It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:34 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19371
Leaning under.

Playoff appearances in the Super Bowl Era:

2010s 2
2000s 3
1990s 3
1980s 5
1970s 2

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 2:12 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55952
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Under, but at 2, they won't 0fer the whole decade like the Buccaneers did, but they'll be their usual Bears selves. This team will never be a perennial contender, the Packers would appear to have terminal divisional hegemony: they've won it almost every year for 25 years, why would that change now with less parity than there was when they did it before?

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 2:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19371
Curious Hair wrote:
Under, but at 2, they won't 0fer the whole decade like the Buccaneers did, but they'll be their usual Bears selves. This team will never be a perennial contender, the Packers would appear to have terminal divisional hegemony: they've won it almost every year for 25 years, why would that change now with less parity than there was when they did it before?


They are going to have to draft the next Aaron Rodgers for that to happen. They did it once with Favre, chances of doing it twice are pretty low.

My fear is the Bear waste the next four years on Mitch. Then fire Pace and cut him loose after the second year of his new deal Pace will give him.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 4:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I'll take the over. They'll get in next year with a 10-6 record and then sometime in the decade string together back-to-back playoff appearances. There are three teams in the division that actually contend and Minnesota is teetering on the cliff while Green Bay is on the verge of 12 entering full & terminal decline. Bears are not without flaws either, obviously, but they aren't stuck having to deal with a New England, New Orleans or Seattle situation. LeFleur isn't going to build a powerhouse any sooner than Nagy is.

I would say Minnesota, Chicago and GB each win the north three times and the spare goes to one of them. The fact that Detroit is a total non-factor makes three very attainable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 4:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Fun fact: the Lions have the same number of NFC North/Central titles as the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
I agree with under at 2. They are good for a horseshoe up the ass 11 win season followed by a first round exit every 4 years or so.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10107
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Over. Two #6 seeds in years when they play the AFC South, and a flukey #4 seed after both Rodgers and Cousins retire

16 team conference, 60 playoff spots up for grabs over the decade. 3 sounds right, 4 would be possible if they were in the East.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10107
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
I think they would have had 3 in the 70s if there were six playoff teams instead of four.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Over

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Definitely OVER. With all the teams that make the playoffs these days, it'd be tough to not make it three out of ten.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
GoldenJet wrote:
Definitely OVER. With all the teams that make the playoffs these days, it'd be tough to not make it three out of ten.

The playoff format hasn’t changed in decades.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
FavreFan wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Definitely OVER. With all the teams that make the playoffs these days, it'd be tough to not make it three out of ten.

The playoff format hasn’t changed in decades.


So what...I stand by by post.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
The Bears are not one of the NFL's truly moribund franchises. They may under-perform but not to a serious extent. They go through the usual NFL cycle. This was a rough decade because the Trestman/Emery debacle coupled with the unending Cutler marriage kept them in a deepening cycle of malaise that is uncharacteristic of the Bears.

Fact is we dont have a tough division. The Packers and Vikings really haven't been that much better since 2011. The Lions are truly abysmal and the type of franchise that would look at this proposition and seriously consider the under. The fact we share a division with them is a big advantage, not everyone is so fortunate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
When does a decade start or end?

Is 10 the end or the beginning?

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19371
GoldenJet wrote:
When does a decade start or end?

Is 10 the end or the beginning?


10 -19

20-29

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 5:52 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55952
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Antarctica wrote:
The Bears are not one of the NFL's truly moribund franchises.


They're the next tier up from truly moribund, they're in there with the Buccaneers, Jets, and Bengals.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Curious Hair wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
The Bears are not one of the NFL's truly moribund franchises.


They're the next tier up from truly moribund, they're in there with the Buccaneers, Jets, and Bengals.

They’re a bit above them. They’re kind of like the Cowboys actually. (If we are talking past 20 years)

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 6:28 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55952
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Nope, Cowboys seem to make the playoffs about every other year. Bears average one every five, I think.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Curious Hair wrote:
Nope, Cowboys seem to make the playoffs about every other year. Bears average one every five, I think.

Cowboys have made the playoffs 7 times since 2000, Bears are at 5. Neither have done much when they got there, at least the Bears have made a NFCCG and a Super Bowl in that span, Cowboys haven’t. Might not be the best analogy but I wouldn’t say the Cowboys have been more successful than the Bears in that time.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
conns7901 wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Under, but at 2, they won't 0fer the whole decade like the Buccaneers did, but they'll be their usual Bears selves. This team will never be a perennial contender, the Packers would appear to have terminal divisional hegemony: they've won it almost every year for 25 years, why would that change now with less parity than there was when they did it before?


They are going to have to draft the next Aaron Rodgers for that to happen. They did it once with Favre, chances of doing it twice are pretty low.

My fear is the Bear waste the next four years on Mitch. Then fire Pace and cut him loose after the second year of his new deal Pace will give him.


their chances of getting rodgers were extremely low. he was supposed to go #1 or 2. green bay only took him because he was obviously the best PLAYER at the moment (#22 or whatever), let alone QB...

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Curious Hair, FrankDrebin, NME, One Post, USA and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group