It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:59 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1072 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Mack was a problem. For that type of money you have to regularly make game changing plays. He took the last 12 games off.

No.

Mitch and the offensive line were the problem all 16 games.


Mack was a top 3 defensive player, he was supposed to be a difference maker.

It’s a little bizarre that so many people act like he’s not paid like a starting QB. “He wasn’t terrible so he’s not the problem”. Willfully stupid.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Mack was a problem. For that type of money you have to regularly make game changing plays. He took the last 12 games off.

No.

Mitch and the offensive line were the problem all 16 games.


Mack was a top 3 defensive player, he was supposed to be a difference maker.

Your Mitch cheerleading is so fucking annoying, but I still love you.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Mack was a problem. For that type of money you have to regularly make game changing plays. He took the last 12 games off.

No.

Mitch and the offensive line were the problem all 16 games.


Mack was a top 3 defensive player, he was supposed to be a difference maker.

Your Mitch cheerleading is so fucking annoying, but I still love you.

His Mitch comments make more sense than your Mack comments.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Mack was a problem. For that type of money you have to regularly make game changing plays. He took the last 12 games off.

No.

Mitch and the offensive line were the problem all 16 games.


Mack was a top 3 defensive player, he was supposed to be a difference maker.

Your Mitch cheerleading is so fucking annoying, but I still love you.


This has nothing to do with Mitch, Nagy, Pace, O-line or anyone else. When you make a guy the highest paid defender in NFL history, you expect him to be an impact player. Mack wasn't an impact player this season. He was simply good. He was invisible MANY games. The Vikings backups pushed him around. That's not acceptable for the highest paid defender in the league.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
The tortoise is wise.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Mack was a problem. For that type of money you have to regularly make game changing plays. He took the last 12 games off.

No.

Mitch and the offensive line were the problem all 16 games.


Mack was a top 3 defensive player, he was supposed to be a difference maker.

Your Mitch cheerleading is so fucking annoying, but I still love you.


This has nothing to do with Mitch, Nagy, Pace, O-line or anyone else. When you make a guy the highest paid defender in NFL history, you expect him to be an impact player. Mack wasn't an impact player this season. He was simply good. He was invisible MANY games. The Vikings backups pushed him around. That's not acceptable for the highest paid defender in the league.


I guess, but it doesn’t matter to me.

The defense was still 4th in pts allowed, and top 10 in yards allowed.

Mitch is no Trent Dilfer, and the offense wasn’t getting past wild card weekend anyway.

Your complaint is largely irrelevant.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Mack was a problem. For that type of money you have to regularly make game changing plays. He took the last 12 games off.

No.

Mitch and the offensive line were the problem all 16 games.


Mack was a top 3 defensive player, he was supposed to be a difference maker.

Your Mitch cheerleading is so fucking annoying, but I still love you.


This has nothing to do with Mitch, Nagy, Pace, O-line or anyone else. When you make a guy the highest paid defender in NFL history, you expect him to be an impact player. Mack wasn't an impact player this season. He was simply good. He was invisible MANY games. The Vikings backups pushed him around. That's not acceptable for the highest paid defender in the league.


I guess, but it doesn’t matter to me.

:lol: :lol:

Bills speaks for many Bear fans with this response and it’s amusing every time.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Nas wrote:
Mack was a problem. For that type of money you have to regularly make game changing plays. He took the last 12 games off.

No.

Mitch and the offensive line were the problem all 16 games.


Mack was a top 3 defensive player, he was supposed to be a difference maker.

Your Mitch cheerleading is so fucking annoying, but I still love you.


This has nothing to do with Mitch, Nagy, Pace, O-line or anyone else. When you make a guy the highest paid defender in NFL history, you expect him to be an impact player. Mack wasn't an impact player this season. He was simply good. He was invisible MANY games. The Vikings backups pushed him around. That's not acceptable for the highest paid defender in the league.


I guess, but it doesn’t matter to me.

The defense was still 4th in pts allowed, and top 10 in yards allowed.

Mitch is no Trent Dilfer, and the offense wasn’t getting past wild card weekend anyway.

Your complaint is largely irrelevant.


You're worried about why (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky sucked but not why the highest paid defensive player in NFL history was just good and was absent in MANY games. That's ass backwards. Regardless of what the offense does, Mack has to be an impact player.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
You've already correctly stated that the offense was to blame for the poor season so not sure why you're commiting treason here by parroting talking points from bored Raiders and Packers fans.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
You've already correctly stated that the offense was to blame for the poor season so not sure why you're commiting treason here by parroting talking points from bored Raiders and Packers fans.


The offense was the reason the Bears were 8-8 along with Nagy. That doesn't mean that Mack couldn't have played better. His play wasn't acceptable for his talent and contract.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
I accept Nas’ criticism of Mack, but given how the defense was still outstanding in a down year for Khalil his complaint remains largely irrelevant.

Especially when you look at the other side of the ball.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Nas wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
You've already correctly stated that the offense was to blame for the poor season so not sure why you're commiting treason here by parroting talking points from bored Raiders and Packers fans.


The offense was the reason the Bears were 8-8 along with Nagy. That doesn't mean that Mack couldn't have played better. His play wasn't acceptable for his talent and contract.

Image

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
Nas wrote:
Mack was a problem. For that type of money you have to regularly make game changing plays. He took the last 12 games off.

Hard to argue.

In hindsight he really has been more of a follower than a leader in his career.

Would you not have traded your last two first round picks for Mack?

