy.


Yes, Derrick Coleman was a phenomenally talented player. If he had a better work ethic and less of an ego, he could've been an all-time great player. While I don't think Beasely is as talented as Coleman, his game is similar. And if Beasley has the work ethic that Coleman lacked, he will be a very, very good player--and very quickly, too.

As for the Brand talk, there is just no similarity between the two players. As far as I can tell, Beasley's game is way more diverse than Brand's and Beasley possesses an elite level of athleticism and explosiveness that Brand lacks.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Tall Midget wrote:
MattInTheCrown wrote:
That'd be exciting, but damn: talk about a youth movement.

I'm ready to burn this roster down. It's full of role players and devoid of stars. Pax has built his team by focusing on the periphery rather than the core; his thinking needs to be reversed.

Yeah, I'm ready to tear the roster down as well; I've already said I'm of the mind that this team is not a tweak-candidate. That said, it's a difference between blowing it up and bringing veterans in and starting over with two 19 year olds. You do that, and you're on a 5 year plan. It'd be fine with me, but I wonder how most would feel about that.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
I'm a Bulls season ticket holder, and if blowing it up and waiting five more years means I'll never again have to watch Hinrich, Duhon, Thomas, Gray etc, it'll be worth it. However, Gordon and Deng are your only chips worth anything, and that's likely the 2 they'll keep

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Beasley seems like GrandMaMa Larry Johnson to me - athletic, undersized scorer/rebounder.

Probably make a real good NBA player but might be prone to break down physically after a few years of being down low. Seems like he'd be a nice player to have but not a dominant guy. However, I only saw him play a limited number of times.

I'd rather they took Rose.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
The more I think about it, my Brand comparison is a little off. I was looking at it on a pure numbers comparison.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:19 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Beasley seems like GrandMaMa Larry Johnson to me - athletic, undersized scorer/rebounder.

Probably make a real good NBA player but might be prone to break down physically after a few years of being down low. Seems like he'd be a nice player to have but not a dominant guy. However, I only saw him play a limited number of times.

I'd rather they took Rose.


Yeah, I'd rather have Rose, too, but I think Beasley will be a very good NBA player and thus advocate trading to obtain both Beasley and Rose.

I like the Larry Johnson comparison, especially prior to his back injuries. Beasley strikes me as more athletic and more skilled, though.

Good post, Noisy. You've bought yourself a little time off of my foes list.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Tall Midget wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:

I assume you mean Deng and Noah? If so, I would make that trade.


It would take more than that and who the hell would play C for us? Gooden? Gray?

I dont think we should give up Noah, his value isnt high enough and hes more valuable to us than he would be to most other teams.


I would make the trade because I am looking for flat out, stone-cold killers. With his athleticism and broad range of skills, Beasley can be such a player, in my opinion (as can Rose). If I have Rose and Beasley on my team, I will have the cornerstones for my championship team in place. The question of who will play center is thus somewhat peripheral. That position could be addressed by trading Hinrich and Gordon or through next year's draft when a good low post player might be available to them, especially since a team starting Rose and Beasley is unlikely to make the playoffs. I would fully advocate sucking for a year to develop Rose and Beasley (and Thabo and Tyrus, to see what they can do) and then getting another reasonable draft pick next year to acquire my third core player.


I get your point, but it doesnt effect mine. Noah sure as hell wont be a deal-breaker to any team trying to deal Beasley. Therefore, I would move Hinrich or Gordon as you suggested instead of Noah. Gooden's expiring contract would also be more valuable than Noah. I'd rather move Tyrus instead of Noah also, and he would probably be at least as valuable as Noah. Noah is our ONLY Center. Gray isnt even necessarily a decent backup, let alone a starter. I think Noah will be Chandler-like guy in 2 years so I dont think its worth dealing him right now when his value isnt much.

Also I get your point about worrying about the peripheral instead of the core, but why cant you worry about both? All great GM's do, see RC Buford.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:11 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
FavreFan wrote:

I get your point, but it doesnt effect mine. Noah sure as hell wont be a deal-breaker to any team trying to deal Beasley. Therefore, I would move Hinrich or Gordon as you suggested instead of Noah. Gooden's expiring contract would also be more valuable than Noah. I'd rather move Tyrus instead of Noah also, and he would probably be at least as valuable as Noah. Noah is our ONLY Center. Gray isnt even necessarily a decent backup, let alone a starter. I think Noah will be Chandler-like guy in 2 years so I dont think its worth dealing him right now when his value isnt much.

Also I get your point about worrying about the peripheral instead of the core, but why cant you worry about both? All great GM's do, see RC Buford.



I guess I'm not sure what your point was. If it's that you wouldn't want to trade Noah to acquire Beasley, then I agree. If it's that you wouldn't trade Noah to acquire Beasley, then I vehemently disagree. The Bulls have no core players, and thus everyone's for sale as far as I am concerned.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
Noah's attitude is going to be his biggest problem. Noah seemingly is a head case. I'm not talking about the off season stuff but how he comported himself throughout the season.

I don't think he'll become Ron Artest, but if Noah was as big of an idiot his rookie year then it's only going to get worse.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Tall Midget wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

I get your point, but it doesnt effect mine. Noah sure as hell wont be a deal-breaker to any team trying to deal Beasley. Therefore, I would move Hinrich or Gordon as you suggested instead of Noah. Gooden's expiring contract would also be more valuable than Noah. I'd rather move Tyrus instead of Noah also, and he would probably be at least as valuable as Noah. Noah is our ONLY Center. Gray isnt even necessarily a decent backup, let alone a starter. I think Noah will be Chandler-like guy in 2 years so I dont think its worth dealing him right now when his value isnt much.

Also I get your point about worrying about the peripheral instead of the core, but why cant you worry about both? All great GM's do, see RC Buford.



I guess I'm not sure what your point was. If it's that you wouldn't want to trade Noah to acquire Beasley, then I agree. If it's that you wouldn't trade Noah to acquire Beasley, then I vehemently disagree. The Bulls have no core players, and thus everyone's for sale as far as I am concerned.


Obviously I WOULD trade Noah for Beasley if it came down to that. My point was two-fold.

1.) Noah is more valuable to us then most other teams. He has less value then Gordon, Hinrich, Tyrus, Gooden, etc. I would rather give up one of those guys, because we are deep at all their positions. Noah is our only Center. So therefore, it would be unnecessary to trade him and therefore we shouldnt. If Riley was erratic enough to demand we include him, I guess I would but that wouldnt make sense for the Heat.

2.) A good GM doesnt just focus on core and not role players. Core players will do nothing for you if you cant fill out the rest of the roster, look at KG in Minnesota.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 215 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group