I would have wanted to at the time. In hindsight it would have sucked to give Mack $20+ million a year when we got Za’Darius for $15 million a year and no draft pick compensation

Packers are probably Super Bowl favorites with Mack right now.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
There were at least two games and maybe more where, if the defense did their job in the 4th, the game would have been won. It was good but just wasn't as fierce, which falls squarely on the shoulders of the guy who couldn't get to the QB.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
Nas wrote:
Mack was a problem. For that type of money you have to regularly make game changing plays. He took the last 12 games off.

Hard to argue.

In hindsight he really has been more of a follower than a leader in his career.

Would you not have traded your last two first round picks for Mack?

I would have wanted to at the time. In hindsight it would have sucked to give Mack $20+ million a year when we got Za’Darius for $15 million a year and no draft pick compensation

Packers are probably Super Bowl favorites with Mack right now.

Nope

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
good dolphin wrote:
There were at least two games and maybe more where, if the defense did their job in the 4th, the game would have been won. It was good but just wasn't as fierce, which falls squarely on the shoulders of the guy who couldn't get to the QB.


What two games?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Nope

Do you think Mack took the last 12 games off? He was nearly as good as Za'Darius without trying. Right?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
312player wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
There were at least two games and maybe more where, if the defense did their job in the 4th, the game would have been won. It was good but just wasn't as fierce, which falls squarely on the shoulders of the guy who couldn't get to the QB.


What two games?


Raiders and I'll have to review the other games

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:22 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Chargers game was lost because Mitch put the ball on the turf twice in the 4th quarter.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nope

Do you think Mack took the last 12 games off? He was nearly as good as Za'Darius without trying. Right?

No he wasn't as good as Za'Darius, and I find it amusing that you think he is so much better than Za'Darius that he would move a point spread by 7.5 points.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
good dolphin wrote:
312player wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
There were at least two games and maybe more where, if the defense did their job in the 4th, the game would have been won. It was good but just wasn't as fierce, which falls squarely on the shoulders of the guy who couldn't get to the QB.


What two games?


Raiders and I'll have to review the other games



I put that game on special teams, the D had it won.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nope

Do you think Mack took the last 12 games off? He was nearly as good as Za'Darius without trying. Right?

No he wasn't as good as Za'Darius, and I find it amusing that you think he is so much better than Za'Darius that he would move a point spread by 7.5 points.

I'm using the idea that Mack didn't try the last 12 games and was still nearly as good. Imagine if he tried!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
RFDC wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
The expectation was that the Bears would compete for a Super Bowl and the RAIDERS would stink for a few years.

It's not complicated.

So after two years the Bears competed for a SuperBowl in one year. The Raiders have stunk for 2 years.

Bears win.

You are right not complicated.


"Competed for a Super Bowl?"

They didn't even win a single playoff game.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14922
pizza_Place: Grazianos
good dolphin wrote:
There were at least two games and maybe more where, if the defense did their job in the 4th, the game would have been won. It was good but just wasn't as fierce, which falls squarely on the shoulders of the guy who couldn't get to the QB.


I think that the loss of Hicks cannot be understated as to why the over-all defense wasn't as good as last season. Some will disagree with me but I think that Mack had teams game planning the shit to take care of Mack either by diagramming plays around him or making sure that they had two or three players specifically charged with blocking him. Goldman, to me was a disappointment also all season also.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23833
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
IMU wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
The expectation was that the Bears would compete for a Super Bowl and the RAIDERS would stink for a few years.

It's not complicated.

So after two years the Bears competed for a SuperBowl in one year. The Raiders have stunk for 2 years.

Bears win.

You are right not complicated.


"Competed for a Super Bowl?"

They didn't even win a single playoff game.


The Bulls are “competing” for the playoffs!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Simple Thoughts: by RFDC

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Do they move Mack around or is he doing the same thing every play? He looks like a RE in a 4-3, but they play 3-4. I'm confused.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 7:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Furious Styles wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
I forget how much of a simpleton RFDC is.

The Bears regressed this year. Badly. Mack disappeared for large periods of time.

The clock is ticking.

But over the course of two years, the Bears are still up. If you want to ignore last years results that is fine, but it does not change the total picture right now.

Year 1 Bears Playoffs. Raiders Crap.

Year 2 Bears Crap. Raiders Crap.

If Mack retired tomorrow it would be a good trade!

UPDATE:
Year 1 Bears Playoffs. Raiders Crap.

Year 2 Bears Crap. Raiders Crap.

Year 3 Bears Playoffs. Raiders Crap.

Overall record since the Mack trade:
Bears 28-21(probably 28-22)
Raiders 19-29

Maybe Year 4 will be kind to the RAIDERS but if Mack retired after this season it certainly would be a good trade.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Brick wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
I forget how much of a simpleton RFDC is.

The Bears regressed this year. Badly. Mack disappeared for large periods of time.

The clock is ticking.

But over the course of two years, the Bears are still up. If you want to ignore last years results that is fine, but it does not change the total picture right now.

Year 1 Bears Playoffs. Raiders Crap.

Year 2 Bears Crap. Raiders Crap.

If Mack retired tomorrow it would be a good trade!

UPDATE:
Year 1 Bears Playoffs. Raiders Crap.

Year 2 Bears Crap. Raiders Crap.

Year 3 Bears Playoffs. Raiders Crap.

Overall record since the Mack trade:
Bears 28-21(probably 28-22)
Raiders 19-29

Maybe Year 4 will be kind to the RAIDERS but if Mack retired after this season it certainly would be a good trade.


Gotta keep it simple so Furious understands.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
You guys have low standards. Must be a state of Indiana thing.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1072 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The Doctor Of Style and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group